848
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Feasibility and patient’s experiences of perioperative telemonitoring in major abdominal surgery: an observational pilot study

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 515-523 | Received 14 Apr 2022, Accepted 29 Jul 2022, Published online: 18 Aug 2022

References

  • Michard F. Smartphones and e-tablets in perioperative medicine. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017;70(5):493–499.
  • Joshi M, Ashrafian H, Aufegger L, et al. Wearable sensors to improve detection of patient deterioration. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019;16(2):145–154.
  • Soon S, Svavarsdottir H, Downey C, et al. Wearable devices for remote vital signs monitoring in the outpatient setting: an overview of the field. BMJ Innov. 2020;6(2):55.
  • Leenen JPL, Leerentveld C, van Dijk JD, et al. Current evidence for continuous vital signs monitoring by wearable wireless devices in hospitalized adults: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e18636.
  • Haveman ME, Jonker LT, Hermens HJ, et al. Effectiveness of current perioperative telemonitoring on postoperative outcome in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: a systematic review of controlled trials. J Telemed Telecare 2021:1357633X2110477 DOI:10.1177/1357633X211047710.
  • Jansen-Kosterink S, Vollenbroek-Hutten M, Hermens H. A renewed framework for the evaluation of telemedicine. Eighth Int. Conf. eHealth, Telemedicine and Social Medicine April 24-28, 2016. Venice, Italy. Med. eTELEMED; 2016.
  • Cramer JA, Benedict A, Muszbek N, et al. The significance of compliance and persistence in the treatment of diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidaemia: a review. Int J Clin Pract. 2008;62(1):76–87.
  • Jonker LT, Haveman ME, de Bock GH, et al. Feasibility of perioperative ehealth interventions for older surgical patients: a systematic review [Internet]. J Am Med Dir Assoc Elsevier Inc. 2020:1–8. DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2020.05.035.
  • Patel B Thind A . Usability of mobile health apps for postoperative care: systematic review. JMIR Perioperative Medicine. 2020;3(2): e19099 .
  • Jansen-Kosterink S. The added value of telemedicine services for physical rehabilitation [Internet]; 2014. [cited 2022 Aug 8]. Available from: https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/6030962/Thesis_Jansen-Kosterink.pdf
  • Scott AR, Alore EA, Naik AD, et al. Mixed-methods analysis of factors impacting use of a postoperative mhealth app. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2017;5(2):e11.
  • Da La Cruz Monroy MFI, Mosahebi A. The use of smartphone applications (apps) for enhancing communication with surgical patients: a systematic review of the literature. Surg Innov. 2019;26(2):244–259.
  • Keng CJS, Goriawala A, Rashid S, et al. Home to stay: an integrated monitoring system using a mobile app to support patients at home following colorectal surgery. J Patient Exp. 2020;7(6):1241–1246.
  • von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–1457.
  • op den AH, Tabak M, Perianu MM, et al. Development and evaluation of a sensor-based system for remote monitoring and treatment of chronic diseases - the continuous care & coaching platform. Proc. 6th Int. Symp. eHealth Serv. Technol. EHST 2012. SCITEPRESS. Science and Technology Publications; 2012. p. 19–27.
  • Downey C, Randell R, Brown J, et al. Continuous versus intermittent vital signs monitoring using a wearable, wireless patch in patients admitted to surgical wards: pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(12):1–10.
  • Skraastad EJ, Borchgrevink PC, Nilsen TIL, et al. Postoperative quality and safety using Efficacy Safety Score (ESS) and a wireless patient monitoring system at the ward: a randomised controlled study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020;64(3):301–308.
  • Weenk M, Bredie SJ, Koeneman M, et al. Continuous monitoring of vital signs in the general ward using wearable devices: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(6):e15471.
  • Breteler MJM, Huizinga E, van Loon K, et al. Reliability of wireless monitoring using a wearable patch sensor in high-risk surgical patients at a step-down unit in the Netherlands: a clinical validation study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e020162.
  • Jonker LT, Plas M, de Bock GH, et al. Remote home monitoring of older surgical cancer patients: perspective on study implementation and feasibility. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(1):67–78.
  • Koenig C, Ammann RA, Kuehni CE, et al. Continuous recording of vital signs with a wearable device in pediatric patients undergoing chemotherapy for cancer—an operational feasibility study. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(9):5283. • Of interest, since it evaluated the feasibility of the Everion biosensor in a more difficult patient population.
  • Haemmerli M, Ammann RA, Roessler J, et al. Vital signs in pediatric oncology patients assessed by continuous recording with a wearable device, NCT04134429. Sci Data. 2022;9(1):89.
  • Heuser J, Maeda A, Yang L, et al. Impact of a mobile app to support home recovery of patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Surg Res. 2021;261:179–184.
  • Gustavell T, Sundberg K, Segersvärd R, et al. Decreased symptom burden following surgery due to support from an interactive app for symptom management for patients with pancreatic and periampullary cancer. Acta Oncol (Madr). 2019;58(9):1307–1314.
  • Zand A, Nguyen A, Stokes Z, et al. Patient experiences and outcomes of a telehealth clinical care pathway for postoperative inflammatory bowel disease patients. Telemed J E Health. 2019;26(7) :889–897.
  • van der Velde M, Valkenet K, Geleijn E, et al. Usability and preliminary effectiveness of a preoperative mHealth app for people undergoing major surgery: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2021;9(1):1–15.
  • HuisIn’t Veld RMHA, Kosterink SM, Barbe T, et al. Relation between patient satisfaction, compliance and the clinical benefit of a teletreatment application for chronic pain. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(6):322–328.
  • Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q Manag Inf Syst. 1989;13(3):319–339
  • Leenen JPL, Dijkman EM, Van Dijk JD, et al. Feasibility of continuous monitoring of vital signs in surgical patients on a general ward: an observational cohort study. BMJ Open. 2021;11(2):e042735.
  • Dechant H, Tohme WG, Mun SK, et al. Health systems evaluation of telemedicine: a staged approach. Telemed J. 1996;2(4):303–312.
  • Haveman ME, van Rossum MC, Vaseur RME, et al. Continuous monitoring of vital signs with wearable sensors during daily life activities: validation study. JMIR Form Res. 2022;6(1):e30863.
  • Haveman ME, vanMelzen R, Schuurmann RCL, et al. Continuous monitoring of vital signs with the Everion biosensor on the surgical ward: a clinical validation study. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2021;18(Sup1):145–152.
  • Vonk Noordegraaf A, Anema JR, Van Mechelen W, et al. A personalised eHealth programme reduces the duration until return to work after gynaecological surgery: results of a multicentre randomised trial. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;121(9):1127–1135.
  • Bouwsma EVA, Huirne JAF, Van De Ven PM, et al. Effectiveness of an internet-based perioperative care programme to enhance postoperative recovery in gynaecological patients: cluster controlled trial with randomised stepped-wedge implementation. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):1–10.