References
- Sakles JC, Mosier J, Chiu S, et al. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(6):739–748.
- Kaplan MB, Hagberg CA, Ward DS, et al. Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation. J Clin Anaesth . 2006;18(5):357–362.
- Cavus E, Kieckhaefer J, Doerges V, et al. The C-MAC videolaryngoscope: first experiences with a new device for videolaryngoscopy guided intubation.2010 AnesthAnalg. Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2010;110(2):473–477.
- Mosier J, Chiu S, Patanwala AE, et al. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngoscope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(4):414–420.e1.
- Blajic I, Hodzovic I, Lucovnik M, et al. A randomised comparison of C-MAC™ and King Vision® videolaryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy in 180 obstetric patients. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019;39:35–41.
- Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, et al. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(6):1290–1297.
- Shin M, Bai SJ, Lee KY, et al. Comparing McGRATH® MAC, C-MAC®, and Macintosh Laryngoscopes Operated by Medical Students: a Randomized, Crossover, Manikin Study. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:8943931.
- Bhat R, Sanickop CS, Patil MC, et al. Comparison of Macintosh laryngoscope and C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in lateral position. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2015;31(2):226–229.
- Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh Blade versus GlideScope. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(1):32–37.
- Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, et al. Laryngoscopic intubation: learning and performance. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(1):23–27.
- Asai T. Are videolaryngoscopes useful for nasotracheal intubation? J Anesth. 2014;28(5):647–649.
- Hirabayashi Y, Seo N. Nasotracheal intubation using the Airtraq versus Macintosh laryngoscope: a manikin study. Anesth Prog. 2008;55(3):78–81.
- Puchner W, Drabauer L, Kern K, et al. Indirect versus direct laryngoscopy for routine nasotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(4):280–285.
- Jones PM, Armstrong KP, Armstrong PM, et al. A comparison of glidescope videolaryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(1):144–148.
- Kwak HJ, Lee SY, Lee SY, et al. McGrath Video Laryngoscopy facilitates routine nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery: a comparison with Macintosh laryngoscopy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(2):256–261.
- Hirabayashi Y, Hoshijima H, Kuratani N, et al. Efficacy of videolaryngoscopes for nasotracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Masui. 2013;62(11):1375–1379.
- Xue F, Zhang G, Liu J, et al. A clinical assessment of the Glidescope videolaryngoscope in nasotracheal intubation with general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18(8):611–615.
- Lili X, Zhiyong H, Jianjun S. A comparison of the GlideScope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014;26(1):27–31.
- Liu ZJ, Yi J, Guo WJ, et al. Comparison of McGrath Series 3 and Macintosh laryngoscopes for tracheal intubation in patients with normal airway by inexperienced anesthetists: a randomized study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(2):e2514.
- Su YC, Chen CC, Lee YK, et al. Comparison of video laryngoscopes with direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28(11):788e795.
- Gupta R, Sahni A. Is video laryngoscopy easier than direct laryngoscopy for intubation in patients with contracture neck? Saudi J Anaesth. 2020;14(2):206–211.
- Stroumpoulis K, Pagoulatou A, Violari M, et al. Videolaryngoscopy in the management of the difficult airway: a comparison with the Macintosh blade. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26(3):218–222.
- Hoshijima H, Mihara T, Maruyama K, et al. C-MAC videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2018;49:53–62.
- Chemsian R, Bhananker S, Ramaiah R. Videolaryngoscopy. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014;4(1):35–41.
- Niforopoulou P, Pantazopoulos I, Demestiha T, et al. Video-laryngoscopes in the adult airway management: a topical review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(9):1050–1061.
- Pappu A, Sharma B, Jain R, et al. A randomised comparative study of “videoendoscope” with the Truview EVO2, C-MAC D blade videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh laryngoscope. Indian J Anaesth. 2020;64(Suppl 3):S186–S192.
- Kiliçaslan A, Topal A, Erol A, et al. Comparison of the C-MAC D-blade, conventional c-mac, and macintosh laryngoscopes in simulated easy and difficult airways. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2014;42:182–189.
- Mathew A, Chandy J, Punnoose J, et al. A randomized control led study comparing CMAC video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope for insertion of double lumen tube in patients undergoing elective thoracotomy. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021;37(2):266–271.
- Leff B, Finucane TE. Gizmo idolatry. JAMA. 2008;299(15):1830–1832.
- Duggan LV, Marshall SD, Scott J, et al. The MacGyver bias and attraction of homemade devices in healthcare. Can J Anaesth. 2019;66(7):757–761.