559
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Emergency provider preference for powered intraosseous devices and satisfaction with features improving safety, reliability, and ease-of-use

, &
Pages 329-336 | Received 12 Aug 2022, Accepted 08 Mar 2023, Published online: 15 Mar 2023

References

  • Merchant RM, Topjian AA, Panchal AR, et al. Part 1: executive summary: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S337–s57.
  • Perkins GD, Graesner JT, Semeraro F, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines 2021: executive summary. Resuscitation. 2021;161:1–60.
  • Weiser G, Hoffmann Y, Galbraith R, et al. Current advances in intraosseous infusion - a systematic review. Resuscitation. 2012;83(1):20–26.
  • Sharma RK. Occupational health hazards in emergency and triage of health care setting. Lett Health Biol Sci. 2017;2(2)68–70.
  • Dyson E, Smith GB. Common faults in resuscitation equipment–guidelines for checking equipment and drugs used in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation. 2002;55(2):137–149.
  • Bahat H, Hasidov-Gafni A, Youngster I, et al. The prevalence and underreporting of needlestick injuries among hospital workers: a cross-sectional study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021;33(1):1.
  • Norris B, West J, Anderson O, et al. Taking ergonomics to the bedside – a multi-disciplinary approach to designing safer healthcare. Appl Ergon. 2014;45(3):629–638.
  • Petitpas F, Guenezan J, Vendeuvre T, et al. Use of intra-osseous access in adults: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):102.
  • Gazin N, Auger H, Jabre P, et al. Efficacy and safety of the EZ-IO™ intraosseous device: out-of-hospital implementation of a management algorithm for difficult vascular access. Resuscitation. 2011;82(1):126–129.
  • Chatterji AK, Fabrizio KR, Mitchell W, et al. Physician-industry cooperation in the medical device industry. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(6):1532–1543.
  • Little A, Alsbrooks K, Jones D. Physician preferences associated with powered intraosseous access systems: safety features, reliability, and ease-of-use. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022;3(3):e12710.
  • Patterson P, Yearly D. Safety in the prehospital emergency medical services setting patient safety network: patient safety network; 2019 [ Available from]: https://psnet.ahrq.gov/perspective/safety-prehospital-emergency-medical-services-setting#.
  • World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194.
  • U.S. Department of health and human services, office for human research protections. Subpart A of 45 CFR Part 46: Basic Health and Human Services Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects. 2018.
  • Bielski K, Szarpak L, Smereka J, et al. Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during simulated pediatric resuscitation. A randomized crossover manikin trial. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(7):865–871.
  • Shavit I, Hoffmann Y, Galbraith R, et al. Comparison of two mechanical intraosseous infusion devices: a pilot, randomized crossover trial. Resuscitation. 2009;80(9):1029–1033.