Robotic navigation during spine surgery: an update of literature

References

• Perfetti DC, Kisinde S, Rogers-LaVanne MP, et al. Robotic spine surgery: past, present, and future. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022;47(13):909–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubelski D, Theodore N. Benefits of robotic spine surgery: the future is bright. Neurosurg Focus. 2022;52(1):E5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg B, Mehta N, Malhotra R. Robotic spine surgery: ushering in a new era. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(5):753–760.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C. Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986;203:7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Vaccaro AR, Garfin SR. Pedicle-screw fixation in the lumbar spine. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1995;3(5):263–274.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen AF, Kazarian GS, Jessop GW, et al. Robotic technology in orthopaedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018;100(22):1984–1992. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.17.01397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Tian W, Liu Y, et al. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019;30(5):615–622. DOI:10.3171/2018.10.SPINE18487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Han XG, Xu YF, et al. Robot- assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw placement in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease. World Neurosurg. 2019;125:e429–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan M, Liu Y, He D, et al. Improved Accuracy of Cervical Spinal Surgery with Robot-Assisted Screw Insertion: a Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(5):285–291. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000003258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringel F, Stuer C, Reinke A, et al. Accuracy of robot-assisted placement of lumbar and sacral pedicle screws: a prospective randomized comparison to conventional freehand screw implantation. Spine. 2012;37(8):E496–501. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824b7767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roser F, Tatagiba M, Maier G. Spinal robotics: current applications and future perspectives. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(Suppl 1):12–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Jung WI, Chang BS, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13(3):e1779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Han XG, Xu YF, et al. Robotic navigation during spine surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020;17(1):27–32. DOI:10.1080/17434440.2020.1699405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayed I, Tai A, Triano M, et al. Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: evaluation of Accuracy of the First 100 Screws and Comparison with Cohort of Fluoroscopy-guided Screws. World Neurosurg. 2020;143:e492–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang B, Pennington Z, Azad T, et al. Robot-assisted versus freehand instrumentation in short-segment lumbar fusion: experience with real-time image-guided spinal robot. World Neurosurg. 2020;136:e635–645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayed I, Tai A, Triano MJ, et al. Lateral versus prone robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement: a CT-based comparative assessment of accuracy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022;37:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafi KA, Pompeu YA, Vaishnav AS, et al. Does robot-assisted navigation influence pedicle screw selection and accuracy in minimally invasive spine surgery? Neurosurg Focus. 2022;52(1):E4. DOI:10.3171/2021.10.FOCUS21526
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toossi N, Vardiman AB, Benech CA, et al. Factors affecting the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in robot-assisted surgery: a multicenter study. Spine. 2022;47(23):1613–1619. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman IH, Kisinde S, Hesselbacher S. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement during spine surgery. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2020;10(2):e0020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao S, Wei J, Li W, et al. Accuracy of robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement under regional anesthesia: a retrospective cohort study. Pain Res Manag. 2021;2021:6894001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee NJ, Buchanan IA, Boddapati V, et al. Do robot-related complications influence 1 year reoperations and other clinical outcomes after robot-assisted lumbar arthrodesis? A multicenter assessment of 320 patients. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):308. DOI:10.1186/s13018-021-02452-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee NJ, Zuckerman SL, Buchanan IA, et al. Is there a difference between navigated and non-navigated robot cohorts in robot-assisted spine surgery? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 2,800 screws and 372 patients. Spine J. 2021;21(9):1504–1512. DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2021.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee NJ, Zuckerman SL, Buchanan IA, et al. Is there a difference in screw accuracy, robot time per screw, robot abandonment, and radiation exposure between the mazor X and the renaissance? A propensity-matched analysis of 1179 robot-assisted screws. Global Spine J. 2021;21925682211029867:219256822110298.
   Google Scholar
• Liounakos JI, Khan A, Eliahu K, et al. Ninety-day complication, revision, and readmission rates for current-generation robot-assisted thoracolumbar spinal fusion surgery: results of a multicenter case series. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022;36(5):841–848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao JZ, Khan A, Soliman MAR, et al. Use of the scan-and-plan workflow in next-generation robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion: retrospective cohort study and literature review. World Neurosurg. 2021;151:e10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Zhang H, Zhang L, et al. Accuracy and deviation analysis of robot-assisted spinal implants: a retrospective overview of 105 cases and preliminary comparison to open freehand surgery in lumbar spondylolisthesis. Int J Med Robot. 2021;17(4):e2273. DOI:10.1002/rcs.2273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang TY, Mehta VA, Sankey EW, et al. Operative time and learning curve between fluoroscopy-based instrument tracking and robot-assisted instrumentation for patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF). Clin Neurol Neurosur. 2021;206:106698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu D, Ma X, Xie L, et al. Surgical precision and efficiency of a novel electromagnetic system compared to a robot-assisted system in percutaneous pedicle screw placement of endo-LIF. Global Spine J. 2021;21925682211025501:219256822110255.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JN, Fan Y, He X, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted and freehand pedicle screw placement for lumbar revision surgery. Int Orthop. 2021;45(6):1531–1538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du SY, Dai J, Zhou ZT, et al. Size selection and placement of pedicle screws using robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided techniques for thoracolumbar fractures: possible implications for the screw loosening rate. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):365. DOI:10.1186/s12893-022-01814-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan A, Soliman MAR, Lee NJ, et al. CT-to-fluoroscopy registration versus scan-and-plan registration for robot-assisted insertion of lumbar pedicle screws. Neurosurg Focus. 2022;52(1):E8. DOI:10.3171/2021.10.FOCUS21506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai YP, Lin YH, Wu YC, et al. Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement led to lower screw loosening rate than fluoroscopy-guided technique in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a single-center retrospective study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(17):4989. DOI:10.3390/jcm11174989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee NJ, Buchanan IA, Zuckermann SL, et al. What is the comparison in robot time per screw, radiation exposure, robot abandonment, screw accuracy, and clinical outcomes between percutaneous and open robot-assisted short lumbar fusion?: a multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 310 patients. Spine. 2022;47(1):42–48. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000004132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee NJ, Leung E, Buchanan IA, et al. A multicenter study of the 5-year trends in robot-assisted spine surgery outcomes and complications. J Spine Surg. 2022;8(1):9–20. DOI:10.21037/jss-21-102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasan N, Scherman DB, Kam A. A tale of two robots: operating times and learning curves in robot-assisted lumbar fusion. J Clin Neurosci. 2022;97:42–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Gao L, Huang D, et al. Radiological and clinical differences between tinavi orthopedic robot and O-Arm navigation system in thoracolumbar screw implantation for reconstruction of spinal stability. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26:e924770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng S, Tian W, Wei Y. Clinical effects of oblique lateral interbody fusion by conventional open versus percutaneous robot-assisted minimally invasive pedicle screw placement in elderly patients. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le XF, Shi Z, Wang QL, et al. Rate and risk factors of superior facet joint violation during cortical bone trajectory screw placement: a comparison of robot-assisted approach with a conventional technique. Orthop Surg. 2020;12(1):133–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yongqi L, Dehua Z, Hongzi W, et al. Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):208. DOI:10.1186/s12891-020-03239-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Song Q, Wang K, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective matched-control analysis for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes. J Comp Eff Res. 2021;10(10):845–856. DOI:10.2217/cer-2021-0078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui GY, Han XG, Wei Y, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(7):1960–1968. DOI:10.1111/os.13044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du W, Zou D, Zhang J, et al. Guide wire displacement in robot-assisted spinal pedicle screw implantation. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2021;16(3):526–535.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han XG, Tang GQ, Han X, et al. Comparison of outcomes between robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion in single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis. Orthop Surg. 2021;13(7):2093–2101. DOI:10.1111/os.13151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin M, Lei L, Li F, et al. Does robot navigation and intraoperative computed tomography guidance help with percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy? A match-paired study. World Neurosurg. 2021;147:e459–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Zhang Q, Fan MX, et al. Learning curves of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixations based on the cumulative sum test. World J Clin Cases. 2021;9(33):10134–10142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Fan MX, Han XG, et al. Risk factors of unsatisfactory robot-assisted pedicle screw placement: a case-control study. Neurospine. 2021;18(4):839–844. DOI:10.14245/ns.2142560.180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang M, Wang L, Yuan S, et al. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a technical note and two years clinical results. Pain Physician. 2022;25(1):E73–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan M, Fang Y, Zhang Q, et al. A prospective cohort study of the accuracy and safety of robot-assisted minimally invasive spinal surgery. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Chen L, Liu Y, et al. Accuracy and safety of robot-assisted cortical bone trajectory screw placement: a comparison of robot-assisted technique with fluoroscopy-assisted approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23(1):328. DOI:10.1186/s12891-022-05206-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Li C, Wang Z, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up. J Robot Surg. 2022;17(2):473–485. DOI:10.1007/s11701-022-01442-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu T, Jiao JH, Wang Y, et al. Robot-assisted versus navigation-assisted screw placement in spinal vertebrae. Int Orthop. 2022;47(2):527–532. DOI:10.1007/s00264-022-05638-0. Int Orthop
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhan J, Xu W, Lin J, et al. Accuracy and safety of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided posterior C1 lateral mass and C2 pedicle screw internal fixation for atlantoaxial dislocation: a preliminary study. BioMed Res Int. 2022;2022:8508113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang HQ, Wang CC, Zhang RJ, et al. Predictors of accurate intrapedicular screw placement in single-level lumbar (L4-5) fusion: robot-assisted pedicle screw, traditional pedicle screw, and cortical bone trajectory screw insertion. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):284. DOI:10.1186/s12893-022-01733-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang RJ, Zhou LP, Zhang HQ, et al. Rates and risk factors of intrapedicular accuracy and cranial facet joint violation among robot-assisted, fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous, and freehand techniques in pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: a comparative cohort study. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang RJ, Zhou LP, Zhang L, et al. Safety and risk factors of TINAVI robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in spinal surgery. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022;17(1):379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan K, Zhang Q, Tian W. Comparison of accuracy and safety between second-generation TiRobot-assisted and free-hand thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Chen J, Zhu QA, et al. A preliminary study of a novel robotic system for pedicle screw fixation: a randomised controlled trial. J Orthop Translat. 2020;20:73–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Huang L, Zhou W, et al. Evaluation of a new spinal surgical robotic system of Kirschner wire placement for lumbar fusion: a multi-centre, randomised controlled clinical study. Int J Med Robot. 2021;17(2):e2207. DOI:10.1002/rcs.2207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Wang Z, Zeng L, et al. Application and evaluation of an independent robotic arm system in K-wire placement for lumbar fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2021;34(8):E466–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin MC, Liu HW, Su YK, et al. Robot-guided versus freehand fluoroscopy-guided minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-institution, observational, case-control study. Neurosurg Focus. 2022;52(1):E9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Wang L, Jiang Z, et al. State recognition of decompressive laminectomy with multiple information in robot-assisted surgery. Artif Intell Med. 2020;102:101763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Du Z, Yu H. Precise laminae segmentation based on neural network for robot-assisted decompressive laminectomy. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021;209:106333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Jiang S, Song X, et al. Collaborative spinal robot system for laminectomy: a preliminary study. Neurosurg Focus. 2022;52(1):E11. DOI:10.3171/2021.10.FOCUS21499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang DS, Li NY, Kleinhenz DT, et al. Risk of postoperative complications and revision surgery following robot-assisted posterior lumbar spinal fusion. Spine. 2020;45(24):E1692–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Yu G, Jiang S, et al. Robot-assisted laminectomy in spinal surgery: a systematic review. Ann Transl Med. 2021;9(8):715. DOI:10.21037/atm-20-5270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar