Biomaterial engineering surface to control polymicrobial dental implant-related infections: focusing on disease modulating factors and coatings development

References

• Buser D, Janner SFM, Wittneben JG, et al. 10-Year Survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-Etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(6):839–851. DOI:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howe MS, Keys W, Richards D. Long-term (10-year) dental implant survival: a systematic review and sensitivity meta-analysis. J Dent. 2019;84:9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisch E, Wild V, Ratka-Krüger P, et al. Long-term results of implants and implant-supported prostheses under systematic supportive implant therapy: a retrospective 25-year study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020;22:689–696.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10(6):387–416. DOI:10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Avila ED, Nagay BE, Pereira MMA, et al. Race for applicable antimicrobial dental implant surfaces to fight biofilm-related disease: advancing in Laboratorial Studies vs Stagnation in Clinical Application. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022;8(8):3187–3198. DOI:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c00160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sailer I, Karasan D, Todorovic A, et al. Prosthetic failures in dental implant therapy. Periodontol. 2000;88(1):130–144. DOI:10.1111/prd.12416
   Google Scholar
• Kotsakis GA, Olmedo DG. Peri-implantitis is not periodontitis: scientific discoveries shed light on microbiome-biomaterial interactions that may determine disease phenotype. Periodontol. 2000;86(1):231–240.
   Google Scholar
• Berglundh T, Armitage G, Araujo MG, et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:S286–S291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz F, Derks J, Monje A, et al. Peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45:S246–S266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sgolastra F, Petrucci A, Severino M, et al. Periodontitis, implant loss and peri-implantitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2015;26(4):e8–e16. DOI:10.1111/clr.12319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabe M, Verdes D, Seeger S. Understanding protein adsorption phenomena at solid surfaces. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2011;161(1–2):87–106.
   Google Scholar
• Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Montanaro L. Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:397–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasserre JF, Michel B, Selena T. Oral microbes, biofilms and their role in periodontal and peri-implant diseases. Materials. 2018;11(10):1802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh PD, Moter A, Devine DA. Dental plaque biofilms: communities, conflict and control. Periodontol. 2011;55(1):16–35.
   Google Scholar
• Salvi GE, Cosgarea R, Sculean A. Prevalence and mechanisms of periimplant diseases. J Dent Res. 2017;96(1):31–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarnow DP. Increasing prevalence of peri-implantitis: how will we manage? J Dent Res. 2016;95(1):7–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks J, Tomasi C. Peri-implant health and disease. a systematic review of current epidemiology. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:S158–S171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romandini M, Lima C, Pedrinaci I, et al. Prevalence and risk/protective indicators of peri-implant diseases: a university-representative crosssectional study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021;32(1):112–122. DOI:10.1111/clr.13684
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cosgarea R, Sculean A, Shibli JA, et al. Prevalence of peri-implant diseases – a critical review on the current evidence. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33(suppl 1):e063. DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0063
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramanauskaite A, Fretwurst T, Schwarz F. Efficacy of alternative or adjunctive measures to conventional non-surgical and surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7(1):112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Almeida JM, Matheus HR, Rodrigues Gusman DJ, et al. Effectiveness of mechanical debridement combined with adjunctive therapies for nonsurgical treatment of periimplantitis: a systematic review. Implant Dent. 2017;6(1):137–144. DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000469
   Google Scholar
• Toledano M, Osorio MT, Vallecillo-Rivas M, et al. Efficacy of local antibiotic therapy in the treatment of peri-implantitis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. J Dent. 2021;113:103790.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibli JA, Ferrari DS, Siroma RS, et al. Microbiological and clinical effects of adjunctive systemic metronidazole and amoxicillin in the non-surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: 1 year follow-up. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33(suppl 1):e080. DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0080
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa RC, Nagay BE, Bertolini M, et al. Fitting pieces into the puzzle: the impact of titanium-based dental implant surface modifications on bacterial accumulation and polymicrobial infections. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;298:102551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrektsson T, Jemt T, Mölne J, et al. On inflammation-immunological balance theory—A critical apprehension of disease concepts around implants: mucositis and marginal bone loss may represent normal conditions and not necessarily a state of disease. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(1):183–189. DOI:10.1111/cid.12711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol. 2017;73(1):7–21.
   Google Scholar
• Souza JGS, Bertolini M, Costa RC, et al. Proteomic profile of the saliva and plasma protein layer adsorbed on Ti–Zr alloy: the effect of sandblasted and acid-etched surface treatment. Biofouling. 2020;36:428–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantaroto HN, Amorim KP, Matozinho Cordeiro J, et al. Proteome analysis of the salivary pellicle formed on titanium alloys containing niobium and zirconium. Biofouling. 2019;35:173–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JGS, Bertolini M, Costa RC, et al. Targeting pathogenic biofilms: newly developed superhydrophobic coating favors a host-compatible microbial profile on the titanium surface. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(9):10118–10129. DOI:10.1021/acsami.9b22741
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belibasakis GN, Manoil D. Microbial community-driven etiopathogenesis of peri-implantitis. J Dent Res. 2021;100(1):21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mombelli A, Décaillet F. The characteristics of biofilms in peri-implant disease. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38(11):203–213.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• William Costerton J, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, et al. Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49(1):711–745. DOI:10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karygianni L, Ren Z, Koo H, et al. Biofilm Matrixome: extracellular components in structured microbial communities. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28(8):668–681. DOI:10.1016/j.tim.2020.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa RC, Bertolini M, Costa Oliveira BE, et al. Polymicrobial biofilms related to dental implant diseases: unravelling the critical role of extracellular biofilm matrix. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2022;18:8–21.
   Google Scholar
• Solano C, Echeverz M, Lasa I. Biofilm dispersion and quorum sensing. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2014;18:96–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal M, Ahmad W, Andleeb S, et al. Bacterial biofilm and associated infections. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018;81:7–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming HC, Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8:623–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coli P, Jemt T. Are marginal bone level changes around dental implants due to infection? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23:170–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JGS, Mendonça Bertolini M, Cavalcante Costa R, et al. Targeting implant-associated infections: titanium surface loaded with antimicrobial. iScience. 2020;24(1):102008. DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2020.102008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrêa MG, Pimentel SP, Ribeiro FV, et al. Host response and periimplantitis. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33(suppl 1):e066. DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0066
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cekici A, Kantarci A, Hasturk H, et al. Inflammatory and immune pathways in the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. Periodontol. 2014;64(1):57–80. DOI:10.1111/prd.12002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JG, Costa RC, Sampaio AA, et al. Cross-kingdom microbial interactions in dental implant-related infections: is Candida albicans a new villain? iScience. 2022;25(4):103994. DOI:10.1016/j.isci.2022.103994
   Google Scholar
• Ravidà A, Siqueira R, Di Gianfilippo R, et al. Prognostic factors associated with implant loss, disease progression or favorable outcomes after periimplantitis surgical therapy. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022;24(2):222–232. DOI:10.1111/cid.13074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson K, Derks J, Håkansson J, et al. Interventions for peri-implantitis and their effects on further bone loss: a retrospective analysis of a registrybased cohort. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(8):872–879. DOI:10.1111/jcpe.13129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilarrasa J, Soldini MC, Pons R, et al. Outcome indicators of non-surgical therapy of peri-implantitis: a prospective case series analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023. DOI:10.1007/s00784-023-04918-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hashedi AA, Laurenti M, Benhamou V, et al. Decontamination of titanium implants using physical methods. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2017;28(8):1013–1021. DOI:10.1111/clr.12914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas N, Grewal M, Kuehne SA, et al. High speed imaging of biofilm removal from a dental implant model using ultrasonic cavitation. Dental Materials. 2020;36:733–743.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John G, Becker J, Schwarz F. Rotating titanium brush for plaque removal from rough titanium surfaces - an in vitro study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2014;25(7):838–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drago L, Del Fabbro M, Bortolin M, et al. Biofilm Removal and Antimicrobial Activity of Two Different Air-Polishing Powders: an in vitro Study. J Periodontol. 2014;85(11):e363–e369. DOI:10.1902/jop.2014.140134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak D, Shani-Kdoshim S, Alias M, et al. The in vitro efficacy of biofilm removal from titanium surfaces using Er: yAG laser: comparison of treatment protocols and ablation parameters. J Periodontol. 2022;93(1):100–109. DOI:10.1002/JPER.19-0574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassetti M, Schär D, Wicki B, et al. Anti-infective therapy of peri-implantitis with adjunctive local drug delivery or photodynamic therapy: 12-month outcomes of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2014;25(3):279–287. DOI:10.1111/clr.12155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeiro JM, Pires JM, Souza JGS, et al. Optimizing citric acid protocol to control implant-related infections: an in vitro and in situ study. J Periodontal Res. 2021;56(3):558–568. DOI:10.1111/jre.12855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faggion CM, Listl S, Frühauf N, et al. A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on non-surgical treatments for peri-implantitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:1015–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Amo F S-L, Yu S-H, Wang H-L. Non-surgical therapy for periimplant diseases: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2016;7(3):e13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carcuac O, Derks J, Abrahamsson I, et al. Surgical treatment of periimplantitis: 3-year results from a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44(12):1294–1303. DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcuac O, Derks J, Abrahamsson I, et al. Risk for recurrence of disease following surgical therapy of peri-implantitis—A prospective longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(11):1072–1077. DOI:10.1111/clr.13653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito M, Grusovin MG, v WH, Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri-implantitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;1:CD004970. DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD004970.pub5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zandim-Barcelos DL, de CG, Sapata VM, et al. Implant-based factor as possible risk for peri-implantitis. Braz Oral Res. 2019;33(1):e067. DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0067
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gay NJ, Symmons MF, Gangloff M, et al. Assembly and localization of Tolllike receptor signalling complexes. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(8):546–558. DOI:10.1038/nri3713
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uriarte SM, Hajishengallis G. Neutrophils in the periodontium: Interactions with pathogens and roles in tissue homeostasis and inflammation. Immunol Rev. 2022;314:93–110. DOI:10.1111/imr.13152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves DT, Cochran D. The contribution of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor to periodontal tissue destruction. J Periodontol. 2003;74(3):391–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faot F, Nascimento GG, Bielemann AM, et al. Can peri-implant crevicular fluid assist in the diagnosis of peri-implantitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2015;86(5):631–645. DOI:10.1902/jop.2015.140603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca FJPO, Junior MM, Lourenço EJV, et al. Cytokines expression in saliva and peri-implant crevicular fluid of patients with peri-implant disease. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2014;25(2):e68–e72. DOI:10.1111/clr.12052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer S, Giannopoulou C, Courvoisier D, et al. Experimental mucositis and experimental gingivitis in persons aged 70 or over. Clinical and biological responses. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2017;28(8):1005–1012. DOI:10.1111/clr.12912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardegan GP, Shibli JA, Roth LA, et al. Transforming growth factor-β, interleukin-17, and IL-23 gene expression profiles associated with human peri-implantitis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2017;28(7):e10–e15. DOI:10.1111/clr.12846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casado PL, Canullo L, de Almeida Filardy A, et al. Interleukins 1 β and 10 expressions in the periimplant crevicular fluid from patients with untreated periimplant disease. Implant Dent. 2013;22(2):143–150. DOI:10.1097/ID.0b013e3182818792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güncü GN, Akman AC, Günday S, et al. Effect of inflammation on cytokine levels and bone remodelling markers in peri-implant sulcus fluid: a preliminary report. Cytokine. 2012;59:313–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schminke B, Vom Orde F, Gruber R, et al. The pathology of bone tissue during peri-implantitis. J Dent Res. 2015;94:354–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arakawa H, Uehara J, Hara ES, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 is the major potential collagenase in active peri-implantitis. J Prosthodont Res. 2012;56(4):249–255. DOI:10.1016/j.jpor.2012.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivelä-Rajamäki M, Maisi P, Srinivas R, et al. Levels and molecular forms of MMP-7 (matrilysin-1) and MMP-8 (collagenase-2) in diseased human peri-implant sulcular fluid. J Periodontal Res. 2003;38(6):583–590. DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0765.2003.00688.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorsa T, Mäntylä P, Rönkä H, et al. Scientific basis of a matrix metalloproteinase-8 specific chair-side test for monitoring periodontal and peri-implant health and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;878:130–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Majid A, Alassiri S, Rathnayake N, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 as an inflammatory and prevention biomarker in periodontal and peri-implant diseases. Int J Dent. 2018;2018:1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xanthopoulou V, Räisänen I, Sorsa T, et al. Active MMP-8 as a biomarker of peri-implant health or disease. Eur J Dent. 2022;1753454. DOI:10.1055/s-0042-1753454
   Google Scholar
• Fretwurst T, Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Nelson K, et al. Characterization of macrophages infiltrating peri-implantitis lesions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(3):274–281. DOI:10.1111/clr.13568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreyer H, Grischke J, Tiede C, et al. Epidemiology and risk factors of periimplantitis: a systematic review. J Periodontal Res. 2018;53(5):657–681. DOI:10.1111/jre.12562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venza I, Visalli M, Cucinotta M, et al. Proinflammatory gene expression at chronic periodontitis and peri-implantitis sites in patients with or without type 2 diabetes. J Periodontol. 2010;81(1):99–108. DOI:10.1902/jop.2009.090358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negri BM, Pimentel SP, Casati MZ, et al. Impact of a chronic smoking habit on the osteo-immunoinflammatory mediators in the peri-implant fluid of clinically healthy dental implants. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;70:55–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqahtani F, Alqhtani N, Alkhtani F, et al. Clinicoradiographic markers of peri-implantitis in cigarette-smokers and never-smokers with type 2 diabetes mellitus at 7-years follow-up. J Periodontol. 2020;91:1132–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song F, Koo H, Ren D. Effects of material properties on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. J Dent Res. 2015;94(8):1027–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barfeie A, Wilson J, Rees J. Implant surface characteristics and their effect on osseointegration. Br Dent J. 2015;218(5):e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruyn H, Christiaens V, Doornewaard R, et al. Implant surface roughness and patient factors on long-term peri-implant bone loss. Periodontol. 2017;73(1):218–227. DOI:10.1111/prd.12177
   Google Scholar
• Matos GRM. Surface roughness of dental implant and osseointegration. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021;20(1):1–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rigolin MSM, de Avila ED, Basso FG, et al. Effect of different implant abutment surfaces on OBA-09 epithelial cell adhesion. Microsc Res Tech. 2017;80(12):1304–1309. DOI:10.1002/jemt.22941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp F, Liang L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, et al. Surface characteristics of dental implants: a review. Dental Mater. 2018;34(1):201840–201857. DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrukhov O, Huber R, Shi B, et al. Proliferation, behavior, and differentiation of osteoblasts on surfaces of different microroughness. Dental Mater. 2016;32(11):1374–1384. DOI:10.1016/j.dental.2016.08.217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Chen SE, Shao J, et al. Combinatorial surface roughness effects on osteoclastogenesis and osteogenesis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(43):36652–36663. DOI:10.1021/acsami.8b10992
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes KR, Zhang Y, Magri AMP, et al. Biomaterial property effects on platelets and macrophages: an in vitro Study. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2017;3(12):3318–3327. DOI:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa RC, Nagay BE, Dini C, et al. The race for the optimal antimicrobial surface: perspectives and challenges related to plasma electrolytic oxidation coating for titanium-based implants. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2023;311:102805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puckett SD, Taylor E, Raimondo T, et al. The relationship between the nanostructure of titanium surfaces and bacterial attachment. Biomaterials. 2010;31:706–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp F, Gittens RA, Scheideler L, et al. A review on the wettability of dental implant surfaces I: theoretical and experimental aspects. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(7):2894–2906. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.02.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terada A, Okuyama K, Nishikawa M, et al. The effect of surface charge property on Escherichia coli initial adhesion and subsequent biofilm formation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(7):1745–1754. DOI:10.1002/bit.24429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hori N, Ueno T, Minamikawa H, et al. Electrostatic control of protein adsorption on UV-photofunctionalized titanium. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(10):4175–4180. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasa F, Hori N, Ueno T, et al. Enhancement of osteoblast adhesion to UVphotofunctionalized titanium via an electrostatic mechanism. Biomaterials. 2010;31(10):2717–2727. DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.12.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kügler R, Bouloussa O, Rondelez F. Evidence of a charge-density threshold for optimum efficiency of biocidal cationic surfaces. Microbiology. 2005;151:1341–1348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagay BE, Cordeiro JM, Barao VAR. Insight into corrosion of dental implants: from biochemical mechanisms to designing corrosion-resistant materials. Curr Oral Health Rep. 2022;9(2):7–21. DOI:10.1007/s40496-022-00306-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costa RC, Abdo VL, Mendes PHC, et al. Microbial corrosion in titaniumbased dental implants: how tiny bacteria can create a big problem? J Bio Tribocorros. 2021;7(4):136. DOI:10.1007/s40735-021-00575-8
   Google Scholar
• Wheelis SE, Gindri IM, Valderrama P, et al. Effects of decontamination solutions on the surface of titanium: investigation of surface morphology, composition, and roughness. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2016;27(3):329–340. DOI:10.1111/clr.12545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabilleau G, Bourdon S, Joly-Guillou ML, et al. Influence of fluoride, hydrogen peroxide and lactic acid on the corrosion resistance of commercially pure titanium. Acta Biomater. 2006;2(1):121–129. DOI:10.1016/j.actbio.2005.09.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dini C, Costa RC, Sukotjo C, et al. Progression of bio-tribocorrosion in implant dentistry. Front Mech Eng. 2020;6:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuo R. Biofilms: strategies for metal corrosion inhibition employing microorganisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;76(6):1245–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asa’ad F, Thomsen P, Kunrath MF. The Role of Titanium Particles and Ions in the Pathogenesis of Peri-Implantitis. J Bone Metab. 2022;29(3):145–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Souza JGS, Costa Oliveira BE, Bertolini M, et al. Titanium particles and ions favor dysbiosis in oral biofilms. J Periodontal Res. 2020;55(2):258–266. DOI:10.1111/jre.12711
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barão VAR, Yoon CJ, Mathew MT, et al. Attachment of porphyromonas gingivalis to corroded commercially pure titanium and titanium-aluminum-vanadium alloy. J Periodontol. 2014;85(9):1275–1282. DOI:10.1902/jop.2014.130595
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettersson M, Kelk P, Belibasakis GN, et al. Titanium ions form particles that activate and execute interleukin-1β release from lipopolysaccharide-primed macrophages. J Periodontal Res. 2017;52(1):21–32. DOI:10.1111/jre.12364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachi T, Shuto T, Shinohara Y, et al. Release of titanium ions from an implant surface and their effect on cytokine production related to alveolar bone resorption. Toxicology. 2015;327:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag L, Spinell T, Kröger A, et al. Dental implant material related changes in molecular signatures in peri-implantitis – a systematic review and integrative analysis of omics in-vitro studies. Dental Materials. 2023;39:101–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolzer C, Müller M, Gosau M, et al. Do titanium dioxide particles stimulate macrophages to release proinflammatory cytokines and increase the risk for peri-implantitis? J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2023;81(3):308–317. DOI:10.1016/j.joms.2022.10.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang R, Yi Y, Hao L, et al. Thermoresponsive nanostructures: from mechano-bactericidal action to bacteria release. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2021;13(51):60865–60877. DOI:10.1021/acsami.1c16487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Su B, Chinnaraj S, et al. Nanostructured titanium surfaces exhibit recalcitrance towards Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm formation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1071. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-19484-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin WT, Tan HL, Duan ZL, et al. Inhibited bacterial biofilm formation and improved osteogenic activity on gentamicin-loaded titania nanotubes with various diameters. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:1215–1230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verza BS, van den Beucken JJJP, Brandt JV, et al. A long-term controlled drug-delivery with anionic beta cyclodextrin complex in layer-by-layer coating for percutaneous implants devices. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;257:117604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oirschot BAJA, Zhang Y, Alghamdi HS, et al. Surface engineering for dental implantology: favoring tissue responses along the implant. Tissue Eng Part A. 2022;28(11–12):555–572. DOI:10.1089/ten.tea.2021.0230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkekhia D, Hammond PT, Shukla A. Layer-by-Layer biomaterials for drug delivery. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2020;22(1):1–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu J, Zhou M, Zhang L, et al. Antibacterial adhesion strategy for dental titanium implant surfaces: from mechanisms to application. J Funct Biomater. 2022;13(4):169. DOI:10.3390/jfb13040169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maan AMC, Hofman AH, de Vos WM, et al. Recent developments and practical feasibility of polymer-based antifouling coatings. Adv Funct Mater. 2020;30(32):2000936. DOI:10.1002/adfm.202000936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han B, Fang J, Yang Z, et al. Pegylated coating affects DBM osteoinductivity in vivo by changing inflammatory responses. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2020;3(12):8722–8730. DOI:10.1021/acsabm.0c01113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li B, Xia X, Guo M, et al. Biological and antibacterial properties of the micronanostructured hydroxyapatite/chitosan coating on titanium. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):14052. DOI:10.1038/s41598-019-49941-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hu X, Neoh KG, Shi Z, et al. An in vitro assessment of titanium functionalized with polysaccharides conjugated with vascular endothelial growth factor for enhanced osseointegration and inhibition of bacterial adhesion. Biomaterials. 2010;31:8854–8863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouirfa H, Bouloussa H, Migonney V, et al. Review of titanium surface modification techniques and coatings for antibacterial applications. Acta Biomater. 2019;83:37–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linklater DP, Baulin VA, Juodkazis S, et al. Mechano-bactericidal actions of nanostructured surfaces. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(1):8–22. DOI:10.1038/s41579-020-0414-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younas H, Fei Y, Shao J, et al. Developing an antibacterial superhydrophilic barrier between bacteria and membranes to mitigate the severe impacts of biofouling. Biofouling. 2016;32(9):1089–1102. DOI:10.1080/08927014.2016.1229775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SW, Phillips KS, Gu H, et al. How microbes read the map: effects of implant topography on bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. Biomaterials. 2021;268:120595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barão VAR, Costa RC, Shibli JA, et al. Emerging titanium surface modifications: the war against polymicrobial infections on dental implants. Braz Dent J. 2022;33(1):1–12. DOI:10.1590/0103-6440202204860
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Truong VK, Webb HK, Fadeeva E, et al. Air-directed attachment of coccoid bacteria to the surface of superhydrophobic lotus-like titanium. Biofouling. 2012;28:539–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensikat HJ, Ditsche-Kuru P, Neinhuis C, et al. Superhydrophobicity in perfection: the outstanding properties of the lotus leaf. Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2011;2:152–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Wang L, Levänen E. Superhydrophobic surfaces for the reduction of bacterial adhesion. RSC Adv. 2013;3(30):12003–12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova EP, Hasan J, Webb HK, et al. Natural bactericidal surfaces: mechanical rupture of pseudomonas aeruginosa cells by cicada wings. Small. 2012;8:2489–2494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X. Bactericidal mechanism of nanopatterned surfaces. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2015;18(2):1311–1316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P B, V U. In Vitro bioactivity, biocompatibility and corrosion resistance of multi-ionic (Ce/Si) co-doped hydroxyapatite porous coating on Ti-6Al-4 V for bone regeneration applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;119:111620.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WC, Ko CL. Roughened titanium surfaces with silane and further RGD peptide modification in vitro. Mater Sci Eng C. 2013;33(5):2713–2722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suo L, Jiang N, Wang Y, et al. The enhancement of osseointegration using a graphene oxide/chitosan/hydroxyapatite composite coating on titanium fabricated by electrophoretic deposition. J Biomed Mater Res. 2019;107(3):635–645. DOI:10.1002/jbm.b.34156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeiro JM, Nagay BE, Dini C, et al. Copper source determines chemistry and topography of implant coatings to optimally couple cellular responses and antibacterial activity. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021;134:112550.
   Google Scholar
• Yang C, Li J, Zhu C, et al. Advanced antibacterial activity of biocompatible tantalum nanofilm via enhanced local innate immunity. Acta Biomater. 2019;89:403–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespi R, Marconcini S, Crespi G, et al. Nonsurgical treatment of periimplantitis without eliminating granulation tissue: a 3-year study. Implant Dent. 2019;28(1):4–10. DOI:10.1097/ID.0000000000000832
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcuac O, Derks J, Charalampakis G, et al. Adjunctive systemic and local antimicrobial therapy in the surgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res. 2016;95:50–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javed F, Alghamdi AST, Ahmed A, et al. Clinical efficacy of antibiotics in the treatment of peri-implantitis. Int Dent J. 2013;63(4):169–176. DOI:10.1111/idj.12034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399:629–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akshaya S, Rowlo PK, Dukle A, et al. Antibacterial coatings for titanium implants: recent trends and future perspectives. Antibiotics. 2022;11(12):1719. DOI:10.3390/antibiotics11121719
   Google Scholar
• de Avila ED, Castro AGB, Tagit O, et al. Anti-bacterial efficacy via drug delivery system from layer-by-layer coating for percutaneous dental implant components. Appl Surf Sci. 2019;488:194–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shivaram A, Bose S, Bandyopadhyay A. Understanding long-term silver release from surface modified porous titanium implants. Acta Biomater. 2017;58:550–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li C, Yu Y, et al. Characterization and property of bifunctional Zn incorporated TiO2 micro-arc oxidation coatings: the influence of different Zn sources. Ceram Int. 2019;45(16):19747–19756. DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.06.228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thainan D, Mendes SL, Reis G, et al. Does the incorporation of zinc into TiO 2 on titanium surfaces increase bactericidal activity? A systematic review and meta-analysis; 2022. DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.007
   Google Scholar
• Santos-Coquillat A, Mohedano M, Martinez-Campos E, et al. Bioactive multi-elemental PEO-coatings on titanium for dental implant applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;97:738–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odatsu T, Kuroshima S, Sato M, et al. Antibacterial properties of nano-Ag coating on healing abutment: an in vitro and clinical study. Antibiotics. 2020;9:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Carinci F, Lauritano D, Bignozzi CA, et al. A new strategy against periimplantitis: antibacterial internal coating. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(16):3897. DOI:10.3390/ijms20163897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza JGS, Lima CV, Costa Oliveira BE, et al. Dose-response effect of chlorhexidine on a multispecies oral biofilm formed on pure titanium and on a titanium-zirconium alloy. Biofouling. 2018;34:1175–1184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matos AO, de Almeida AB, Beline T, et al. Synthesis of multifunctional chlorhexidine-doped thin films for titanium-based implant materials. Mater Sci Eng C. 2020;117:111289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riool M, Dirks AJ, Jaspers V, et al. A chlorhexidine-releasing epoxy-based coating on titanium implants prevents Staphylococcus aureus experimental biomaterial-associated infection. Eur Cell Mater. 2017;33:143–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negut I, Bita B, Groza A. Polymeric coatings and antimicrobial peptides as efficient systems for treating implantable medical devices associatedinfections. Polymers. 2022;14(8):1611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riool M, de Breij A, Drijfhout JW, et al. Antimicrobial peptides in biomedical device manufacturing. Front Chem. 2017;5:63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarghami V, Ghorbani M, Pooshang Bagheri K, et al. Melittin antimicrobial peptide thin layer on bone implant chitosan-antibiotic coatings and their bactericidal properties. Mater Chem Phys. 2021;5:263.
   Google Scholar
• Chen J, Shi X, Zhu Y, et al. On-demand storage and release of antimicrobial peptides using Pandora’s box-like nanotubes gated with a bacterial infection-responsive polymer. Theranostics. 2020;10(1):109–122. DOI:10.7150/thno.38388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou L, Lai Y, Huang W, et al. Biofunctionalization of microgroove titanium surfaces with an antimicrobial peptide to enhance their bactericidal activity and cytocompatibility. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;128:552–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao Q, Sun JL, Huang F, et al. Antibacterial peptide HHC-36 sustained release coating promotes antibacterial property of percutaneous implant. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9:735889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Chen J, Xue Y, et al. Polymer brush grafted antimicrobial peptide on hydroxyapatite nanorods for highly effective antibacterial performance. Chem Eng J. 2021;423:130133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellotti D, Remelli M. Lights and shadows on the therapeutic use of antimicrobial peptides. Molecules. 2022;27(14):4584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi N. Oral microbiome metabolism: from “who are they?” to “what are they doing? J Dent Res. 2015;94(12):1628–1637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Y, Ye H, Liu Y, et al. pH dependent silver nanoparticles releasing titanium implant: a novel therapeutic approach to control peri-implant infection. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2017;158:127–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Jiang X, Lai H, et al. Smart bacteria-responsive drug delivery systems in medical implants. J Funct Biomater. 2022;13(4):173. DOI:10.3390/jfb13040173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi H, Schulte A, Müller M, et al. Drug release from thermo-responsive polymer brush coatings to control bacterial colonization and biofilm growth on titanium implants. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(11):e2100069. DOI:10.1002/adhm.202100069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Xu J, Jian X, et al. NIR light-driven photocatalysis on amphip 2 nanotubes for controllable drug release. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(20):23606–23616. DOI:10.1021/acsami.0c04260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagay BE, Dini C, Cordeiro JM, et al. Visible-light-induced photocatalytic and antibacterial activity of TiO2 codoped with nitrogen and bismuth: new perspectives to control implant-biofilm-related diseases. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(20):18186–18202. DOI:10.1021/acsami.9b03311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khudhair D, Bhatti A, Li Y, et al. Anodization parameters influencing the morphology and electrical properties of TiO2 nanotubes for living cell interfacing and investigations. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;59:1125–1142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng W, Geng Z, Li Z, et al. Controlled release behaviour and antibacterial effects of antibiotic-loaded titania nanotubes. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;62:105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Li C, Zhang S, et al. Role of TiO 2 nanotubes on the surface of implants in osseointegration in animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthodontics. 2020;29(6):501–510. DOI:10.1111/jopr.13163
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinn Aw M, Kurian M, Losic D. Non-eroding drug-releasing implants with ordered nanoporous and nanotubular structures: concepts for controlling drug release. Biomater Sci. 2014;2(1):10–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa RC, Souza JGS, Cordeiro JM, et al. Synthesis of bioactive glass based coating by plasma electrolytic oxidation: untangling a new deposition pathway toward titanium implant surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;579:680–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikdar S, Menezes PV, Maccione R, et al. Plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) process—processing, properties, and applications. Nanomaterials. 2021;11(6):1375. DOI:10.3390/nano11061375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da SV MI, da Cruz NC, Landers R, et al. Incorporation of Ca, P, and Si on bioactive coatings produced by plasma electrolytic oxidation: the role of electrolyte concentration and treatment duration. Biointerphases. 2015;10(4):041002. DOI:10.1116/1.4932579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan R, Li J, Wu Q, et al. Trace element-augmented titanium implant with targeted angiogenesis and enhanced osseointegration in osteoporotic Rats. Front Chem. 2022;10:839062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Feng W, Zhao B-H, et al. In vivo effect of titanium implants with porous zinc-containing coatings prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation method on osseointegration in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33:298–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokosz K, Hryniewicz T, Ł D. Phosphate porous coatings enriched with selected elements via PEO treatment on titanium and its alloys: a review. Materials. 2020;13(11):2468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hengel IAJ, Tierolf MWAM, MWAM T, et al. Antibacterial titanium implants biofunctionalized by plasma electrolytic oxidation with silver, zinc, and copper: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(7):3800. DOI:10.3390/ijms22073800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besra L, Liu M. A review on fundamentals and applications of electrophoretic deposition (EPD). Prog Mater Sci. 2007;52(1):1–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccaccini AR, Keim S, Ma R, et al. Electrophoretic deposition of biomaterials. J R Soc Interface. 2010;7(suppl_5):S581–613. DOI:10.1098/rsif.2010.0156.focus
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari S, Tiyyagura HR, Pottathara YB, et al. Surface functionalization of chitosan as a coating material for orthopaedic applications: a comprehensive review. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;255:117487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stojanovic D, Jokic B, Veljovic D, et al. Bioactive glass–apatite composite coating for titanium implant synthesized by electrophoretic deposition. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2007;27(2–3):1595–1599. DOI:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.04.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamuner A, Pasquato A, Castagliuolo I, et al. Selective grafting of protease-resistant adhesive peptides on titanium surfaces. Molecules. 2022;27(24):8727. DOI:10.3390/molecules27248727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang K, Song W, Wang L, et al. Immobilization of chitosan film containing semaphorin 3A onto a microarc oxidized titanium implant surface via silane reaction to improve MG63 osteogenic differentiation. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:4649–4657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaz JM, Pezzoli D, Chevallier P, et al. Antibacterial coatings based on chitosan for pharmaceutical and biomedical applications. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(8):866–885. DOI:10.2174/1381612824666180219143900
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Córdoba A, Hierro-Oliva M, Pacha-Olivenza MÁ, et al. Direct Covalent Grafting of Phytate to Titanium Surfaces through Ti–O–P Bonding Shows Bone Stimulating Surface Properties and Decreased Bacterial Adhesion. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(18):11326–11335. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b02533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlukhina S, Sukhishvili S. Polymer assemblies for controlled delivery of bioactive molecules from surfaces. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63(9):822–836.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volodkin D, Madaboosi N, Blacklock J, et al. Surface-supported multilayers decorated with bio-active material aimed at light-triggered drug delivery. Langmuir. 2009;25:14037–14043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li QL, Huang N, Chen J, et al. Anticoagulant surface modification of titanium via layer-by-layer assembly of collagen and sulfated chitosan multilayers. J Biomed Mater Res. 2009;89(3):575–584. DOI:10.1002/jbm.a.31999
   Google Scholar
• Pham VTH, Truong VK, Orlowska A, et al. “Race for the Surface”: eukaryotic Cells Can Win. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(34):22025–22031. DOI:10.1021/acsami.6b06415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao J, Li Y, Li B, et al. Biological and mechanical effects of micronanostructured titanium surface on an osteoblastic cell line in vitro and osteointegration in vivo. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2017;183(1):280–292. DOI:10.1007/s12010-017-2444-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamlet SM, Lee RSB, Moon HJ, et al. Hydrophilic titanium surface-induced macrophage modulation promotes pro-osteogenic signalling. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(11):1085–1096. DOI:10.1111/clr.13522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar