1,622
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Safe and effective use of a passive safety needle by healthcare professionals in a simulated environment, including perceptions and preferences

, &
Pages 963-971 | Received 21 Jun 2023, Accepted 26 Aug 2023, Published online: 11 Sep 2023

References

  • Bouya S, Balouchi A, Rafiemanesh H, et al. Global prevalence and device related causes of needle stick injuries among health care workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Glob Health. 2020;86(1):35. doi: 10.5334/aogh.2698
  • King KC, Strony RN. StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing;1 Jan 2022
  • Alfulayw KH, Al-Otaibi ST, Alqahtani HA. Factors associated with needlestick injuries among healthcare workers: implications for prevention. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1074. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07110-y
  • Cooke CE, Stephens JM. Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of needlestick injuries in healthcare workers. Med Devices (Auckl). 2017;10:225–235. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S140846
  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Needlestick safety and prevention act [cited 15 Apr 2023; available at https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-106hr5178enr/pdf/BILLS-106hr5178enr.pdf.
  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Recommended practices for safety and Health programs. Identifying hazard control options: the hierarchy of controls [cited 15 Apr 2023; available at https://www.osha.gov/safety-management/hazard-prevention.
  • Schuurmans J, Lutgens SP, Groen L, et al. Do safety engineered devices reduce needlestick injuries? J Hosp Infect. 2018 Sep;100(1):99–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.04.026
  • Ottino MC, Argentero A, Argentero PA, et al. Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy—comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices. BMJ Open. 2019;9(11):e030576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030576
  • Lavoie MC, Verbeek JH, Pahwa M. Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;3: CD009740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009740.pub2
  • International Safety Center. U.S. Epinet sharps injury and blood and body fluid exposure surveillance research group. Sharps Injury Data Report For 2021; 41 Hospitals Contributing Data; 1684 Total Injuries [cited 2 Jun 2023 available at: https://internationalsafetycenter.org/exposure-reports/.
  • Tosini W, Ciotti C, Goyer F, et al. Needlestick injury rates according to different types of safety-engineered devices: results of a French multicenter study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31(4):402–407. doi: 10.1086/651301
  • Jackson AP, Almerol LA, Campbell J, et al. Needlestick injuries: the role of safety-engineered devices in prevention. Br J Nurs. 2020;29(14):S22–S30. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2020.29.14.S22
  • Lamontagne F, Abiteboul D, Lolom I, et al. Role of safety-engineered devices in preventing needlestick injuries in 32 French hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Jan;28(1):18–23. doi: 10.1086/510814
  • Cullen BL, Genasi F, Symington I, et al. Potential for reported needlestick injury prevention among healthcare workers through safety device usage and improvement of guideline adherence: expert panel assessment. J Hosp Infect. 2006;63(4):445–451. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.04.008