Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: anticipating and avoiding complications

References

• Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275–e444. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field ME, Goldstein L, Corriveau K, et al. Evaluating outcomes of same-day discharge after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a real-world cohort. Heart Rhythm O2. 2021;2(4):333–340. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.07.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rashedi S, Tavolinejad H, Kazemian S, et al. Efficacy and safety of same-day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Cardiol. 2022;45(2):162–172. doi: 10.1002/clc.23778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama Y, Miyamoto K, Nakai M, et al. Complications associated with catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the jroad-dpc study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(11):e019701. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.019701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee WC, Wu PJ, Chen HC, et al. Efficacy and safety of ablation for symptomatic atrial fibrillation in elderly patients: a meta-analysis. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:734204. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.734204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elayi CS, Darrat Y, Suffredini JM, et al. Sex differences in complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results on 85,977 patients. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018;53(3):333–339. doi: 10.1007/s10840-018-0416-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaiser DW, Fan J, Schmitt S, et al. Gender differences in clinical outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;2(6):703–710. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.04.014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peters NS. Catheter ablation for cardiac arrhythmias. BMJ. 2000 cited Apr 7 2023; 321(7263):716–717. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7263.716
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D’Souza S, Elshazly MB, Dargham SR, et al. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation complications in obese and diabetic patients: insights from the US nationwide inpatient sample 2005-2013. Clin Cardiol. 2021;44(8):1151–1160. doi: 10.1002/clc.23667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisbal F, Abugattas JP, Trotta O, et al. Personalized assessment of the cumulative complication risk of the atrial fibrillation ablation track: the AF-TRACK calculator. Heart Rhythm O2. 2022;3(6Part A):656–664. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2022.07.013
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kelm M, Perings SM, Jax T, et al. Incidence and clinical outcome of iatrogenic femoral arteriovenous fistulas: implications for risk stratification and treatment. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40(2):291–297. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01966-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ströker E, de Asmundis C, Kupics K, et al. Value of ultrasound for access guidance and detection of subclinical vascular complications in the setting of atrial fibrillation cryoballoon ablation. EP Europace. 2019;21(3):434–439. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynn GJ, Haq I, Hung J, et al. Improving safety in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective study of the use of ultrasound to guide vascular access: vascular ultrasound for afa. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(7):680–685. doi: 10.1111/jce.12404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagata K, Wichterle D, Roubícek T, et al. Ultrasound-guided versus conventional femoral venipuncture for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a multicentre randomized efficacy and safety trial (ULTRA-FAST trial). EP Europace. 2018;20(7):1107–1114. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett PD, Eckart RE, Bauch TD, et al. Fluoroscopic localization of the femoral head as a landmark for common femoral artery cannulation. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2005;65(2):205–207. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghannam M, Chugh A, Dillon P, et al. Protamine to expedite vascular hemostasis after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(11):1642–1647. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.06.045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshmanadoss U, Wong WS, Kutinsky I, et al. Figure-of-eight suture for venous hemostasis in fully anticoagulated patients after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2017;17(5):134–139. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2017.02.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohammed M, Ramirez R, Steinhaus DA, et al. Comparative outcomes of vascular access closure methods following atrial fibrillation/flutter catheter ablation: insights from VAscular closure for cardiac ablation registry. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;64(2):301–310. doi: 10.1007/s10840-021-00981-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontopodis N, Tsetis D, Tavlas E, et al. Ultrasound guided compression versus ultrasound guided thrombin injection for the treatment of post-catheterization femoral pseudoaneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51(6):815–823. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.02.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng CF, Wei J, Lee YT, et al. High-output heart failure resulting from an obscure traumatic arteriovenous fistula. J Chin Med Assoc. 2008;71(8):428–430. doi: 10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70096-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling R, Dhillon GS, Tondo C, et al. Safety, effectiveness, and quality of life following pulmonary vein isolation with a multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon catheter in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: 1-year outcomes from SHINE. EP Europace. 2021;23(6):851–860. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa382
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee G, Sparks PB, Morton JB, et al. Low risk of major complications associated with pulmonary vein antral isolation for atrial fibrillation: results of 500 consecutive ablation procedures in patients with low prevalence of structural heart disease from a single center. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Aug no–no. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01870.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimarchi S, Smith DE, Share D, et al. Retroperitoneal hematoma after percutaneous coronary intervention: prevalence, risk factors, management, outcomes, and predictors of mortality. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3(8):845–850. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.05.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lellouche N, Sebag FA, Elbaz N, et al. Acute pericardial effusion following atrial fibrillation ablation: characteristics and relationship with arrhythmia recurrences. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;104(8–9):450–457. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2011.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black-Maier E, Pokorney SD, Barnett AS, et al. Risk of atrioesophageal fistula formation with contact force-sensing catheters. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(9):1328–1333. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman DJ, Pokorney SD, Ghanem A, et al. Predictors of cardiac perforation with catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(6):636–645. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.01.011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cochet H, Sacher F, Chaumeil A, et al. Steam pop during radiofrequency ablation: imaging features on magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(3):559–560. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunch TJ, Asirvatham SJ, Friedman PA, et al. Outcomes after cardiac perforation during radiofrequency ablation of the atrium. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(11):1172–1179. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.50135.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen MEF, Leo M, Kalla M, et al. Management of tamponade complicating catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: early removal of pericardial drains is safe and effective and reduces analgesic requirements and hospital stay compared to conventional delayed removal. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(4):367–373. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2016.09.016
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin T, Bai R, Wei CY, et al. Periprocedural anticoagulation of patients undergoing pericardiocentesis for cardiac tamponade complicating catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Int Heart J. 2015;56(1):56–61. doi: 10.1536/ihj.14-158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts WC. Pericardial heart disease: its morphologic features and its causes.Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005 [Accessed Apr 7, 2023];18(1):38–55. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2005.11928030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stauber A, Kornej J, Shamloo AS, et al. Impact of single versus double transseptal puncture on outcome and complications in pulmonary vein isolation procedures. Cardiol J. 2020;28(5):671–677. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2020.0037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earley MJ. How to perform a transseptal puncture. Heart. 2009;95(1):85–92. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.135939
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuercher R, Herling A, Schmidt MT, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography-guided transseptal left atrial access to improve safety in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2546. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092546
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawhney V, Breitenstein A, Watts T, et al. A novel technique for performing transseptal puncture guided by a non-fluoroscopic 3D mapping system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42(1):4–12. doi: 10.1111/pace.13541
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elvin Gul E, Azizi Z, Alipour P, et al. Fluoroless catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: integration of intracardiac echocardiography and cartosound module. J Atr Fibrillation. 2021;14(2):20200477. doi: 10.4022/jafib.20200477
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mol D, Renskers L, Balt JC, et al. Persistent phrenic nerve palsy after atrial fibrillation ablation: follow‐up data from the Netherlands Heart registration. Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2022;33(3):559–564. doi: 10.1111/jce.15368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah DP, Knight BP. Transseptal catheterization using a powered radiofrequency transseptal needle. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2010;27(1):15–16. doi: 10.1007/s10840-009-9414-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadehra V, Buxton AE, Antoniadis AP, et al. The use of a novel nitinol guidewire to facilitate transseptal puncture and left atrial catheterization for catheter ablation procedures. Europace. 2011;13(10):1401–1405. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhouli M, Sarraf M, Zack CJ, et al. Iatrogenic atrial septal defect following transseptal cardiac interventions. Int J Cardiol. 2016;209:142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.02.068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, et al. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(1):32–38. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.859116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorla R, Dentali F, Crippa M, et al. Perioperative safety and efficacy of different anticoagulation strategies with direct oral anticoagulants in pulmonary vein isolation: a meta-analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(6):794–806. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.04.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Briceño DF, Madan N, Romero J, et al. Thromboembolic and bleeding risks in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: oral anticoagulation perspectives. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2017;16(7):769–777. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2017.1325867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alqarawi W, Grose E, Ramirez FD, et al. Prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients anticoagulated with direct oral anticoagulants: systematic review and meta-analysis. CJC Open. 2021;3(5):658–665. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2020.12.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anter E, Silverstein J, Tschabrunn CM, et al. Comparison of intracardiac echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography for imaging of the right and left atrial appendages. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(11):1890–1897. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce GK, Bunch TJ, Milton MA, et al. Discrepancies between catheter tip and tissue temperature in cooled-tip ablation: relevance to guiding left atrial ablation. Circulation. 2005;112(7):954–960. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.492439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki S, Hasegawa K, Mukai M, et al. Clinically manifesting air embolisms in cryoballoon ablation: can novel water buckets reduce the risk? JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(9):1067–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shiomi S, Tokuda M, Yamashita S, et al. Successful bail-out of a massive air embolism during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2022;9(3):148–151. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2022.12.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCarthy CJ, Behravesh S, Naidu SG, et al. Air embolism: diagnosis, clinical management and outcomes. Diagnostics. 2017;7(1):5. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics7010005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young M, Johnson R, Farhat H. Monorail microsnare retrieval of cardiac microcatheter tip embolised to the middle cerebral artery after attempted cardiac ablation procedure. BMJ Case Rep. 2020;13(3):e015800. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2020-015800
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glowniak A, Tarkowski A, Janczarek M, et al. Silent cerebral infarcts following pulmonary vein isolation with different atrial fibrillation ablation techniques - incidence and risk factors. Arch Med Sci. 2022;18(3):632–638. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.85348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Bary C, Deneke T, Arentz T, et al. Clinical impact of the microembolic signal burden during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: just a lot of noise? J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(5):1091–1101. doi: 10.1002/jum.14447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deneke T, Jais P, Scaglione M, et al. Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):455–463. doi: 10.1111/jce.12608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhavan M, Graff-Radford J, Piccini JP, et al. Cognitive dysfunction in atrial fibrillation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(12):744–756. doi: 10.1038/s41569-018-0075-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forleo GB, Della Rocca DG, Lavalle C, et al. A patient with asymptomatic cerebral lesions during af ablation: how much should we worry? J Atr Fibrillation. 2016;8(5):1323. doi: 10.4022/jafib.1323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• von Bary C, Deneke T, Arentz T, et al. Silent cerebral events as a result of left atrial catheter ablation do not cause neuropsychological sequelae–a MRI-controlled multicenter study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;43(3):217–226. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0004-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teunissen C, Velthuis BK, Hassink RJ, et al. Incidence of pulmonary vein stenosis after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(6):589–598. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.02.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al Fori J, Al Belushi M, Al Shuraiqi M, et al. Pulmonary vein occlusion and lung infarction after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Case Rep Pulmonol. 2020;2020:2357846. doi: 10.1155/2020/2357846
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fath AR, Aglan A, Scott LR, et al. A unique compensatory mechanism for total pulmonary vein occlusion post atrial fibrillation catheter ablation visualized by multimodality imaging. Case Rep Cardiol. 2020;2020:9673958. doi: 10.1155/2020/9673958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogler J, Fink T, Sohns C, et al. Acute hemoptysis following cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation: a multicenter study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(7):773–782. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2020.02.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sudo K, Shigeta T, Oda A, et al. Pulmonary vein perforation and life-threatening hemoptysis during cryoballoon ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. JACC Case Rep. 2022;4(7):418–423. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2021.11.026
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Makita T, Kuwahara T, Takahashi K, et al. Severe hemothorax complications during atrial fibrillation ablation: lessons from two cases. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2022;8(8):586–590. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2022.05.018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakano T, Hirata A, Sotomi Y, et al. Right hemothorax caused by septal puncture during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a case with atrial septal aneurysm and pulmonary emphysema. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(4):555–556. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.12.004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kapur S, Barbhaiya C, Deneke T, et al. Esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula caused by ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2017;136(13):1247–1255. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.025827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilz RR, Schmidt V, Pürerfellner H, et al. A worldwide survey on incidence, management, and prognosis of oesophageal fistula formation following atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the POTTER-AF study. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(27):2458–2469. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarairah SY, Woodbury B, Methachittiphan N, et al. Esophageal thermal injury following cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(3):262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.10.014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zellerhoff S, Lenze F, Eckardt L. Prophylactic proton pump inhibition after atrial fibrillation ablation: is there any evidence? Europace. 2011;13(9):1219–1221. doi: 10.1093/europace/eur139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordes F, Ellermann C, Dechering DG, et al. Pre-procedural proton pump inhibition is associated with fewer peri-oesophageal lesions after cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83928-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung LWM, Bajpai A, Zuberi Z, et al. Randomized comparison of oesophageal protection with a temperature control device: results of the IMPACT study. Europace. 2020;23(2):205–215. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaniswamy C, Koruth JS, Mittnacht AJ, et al. The extent of mechanical esophageal deviation to avoid esophageal heating during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(10):1146–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.03.017
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koruth JS, Reddy VY, Miller MA, et al. Mechanical esophageal displacement during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2012;23(2):147–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02162.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj R, Naniwadekar A, Whang W, et al. Esophageal deviation during atrial fibrillation ablation: clinical experience with a dedicated esophageal balloon retractor. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(8):1020–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.04.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deneke T, Nentwich K, Berkovitz A, et al. High-resolution infrared thermal imaging of the esophagus during atrial fibrillation ablation as a predictor of endoscopically detected thermal lesions: results from the heat-af study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(11):e006681. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2235–2245. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heeger CH, Sohns C, Pott A, et al. Phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation: results of the worldwide yeti registry. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022;15(1):e010516. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010516
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamane T, Inaba O, Hachisuka E, et al. Persistent diarrhea following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a lesser-known complication of left atrial ablation procedures. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2021;7(9):633–636. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2021.06.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alsamman M, Ashraf B, Dankyi B, et al. Fix the heart, damage the gut: a case report and literature review of ablation-induced gastroparesis. Cureus. 14(4):e23946. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nullens S, Naegels S, Ruytjens I. Gastric distension and gastroparesis following pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: a case report and review of the literature. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2022;85(3):531–534. doi: 10.51821/85.3.9112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai CF, Chen SA, Tai CT, et al. Bezold-jarisch-like reflex during radiofrequency ablation of the pulmonary vein tissues in patients with paroxysmal focal atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10(1):27–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00638.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki S, Kajiyama T, Watanabe T, et al. Atrioventricular conduction disturbance during pulmonary vein isolation using the second-generation cryoballoon - vagal impact of cryoballoon ablation. Int J Cardiol. 2018;265:113–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arita T, Kubota S, Okamoto K, et al. Bezold-jarisch-like reflex during Brockenbrough’s procedure for radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal left atrial fibrillation: report of two cases. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2003;8(3):195–202. doi: 10.1023/a:1023917221763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Dong JZ, Liu XP, et al. Sinus node injury as a result of superior vena cava isolation during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011;34(2):163–170. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02903.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho SY, Sánchez-Quintana D. Anatomy and pathology of the sinus node. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;46(1):3–8. doi: 10.1007/s10840-015-0049-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobza R, Hindricks G, Tanner H, et al. Late recurrent arrhythmias after ablation of atrial fibrillation: incidence, mechanisms, and treatment. Heart Rhythm. 2004;1(6):676–683. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.08.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Barakat AF, Saliba WI, et al. Recurrent atrial fibrillation after initial long-term ablation success: electrophysiological findings and outcomes of repeat ablation procedures. Circ: Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(4):e005785. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales G, Hunter TD, Rajendra A, et al. Real-world trends in atrial fibrillation ablation indicate increasing durability of pulmonary vein isolation at repeat ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Jan;46(6):535–542. doi: 10.1111/pace.14666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma A, Mantovan R, Macle L, et al. Substrate and trigger ablation for reduction of atrial fibrillation (STAR AF): a randomized, multicentre, international trial. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(11):1344–1356. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osorio J, Zei PC, Díaz JC, et al. High-frequency low-tidal-volume ventilation improves long-term outcomes in atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter prospective study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 May S2405500X23002980. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2023.05.015
   Google Scholar
• Desimone CV, Hu T, Ebrille E, et al. Catheter ablation related mitral valve injury: the importance of early recognition and rescue mitral valve repair. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(9):971–975. doi: 10.1111/jce.12439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balter S, Miller DL. Patient skin reactions from interventional fluoroscopy procedures. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;202(4):W335–342. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong KCK, Sadarmin PP, Prendergast BD, et al. Acute occlusion of left circumflex artery following radiofrequency catheter ablation at the mitral isthmus. Europace. 2010;12(5):743–745. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Innocentiis C, Astore P, Giannantonio M, et al. Multivessel coronary spasm triggered by ganglionated plexi stimulation during atrial fibrillation radiofrequency catheter ablation: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2023;7(2):ytad007. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytad007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakamura T, Takami M, Fukuzawa K, et al. Incidence and characteristics of coronary artery spasms related to atrial fibrillation ablation procedures　- large-scale multicenter analysis. Circ J. 2021;85(3):264–271. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsushima T, Osman MN, Josephson RA, et al. First case report: Late‐onset coronary artery spasm after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a Caucasian patient. Clin Case Rep. 2020;8(9):1786–1790. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.2977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, et al. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(5):417–427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1707855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero J, Gabr M, Alviz I, et al. Focal impulse and rotor modulation guided ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of head-to-head comparative studies. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32(7):1822–1832. doi: 10.1111/jce.15036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natale A, Mohanty S, Goldstein L, et al. Real-world safety of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with contact force or cryoballoon ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;60(3):445–452. doi: 10.1007/s10840-020-00734-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akar JG, Hummel JP, Yao X, et al. Catheter-related complications and mortality of atrial fibrillation ablation following introduction of contact force-sensing technology. BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2020;2(1):e000058. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2020-000058
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macle L, Frame D, Gache LM, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation with a spring sensor-irrigated contact force-sensing catheter compared with other ablation catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019; 9(6):e023775. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023775
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlögl S, Schlögl KS, Bengel P, et al. Impact of open-irrigated radiofrequency catheter with contact force measurement on the efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation: a single-center direct comparison. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;65(3):685–693. doi: 10.1007/s10840-022-01316-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma K, Brinker JA, Henrikson CA. Computed tomography imaging in atrial fibrillation ablation. J Atr Fibrillation. 2011;4(1):319. doi: 10.4022/jafib.319
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winkle RA, Mohanty S, Patrawala RA, et al. Low complication rates using high power (45-50 W) for short duration for atrial fibrillation ablations. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(2):165–169. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.11.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshem E, Zilberman I, Tschabrunn CM, et al. High-power and short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: biophysical characterization. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(4):467–479. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.11.018
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li M, Ma Y, Lin Q, et al. Comparison between high-power short-duration and conventional ablation strategy in atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis. Cardiovasc Ther. 2022:2022;1065077. doi: 10.1155/2022/1065077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popa MA, Bourier F, Lengauer S, et al. Safety profile and long-term efficacy of very high-power short-duration (60–70 W) catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results of a large comparative analysis. Europace. 2022;25(2):408–416. doi: 10.1093/europace/euac215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benali K, Khairy P, Hammache N, et al. Procedure-related complications of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81(21):2089–2099. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shtembari J, Shrestha DB, Pathak BD, et al. Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. J Clin Med. 2023;12(2):719. doi: 10.3390/jcm12020719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar