Hydrus microstent for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: overview of its safety and efficacy

References

• Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, et al. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the early manifest glaucoma trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct 1;120(10):1268–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaasterland DE, Ederer F, Beck A, et al. The advanced glaucoma intervention study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130(4):429–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW, et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the collaborative initial glaucoma treatment study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmol. 2001;108(11):1943–1953. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)00873-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan BC, Mikelberg FS, Artes PH, et al. Canadian glaucoma study: 3. Impact of risk factors and intraocular pressure reduction on the rates of visual field change. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 Oct;128(10):1249–1255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsai JC, McClure CA, Ramos SE, et al. Compliance barriers in glaucoma: a systematic classification. J Glaucoma Internet. 2003 Oct [cited 2023 Jan 3];12(5):393–398. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14520147/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram C, Stahlberg E, Pfeiffer N. Patient-reported nonadherence with glaucoma therapy. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther Internet. 2019 May 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 35(4):223–228. doi: 10.1089/jop.2018.0134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla A, Mcgalliard JN, Batterbury M. Use of eyedrops in glaucoma: how can we help to reduce non-compliance? Acta Ophthalmol Scand Internet. 2007 Jun [cited 2023 Jan 3];85(4):464. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00882.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baudouin C, Pisella PJ, Fillacier K, et al. Ocular surface inflammatory changes induced by topical antiglaucoma drugs: human and animal studies. Ophthalmol Internet. 1999 Mar 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];106(3):556–563. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90116-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noecker RJ, Herrygers LA, Anwaruddin R. Corneal and conjunctival changes caused by commonly used glaucoma medications. Cornea Internet. 2004 Jul [cited 2023 Jan 3];23(5):490–496. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000116526.57227.82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung EW, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN. Prevalence of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma Internet. 2008 Aug [cited 2023 Jan 3];17(5):350–355. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c5f4f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skalicky SE, Goldberg I, McCluskey P. Ocular surface disease and quality of life in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol Internet. 2012 [[cited 2023 Jan 3]]; 153(1):1–9.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.05.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fechtner RD, Godfrey DG, Budenz D, et al. Prevalence of ocular surface complaints in patients with glaucoma using topical intraocular pressure-lowering medications. Cornea Internet. 2010 Jun [cited 2023 Jan 3];29(6):618–621. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181c325b2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Aref AA. A review of selective laser trabeculoplasty: recent findings and Current perspectives. Ophthalmol Ther Internet. 2017 Jun 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 6(1):19–32. doi: 10.1007/s40123-017-0082-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achiron A, Sharif N, Achiron RN, et al. Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol Internet. 2012 Oct 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];23(2):625–585. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22249233/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson TW, Chang DF, Marquis R, et al. A Schlemm canal microstent for intraocular pressure reduction in primary open-angle glaucoma and cataract: the HORIZON study. Ophthalmol Internet. 2019 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];126(1):29–37. doi; 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.05.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker RF. Flow of aqueous humor in humans [the friedenwald lecture]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Internet. 1991 [cited 2023 Jan 3];32(13):3145–3166. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1748546/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M. ‘What controls aqueous humour outflow resistance?’. Exp Eye Res Internet. 2006 Apr [[cited 2023 Jan 3]];82(4):545–557. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16386733/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brubaker RF, Nagataki S, Townsend DJ, et al. The effect of age on aqueous humor formation in man. Ophthalmol Internet. 1981 [cited 2023 Jan 3];88(3):283–288. doi; 10.1016/S0161-6420(81)35037-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vranka JA, Kelley MJ, Acott TS, et al. Extracellular matrix in the trabecular meshwork: intraocular pressure regulation and dysregulation in glaucoma. Exp Eye Res Internet. 2015 Apr 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 133:112–125. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.07.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BILL A, SVEDBERGH B. Scanning electron microscopic studies of the trabecular meshwork and the canal of Schlemm–an attempt to localize the main resistance to outflow of aqueous humor in man. Acta Ophthalmol Internet. 1972 [cited 2023 Jan 3];50(3):295–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1972.tb05954.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson M, Johnson DH, Kamm RD, et al. The filtration characteristics of the aqueous outflow system. Exp Eye Res InternetExperimental Eye Research. 1990 [[cited 2023 Jan 3]]; 50(4):407–418. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(90)90142-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller KE, Bradley JM, Vranka JA. et al. Segmental versican expression in the trabecular meshwork and involvement in outflow facility. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Internet. 2011 Jul [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 52(8); 5049–5057. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein DL, Rohen JW. Morphology of the trabecular meshwork and inner-wall endothelium after cationized ferritin perfusion in the monkey eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Internet. 1991 [cited 2023 Jan 3];32(1):160–171. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1987099/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ethier CR, Read AT, Chan D. Biomechanics of Schlemm’s canal endothelial cells: influence on F-actin architecture. Biophys J Internet. 2004 [[cited 2023 Jan 3]]; 87(4):2828–2837. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.103.038133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hann CR, Fautsch MP. Recent developments in understanding the Role of aqueous humor outflow in normal and primary open angle glaucoma. Curr Ophthalmol Rep. 2015 Jun 1[cited 2023 Jan 3];3(2): Internet:67–73. doi: 10.1007/s40135-015-0072-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu Z, Overby DR, Scott PA. et al. The mechanism of increasing outflow facility by rho-kinase inhibition with Y-27632 in bovine eyes. Exp Eye Res Internet. 2008 Feb [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 86(2); 271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2007.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant WM. Further studies on facility of flow through the trabecular meshwork. AMA Arch Ophthalmol. Arch Ophtalmol Internet. 1958 [cited 2023 Jan 3];60(4):523–533. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1958.00940080541001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carreon T, van der Merwe E, Fellman RL, et al. Aqueous outflow - a continuum from trabecular meshwork to episcleral veins. Prog Retin Eye Res InternetProgress in Retinal and Eye Research. 2017 Mar 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];57:108–133. doi: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone MA. The aqueous outflow system as a mechanical pump: evidence from examination of tissue and aqueous movement in human and non-human primates. J Glaucoma Internet. 2004 Oct [cited 2023 Jan 3];13(5):421–438. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000131757.63542.24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone MA, Saheb H, Ahmed IIK, et al. Effects of a Schlemm canal scaffold on collector channel ostia in human anterior segments. Exp Eye Res Internet. 2014 [[cited 2023 Jan 3]];119:70–76. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2013.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone MA, Grant WM. Pressure-dependent changes in structures of the aqueous outflow system of human and monkey eyes. Am J Ophthalmol Internet. 1973 [[cited 2023 Jan 3]]; 75(3):365–383. doi: 10.1016/0002-9394(73)91145-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista SA, Lu Z, Hofmann S, et al. Reduction of the available area for aqueous humor outflow and increase in meshwork herniations into collector channels following acute IOP elevation in bovine eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Internet. 2008 [cited 2023 Jan 3];49(12):5346–5352. doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-1707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castleman LS, Motzkin SM, Alicandri FP, et al. Biocompatibility of nitinol alloy as an implant material. J Biomed Mater Res Internet. 1976 [cited 2023 Jan 3];10(5):695–731. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820100505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson E, Nash DH, Dempster WM. On the experimental testing of fine nitinol wires for medical devices. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Internet. 2011 Apr [cited 2023 Jan 3];4(3):261–268. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider W, Munroe N, Pulletikurthi C. et al. A comparative biocompatibility analysis of ternary nitinol alloys. J Mater Eng Perform Internet. 2009 Aug [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 18(5–6); 760–764. doi: 10.1007/s11665-009-9435-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabalovskaya SA. Surface, corrosion and biocompatibility aspects of nitinol as an implant material. Biomed Mater Eng Internet. 2002 [cited 2023 Jan 3];12(1):69–109. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11847410/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assad M, Chernyshov A, Leroux MA, et al. A new porous titanium-nickel alloy: part 1. Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity evaluation. Biomed Mater Eng Internet. 2002 [cited 2023 Jan 3];12(3):225–237. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12446938/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wever DJ, Veldhuizen AG, Sanders MM. et al. Cytotoxic, allergic and genotoxic activity of a nickel-titanium alloy. Biomaterials Internet. 1997 Aug [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 18(16); 1115–1120. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00041-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko GY, Song HY, Seo TS, et al. Obstruction of the lacrimal system: treatment with a covered, retrievable, expandable nitinol stent versus a lacrimal polyurethane stent. Radiology. 2003 Apr 1[cited 2023 Jan 3];227(1): 270–276. Internet. 10.1148/radiol.2271011674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roosli C, Schmid P, Huber AM. Biocompatibility of nitinol stapes prosthesis. Otol Neurotol Internet. 2011 Feb [cited 2023 Jan 3];32(2):265–270. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318201622e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan N, Uvelius B, Zaszczurynski P, et al. Biocompatibility of nitinol and stainless steel in the bladder: an experimental study. J Urol Internet. 2005 [cited 2023 Jan 3];173(2):647–650. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000143197.93944.14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kujala S, Pajala A, Kallioinen M, et al. Biocompatibility and strength properties of nitinol shape memory alloy suture in rabbit tendon. Biomaterials Internet. 2004 [cited 2023 Jan 3];25(2):353–358. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00488-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verheye S, de Meyer GRY, Salu K, et al. Histopathologic evaluation of a novel-design nitinol stent: the biflex stent. Int J Cardiovasc Intervent Internet. 2004 [cited 2023 Jan 3];6(1):13–19. doi: 10.1080/14628840410030342
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olson JL, Velez-Montoya R, Erlanger M. Ocular biocompatibility of nitinol intraocular clips. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Internet. 2012 Jan [cited 2023 Jan 3];53(1):354–360. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11-8496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz LJ, Erb C, Carceller Guillamet A, et al. Long-term titrated IOP control with one, two, or three trabecular micro-bypass stents in open-angle glaucoma subjects on topical hypotensive medication: 42-month outcomes. Clin Ophthalmol Internet 2018 Jan 31[cited 2023 Jan 3];12:255–262. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S152268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camras LJ, Yuan F, Fan S. et al. A novel Schlemm’s canal scaffold increases outflow facility in a human anterior segment perfusion model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Internet. 2012 Sep [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 53(10); 6115–6121. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson DH, Johnson M, Camras C. How does nonpenetrating glaucoma surgery work? Aqueous outflow resistance and glaucoma surgery. J Glaucoma Internet. 2001 [cited 2023 Jan 3];10(1):55–67. doi: 10.1097/00061198-200102000-00011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays CL, Gulati V, Fan S, et al. Improvement in outflow facility by two novel microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Internet. 2014 [cited 2023 Jan 3];55(3):1893–1900. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit BA, Johnstone MA. Effects of viscoelastic injection into Schlemm’s canal in primate and human eyes: potential relevance to viscocanalostomy. Ophthalmol Internet. 2002 [[cited 2023 Jan 3]]; 109(4):786–792. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(01)01006-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grierson I, Saheb H, Kahook MY, et al. A novel Schlemm’s canal scaffold: histologic observations. J Glaucoma Internet. 2015 Aug 19 [cited 2023 Jan 3];24(6):460–468. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabalovskaya S, Anderegg J, van Humbeeck J. Critical overview of nitinol surfaces and their modifications for medical applications. Acta Biomater Internet. 2008 [[cited 2023 Jan 3]]; 4(3):447–467. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabalovskaya SA, Tian H, Anderegg JW, et al. The influence of surface oxides on the distribution and release of nickel from nitinol wires. Biomaterials Internet. 2009 Feb [[cited 2023 Jan 3]];30(4):468–477. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18996586/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulati V, Fan S, Hays CL, et al. A novel 8-mm Schlemm’s canal scaffold reduces outflow resistance in a human anterior segment perfusion model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Internet. 2013 [cited 2023 Jan 3];54(3):1698–1704. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-11373
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan F, Schieber AT, Camras LJ, et al. Mathematical modeling of outflow facility increase with trabecular meshwork bypass and Schlemm canal dilation. J Glaucoma Internet. 2016 [cited 2023 Jan 3];25(4):355–364. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche D, Nkrumah G, Ng C. Real-world efficacy of the Hydrus microstent in black and afro-latino patients with glaucoma: a retrospective study. Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 19;12:2515841420964311. doi: 10.1177/2515841420964311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fea AM, Rekas M, Au L. Evaluation of a Schlemm canal scaffold microstent combined with phacoemulsification in routine clinical practice: two-year multicenter study. J Cataract Refract Surg Internet. 2017 Jul 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 43(7):886–891. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2017.04.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavia C, Dallorto L, Maule M, et al. Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One Internet. 2017 Aug 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 12(8):e0183142. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahuja Y, Ma Khin Pyi S, Malihi M, et al. Clinical results of ab interno trabeculotomy using the trabectome for open-angle glaucoma: the mayo clinic series in Rochester, Minnesota. Am J Ophthalmol Internet. 2013 [cited 2023 Jan 3];156(5):927–935.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2013.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson TJ, Berdahl JP, Schweitzer JA, et al. Evaluation of a trabecular micro-bypass stent in pseudophakic patients with open-angle glaucoma. J Glaucoma Internet. 2016 Nov 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];25(11):896–900. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong MOM, Lee JWY, Choy BNK, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of selective laser trabeculoplasty in open-angle glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol Internet. 2015 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];60(1):36–50. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2014.06.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee GA, Porter AJ, Vincent RA, et al. Combined phacoemulsification and microinvasive glaucoma surgery in comparison to phacoemulsification alone for open angle glaucoma. Eye (Lond) Internet. 2020 Feb 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];34(2):312–318. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0459-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandolfi SA, Ungaro N, Ghirardini S, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes between Canaloplasty and Schlemm’s canal scaffold at 24 months’ follow-up. J Ophthalmol Internet. 2016 [cited 2023 Jan 3];2016:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2016/3410469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fea AM, Ahmed IIK, Lavia C, et al. Hydrus microstent compared to selective laser trabeculoplasty in primary open angle glaucoma: one year results. Clin Exp Ophthalmol Internet. 2017 Mar 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];45(2):120–127. doi; 10.1111/ceo.12805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Mugheiry TS, Cate H, Clark A, et al. Microinvasive glaucoma stent (MIGS) surgery with concomitant phakoemulsification cataract extraction: outcomes and the learning curve. J Glaucoma Internet. 2017 [cited 2023 Jan 3];26(7):646–651. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer N, Garcia-Feijoo J, Martinez-De-La-Casa JM, et al. A randomized trial of a Schlemm’s canal microstent with phacoemulsification for reducing intraocular pressure in open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmol [Internet]. 2015 Jul 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];122 7:1283–1293. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montesano G, Ometto G, Ahmed IIK, et al. Am J five-year visual field outcomes of the HORIZON trial. Ophthalmol. 2023 Jul;251:143–155. Epub 2023 Feb 21.PMID: 36813144 Free article. Clinical Trial. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2023.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zebardast N, Zheng C, Jampel HD. Effect of a Schlemm’s canal microstent on early postoperative intraocular pressure after cataract surgery: an analysis of the HORIZON randomized controlled trial. Ophthalmol Internet. 2020 Oct 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3]; 127(10):1303–1310. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.01.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed IIK, Fea A, Au L, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing Hydrus and iStent microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants for standalone treatment of open-angle glaucoma: the COMPARE study. Ophthalmol Internet. 2020 Jan 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];127(1):52–61. doi; 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes DP, Clement CI, Nguyen V, et al. Comparative study of 2-year outcomes for Hydrus or iStent inject microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants with cataract surgery. Clin Exp Ophthalmol Internet. 2022 Apr 1 [cited 2023 Jan 3];50(3):303–311. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu R, Guo D, Hong N, et al. Comparison of Hydrus and iStent microinvasive glaucoma surgery implants in combination with phacoemulsification for treatment of open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open Internet. 2022 Jun 15 [cited 2023 Jan 3];12(6):e051496. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fea AM, Consolandi G, Pignata G, et al. A comparison of endothelial cell loss in combined cataract and MIGS (Hydrus) procedure to phacoemulsification alone: 6-month results. J Ophthalmol Internet. 2015 [cited 2023 Jan 3];2015:1–5. doi: 10.1155/2015/769289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche D, Martin A, Brown A, et al. Mispositioned Hydrus microstents: a case series imaged with NIDEK GS-1 gonioscope. J Ophthalmol. 2022 Sep 8;2022:1605195. doi: 10.1155/2022/1605195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atik A, Rhodes LA, Samuels BC, et al. Cost utility of Schlemm’s canal microstent injection with cataract surgery for open-angle glaucoma in the US Medicare system. J Glaucoma. 2022 Jun 1;31(6):413–422. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001993
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ocuda M, Sotaro M, Fumio T, et al. Association of the prolonged use of antiglaucoma medications with the surgical failure of ab interno microhook trabeculotomy. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022;100(6):e1209–e1215. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35080795/.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar