Comparison of the HugeMed video laryngoscope with the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal tracheal intubation in children undergoing dental treatment: a randomized controlled clinical study

References

• Brambrink AM, Braun U. Airway management in infants and children. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005;19(4):675–697. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2005.07.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoo JY, Chae YJ, Lee YB, et al. A comparison of the Macintosh laryngoscope, McGrath video laryngoscope, and pentax airway scope in paediatric nasotracheal intubation. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):17365. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35857-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandes IB, Ramos-Jorge J, Coelho VS, et al. Association between different stages of dental caries in preschoolers and familial socioeconomic factors. Braz Oral Res. 2022;36:e018. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2022.vol36.0018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giraudon A, Bordes-Demolis M, Blondeau B, et al. Comparison of the McGrath® MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy for novice laryngoscopists in children without difficult intubation: a randomised controlled trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36(5):261–265. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato A, Sobue K, Kako E, et al. The usefulness of the McGrath MAC laryngoscope in comparison with Airwayscope and Macintosh laryngoscope during routine nasotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12871-017-0451-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee MC, Tseng KY, Shen YC, et al. Nasotracheal intubation in patients with limited mouth opening: a comparison between fibreoptic intubation and the Trachway®. Anaesthesia. 2016 Jan;71(1):31–38. doi: 10.1111/anae.13232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng KY, Lu IC, Shen YC, et al. A comparison of the video laryngoscopes with Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation. Asian J Anesthesiol. 2017;55(1):17–21. doi: 10.1016/j.aja.2017.05.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pascarella G, Caruso S, Antinolfi V, et al. The VL3 videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults: a prospective pilot study. Saudi J Anaesth. 2020;14(3):318–322. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_145_20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta N, Gupta A, Sarma R, et al. Video laryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in oromaxillofacial surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Korean J Anesth. 2021;74(5):439–448. doi: 10.4097/kja.21234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Ríos MÁ, Sastre JA, Onrubia-Fuertes X, et al. Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) Spanish Society of Emergency and Emergency Medicine (SEMES) and Spanish Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) Guideline for difficult airway management. Part I. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Eng Ed). 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2024.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Ríos MÁ, Sastre JA, Onrubia-Fuertes X, et al. Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR) Spanish Society of Emergency and Emergency Medicine (SEMES) and Spanish Society of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (SEORL-CCC) Guideline for difficult airway management. Part II. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Eng Ed). 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2024.02.002
   Google Scholar
• Shailaja S, Nichelle SM, Shetty AK, et al. Comparing ease of intubation in obese and lean patients using intubation difficulty scale. Anesth Essays Res. 2014;8(2):168–174. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.134493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holm-Knudsen RJ, Rasmussen LS. Paediatric airway management: basic aspects. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2009;53(1):1–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01794.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, et al. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(6):1290–1297. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikich N, Lerman J. Development and psychometric evaluation of the pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium scale. Anesthesiology. 2004;100(5):1138–1145. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200405000-00015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984;39(11):1105–1111. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb08932.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hur M, Kim JY, Min SK, et al. Comparison of McGrath video laryngoscope and Macintosh laryngoscope in children with torticollis: randomized controlled trial. Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 10;8(12):1171. doi: 10.3390/children8121171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean P, Edmunds K, Shah A, et al. Video laryngoscope screen visualization and tracheal intubation performance: a video-based study in a pediatric emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2022;79(4):323–332. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor AM, Peck M, Launcelott S, et al. The McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope vs the Macintosh laryngoscope: a randomised, controlled trial in patients with a simulated difficult airway. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(2):142–147. doi: 10.1111/anae.12075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Lu Y, Huang Y, et al. Pediatric video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscope: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pediatr Anesthesia. 2014;24(10):1056–1065. doi: 10.1111/pan.12458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appikonda I. Comparison of HugeMed® video laryngoscope and McCoy laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in patients with simulated cervical spine immobilization. Chennai: Stanley Medical College; 2021. p. eprint/15571.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JE, Kwak HJ, Jung WS, et al. A comparison between McGrath MAC videolaryngoscopy and Macintosh laryngoscopy in children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018;62(3):312–318. doi: 10.1111/aas.13043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi IK, Kwak HJ, Kim KM, et al. Comparison of pentax airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope for orotracheal intubation in children: a randomised non‐inferiority trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019;63(7):853–858. doi: 10.1111/aas.13368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karalapillai D, Darvall J, Mandeville J, et al. A review of video laryngoscopes relevant to the intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med Jul. 2014;18(7):442–452. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.136073
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peyton J, Park R, Staffa SJ, et al. A comparison of videolaryngoscopy using standard blades or non-standard blades in children in the paediatric difficult intubation registry. Br J Anaesth. 2021 Jan;126(1):331–339. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wünsch VA, Köhl V, Breitfeld P, et al. Hyperangulated blades or direct epiglottis lifting to optimize glottis visualization in difficult Macintosh videolaryngoscopy: a non-inferiority analysis of a prospective observational study. Front Med. 2023 Nov;30(10):1292056. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1292056
   Google Scholar
• Saul SA, Ward PA, McNarry AF. Airway management: The current role of videolaryngoscopy. J Pers Med. 2023;13(9):1327. doi: 10.3390/jpm13091327
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vareed GM, Korula SV, Menon GD, et al. Comparison between McGrath and Macintosh laryngoscopes as an educational tool for successful intubation by novice airway managers: a randomised cross-over manikin-based trial. Airway. 2021;4(3):168. doi: 10.4103/arwy.arwy_27_21
   Google Scholar
• Uchinami Y, Fujita N, Ando T, et al. The relationship between years of anesthesia experience and first-time intubation success rate with direct laryngoscope and video laryngoscope in infants: a retrospective observational study. J Anesth. 2022 Dec;36(6):707–714. doi: 10.1007/s00540-022-03106-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh GU, Kwak HJ, Lee KC, et al. Randomized comparison of McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope, and Macintosh direct laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in patients with manual in-line stabilization. Can J Anaesth. 2019 Oct;66(10):1213–1220. doi: 10.1007/s12630-019-01409-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho CH, Chen LC, Hsu WH, et al. A comparison of McGrath videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2499. doi: 10.3390/jcm11092499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengel N, Karabulut G, Kavuncuoğlu D, et al. Nasotracheal intubation performance with the McGrath videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope in oral and maxillofacial surgery-An observational study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2002;25(5):683. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_1923_21
   Google Scholar
• Efune PN, Saynhalath R, Blackwell JM, et al. The TruView PCD™ videolaryngoscope for nasotracheal intubation in pediatric patients: a subset analysis from a prospective randomized controlled trial. Pediatric Anesthesia. 2002;30(10):1157–1158. doi: 10.1111/pan.14005
   Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Kim JT, Kim HS, et al. A comparison of GlideScope® video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy for nasotracheal intubation in children. Pediatr Anesthesia. 2011;21(4):417–421. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03517.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keles S, Kocaturk O. Postoperative discomfort and emergence delirium in children undergoing dental rehabilitation under general anesthesia: comparison of nasal tracheal intubation and laryngeal mask airway. J Pain Res. 2018;11:103–110. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S153637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Boghdadly K, Bailey CR, Wiles MD. Postoperative sore throat: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(6):706–717. doi: 10.1111/anae.13438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones PM, Turkstra TP, Armstrong KP, et al. Comparison of a single-use GlideScope® Cobalt videolaryngoscope with a conventional GlideScope® for orotracheal intubation. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57(1):18–23. doi: 10.1007/s12630-009-9204-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar