Assessing nanomaterial exposures in aquatic ecotoxicological testing: Framework and case studies based on dispersion and dissolution

References

• Allen HJ, Impellitteri CA, Macke DA, Heckman JL, Poynton HC, Lazorchak JM, et al. 2010. Effects from filtration, capping agents, and presence/absence of food on the toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Daphnia magna. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2742–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2006. Standard terminology relating to nanotechnology. E2456-06. In: ASTM Standards on Environmental Sampling, Vol. 14.02; American Society for Testing and Materials: Conshohocken, PA, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Arndt DA, Moua M, Chen J, Klaper RD. 2013. Core structure and surface functionalization of carbon nanomaterials alter impacts to daphnid mortality, reproduction, and growth: acute assays do not predict chronic impacts. Environ Sci Technol 47:9444–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts JH, Hadi M, Irfan MA, Keene AM, Kreiling R, Lyon D, et al. 2015. A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 71:S1–S27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudrie CE, Satterfield T, Kandlikar M, Harthorn BH. 2013a. Expert views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies. PLoS One 8:e80250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaudrie CE, Kandlikar M, Satterfield T. 2013b. From cradle-to-grave at the nanoscale: gaps in US regulatory oversight along the nanomaterial life cycle. Environ Sci Technol 47:5524–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell IR, Ives JA, Jonas WB. 2014. Nonlinear effects of nanoparticles: biological variability from hormetic doses, small particle sizes, and dynamic adaptive interactions. Dose Response 12:202–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman JG, Kennedy AJ, Bednar AJ, Ranville JF, Laird JG, Harmon AR, et al. 2013. Comparing the effects of nanosilver size and coating variations on bioavailability, internalization, and elimination, using Lumbriculus variegatus. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:2069–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman JG, Kennedy AJ, Harmon AR. 2015. Environmental Consequences of Nanotechnologies: Nanoparticle Dispersion in Aqueous Media: SOP-T-1. ERDC/EL SR-15-2. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman JG, Kennedy AJ, Stanley JK, Rabalais L. 2017a. Environmental Consequences of Nanotechnologies: Sediment Spiking Methodologies for Nanomaterial Powders and Aqueous Suspensions for Aquatic Toxicity Bioassays: SOP-T-3. ERDC/EL SR-17-X. Vicksburg (MS): U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman J, Butler A, Harmon A, Kennedy A. 2017b. Environmental Consequences of Nanotechnologies Scientific Operating Procedure SOP-T-4: Soil Spiking Methodologies for Nanomaterials. ERDC/EL SR-17-X. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Coll C, Notter D, Gottschalk F, Sun T, Som C, Nowack B. 2016. Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes). Nanotoxicology 10:436–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier ZA, Kennedy AJ, Poda AR, Cuddy MF, Moser RD, MacCuspie RI, et al. 2015. Tiered guidance for risk-informed environmental health and safety testing of nanotechnologies. J Nano Res 17:155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond S, Utterback D, Andersen C, Burgess R, Hirano S, Ho K, et al. 2009. Review of OECD/OPPTS Harmonized and OECD Ecotoxicity Test Guidelines for Their Applicability to Manufactured Nanomaterials. Washington (DC): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Domingos RF, Baalousha M, Ju-Nam Y, Reid MM, Tufenkji N, Lead JR, et al. 2009. Characterizing manufactured nanoparticles in the environment: multimethod determination of particle sizes. Environ Sci Technol 43:7277–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Badawy AM, Luxton TP, Silva RG, Scheckel KG, Suidan MT, Tolaymat TM. 2010. Impact of environmental conditions (pH, ionic strength, and electrolyte type) on the surface charge and aggregation of silver nanoparticles suspensions. Environ Sci Technol 44:1260–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals. 1996. Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Sparingly Soluble, Volatile and Unstable Substances. ECETOC Monograph. Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Garner KL, Suh S, Lenihan HS, Keller AA. 2015. Species sensitivity distributions for engineered nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 49:5753–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin H, Nameth C, Avery D, Bergeson LL, Bernard D, Beryt E, et al. 2015. Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making. ACS Nano 9:3409–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffitt RJ, Luo J, Gao J, Bonzongo JC, Barber DS. 2008. Effects of particle composition and species on toxicity of metallic nanomaterials in aquatic organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1972–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handy RD, van den Brink N, Chappell M, Mühling M, Behra R, Dušinská M, et al. 2012. Practical considerations for conducting ecotoxicity test methods with manufactured nanomaterials: what have we learnt so far? Ecotoxicology 21:933–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen SF, Jensen KA, Baun A. 2014. NanoRiskCat: a conceptual tool for categorization and communication of exposure potentials and hazards of nanomaterials in consumer products. J Nano Res 16:2195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon AR, Kennedy AJ, Poda AR, Bednar AJ, Chappell MA, Steevens JA. 2014. Determination of nanosilver dissolution kinetics and toxicity in an environmentally relevant aqueous medium. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:1783–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendren CO, Lowry GV, Unrine JM, Wiesner MR. 2015. A functional assay-based strategy for nanomaterial risk forecasting. Sci Total Environ 536:1029–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoheisel SM, Diamond S, Mount D. 2012. Comparison of nanosilver and ionic silver toxicity in Daphnia magna and Pimephales promelas. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:2557–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden PA, Gardea-Torresdey J, Klaessig F, Turco RF, Mortimer M, Hund-Rinke K, et al. 2016. Considerations of environmentally relevant test conditions for improved evaluation of ecological hazards of engineered nanomaterials. Environ Sci Technol 50:6124–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hund-Rinke K, Herrchen M, Schlinch K, Schwirn K, Volker D. 2015. Test strategy for assessing the risks of nanomaterials in the environment considering general regulatory procedures. Environ Sci Eur 27:24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hund-Rinke K, Baun A, Cupi D, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Kinross JH, et al. 2016. Regulatory ecotoxicity testing of nanomaterials – proposed modifications of OECD test guidelines based on laboratory experience with silver and titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Nanotoxicology. 10:1442–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull MS, Kennedy AJ, Steevens JA, Bednar AJ, Weiss CA, Vikesland PJ. 2009. Release of metal impurities from carbon nanomaterials influences aquatic toxicity. Environ Sci Technol 43:4169–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull M, Kennedy AJ, Detzel C, Vikesland PJ, Chappell MA. 2012. Moving beyond mass: the unmet need to consider dose metrics in environmental nanotoxicology studies. Environ Sci Technol 46:10881–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnel J. 2015. Conceptual questions and challenges associated with the traditional risk assessment paradigm for nanomaterials. Nanoethics 9:261–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy AJ, Hull MS, Steevens JA, Dontsova KM, Chappell MA, Gunter JC, Weiss CA. 2008. Factors influencing the partitioning and toxicity of nanotubes in the aquatic environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1932–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy AJ, Chappell MA, Bednar AJ, Ryan AC, Laird JG, Stanley JK, Steevens JA. 2012. Impact of organic carbon on the stability and toxicity of fresh and stored silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 46:10772–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy AJ, Lotufo GR, Steevens JA. 2015a. Review of Dredged Elutriate Application Factors: Relevance to Acute-to-Chronic Protection, Contaminant, and Endpoint Specificity. ERDC/EL TR-15-10. Vicksburg (MS): U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy AJ, Hull MS, Diamond S, Chappell MA, Bednar AJ, Laird JG, et al. 2015b. Gaining a critical mass: a dose metric conversion case study using silver nanoparticles. Environ Sci Technol 49:12490–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaine SJ, Alvarez P, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD, Lyon DY, et al. 2008. Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27:1825–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Wallis LK, Diamond SA, Ma H, Hoff DJ. 2014. Species sensitivity and dependence on exposure conditions impacting the phototoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles to benthic organisms. Environ Toxicol Chem 33:1563–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Hurt RH. 2010. Ion release kinetics and particle persistence in aqueous nano-silver colloids. Environ Sci Technol 44:2169–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry GV, Gregory KB, Apte SC, Lead JR. 2012. Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 46:6893–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma H, Brennan A, Diamond SA. 2012. Phototoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles under solar radiation to two aquatic species: Daphnia magna and Japanese medaka. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:1621–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCuspie RI, Allen AJ, Martin MN, Hackley VA. 2013. Just add water: reproducible single dispersed silver nanoparticle suspensions on-demand. J Nano Res 15:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackevica A, Skjolding LM, Gergs A, Palmqvist A, Baun A. 2015. Chronic toxicity of silver nanoparticles to Daphnia magna under different feeding conditions. Aquat Toxicol 161:10–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2000. Guidance Document on Aquatic Toxicity Testing of Difficult 1106 Substances and Mixtures. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2012. Test No. 211: Daphnia magna Reproduction Test. Paris, France: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2016. Categorisation of Manufactured Nanomaterials. Workshop Report. Series on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials, No. 66. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=env/jm/mono(2016)9&doclanguage=en.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen EJ, Diamond SA, Kennedy AJ, Goss GG, Ho K, Lead JR, et al. 2015. Adapting OECD aquatic toxicity tests for use with manufactured nanomaterials: key issues and consensus recommendations. Environ Sci Technol 49:9532–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poda AR, Bednar AJ, Kennedy AJ, Harmon A, Hull M, Mitrano DM, et al. 2011. Characterization of silver nanoparticles using flow-field flow fractionation interfaces to inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy. J Chromatogr A 1218:4219–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potthoff A, Weil M, Meiβner T, Kühnel D. 2015. Towards sensible toxicity testing for nanomaterials: proposal for the specification of test design. Sci Technol Adv Mater 16:065006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer I, White TA, Baalousha M, Chipman K, Viant MR, Lead JR. 2011. Aggregation and dispersion of silver nanoparticles in exposure media for aquatic toxicity tests. J Chromatogr A 1218:4226–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saleh NB, Nabiul Afrooz ARM, Bisesi JH, Aich N, Plaza-Tuttle J, Sabo-Attwood T. 2014. Emergent properties and toxicological considerations for nanohybrid materials in aquatic systems. Nanomaterials 4:372–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taurozzi JS, Hackley VA, Wiesner MR. 2011. Preparation of a nanoscale TiO2 aqueous dispersion for toxicological or environmental testing Ver. 1.1. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1200-3
   Google Scholar
• Taurozzi JS, Hackley VA, Wiesner MR. 2013. A standardised approach for the dispersion of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in biological media. Nanotoxicology 7:389–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tejamaya M, Romer I, Merrifield RC, Lead JR. 2012. Stability of citrate, PVP, and PEG coated silver nanoparticles in ecotoxicology media. Environ Sci Technol 46:7011–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1996. Ecological Effects Test Guidelines: OPPTS 850.1000 Special Considerations for Conducting Aquatic Laboratory Studies. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances (7101). EPA 712–C–96–113. Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2002a. Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater and Marine Organisms, 4th ed. EPA-821-R-02-012, Washington (DC): Office of Water.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency. 2002b. Short-Term Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms, 4th ed. EPA 821/R-02/013. Washington (DC): Office of Water, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA)/Army Corps of Engineers (ACE). 1998. Evaluation of Material Proposed for Discharge to Waters of the US Testing Manual (Inland Testing Manual). EPA/823/B-98/004. Washington (DC): US Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar