Probabilistic risk assessment of emerging materials: case study of titanium dioxide nanoparticles

References

• Agrios AG, Pichat P. 2005. State of the art and perspectives on materials and applications of photocatalysis over TiO2. J Appl Electrochem 35:655–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen BC, Kavlock RJ, Kimmel CA, Faustman EM. 1994. Dose-response assessment for developmental toxicity: II. Comparison of generic benchmark dose estimates with no observed adverse effect levels. Toxicol Sci 23:487–95.
   Google Scholar
• Arts JHE, Hadi M, Irfan MA, Keene AM, Kreiling R, Lyon D, et al. 2015. A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 71:S1–S27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auffan M, Rose J, Bottero JY, Lowry GV, Jolivet JP, Wiesner MR. 2009. Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat Nanotechnol 4:634–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach S, Schmidt E. 2008. Determining the dustiness of powders-a comparison of three measuring devices. Ann Occup Hyg 52:717–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow S, et al. (European Food Safety Authority) 2009. Guidance of the scientific committee on a request from EFSA on the use of the benchmark dose approach in risk assessment. EFSA J 1150:1–72.
   Google Scholar
• Bermudez E, Mangum JB, Asgharian B, Wong BA, Reverdy EE, Janszen DB, et al. 2002. Long-term pulmonary responses of three laboratory rodent species to subchronic inhalation of pigmentary titanium dioxide particles. Toxicol Sci 70:86–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bermudez E, Mangum JB, Wong BA, Asgharian B, Hext PM, Warheit DB, Everitt JI. 2004. Pulmonary responses of mice, rats, and hamsters to subchronic inhalation of ultrafine titanium dioxide particles. Toxicol Sci 77:347–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breum NO. 1999. The rotating drum dustiness tester: variability in dustiness in relation to sample mass, testing time, and surface adhesion. Ann Occup Hyg 43:557–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer DH, Duuren-Stuurman B, Berges M, Bard D, Jankowska E, Moehlmann C, Pelzer J, Mark D. 2013. Workplace air measurements and likelihood of exposure to manufactured nano-objects, agglomerates, and aggregates. J Nanopart Res 15:2090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer DH, Links IHM, De Vreede SAF, Christopher Y. 2006. Size selective dustiness and exposure; simulated workplace comparisons. Ann Occup Hyg 50:445–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Mao SS. 2007. Titanium dioxide nanomaterials: synthesis, properties, modifications and applications. Chem Rev 107:2891–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherrie JW. 1999. The effect of room size and general ventilation on the relationship between near and far-field concentrations. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 14:539–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung KY, Burdett GJ. 1994. Dustiness testing and moving towards a biologically relevant dustiness index. Ann Occup Hyg 38:945–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crump KS. 1984. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundam Appl Toxicol 4:854–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crump KS. 1995. Calculation of benchmark doses from continuous data. Risk Anal 15:79–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen RT, Stone V, Wilson M, Donaldson K. 2002. Toxicity of volcanic ash from Montserrat. Occup Environ Med. Available from: http://www.iom-world.org/pubs/IOM_TM0201.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Czajka M, Sawicki K, Sikorska K, Popek S, Kruszewski M, Kapka-Skrzypczak L. 2015. Toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles in central nervous system. Toxicol In Vitro 29:1042–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis JA, Gift JS, Zhao QJ. 2011. Introduction to benchmark dose methods and U.S. EPA's benchmark dose software (BMDS) version 2.1.1. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 254:181–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson K, Poland CA. 2013. Nanotoxicity: challenging the myth of nano-specific toxicity. Curr Opin Biotechnol 24:724–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency. 2012. Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose[concentration]-response for human health. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Commission recommendation on the definition of nanomaterial. Off J Eur Union L 38–40. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/policy/commission-recommendation-on-the-definition-of-nanomater-18102011_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2012. Second regulatory review on nanomaterials. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2013. EN 15051 Workplace exposure. Measurement of the dustiness of bulk materials. Requirements and choice of test methods.
   Google Scholar
• European Food Safety Authority. 2009. The Potential Risks Arising from Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies on Food and Feed Safety. The EFSA Journal 958, (European Food Safety Authority).
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca AS, Maragkidou A, Viana M, Querol X, Hämeri K, de Francisco I, et al. 2016. Process-generated nanoparticles from ceramic tile sintering: emissions, exposure and environmental release. Sci Total Environ 565:922–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fransman W, Van Tongeren M, Cherrie JW, Tischer M, Schneider T, Schinkel J, et al. 2011. Advanced reach tool (ART): Development of the mechanistic model. Ann Occup Hyg 55:957–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganser GH, Hewett P. 2017. Models for nearly every occasion: Part II – Two box models. J Occup Environ Hyg 14:58–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global and China Titanium Dioxide Industry Report, 2014–2017. 2015. Available at: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/global-and-china-titanium-dioxide-industry-report-2014-2017-300077141.html
   Google Scholar
• Grassian VH, Haes AJ, Mudunkotuwa IA, Demokritou P, Kane AB, Murphy CJ, et al. 2016. NanoEHS – defining fundamental science needs: no easy feat when the simple itself is complex. Environ Sci Nano 3:15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greßler S, Nentwich M. 2012. Nano and Environment–Part II: Hazard potentials and risks. Nano Trust Dossiers 27:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich U, Fuhst R, Rittinghausen S, Creutzenberg O, Bellmann B, Koch W, Levsen K. 1995. Chronic inhalation exposure of Wistar rats and two different strains of mice to diesel engine exhaust, carbon black, and titanium dioxide. Inhal Toxicol 7:533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hext PM, Tomenson JA, Thompson P. 2005. Titanium dioxide: inhalation toxicology and epidemiology. Ann Occup Hyg 49:461–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds WC. 1999. Aerosol Technology: Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
   Google Scholar
• Iavicoli I, Leso V, Bergamaschi A. 2012. Toxicological effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of in vivo studies. J Nanomater 2012:Article ID 964381. doi: 10.1155/2012/964381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager T, Vermeire TG, Rikken MGJ, Van der Poel P. 2001. Opportunities for a probabilistic risk assessment of chemicals in the European Union. Chemosphere 43:257–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayjock MA, Armstrong T, Taylor M. 2011. The Daubert Standard as applied to exposure assessment modeling using the two-zone (NF/FF) model estimation of indoor air breathing zone concentration as an example. J Occup Environ Hyg 8:D114–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto AJ, Aromaa M, Mäkelä JM, Pasanen P, Hussein T, Hämeri K. 2012. Concept to estimate regional inhalation dose of industrially synthesized nanoparticles. ACS Nano 6:1195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto AJ, Lyyränen J, Auvinen A, Vanhala E, Hämeri K, Tuomi T, Jokiniemi J. 2012. Industrial worker exposure to airborne particles during the packing of pigment and nanoscale titanium dioxide. Inhal Toxicol 24:839–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto AJ, Palomäki JE, Viitanen AK, Siivola KM, Koponen IK, Yu M, et al. 2014. Range-finding risk assessment of inhalation exposure to nanodiamonds in a laboratory environment. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:5382–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto AJ, Jensen AC, Levin M, Kling KI, Maso MD, Nielsen SH, Jensen KA, Koponen IK. 2015. Testing the near field/far field model performance for prediction of particulate matter emissions in a paint factory. Environ Sci Process Impacts 17:62–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto AJ, Aromaa M, Koponen IK, Fransman W, Jensen KA, Mäkelä JM, Hämeri KJ. 2015. Workplace performance of a loose-fitting powered air purifying respirator during nanoparticle synthesis. J Nanopart Res 17:177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee KP, Trochimowicz HJ, Reinhardt CF. 1985. Pulmonary response of rats exposed to titanium dioxide (TiO2) by inhalation for two years Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 79:179–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeuwen CJ, Vermeire TG. 2007. Risk Assessment of Chemicals: An Introduction. Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-6102-8
   Google Scholar
• Levin M, Rojas E, Vanhala E, Vippola M, Liguori B, Kling KI, Koponen IK, et al. 2015. Influence of relative humidity and physical load during storage on dustiness of inorganic nanomaterials: implications for testing and risk assessment. J Nanopart Res 17:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin M, et al. 2015. Limitations in the use of unipolar charging for electrical mobility sizing instruments: a study of the fast mobility particle sizer. Aerosol Sci Technol 49:556–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin M, et al. 2016. Can we trust real time measurements of lung deposited surface area concentrations in dust from powder nanomaterials? Aerosol Air Qual Res 16:1105–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori B, Jensen ACØ, Hansen SF, Baun A, Jensen KA. 2016. Sensitivity Analysis of the exposure assessment module in NanoSafer version 1.1: Ranking of Determining Parameters and Uncertainty. unpublished work.
   Google Scholar
• Limpert E, Stahel W. a, Abbt M. 2001. Log-normal Distributions across the Sciences: Keys and Clues. Bioscience 51:341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhle H, Bellmann B, Creutzenberg O, Dasenbrock C, Ernst H, Kilpper R, et al. 1991. Pulmonary response to toner upon chronic inhalation exposure in rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol 17:280–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 2011. Current Intelligence Bulletin 63: Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide.
   Google Scholar
• Noël A, Truchon G. 2015. Inhaled titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of their pulmonary responses with particular focus on the agglomeration state. Nano Life 5:1450008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberdorster G, Ferin J, Lehnert BE. 1994. Correlation between particle size, in vivo particle persistence, and lung injury. Environ Health Perspect 102:173–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden T. 2006. Annals of occupational hygiene at volume 50: many achievements, a few mistakes, and an interesting future. Ann Occup Hyg 50:751–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2009. Co-operation on risk assessment: Prioritization of important issues on risk assessment of manufactured nanomaterials (Final Report). Development 33.
   Google Scholar
• Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2012. Inhalation toxicity testing: expert meeting on potential revisions to OECD test guidelines and guidance document.
   Google Scholar
• Pietroiusti A. 2012. Health implications of engineered nanomaterials. Nanoscale 4:1231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robichaud CO, Uyar AE, Darby MR, Zucker LG, Wiesner MR. 2009. Estimates of Upper Bounds and Trends in nano-TiO2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 43:4227–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi EM, et al. 2009. Airway exposure to silica-coated TiO2 nanoparticles induces pulmonary neutrophilia in mice. Toxicol Sci 113:422–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering. 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties. Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies Opportunities and Uncertainties (Royal Society).
   Google Scholar
• Schneider T, Brouwer DH, Koponen IK, Jensen KA, Fransman W, Van Duuren-Stuurman B, et al. 2011. Conceptual model for assessment of inhalation exposure to manufactured nanoparticles. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21:450–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider T, Jensen KA. 2008. Combined single-drop and rotating drum dustiness test of fine to nanosize powders using a small drum. Ann Occup Hyg 52:23–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakeel M, Jabeen F, Shabbir S, Asghar MS, Khan MS, Chaudhry AS. 2016. Toxicity of nano-titanium dioxide (TiO2-NP) through various routes of exposure: a review. Biol Trace Elem Res 172:1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi H, Magaye R, Castranova V, Zhao J. 2013. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: a review of current toxicological data. Part Fibre Toxicol 10:15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz M. 2007. Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar. J Med Libr Assoc 95:442–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simko M, Nosske D, Kreyling WG. 2014. Metrics, dose, and dose concept: The need for a proper dose concept in the risk assessment of nanoparticles. Int J Environ Res Public Health 11:4026–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slob W, Bakker MI, Biesebeek JD, Te Bokkers BGH. 2014. Exploring the uncertainties in cancer risk assessment using the integrated probabilistic risk assessment (IPRA) approach. Risk Anal 34:1401–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slob W, Pieters MN. 1998. A probabilistic approach for deriving acceptable human intake limits and human health risks from toxicological studies: general framework. Risk Anal 18:787–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone V, Pozzi-Mucelli S, Tran L, Aschberger K, Sabella S, Vogel U, et al. 2014. ITS-NANO-prioritising nanosafety research to develop a stakeholder driven intelligent testing strategy. Part Fibre Toxicol 11:9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Netherlands’ National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM). 2015. PROAST.
   Google Scholar
• The Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies. 2015. The Nanotechnology Consumer Products Inventory. Available at: http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi/
   Google Scholar
• Tran CL, Cullen RT, Buchanan D, Jones AD, Miller BG, Searl A, Davis JMG. 1999. Investigation and prediction of pulmonary responses to dust. Available at: http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/1999/crr99216b.pdf
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Geological Survey. 2012. 2012 Minerals Yearbook – Titanium. Available at: http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/titanium/myb1-2012-titan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vance ME, Kuiken T, Vejerano EP, McGinnis SP, Hochella MF, Rejeski D, Hull MS. 2015. Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory. Beilstein J Nanotechnol 6:1769–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varner KE, Rindfusz K, Gaglione A, Viveiros E. 2010. Nano Titanium Dioxide Environmental Matters: State of the Science Literature Review. Available at: <http://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_file_download.cfm?p_download_id =498019>
   Google Scholar
• Vincent JH. 1995. Aerosol Science for Industrial Hygienists. Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Yokel RA, MacPhail RC. 2011. Engineered nanomaterials: exposures, hazards, and risk prevention. J Occup Med Toxicol 6:7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li W, Yang Z. 2015. Toxicology of nanosized titanium dioxide: an update. Arch Toxicol 89:2207–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Banerjee S, Yang R, Lungu C, Ramachandran G. 2009. Bayesian modeling of exposure and airflow using two-zone models. Ann Occup Hyg 53:409–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar