Grouping of nanomaterials to read-across hazard endpoints: a review

References

• ANSES. 2010. Development of a control banding tool for nanomaterials (No. 2008-SA-0407), Expert Committee (CES) on Physical Agents, Control Banding.
   Google Scholar
• Araki, D., R. Bose, Q. Chaudhry, K. Dewan, and E. Dufour. 2013. Report of the ICCR Working Group: Safety Approaches to Nanomaterials in Cosmetics (No. ICCR/NANOSAFETY1/R/FINAL/) US FDA: International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulation (ICCR). https://www.iccr-cosmetics.org/topics/.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, J., M. Hadi, M.A. Irfan, A. M. Keene, R. Kreiling, D. Lyon, M. Maier, et al., 2015. “A Decision-Making Framework for the Grouping and Testing of Nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping).” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 71 (2): S1–S27. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, J. H. E., M. Hadi, M. A. Irfan, A. M. Keene, R. Kreiling, D. Lyon, M. Maier, et al., 2016. “Case Studies Putting the Decision-Making Framework for the Grouping and Testing of Nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping) into Practice.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 76: 234–261. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.03.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, J. H. E., M. Hadi, A. M. Keene, R. Kreiling, D. Lyon, M. Maier, K. Michel, et al., 2014. “A Critical Appraisal of Existing Concepts for the Grouping of Nanomaterials.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 70 (2): 492–506. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.07.025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BAuA. 2013. Announcements on hazardous substances - manufactured nanomaterials - announcement 527 [WWW Document]. http://www.baua.de/en/Topics-from-A-to-Z/Hazardous-Substances/TRGS/Announcement-527.html;jsessionid=5208C23A837B260D7B2F355EBF9ED81E.1_cid353
   Google Scholar
• Bove, P., M. A. Malvindi, S. S. Kote, R. Bertorelli, M. Summa, and S. Sabella. 2017. “Dissolution Test for Risk Assessment of Nanoparticles: A Pilot Study.” Nanoscale 9 (19): 6315–6326. doi:10.1039/C6NR08131B.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Standards Institution. 2007. Nanotechnologies – Part 2: Guide to safe handling and disposal of manufactured nanomaterials (No. 71.100.99), ICS 13.100. London, UK: British Standards Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., W. Peijnenburg, Y. Xiao, and M. Vijver. 2017. “Current Knowledge on the Use of Computational Toxicology in Hazard Assessment of Metallic Engineered Nanomaterials.” International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18 (7): 1504. doi:10.3390/ijms18071504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., J. Qiao, R. Bai, Y. Zhao, and C. Chen. 2018. Intelligent testing strategy and analytical techniques for the safety assessment of nanomaterials. Anal Bioanal Chem. doi: 10.1007/s00216-018-0940-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, R., Y. Zhang, F. D. Sahneh, C. M. Scoglio, W. Wohlleben, A. Haase, N. A. Monteiro-Riviere, and J. E. Riviere. 2014. “Nanoparticle Surface Characterization and Clustering through Concentration-Dependent Surface Adsorption Modeling.” ACS Nano 8 (9): 9446–9456. doi:10.1021/nn503573s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, A., R. Bradford, N. Buck, A. Constable, G. Edwards, B. Haber, P. Hepburn, et al., 2012. “Approaches to the Safety Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials (ENM) in Food.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 50 (6): 2224–2242. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.12.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, I. R., F. Jongeneelen, P. Broekhuizen, and F. V. Van, Broekhuizen. 2011. Guidance working safely with nanomaterials and nanoproducts, the guide for employers and employees [WWW Document]. http://www.etui.org/content/download/3553/39999/file/Guidance+on+safe+handling+nanomats&products.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dekkers, S., A. G. Oomen, E. A. J. Bleeker, R. J. Vandebriel, C. Micheletti, J. Cabellos, G. Janer, et al., 2016. “Towards a Nanospecific Approach for Risk Assessment.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 80: 46–59. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.05.037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drew, N. M., E. D. Kuempel, Y. Pei, and F. Yang. 2017. “A Quantitative Framework to Group Nanoscale and Microscale Particles by Hazard Potency to Derive Occupational Exposure Limits: Proof of Concept Evaluation.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 89: 253–267. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECHA. 2013a. Human Health and Environmental Exposure Assessment and Risk Characterisation of Nanomaterials Best Practice for REACH Registrants, Third GAARN Meeting. Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• ECHA. 2013b. Assessing Human Health and Environmental Hazards of Nanomaterials- Best Practice for REACH Registrants, Second GAARN Meeting. Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• ECHA. 2017. Appendix R. 6–1: Recommendations for Nanomaterials Applicable to the Guidance on QSARs and Grouping, Version 01. Helsinki. https://doi.org/10.2823/884050.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA Scientific Committee. 2011. “Guidance on the Risk Assessment of the Application of Nanoscience and Nanotechnologies in the Food and Feed Chain.” EFSA Journal 9 (5): 2140–2136. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2140..
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council. 2006. Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/4, Official Journal of the European Union. Official Journal of the European Union, EC, EC. https://doi.org/http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:396:0001:0849:EN:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Fortino, V., and D. Grevo. 2017. Molecular Signatures and the Computational Classifier Capable to Predict ENM Safety (No. Nanosolutions D11.3), NANOSOLUTIONS. Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Gajewicz, A., M. T. Cronin, B. Rasulev, J. Leszczynski, and T. Puzyn. 2015. “Novel Approach for Efficient Predictions Properties of Large Pool of Nanomaterials Based on Limited Set of Species: Nano-Read-across.” Nanotechnology 26 (1): 015701. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/26/1/015701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajewicz, A., T. Puzyn, K. Odziomek, P. Urbaszek, A. Haase, C. Riebeling, A. Luch, et al., 2018. “Decision Tree Models to Classify Nanomaterials according to the DF4nanoGrouping Scheme.” Nanotoxicology 12 (1): 1–17. doi:10.1080/17435390.2017.1415388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebel, T., H. Foth, G. Damm, A. Freyberger, P. J. Kramer, W. Lilienblum, C. Röhl, et al., 2014. “Manufactured Nanomaterials: Categorization and Approaches to Hazard Assessment.” Archives of Toxicology 88 (12): 2191–2211. doi:10.1007/s00204-014-1383-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, S., T. Xia, R. Rallo, Y. Zhao, Z. Ji, S. Lin, X. Wang, et al., 2011. “Use of a High-Throughput Screening Approach Coupled with in Vivo Zebrafish Embryo Screening to Develop Hazard Ranking for Engineered Nanomaterials.” ACS Nano 5 (3): 1805–1817. doi:10.1021/nn102734s.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godwin, H., C. Nameth, D. Avery, L. L. Bergeson, D. Bernard, E. Beryt, W. Boyes, et al., 2015. “Nanomaterial Categorization for Assessing Risk Potential to Facilitate Regulatory Decision-Making.” ACS Nano 9 (4): 3409. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b00941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guichard, Y., J. Schmit, C. Darne, L. Gaté, M. Goutet, D. Rousset, O. Rastoix, et al., 2012. “Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Nanosized and Microsized Titanium Dioxide and Iron Oxide Particles in Syrian Hamster Embryo Cells.” The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 56: 631–644. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mes006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. F., K. A. Jensen, and A. Baun. 2014. “NanoRiskCat: A Conceptual Tool for Categorization and Communication of Exposure Potentials and Hazards of Nanomaterials in Consumer Products.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 16 (1): 2195. doi:10.1007/s11051-013-2195-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. F., B. H. Larsen, S. I. Olsen, and A. Baun. 2007. “Categorization Framework to Aid Hazard Identification of Nanomaterials.” Nanotoxicology 1 (3): 243–250. doi:10.1080/17435390701727509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, A., Benford, D. Halldorsson, T. Jeger, M. J. Knutsen, H. K. More, S. Naegeli, H. Noteborn, H. Ockleford, C. Ricci. A. et al., and M. 2017. “Guidance on the Use of the Weight of Evidence Approach in Scientific Assessments.” EFSA Journal 15 (8) doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höck, J., T. Epprecht, H. Hofmann, K. Höhner, H. Krug, C. Lorenz, L. Limbach, et al., 2013. Guidelines on the Precautionary Matrix for Synthetic Nanomaterials, Version 3. Köniz, Switzerland: Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH).
   Google Scholar
• Hund-Rinke, K., K. Schlich, D. Kühnel, B. Hellack, H. Kaminski, and C. Nickel. 2018. “Grouping Concept for Metal and Metal Oxide Nanomaterials with Regard to Their Ecotoxicological Effects on Algae, Daphnids and Fish Embryos.” NanoImpact 9: 52–60. doi:10.1016/j.impact.2017.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jantunen, P., S. Gottardo, and H. Crutzen. 2017. “NANoREG Toolbox for the Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials [WWW Document].” European Commission, Joint Research Centre Dataset. http://data.europa.eu/89h/jrc-nano-ehs-ring-nanoreg-tb
   Google Scholar
• Jeliazkova, N., C. Chomenidis, P. Doganis, B. Fadeel, R. Grafström, B. Hardy, J. Hastings, et al., 2015. “The eNanoMapper Database for Nanomaterial Safety Information.” Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 6: 1609–1634. doi:10.3762/bjnano.6.165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, K. A, A. T. Saber, H. V. Kristensen, B. Liguori, A. CØ. Jensen, I. K. Koponen, and H. Wallin. 2014. NanoSafer vs. 1. 1 Nanomaterial Risk Assessment Using First Order Modeling. Japan: Nagoya.
   Google Scholar
• Kuempel, E. D., V. Castranova, C. L. Geraci, and P. A Schulte. 2012. “Development of Risk-Based Nanomaterial Groups for Occupational Exposure Control.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 14 (9):1029. doi:10.1007/s11051-012-1029-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamon, L., D. Asturiol, A. Richarz, E. Joossens, R. Graepel, K. Aschberger, and A. Worth. 2018. “Grouping of Nanomaterials to Read-across Hazard Endpoints: From Data Collection to Assessment of the Grouping Hypothesis by Application of Chemoinformatic Techniques.” Particle and Fibre Toxicology 15(1): 37. doi: 10.1186/s12989-018-0273-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liguori, B., S. F. Hansen, A. Baun, and K. A. Jensen. 2016. “Control Banding Tools for Occupational Exposure Assessment of Nanomaterials - Ready for Use in a Regulatory Context?” NanoImpact 2: 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.impact.2016.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R., H. H. Liu, Z. Ji, C. H. Chang, T. Xia, A. E. Nel, and Y. Cohen. 2015. “Evaluation of Toxicity Ranking for Metal Oxide Nanoparticles via an in Vitro Dosimetry Model.” ACS Nano 9 (9): 9303–9313. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b04420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchese Robinson, R. L., I. Lynch, W. Peijnenburg, J. Rumble, F. Klaessig, C. Marquardt, H. Rauscher, et al., 2016. “How Should the Completeness and Quality of Curated Nanomaterial Data Be Evaluated?” Nanoscale 8 (19): 9919. doi:10.1039/C5NR08944A.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin, H. J. P., Y. Bouzembrak, E. M. Janssen, M. van der Zande, F. Murphy, B. Sheehan, M. Mullins, and H. Bouwmeester. 2017. “Application of Bayesian Networks for Hazard Ranking of Nanomaterials to Support Human Health Risk Assessment.” Nanotoxicology 11 (1): 123–133. doi:10.1080/17435390.2016.1278481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mast, J., and P. J. De Temmerman. 2016. Protocol(s) for Size-distribution Analysis of Primary NM Particles in Air, Powders, and Liquids (No. D2.10). JG Den Haag, Netherlands: NANoREG.
   Google Scholar
• NANOSOLUTIONS. 2017. Nanosolutions Final Report: Final Publishable Summary Report. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. http://nanosolutionsfp7.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Final-report-v5-240517-website.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nel, A., T. Xia, H. Meng, X. Wang, S. Lin, Z. Ji, and H. Zhang. 2013. “Nanomaterial Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: Use of a Predictive Toxicological Approach and High-Throughput Screening.” Accounts of Chemical Research 46 (3): 607–621. doi:10.1021/ar300022h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIH. 2014. Nanomaterial registry [WWW document]. Accessed 26 June 2015. Database. https://www.healthdata.gov/dataset/nanomaterial-registry
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2009. Preliminary Review of OECD Test Guidelines for their Applicability to Manufactured Nanomaterials, Series on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2014. Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals. 2nd ed. Series on Testing and Assessment No. 194 (No. ENV/JM/MONO(2014)4), Series on Testing & Assessment. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. Titanium Dioxide Dossier (NM100-NM105) (No. ENV/CHEM/NANO(2015)21/Part 1 to 5), Working Party on Manufactured Nanomaterials. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. Case Study on the Use of Integrated Approaches for Testing and Assessment on Grouping and Read-across for Nanomaterials - genotoxicity of Nano-TiO2 (No. ENV/JM/MONO(2018)), Series on Testing & Assessment. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Oomen, A., E. Bleeker, P. Bos, F. Broekhuizen, van, S. Gottardo, M. Groenewold, D. Hristozov, et al., 2015. “Grouping and Read-across Approaches for Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12 (10): 13415. doi:10.3390/ijerph121013415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomen, A. G., P. M. J. Bos, T. F. Fernandes, K. Hund-Rinke, D. Boraschi, H. J. Byrne, K. Aschberger, et al., 2014. “Concern-Driven Integrated Approaches to Nanomaterial Testing and Assessment–Report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10.” Nanotoxicology 8 (3): 334–348. doi:10.3109/17435390.2013.802387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oomen, A. G., K. G. Steinhäuser, E. A. J. Bleeker, F. van Broekhuizen, A. Sips, S. Dekkers, S. W. P. Wijnhoven, and P. G. Sayre. 2018. “Risk Assessment Frameworks for Nanomaterials: Scope, Link to Regulations, Applicability, and Outline for Future Directions in View of Needed Increase in Efficiency.” NanoImpact 9: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.impact.2017.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oosterwijk, M. T., M. L. Feber, and E. Burello. 2016. “Proposal for a Risk Banding Framework for Inhaled Low Aspect Ratio Nanoparticles Based on Physicochemical Properties.” Nanotoxicology 10 (6): 780–793. doi:10.3109/17435390.2015.1132344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik, S. Y., D. M. Zalk, and P. Swuste. 2008. “Application of a Pilot Control Banding Tool for Risk Level Assessment and Control of Nanoparticle Exposures.” The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 52: 419–28. doi:10.1093/annhyg/men041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, K., H. Rauscher, A. Mech, J. Riego Sintes, D. Gilliland, M. González, P. Kearns, 2018. “Physico-Chemical Properties of Manufactured Nanomaterials - Characterisation and Relevant Methods. An Outlook Based on the OECD Testing Programme.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 92: 8–28. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.10.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RCC. 2013a. Nanotechnology Initiative Work Element 2, Priority Setting: Development of a Joint Nanomaterials Classification Scheme, Nanotechnology Initiative. Ottawa, Canada: Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC). Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada.
   Google Scholar
• RCC. 2013b. Nanotechnology Initiative Work Element 3: Risk Assessment/Risk Management, Nanotechnology Initiative. Ottawa, Canada: Regulatory Cooperation Council (RCC). Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Riediker, M., C. Ostiguy, J. Triolet, P. Troisfontaine, D. Vernez, G. Bourdel, N. Thieriet, and A. Cadène. 2012. Development of a Control Banding Tool for Nanomaterials. Journal of Nanomaterials, 2:879671. doi:10.1155/2012/879671.
   Google Scholar
• RIVM, JRC, ECHA. 2016. Usage of (eco)toxicological data for bridging data gaps between and grouping of nanoforms of the same substance. Elements to Consider. doi:10.2823/982046.
   Google Scholar
• Schröder, K., C. Pohlenz-Michel, N. Simetska, J. U. Voss, S. Escher, and I. Mangersdorf. 2014. Carcinogenicity and Mutagenicity of Nanoparticles – Assessment of Current Knowledge as Basis for Regulation. Hannover.
   Google Scholar
• Scott-Fordsmand, J. J., M. J. B. Amorim, and P. B. Sørensen. 2018. “Implementing the DF4 in a Robust Model, Allowing for Enhanced Comparison, Prioritisation and Grouping of Nanomaterials.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 92: 207–212. doi:10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.12.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers, K., N. Deleebeek, M. Messiaen, M. Jackson, E. Bleeker, D. Sijm, and F. Broekhuizen. 2015. Grouping Nanomaterials A Strategy Towards Grouping and Read-across (No. 2015-0061), RIVM Report. Bilthoven, Netherlands: RIVM.
   Google Scholar
• Sizochenko, N., A. Mikolajczyk, K. Jagiello, T. Puzyn, J. Leszczynski, and B. Rasulev. 2018. “How the Toxicity of Nanomaterials towards Different Species Could Be Simultaneously Evaluated: A Novel Multi-Nano-Read-across Approach.” Nanoscale 10 (2): 582–591. doi:10.1039/C7NR05618D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhäuser, K. G., and P. G. Sayre. 2017. “Reliability of Methods and Data for Regulatory Assessment of Nanomaterial Risks.” NanoImpact 7: 66–74. doi:10.1016/j.impact.2017.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, V., D. Balharry, T. Fernandes, H. Johnston, L. Munro, and M. Hartl. 2013. Research Prioritisation To Deliver an Intelligent Testing Strategy for the Human and Environmental Safety of Nanomaterials (No. ITS Nano Final Report). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, A. V., S. Önlü, E. Bergamaschi, D. Carlander, A. Costa, W. Engelmann, S. Hartl, et al., 2017. Research Priorities Relevant to Development or Updating of Nano-relevant Regulations and Guidelines. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, V., S. Pozzi-Mucelli, L. Tran, K. Aschberger, S. Sabella, U. Vogel, C. Poland, et al., 2014. “ITS-NANO–Prioritising Nanosafety Research to Develop a Stakeholder Driven Intelligent Testing Strategy.” Particle and Fibre Toxicology 11 (1): 9. doi:10.1186/1743-8977-11-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• UBA, BfR, BAuA. 2011. Nanomaterials and REACH Background Paper on the Position of German Competent Authorities. Berlin, Germany: German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR). https://www.bf.bund.de/cm/349/nanomaterials-and-reach.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van Duuren-Stuurman, B., S. R. Vink, K. J. M. Verbist, H. G. A. Heussen, D. H. Brouwer, D. E. D. Kroese, M. F. J. Van Niftrik, E. Tielemans, W. Fransman, 2012. “Stoffenmanager Nano Version 1.0: A Web-Based Tool for Risk Prioritization of Airborne Manufactured Nano Objects.” The Annals of Occupational Hygiene 56, 1–17. doi:10.1093/annhyg/mer113.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wahid, H., S. Ahmad, M. A. M. Nor, and M. A. Rashid. 2017. Prestasi Kecekapan Pengurusan Kewangan dan Agihan Zakat: Perbandingan Antara Majlis Agama Islam Negeri di Malaysia [WWW document]. Malaysia: J. Ekon. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Warheit, D. B., S. C. Brown, and E. M. Donner. 2015. “Acute and Subchronic Oral Toxicity Studies in Rats with Nanoscale and Pigment Grade Titanium Dioxide Particles.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 84: 208–224. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2015.08.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worth, A., K. Aschberger, D. Asturiol, J. Bessems, K. Gerloff, R. Graepel, E. Joossens, L. Lamon, T. Palosaari, and A. N. Richarz. 2017. Evaluation of the Availability and Applicability of Computational Approaches in the Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. doi:10.2760/248139
   Google Scholar
• Zalk, D. M., S. Y. Paik, and P. Swuste. 2009. “Evaluating the Control Banding Nanotool: A Qualitative Risk Assessment Method for Controlling Nanoparticle Exposures.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11 (7): 1685–704. doi:10.1007/s11051-009-9678-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Z. Ji, T. Xia, H. Meng, C. Low-Kam, R. Liu, S. Pokhrel, et al., 2012. “Use of Metal Oxide Nanoparticle Band Gap to Develop a Predictive Paradigm for Oxidative Stress and Acute Pulmonary Inflammation.” ACS Nano 6 (5): 4349–4368. doi:10.1021/nn3010087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar