Human hazard potential of nanocellulose: quantitative insights from the literature

References

• Bhattacharya, K., G. Kiliç, P. M. Costa, B. Fadeel, K. Bhattacharya, G. Kiliç, P. M. Costa, B. Fadeel, P. M. Costa, and B. Fadeel. 2017. “Cytotoxicity Screening and Cytokine Profiling of Nineteen Nanomaterials Enables Hazard Ranking and Grouping Based on Inflammogenic Potential.” Nanotoxicology 11 (6): 809–826. doi:10.1080/17435390.2017.1363309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilal, M., E. Oh, R. Liu, J. C. Breger, I. L. Medintz, and Y. Cohen. 2019. “Bayesian Network Resource for Meta-Analysis: Cellular Toxicity of Quantum Dots.” Small 15 (34): 1900510, 1–12. doi:10.1002/smll.201900510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanco, A., M. C. Monte, C. Campano, A. Balea, N. Merayo, and C. Negro. 2018. “Nanocellulose for Industrial Use: Cellulose Nanofibers (CNF), Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNC), and Bacterial Cellulose (BC).” Handbook of Nanomaterials for Industrial Applications. Newark, NJ: Elsevier Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Camarero-Espinosa, S., C. Endes, S. Mueller, A. Petri-Fink, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, C. Weder, M. Clift, and E. Foster. 2016. “Elucidating the Potential Biological Impact of Cellulose Nanocrystals.” Fibers 4 (4): 21. doi:10.3390/fib4030021.
   Google Scholar
• Card, J. W., and B. A. Magnuson. 2010. “A Method to Assess the Quality of Studies That Examine the Toxicity of Engineered Nanomaterials.” International Journal of Toxicology 29 (4): 402–410. doi:10.1177/1091581810370720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalán, J., M. Ilves, H. Järventaus, K.-S. Hannukainen, E. Kontturi, E. Vanhala, H. Alenius, K. M. Savolainen, and H. Norppa. 2015. “Genotoxic and Immunotoxic Effects of Cellulose Nanocrystals In Vitro.” Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 56 (2): 171–182. doi:10.1002/em.21913.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catalán, J., E. Rydman, K. Aimonen, K. S. Hannukainen, S. Suhonen, E. Vanhala, C. Moreno, et al. 2017. “Genotoxic and Inflammatory Effects of Nanofibrillated Cellulose in Murine Lungs.” Mutagenesis 32 (1): 23–31. doi:10.1093/mutage/gew035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, M. J. D., E. J. Foster, D. Vanhecke, D. Studer, P. Wick, P. Gehr, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, and C. Weder. 2011. “Investigating the Interaction of Cellulose Nanofibers Derived from Cotton with a Sophisticated 3D Human Lung Cell Coculture.” Biomacromolecules 12 (10): 3666–3673. doi:10.1021/bm200865j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čolić, M., D. Mihajlović, A. Mathew, N. Naseri, and V. Kokol. 2015. “Cytocompatibility and Immunomodulatory Properties of Wood Based Nanofibrillated Cellulose.” Cellulose 22 (1): 763–778. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0524-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čolić, M., S. Tomić, and M. Bekić. 2020. “Immunological Aspects of Nanocellulose.” Immunology Letters 222 (February): 80–89. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2020.04.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DaNa 2016., Methodology of Selection, Aquisition and Evaluation of Toxicological Publications in the Project DaNa [online]. Accessed 5 March 2020. Available from: https://www.nanopartikel.info/files/methodik/DaNa_criteria_checklist_2016tox_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• de Lima, Renata, Leandro Oliveira Feitosa, Cintia Rodrigues Maruyama, Mariana Abreu Barga, Patrícia Cristina Yamawaki, Isolda Jesus Vieira, Eliangela M. Teixeira, Ana Carolina Corrêa, Luiz Henrique Caparelli Mattoso, and Leonardo Fernandes Fraceto. 2012. “Evaluation of the Genotoxicity of Cellulose Nanofibers.” International Journal of Nanomedicine 7: 3555–3565. doi:10.2147/IJN.S30596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobrovolskaia, M. A., M. Shurin, and A. A. Shvedova. 2016. “Current Understanding of Interactions between Nanoparticles and the Immune System.” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 299: 78–89. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2015.12.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, K., F. A. Murphy, R. Duffin, and C. A. Poland. 2010. “Asbestos, Carbon Nanotubes and the Pleural Mesothelium: A Review of the Hypothesis regarding the Role of Long Fibre Retention in the Parietal Pleura, Inflammation and Mesothelioma.” Particle and Fibre Toxicology 7 (1): 5. doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufresne, A. 2017. “Cellulose Nanomaterial Reinforced Polymer Nanocomposites.” Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science 29: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2017.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ede, J., K. Ong, M. Goergen, A. Rudie, C. Pomeroy-Carter, and J. Shatkin. 2019. “Risk Analysis of Cellulose Nanomaterials by Inhalation: Current State of Science.” Nanomaterials 9 (3): 337. doi:10.3390/nano9030337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endes, C., S. Camarero-Espinosa, S. Mueller, E. J. Foster, A. Petri-Fink, B. Rothen-Rutishauser, C. Weder, and M. J. D. Clift. 2016. “A Critical Review of the Current Knowledge Regarding the Biological Impact of Nanocellulose.” Journal of Nanobiotechnology 14 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1186/s12951-016-0230-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endes, C., S. Mueller, C. Kinnear, D. Vanhecke, E. J. Foster, A. Petri-Fink, C. Weder, M. J. D. Clift, and B. Rothen-Rutishauser. 2015. “Fate of Cellulose Nanocrystal Aerosols Deposited on the Lung Cell Surface In Vitro.” Biomacromolecules 16 (4): 1267–1275. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b00055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endes, C., O. Schmid, C. Kinnear, S. Mueller, S. Camarero-Espinosa, D. Vanhecke, E. J. Foster, et al. 2014. “An In Vitro Testing Strategy towards Mimicking the Inhalation of High Aspect Ratio Nanoparticles.” Particle and Fibre Toxicology 11 (40). doi:10.1186/s12989-014-0040-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency 2008., Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment Chapter R. 10 : Characterisation of Dose Concentration Response for Environment. Helsinki: Reproduction.
   Google Scholar
• European Chemicals Agency. 2017. Guidance on Biocidal Products Reguation: Volume III Human Health – Assessment & Evaluation (Parts B + C).
   Google Scholar
• Farcas, M. T., E. R. Kisin, A. L. Menas, D. W. Gutkin, A. Star, R. S. Reiner, N. Yanamala, K. Savolainen, and A. A. Shvedova. 2017. “Pulmonary Exposure to Cellulose Nanocrystals Caused Deleterious Effects to Reproductive System in Male Mice.” J Toxicol Environ Health A 79 (21): 39–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Future Markets Inc. 2015. The Global Market for Nanocellulose. Edinburgh: Future Markets Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, F., and B. Nowack. 2011. “The Release of Engineered Nanomaterials to the Environment.” Journal of Environmental Monitoring 13 (5): 1145–1155. doi:10.1039/c0em00547a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadrup, N., K. Bram, T. Berthing, H. Wol, S. Bengtson, C. Kofoed, R. Espersen, et al. 2019. “Pulmonary Effects of Nano Fibrillated Celluloses in Mice Suggest That Carboxylation Lowers the Inflammatory and Acute Phase Responses.” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology 66: 116–125. doi:10.1016/j.etap.2019.01.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanif, Z., F. R. Ahmed, S. W. Shin, Y. K. Kim, and S. H. Um. 2014. “Size- and Dose-Dependent Toxicity of Cellulose Nanocrystals (CNC) on Human Fibroblasts and Colon Adenocarcinoma.” Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces 119: 162–165. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.04.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, M., G. Li, and B. Nowack. 2019. “Environmental Hazard Assessment for Polymeric and Inorganic Nanobiomaterials Used in Drug Delivery.” Journal of Nanobiotechnology 17 (1): 1–10. doi:10.1186/s12951-019-0489-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeng, F., A. Denneulin, and J. Bras. 2016. “Use of Nanocellulose in Printed Electronics: A Review.” Nanoscale 8 (27): 13131–13154. doi:10.1039/c6nr03054h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilves, M., S. Vilske, K. Aimonen, H. K. Lindberg, S. Pesonen, I. Wedin, M. Nuopponen, et al. 2018. “Nanofibrillated Cellulose Causes Acute Pulmonary Inflammation That Subsides within a Month.” Nanotoxicology 12 (7): 729–746. doi:10.1080/17435390.2018.1472312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesus, S., M. Schmutz, C. Som, G. Borchard, P. Wick, and O. Borges. 2019. Hazard Assessment of Polymeric Nanobiomaterials for Drug Delivery : What Can We Learn From Literature So Far, 7 (October).
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, A. S., F. Jaramillo, U. D. Hemraz, Y. Boluk, K. Ckless, and R. Sunasee. 2017. “Effect of Surface Organic Coatings of Cellulose Nanocrystals on the Viability of Mammalian Cell Lines.” Nanotechnology, Science and Applications 10: 123–136. doi:10.2147/NSA.S145891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonoobi, M., R. Oladi, Y. Davoudpour, K. Oksman, A. Dufresne, Y. Hamzeh, and R. Davoodi. 2015. “Different Preparation Methods and Properties of Nanostructured Cellulose from Various Natural Resources and Residues: A Review.” Cellulose 22 (2): 935–969. doi:10.1007/s10570-015-0551-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug, H. F., and P. Wick. 2011. “Nanotoxicology: An Interdisciplinary Challenge.” Angewandte Chemie 50 (6): 1260–1278. doi:10.1002/anie.201001037.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., M. Fujita, and D. Boraschi. 2017. “Endotoxin Contamination in Nanomaterials Leads to the Misinterpretation of Immunosafety Results.” Frontiers in Immunology 8 (MAY): 472–477. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie, E., E. Ålander, and T. Lindström. 2017. Possible Toxicological Effects of Nanocellulose – An Updated Literature Study, No 2. Stockholm: Innventia.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, V. R., C. Sanchez-Martinez, M. Strømme, and N. Ferraz. 2017. “In Vitro Biological Responses to Nanofibrillated Cellulose by Human Dermal, Lung and Immune Cells: Surface Chemistry Aspect.” Particle and Fibre Toxicology 14 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1186/s12989-016-0182-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmoud, K. A., J. A. Mena, K. B. Male, S. Hrapovic, A. Kamen, and J. H. T. Luong. 2010. “Effect of Surface Charge on the Cellular Uptake and Cytotoxicity of Fluorescent Labeled Cellulose Nanocrystals.” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2 (10): 2924–2932. doi:10.1021/am1006222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menas, A. L., N. Yanamala, M. T. Farcas, M. Russo, S. Friend, P. M. Fournier, A. Star, et al. 2017. “Fibrillar vs Crystalline Nanocellulose Pulmonary Epithelial Cell Responses: Cytotoxicity or Inflammation?” Chemosphere 171: 671–680. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordli, H. R., G. Chinga-Carrasco, A. M. Rokstad, and B. Pukstad. 2016. “Producing Ultrapure Wood Cellulose Nanofibrils and Evaluating the Cytotoxicity Using Human Skin Cells.” Carbohydrate Polymers 150: 65–73. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, B., R. Berry, and R. Goguen. 2014. “Commercialization of Cellulose Nanocrystal (NCCTM) Production: A Business Case Focusing on the Importance of Proactive EHS Management.” Nanotechnology Environmental Health and Safety: Risks, Regulation, and Management (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, K. J., J. A. Shatkin, K. Nelson, J. D. Ede, and T. Retsina. 2017. “Establishing the Safety of Novel Bio-Based Cellulose Nanomaterials for Commercialization.” NanoImpact 6: 19–29. doi:10.1016/j.impact.2017.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E. J., T. O. Khaliullin, M. R. Shurin, E. R. Kisin, N. Yanamala, B. Fadeel, J. Chang, and A. A. Shvedova. 2018. “Fibrous Nanocellulose, Crystalline Nanocellulose, Carbon Nanotubes, and Crocidolite Asbestos Elicit Disparate Immune Responses upon Pharyngeal Aspiration in Mice.” Journal of Immunotoxicology 15 (1): 12–23. doi:10.1080/1547691X.2017.1414339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, M. M., N. R. B. Raposo, R. Brayner, E. M. Teixeira, V. Oliveira, C. C. R. Quintão, L. S. A. Camargo, L. H. C. Mattoso, and H. M. Brandão. 2013. “Cytotoxicity and Expression of Genes Involved in the Cellular Stress Response and Apoptosis in Mammalian Fibroblast Exposed to Cotton Cellulose Nanofibers.” Nanotechnology 24 (7): 075103. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/24/7/075103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccinno, F., R. Hischier, A. Saba, D. Mitrano, S. Seeger, and C. Som. 2016. “Multi-Perspective Application Selection: A Method to Identify Sustainable Applications for New Materials Using the Example of Cellulose Nanofiber Reinforced Composites.” Journal of Cleaner Production 112: 1199–1210. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitkänen, M., H. Kangas, O. Laitinen, A. Sneck, P. Lahtinen, M. S. Peresin, and J. Niinimäki. 2014. “Characteristics and Safety of Nano-Sized Cellulose Fibrils.” Cellulose 21 (6): 3871–3886. doi:10.1007/s10570-014-0397-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, M. 2015. “Toxicity of Cellulose Nanocrystals: A Review.” Industrial Biotechnology 11 (1): 25–33. doi:10.1089/ind.2014.0024.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, M., S. Dong, A. Hirani, and Y. W. Lee. 2009. “Cellulose Nanocrystals for Drug Delivery.” In: Polysaccharide Materials: Performance by Design, 4–81. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Schmutz, M., C. Som, H. F. Krug, and B. Nowack. 2017. “Digging below the Surface: The Hidden Quality of the OECD Nanosilver Dossier.” Environmental Science: Nano 4 (6): 1209–1215. doi:10.1039/C7EN00088J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seabra, A. B., J. S. Bernardes, W. J. Fávaro, A. J. Paula, and N. Durán. 2018. “Cellulose Nanocrystals as Carriers in Medicine and Their Toxicities: A Review.” Carbohydrate Polymers 181: 514–527. (December 2017), doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.12.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shatkin, J. A., and B. Kim. 2015. “Cellulose Nanomaterials: Life Cycle Risk Assessment, and Environmental Health and Safety Roadmap.” Environmental Science: Nano 2 (5): 477–499. doi:10.1039/C5EN00059A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shvedova, A. A., E. R. Kisin, N. Yanamala, M. T. Farcas, A. L. Menas, A. Williams, P. M. Fournier, et al. 2015. “Gender Differences in Murine Pulmonary Responses Elicited by Cellulose Nanocrystals.” Particle and Fibre Toxicology 13 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1186/s12989-016-0140-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockmann-Juvala, H., P. Taxell, and T. Santonen. 2014. Formulating Occupational Exposure Limits Values (OELs) (Inhalation & Dermal). Helsinki: Scaffold.
   Google Scholar
• Stoudmann, N., B. Nowack, and C. Som. 2019. “Prospective Environmental Risk Assessment of Nanocellulose for.” Environmental Science: Nano 6 (8): 2520–2531. doi:10.1039/C9EN00472F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usov, I., G. Nyström, J. Adamcik, S. Handschin, C. Schütz, A. Fall, L. Bergström, and R. Mezzenga. 2015. “Understanding Nanocellulose Chirality and Structure-Properties Relationship at the Single Fibril Level.” Nature Communications 6 (1), 1–11. doi:10.1038/ncomms8564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vartiainen, J., T. Pöhler, K. Sirola, L. Pylkkänen, H. Alenius, J. Hokkinen, U. Tapper, et al. 2011. “Health and Environmental Safety Aspects of Friction Grinding and Spray Drying of Microfibrillated Cellulose.” Cellulose 18 (3): 775–786. doi:10.1007/s10570-011-9501-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura, C., A. F. Lourenço, A. Sousa-Uva, P. J. T. Ferreira, and M. J. Silva. 2018. “Evaluating the Genotoxicity of Cellulose Nanofibrils in a co-Culture of Human Lung Epithelial Cells and Monocyte-Derived Macrophages.” Toxicology Letters 291: 173–183. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2018.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voisin, H., L. Bergström, P. Liu, and A. P. Mathew. 2017. “Nanocellulose-Based Materials for Water Purification.” Nanomaterials, 7 (3): 57. doi:10.3390/nano7030057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigger, H., D. Kawecki, B. Nowack, and V. Adam. 2020. “Systematic Consideration of Parameter Uncertainty and Variability in Probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions.” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 16 (2): 211–212. doi:10.1002/ieam.4214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanamala, N., M. T. Farcas, M. K. Hatfield, E. R. Kisin, V. E. Kagan, C. L. Geraci, and A. A. Shvedova. 2014. “In Vivo Evaluation of the Pulmonary Toxicity of Cellulose Nanocrystals: A Renewable and Sustainable Nanomaterial of the Future.” ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 2 (7): 1691–1698. doi:10.1021/sc500153k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, X., E. Bakaic, T. Hoare, and E. D. Cranston. 2013. “Injectable Polysaccharide Hydrogels Reinforced with Cellulose Nanocrystals: Morphology, Rheology, Degradation, and Cytotoxicity.” Biomacromolecules 14 (12): 4447–4455. doi:10.1021/bm401364z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoppe, J. O., V. Ruottinen, J. Ruotsalainen, S. Rönkkö, L. S. Johansson, A. Hinkkanen, K. Järvinen, and J. Seppälä. 2014. “Synthesis of Cellulose Nanocrystals Carrying Tyrosine Sulfate Mimetic Ligands and Inhibition of Alphavirus Infection.” Biomacromolecules 15 (4): 1534–1542. doi:10.1021/bm500229d.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar