References
- Alessandrelli, M., and M. Polci. 2011. “CLP Application to Nanomaterials: A Specific Aspect.” Annali Dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanita 47 (2): 146–152.
- Basei, G., D. Hristozov, L. Lamon, A. Zabeo, N. Jeliazkova, G. Tsiliki, A. Marcomini, and A. Torsello. 2019. “Making Use of Available and Emerging data to predict the Hazards of Engineered Nanomaterials by Means of in Silico Tools: A Critical Review.” NanoImpact 13: 76–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2019.01.003.
- Basei, G., A. Zabeo, K. Rasmussen, G. Tsiliki, and D. Hristozov. 2021. “A Weight of Evidence Approach to Classify Nanomaterials according to the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging Regulation Criteria.” NanoImpact 24: 100359. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2021.100359.
- Card, J. W., and B. A. Magnuson. 2010. “A Method to Assess the Quality of Studies That Examine the Toxicity of Engineered Nanomaterials.” International Journal of Toxicology 29 (4): 402–410. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581810370720.
- Cazzagon, V., E. Giubilato, L. Pizzol, C. Ravagli, S. Doumett, G. Baldi, M. Blosi, et al. 2022. “Occupational Risk of Nano-Biomaterials: Assessment of Nano-Enabled Magnetite Contrast Agent Using the BIORIMA Decision Support System.” NanoImpact 25: 100373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2021.100373.
- Comandella, D., S. Gottardo, I. M. Rio-Echevarria, and H. Rauscher. 2020. “Quality of Physicochemical Data on Nanomaterials: An Assessment of Data Completeness and Variability.” Nanoscale 12 (7): 4695–4708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr08323e.
- Dusinska, M., M. Roxana Cimpan, D. Carlander, K. Hogveen, V. Fessard, B. Suarez, R. Marcos, et al. 2016. NANoREG D5.07: Develop a rapid high throughput screening methodology to evaluate nanomaterial toxicity. https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2018-11/NANoREG%20D5.07%20DR%20Develop%20a%20rapid%20HTS%20methodology%20to%20evaluate%20NM%20toxicity.pdf
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2011. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment- Chapter R.4: Evaluation of available information. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17235/information_requirements_r4_en.pdf
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2017a. Guidance on the application of the CLP criteria, guidance to regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 on classification, labelling and packaging (CLP) of substances and mixtures, version 5.0. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/23036412/clp_en.pdf/58b5dc6d-ac2a-4910-9702-e9e1f5051cc5
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2017b. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment chapter R.7a: Endpoint specific guidance. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17224/information_requirements_r7a_en.pdf/
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2017c. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment chapter R. 7b : Endpoint specific guidance. https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/17224/information_requirements_r7b_en.pdf/
- ECHA (European Chemicals Agency). 2022. Appendix for nanoforms applicable to the guidance on registration and substance identification (version 2.0). https://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13655/how_to_register_nano_en.pdf/f8c046ec-f60b-4349-492b-e915fd9e3ca0
- European Commission. 2006. “Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency, Amending Directive 1999/45/E.” Official Journal of the European Union L 396: 1–849.
- European Commission, 1994. “Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 of 28 June 1994 Laying down the Principles for the Assessment of Risks to Man and the Environment of Existing Substances in accordance with Council Regulation.” Official Journal of the European Union L 161: 3–11.
- European Parliament and Council, 2008. “ Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures, Amending and Repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC, and Amending Regulation (EC).” Official Journal of the European Union L 353: 1–1355.
- Fernández-Cruz, M. L., D. Hernández-Moreno, J. Catalán, R. K. Cross, H. Stockmann-Juvala, J. Cabellos, V. R. Lopes, et al. 2018. “Quality Evaluation of Human and Environmental Toxicity Studies Performed with Nanomaterials-the GUIDEnano Approach.” Environmental Science: Nano 5 (2): 381–397. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EN00716G.
- Furxhi, I., A. J. Koivisto, F. Murphy, S. Trabucco, B. Del Secco, and A. Arvanitis. 2021. “Data Shepherding in Nanotechnology. The Exposure Field Campaign Template.” Nanomaterials 11 (7): 1818. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11071818.
- Furxhi, I., F. Murphy, M. Mullins, A. Arvanitis, and C. A. Poland. 2020a. “Nanotoxicology Data for in Silico Tools: A Literature Review.” Nanotoxicology 14 (5): 612–637. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2020.1729439.
- Furxhi, I., F. Murphy, M. Mullins, A. Arvanitis, and C. A. Poland. 2020b. “Practices and Trends of Machine Learning Application in Nanotoxicology.” Nanomaterials 10 (1): 116. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010116.
- Gottardo, S., G. Ceccone, H. Freiberger, P. Gibsin, M. Kellermeier, E. Guggiero, B. Stolpe, W. Wacker, and H. Rauscher. 2019. GRACIOUS Data Logging Templates for the Environmental, Health and Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials. Luxembourg: EUR 29848 EN, Publications Office of the European Union. doi:https://doi.org/10.2760/142959, JRC117733.
- GRACIOUS deliverable 6.1: Requirements for data quality criteria, data sources, modelling tools and terminology. 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5db4a6d00&appId=PPGMS.
- EFSA Scientific Committee, A. Hardy, D. Benford, T. Halldorsson, M. J. Jeger, H. K. Knutsen, S. More, H. Naegeli, et al. 2017. “Scientific Opinion on the Guidance on the Use of the Weight of Evidence Approach in Scientific Assessments.” EFSA Journal 2017 15 (8): 4971, 69 pp. doi:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4971.
- Hartmann, N. B., M. Ågerstrand, H. C. H. Lützhøft, and A. Baun. 2017. “NanoCRED: A Transparent Framework to Assess’ the Regulatory Adequacy of Ecotoxicity Data for Nanomaterials – Relevance and Reliability Revisited.” NanoImpact 6: 81–89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2017.03.004.
- Hristozov, D., L. Pizzol, G. Basei, A. Zabeo, A. Mackevica, S. F. Hansen, I. Gosens, et al. 2018. “Quantitative Human Health Risk Assessment along the Lifecycle of Nano-Scale Copper-Based Wood Preservatives.” Nanotoxicology 12 (7): 747–765. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2018.1472314.
- Hristozov, D. R., A. Zabeo, C. Foran, P. Isigonis, A. Critto, A. Marcomini, and I. Linkov. 2014. “A Weight of Evidence Approach for Hazard Screening of Engineered Nanomaterials.” Nanotoxicology 8 (1): 72–87. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2012.750695.
- Jeliazkova, N., M. D. Apostolova, C. Andreoli, F. Barone, A. Barrick, C. Battistelli, C. Bossa, et al. 2021. “Towards FAIR Nanosafety Data.” Nature Nanotechnology 16 (6): 644–654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00911-6.
- Jeliazkova, N., E. Bleeker, R. Cross, A. Haase, G. Janer, W. Peijnenburg, M. Pink, et al. 2022. “How Can we Justify Grouping of Nanoforms for Hazard Assessment? Concepts and Tools to Quantify Similarity.” NanoImpact 25: 100366. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2021.100366.
- Jeliazkova, N., C. Chomenidis, P. Doganis, B. Fadeel, R. Grafström, B. Hardy, J. Hastings, et al. 2015. “The eNanoMapper Database for Nanomaterial Safety Information.” Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 6 (1): 1609–1634. doi:https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.6.165.
- Klimisch, H. J., M. Andreae, and U. Tillmann. 1997. “A Systematic Approach for Evaluating the Quality of Experimental Toxicological and Ecotoxicological Data.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology: RTP 25 (1): 1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/rtph.1996.1076.
- Kochev, N., N. Jeliazkova, V. Paskaleva, G. Tancheva, L. Iliev, P. Ritchie, and V. Jeliazkov. 2020. “Your Spreadsheets Can Be Fair: A Tool and Fairification Workflow for the Enanomapper Database.” Nanomaterials 10 (10): 1908.
- Krug, H. F., N. Bohmer, D. Kühnel, C. Marquardt, K. Nau, and C. Steinbach. 2018. “The DaNa2.0 Knowledge Base Nanomaterials—an Important Measure Accompanying Nanomaterials Development.” Nanomaterials 8 (4): 204. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8040204.
- Loosli, F., K. Rasmussen, H. Rauscher, R. K. Cross, N. Bossa, W. Peijnenburg, J. Arts, et al. 2022. “Refinement of the Selection of Physicochemical Properties for Grouping and Read-across of Nanoforms.” NanoImpact 25: 100375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2021.100375.
- Lubinski, L., P. Urbaszek, A. Gajewicz, M. T. D. Cronin, S. J. Enoch, J. C. Madden, D. Leszczynska, J. Leszczynski, and T. Puzyn. 2013. “Evaluation Criteria for the Quality of Published Experimental Data on Nanomaterials and Their Usefulness for QSAR Modelling.” SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research 24 (12): 995–1008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1062936X.2013.840679.
- Marchese Robinson, R. L., I. Lynch, W. Peijnenburg, J. Rumble, F. Klaessig, C. Marquardt, H. Rauscher, et al. 2016. “How Should the Completeness and Quality of Curated Nanomaterial Data Be Evaluated?” Nanoscale 8 (19): 9919–9943. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr08944a.
- Moermond, C. T. A., R. Kase, M. Korkaric, and M. Ågerstrand. 2016. “CRED: Criteria for Reporting and Evaluating Ecotoxicity Data.” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 35 (5): 1297–1309. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3259.
- Money, C. D., J. A. Tomenson, M. G. Penman, P. J. Boogaard, and R. Jeffrey Lewis. 2013. “A Systematic Approach for Evaluating and Scoring Human Data.” Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology : RTP 66 (2): 241–247. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2013.03.011.
- EFSA Scientific Committee, S. More, V. Bampidis, D. Benford, C. Bragard, T. Halldorsson, A. Hernández-Jerez, S. Hougaard Bennekou, et al. 2021. “Guidance on Risk Assessment of Nanomaterials to Be Applied in the Food and Feed Chain: human and Animal Health.” EFSA Journal 19 (8): 6768, 111 pp. doi:https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6768.
- NANoREG. 2016a. Accumulation potential and aquatic toxicity of relevant groups of nanomaterials and product formula. https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2018-11/NANoREG%20D4.12%20FS%20Accumulation%20potential%20and%20aquatic%20toxicity%20of%20relevant%20groups%20of%20nanomaterials%20and%20product%20formula.pdf
- NANoREG. 2016b. D5.06: Identification and optimization of the most suitable in vitro methodology. https://www.rivm.nl/sites/default/files/2019-01/NANoREG_D5_06_DR_Identification_and_optimization_of_the_most_suitable_in_vitro_methodology_Yo3qmgPoS9aEh1-9l2OVcA.pdf
- OECD. 2012. “Important Issues on Risk Assessment of Manufactured Nanomaterials (OECD Environment, Health and Safety Publications. Series on the Safety of Manufactured Nanomaterials No. 33).” ENV/JM/MONO(2012)/ 8 (33): 57.
- Pizzol, L., D. Hristozov, A. Zabeo, G. Basei, W. Wohlleben, A. J. Koivisto, K. A. Jensen, W. Fransman, V. Stone, and A. Marcomini. 2019. “SUNDS Probabilistic Human Health Risk Assessment Methodology and Its Application to Organic Pigment Used in the Automotive Industry.” NanoImpact 13: 26–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2018.12.001.
- Saarimäki, L. A., A. Federico, I. Lynch, A. G. Papadiamantis, A. Tsoumanis, G. Melagraki, A. Afantitis, A. Serra, and D. Greco. 2021. “Manually Curated Transcriptomics Data Collection for Toxicogenomic Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials.” Scientific Data 8 (1): 41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00808-y.
- Schneider, K., M. Schwarz, I. Burkholder, A. Kopp-Schneider, L. Edler, A. Kinsner-Ovaskainen, T. Hartung, and S. Hoffmann. 2009. “ "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data.” Toxicology Letters 189 (2): 138–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.05.013.
- Seleci, D. A., G. Tsiliki, K. Werle, D. A. Elam, O. Okpowe, K. Seidel, X. Bi, et al. 2022. “Determining Nanoform Similarity via Assessment of Surface Reactivity by Abiotic and in Vitro Assays.” NanoImpact 26: 100390. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2022.100390.
- Stone, V., S. Gottardo, E. A. J. Bleeker, H. Braakhuis, S. Dekkers, T. Fernandes, A. Haase, et al. 2020. “A Framework for Grouping and Read-across of Nanomaterials- Supporting Innovation and Risk Assessment.” Nano Today. 35: 100941. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2020.100941.
- Totaro, S. H. Crutzen, and J. Riego-Sintes. 2017. “Data Logging Templates for the Environmental, Health and Safety Assessment of Nanomaterials.” Publications Office of the European Union. doi:https://doi.org/10.2787/505397.
- Tsiliki, G., D. A. Seleci, A. Zabeo, G. Basei, D. Hristozov, N. Jeliazkova, M. Boyles, et al. 2022. “Bayesian Based Similarity Assessment of Nanomaterials to Inform Grouping.” NanoImpact 25: 100389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2022.100389.
- Zabeo, A., G. Basei, G. Tsiliki, W. Peijnenburg, and D. Hristozov. 2022. “Ordered Weighted Average Based Grouping of Nanomaterials with Arsinh and Dose Response Similarity Models.” NanoImpact 25: 100370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.impact.2021.100370.