The workflows of a novel self-glazed zirconia for dental prostheses fabrication: case reports

References

• Lowe RA. Quality aesthetics in the digital Age of crown and bridge [case reports]. Dent Today. 2015 Dec;34(12):68–71. PubMed PMID: 26749876.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anusavice KJ. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses [research support, N.I.H., extramural review]. Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):102–111. PubMed PMID: 22192254; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3271854. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortorp A, Kihl ML, Carlsson GE. A 3-year retrospective and clinical follow-up study of zirconia single crowns performed in a private practice [evaluation studies]. J Dent. 2009 Sep;37(9):731–736. PubMed PMID: 19564070. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen JZ, Kosmač T. Advanced ceramics for dentistry. 1st ed. Waltham (MA): Elsevier/BH; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, et al. Application of monolithic zirconia ceramics in dental practice: A case history report [case reports]. Int J Prosthodont. 2016 Sep-Oct;29(5):511–513. PubMed PMID: 27611758. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang D, et al. Self-glazed zirconia reducing the wear to tooth enamel. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2016;36(12):2889–2894. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji B, Alrayes AA, Zhao J, et al. Grinding and polishing efficiency of a novel self-glazed zirconia versus the conventional dry-pressed and sintered zirconia ceramics. Adv Appl Ceram. 2018;1–10. doi: 10.1080/17436753.2018.1472904
   Google Scholar
• Frazier WE. Metal additive manufacturing: A review. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014;23(6):1917–1928. doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-0958-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang J, Hooper P, Li N, et al. An integrated method for net-shape manufacturing components combining 3D additive manufacturing and compressive forming processes. Procedia Eng. 2017;207:1182–1187. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.10.1050
   Google Scholar
• Mehl C, Harder S, Byrne A, et al. Prosthodontics in digital times: a case report. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2013;44(1):29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noort RV. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater. 2012;28(1):3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maestre-Ferrín L, Romero-Millán J, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, et al. Virtual articulator for the analysis of dental occlusion: an update. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012;17(1):e160–e163. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mclaughlin JB, Ramos V. Jr. Complete denture fabrication with CAD/CAM record bases. J Prosthet Dent. 2015;114(4):493. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimmer T, Gallus K, Eichberger M, et al. Complete denture fabrication supported by CAD/CAM. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;115(5):541–546. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen H, Kersten H, Wulff H. Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes. Bmc Oral Health. 2014;14(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-14-10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen ZJ, Liu LF, Xu XQ, et al. Fractography of self-glazed zirconia with improved reliability. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Han J-M, Zheng G, et al. Fatigue behaviours of the zirconia dental restorations prepared by two manufacturing methods. Adv Appl Ceram. 2017;116(7):368–375. doi: 10.1080/17436753.2017.1336365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somfai D, Zsigmond Á, Károlyházy K, et al. [The clinical application of zirconium-dioxide-ceramics. case report]. Fogorv Sz. 2015;108(4):121.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scotti R, Cardelli P, Baldissara P, et al. Clinical fitting of CAD/CAM zirconia single crowns generated from digital intraoral impressions based on active wavefront sampling. J Dent. 2011;98:445–447.
   Google Scholar
• Silva JSAE, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, et al. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):515–523. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusai B, Nasser IS. Assessment of chair-side computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing restorations: a review of the literature. J Int Oral Health. 2015;7(4):96.
   Google Scholar
• Boeddinghaus M, Breloer ES, Rehmann P, et al. Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients. Clin Oral Investig. 2015;19(8):2027–2034. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1430-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupawala A, Musani SI, Madanshetty P, et al. A study on the wear of enamel caused by monolithic zirconia and the subsequent phase transformation compared to two other ceramic systems. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2017;17(1):8–14. doi: 10.4103/0972-4052.194940
   Google Scholar
• Alghazzawi TF, Liu PR, Essig ME. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(3):167–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00803.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cross R, Ernst C, Pasmore B. A bridge too far? How boundary spanning networks drive organizational change and effectiveness. Organ Dyn. 2013;42(2):81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller C, Plewnia A, Becker S, et al. Expectations and requests regarding team training interventions to promote interdisciplinary collaboration in medical rehabilitation – a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2015;15(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0413-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar