References
- Rueda AO, Anglada M, Jimenez-Pique E. Contact fatigue of veneer feldspathic porcelain on dental zirconia. Dent Mater. 2015;31:217–224. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.006
- Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater. 2008;24:299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.007
- Liu Y, Wang Y, Wang D, et al. Self-glazed zirconia reducing the wear to tooth enamel. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2016;36:2889–2894. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2015.11.029
- Passos SP, Torrealba Y, Major P, et al. In vitro wear behavior of zirconia opposing enamel: a systematic review. J Prosthodont. 2015;23:593–601. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12167
- Zhang Y, Han JM, Zheng G, et al. Fatigue behaviours of the zirconia dental restorations prepared by two manufacturing methods. Adv Appl Ceram. 2017;116:368–375. doi: 10.1080/17436753.2017.1336365
- Park JH, Park S, Lee K, et al. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;111:20–29. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.06.002
- Hmaidouch R, Müller W-D, Lauer HC, et al. Surface roughness of zirconia for full-contour crowns after clinically simulated grinding and polishing. Int J Oral Sci. 2014;6:241–246. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2014.34
- Malkondu Ö, Tinastepe N, Akan E, et al. An overview of monolithic zirconia in dentistry. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2016;30:644–652. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2016.1177470
- Oh W-S, DeLong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:451–459. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.123851
- Shi A, Wu Z, Huang J, et al. Wear performance of self-glazed zirconia crowns with different amount of occlusal adjustment after 6 months of clinical use. Adv Appl Ceram. 2018;117:445–451. doi: 10.1080/17436753.2018.1477567
- Shen Z, Liu L, Xu X, et al. Fractography of self-glazed zirconia with improved reliability. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2017;37:4339–4345. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2017.03.008
- Bin J, Alganyi AA, Jing Z, et al. Grinding and polishing efficiency of a novel self-glazed zirconia versus the conventional dry-pressed and sintered zirconia ceramics. Adv Appl Ceram. 2018;118:46–55.
- Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9:215–232. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0018-z
- Denry I, Holloway JA. Ceramics for dental applications: a review. Materials (Basel). 2010;3:351–368. doi: 10.3390/ma3010351
- Zhang J, Hu W, Stijacic T, et al. Bonding of novel self-glazed zirconia dental ceramics. Adv Appl Ceram. 2019;118:37–45. doi: 10.1080/17436753.2018.1463935
- Wen R, Faliang D, Zhijian S, et al. The workflows of a novel self-glazed zirconia for dental prostheses fabrication: case reports. Adv Appl Ceram. 2018;117:1–8. doi: 10.1080/17436753.2017.1369658
- Wu J, Huang Z, Yang L, et al. The application of net-shape-formed self-glazed zirconia prostheses via a complete digital workflow in oral implant and restoration: a clinical case report. Adv Appl Ceram. 2019;118:309–312. doi: 10.1080/17436753.2019.1580027
- Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Evaluation of various polishing systems and the phase transformation of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:440–449. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.01.021
- Bai Y, Zhao J, Si W, et al. Two-body wear performance of dental colored zirconia after different surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116:584–590. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.02.006