Phosphate dental cements aged in vivo up to 25 years

References

• Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: a review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(3):280–301. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70128-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladha K, Verma M. Conventional and contemporary luting cements: an overview. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010;10(2):79–88. doi: 10.1007/s13191-010-0022-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leloup JM, Serraj S, Pauvert B, et al. Chemical characterization of in vivo aged zinc polycarboxylate dental cements. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1998;9(9):493–496. doi: 10.1023/A:1008879603360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creugers NH, Käyser AF, van ‘t Hof MA. A meta-analysis of durability data on conventional fixed bridges. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1994;22(6):448–452. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1994.tb00795.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kydd WL, Nicholls JI, Harrington G, et al. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with zinc phosphate cement: an in vivo study. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75(1):9–13. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90411-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatz MB, Oppes S, Chiche G, et al. Influence of cementation technique on fracture strength and leakage of alumina all-ceramic crowns after cyclic loading. Quintessence Int. 2008;39(1):23–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yüksel E, Zaimoğlu A. Influence of marginal fit and cement types on microleakage of all-ceramic crown systems. Braz Oral Res. 2011;25(3):261–266. doi: 10.1590/S1806-83242011000300012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldissara P, Comin G, Martone F, et al. Comparative study of the marginal microleakage of six cements in fixed provisional crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(4):417–422. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70005-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J. 1971;131(3):107–111. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs MS, Windeler AS. An investigation of dental luting cement solubility as a function of the marginal gap. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;65(3):436–442. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(91)90239-s
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, et al. Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathol. 1982;11(6):439–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00188.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS, Fedorowicz Z, et al. Antibacterial agents in composite restorations for the prevention of dental caries. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(12):CD007819. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007819.pub3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund MR. Secondary caries, a problem of primary concern. Oper Dent. 2009;34(3):249–250. doi: 10.2341/1559-2863-34.3.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muliyar S, Shameem KA, Thankachan RP, et al. A. microleakage in endodontics. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(6):99–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Korsch M, Walther W. Peri-implantitis associated with type of cement: a retrospective analysis of different types of cement and their clinical correlation to the peri-implant tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;17:e434–e443. doi: 10.1111/cid.12265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahlou L, Mouradian N. Peri-implantitis and the risk factors. Oral Health; 2018. Available from: https://www.oralhealthgroup.com/features/peri-implantitis-risk-factors/
   Google Scholar
• Pereira S, Anami LC, Pereira CA, et al. Bacterial colonization in the marginal region of ceramic restorations: effects of different cement removal methods and polishing. Oper Dent. 2016;41(6):642–654. doi: 10.2341/15-206-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakeman RJB, Cheetham AK, Clayden NJ, et al. A Magic angle spinning nmr study of the phase diagram Ca3−xZnx(PO4)2. J Solid State Chem. 1989;78(1):23–34. doi: 10.1016/0022-4596(89)90124-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp S, O’Neill IK, Prosser HJ, et al. Infrared spectroscopic studies on the development of crystallinity in dental zinc phosphate cements. J Dent Res. 1978;57(2):245–254. doi: 10.1177/00220345780570021801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis V, Laviole O, Potin-Gautier M, et al. Solubility and disintegration of zinc phosphate cement. Biomaterials. 1992;13(7):467–470. doi: 10.1016/0142-9612(92)90168-N
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan D. Zinc phosphate as a definitive cement for implant-supported crowns and fixed dentures [cited Sep 14, 2019]. Available from: https://www.dovepress.com/zinc-phosphate-as-a-definitive-cement-for-implant-supported-crowns-and-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CCIDE. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S146544
   Google Scholar
• Øilo M, Quinn GD. Fracture origins in twenty-two dental alumina crowns. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016;53:93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim NH, Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, et al. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 2000;83(4):459–465. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(00)70042-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dachi SF, Stigers RW. Reduction of pulpal inflammation and thermal sensitivity in amalgam-restored teeth treated with copal varnish. J Am Dent Assoc. 1967;74(6):1281–1285. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1967.0441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström M, Nyborg H. Cavity treatment with a microbicidal fluoride solution: growth of bacteria and effect on the pulp. J Prosthet Dent. 1973;30(3):303–310. doi: 10.1016/0022-3913(73)90187-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström M. Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent. 1984;9(2):57–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indian dental academy. Microleakage/ Orthodontic Course by Indian Dental Academy, 07:08:31 UTC.
   Google Scholar
• Behr M, Rosentritt M, Wimmer J, et al. Self-adhesive resin cement versus zinc phosphate luting material: a prospective clinical Trial Begun 2003. Dent Mater. 2009;25(5):601–604. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwani C, Rapoport D, La Rosa S, et al. Radiographic detection and characteristic patterns of residual excess cement associated with cement-retained implant restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;107(3):151–157. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60046-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, et al. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78(1):43–47. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70086-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente NA, Andreana S. Peri-implant disease: what we know and what we need to know. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016;46(3):136–151. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2016.46.3.136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linkevicius T, Puisys A, Vindasiute E, et al. Does residual cement around implant-supported restorations cause peri-implant disease? a retrospective case analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(11):1179–1184. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02570.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gryksa M. Characterization of Zirconia/Phosphate Cement Interfaces in Dentistry.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker A. The crystal structure of hopeite, Zn3(PO4)2.4H2O. Acta Cryst B. 1975;31(8):2026–2035. doi: 10.1107/S0567740875006784
   Google Scholar
• Cartz L, Servais G, Rossi F. Surface structure of zinc phosphate dental cements. J Dent Res. 1972;51(6):1668–1671. doi: 10.1177/00220345720510062901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar