Early hydration and hardening of OPC-CSA blends for cementitious structure of 3D printing

References

• Ghaffar SH, Corker J, Fan M. Additive manufacturing technology and its implementation in construction as an eco-innovative solution. Autom Constr. 2018;93:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro-Sastre A, Fernández-Abia AI, Rodríguez-González P, et al. Characterization of materials used in 3D-printing technology with different analysis techniques. Ann DAAAM Proc. 2018;29:947–954. doi: 10.2507/29th.daaam.proceedings.136
   Google Scholar
• Lim S, Buswell RA, Le TT, et al. Developments in construction-scale additive manufacturing processes. Autom Constr. 2012;21:262–268. doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2011.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Y, Li M, Tan MJ, et al. Design 3D printing cementitious materials via Fuller Thompson theory and Marson-Percy model. Constr Build Mater. 2018;163:600–610. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trauchessec R, Mechling JM, Lecomte A, et al. Hydration of ordinary Portland cement and calcium sulfoaluminate cement blends. Cem Concr Compos. 2015;56:106–114. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki JJ, Bullard JW, Sant G, et al. Cements in the 21st century: challenges, perspectives, and opportunities. J Am Ceram Soc. 2017;100(7):2746–2773. doi: 10.1111/jace.14948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winnefeld F, Haha MB, Lothenbach B. Hydration mechanisms of calcium sulfoaluminate cements assessed by scanning electron microscopy and thermodynamic modelling. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Congress on the Chemistry of Cement; Madrid, Spain; 2011:3–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chaunsali P, Mondal P. Influence of calcium sulfoaluminate (CSA) cement content on expansion and hydration behavior of various ordinary portland cement-CSA blends. J Am Ceram Soc. 2015;98(8):2617–2624. doi: 10.1111/jace.13645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu L, Wang P, Zhang G. Formation of ettringite in Portland cement/calcium aluminate cement/calcium sulfate ternary system hydrates at lower temperatures. Constr Build Mater. 2012;31:347–352. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palou M, Majling J, Drábik M, et al. Ettringite & its chromate analogue, structure and thermal stability. Solid State Phenom. 2003;90:395–400.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen T, Valdenaire PL, Pellenq R, et al. A reaction model for cement solidification: Evolving the C–S–H packing density at the micrometer-scale. J Mech Phys Solids. 2018;118:58–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jmps.2018.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen P, Lu L, He Y, et al. The effect of curing regimes on the mechanical properties, nano-mechanical properties and microstructure of ultra-high performance concrete. Cem Concr Res. 2019;118:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li LG, Lin CJ, Chen GM, et al. Effects of packing on compressive behavior of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr Build Mater. 2017;157:757–777. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization. Fine ceramics (advanced ceramics, advanced technical ceramics) – determination of bulk density of ceramic powders – part 2: untapped density. ISO 23145. Geneva: International Standards Organization (ISO); 2012.
   Google Scholar
• International Standards Organization. Fine ceramics (advanced ceramics, advanced technical ceramics) – test method for flexural strength of monolithic ceramics at room temperature. ISO 14704. Geneva: International Standards Organization (ISO); 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Knop Y, Peled A. Packing density modeling of blended cement with limestone having different particle sizes. Constr Build Mater. 2016;102:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shishira MRI, Taipa FS, Aziza NA, et al. Physical properties of spray-dried pink guava (Psidium guajava) powder. Agric Agric Sci Procedia. 2017;2:74–81.
   Google Scholar
• Maleka RI, Khalilb ZH, Imbabyb SS, et al. The contribution of class-F fly ash to the strength of cementitious mixtures. Cem Concr Res. 2005;35:1152–1154. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crammond NJ. Quantitative X-ray diffraction analysis of ettringite, thaumasite and gypsum in concretes and mortars. Cem Concr Res. 1984;15(3):431–441. doi: 10.1016/0008-8846(85)90116-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briant LD, Randy K, Michal S. The reference intensity ratio: its measurement and significance. Powder Diffr. 1990;5(2):76–78. doi: 10.1017/S0885715600015372
   Google Scholar
• Bae CJ, Ramachandran A, Chung K, et al. Ceramic stereolithography: additive manufacturing for 3D complex ceramic structures. J Korean Ceram Soc. 2017;54(6):470–477. doi: 10.4191/kcers.2017.54.6.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Ni W, Li J, et al. Carbonation of steel slag and gypsum for building materials and associated reaction mechanisms. Cem Concr Res. 2019;125:105893. doi: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2019.105893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YS, Dai JG. Use of magnesia sand for optimal design of high performance magnesium potassium phosphate cement mortar. Constr Build Mater. 2017;153:385–392. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade JB, Martin GP, Long DF. A methodological approach for determining the effect of moisture content on the compaction properties of powders: granular hydroxyapatite. Powder Technol. 2013;246:511–519. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2013.06.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar