Critiquing narrative inquiry’s epistemological pillars within a large-scale study into the teaching of phonics

References

• Atkinson, R., 2007. The life story interview as a bridge in narrative inquiry. In: J. Clandinin, ed. Handbook of narrative inquiry. London: SAGE, 224–245.
   Google Scholar
• Caine, V., Estefan, A., and Clandinin, D.J., 2013. A return to methodological commitment: reflections on narrative inquiry. Scandinavian journal of educational research, 57 (6), 574–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Rastle, K., and Nation, K., 2018. Ending the reading wars: reading acquuisition from novice to expert. Psychological science in the public interest, 19 (1), 5–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catholic Education Melbourne. 2017. Phonics in context: successful and animated readers and writers (Draft for Consultation). East Melbourne, Catholic Education Victoria. Available from: https://stgreensboroughnth.catholic.edu.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Phonics-in-Context-Published.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, J., and Connelly, M., 2000. Narrative inquiry. Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Clandinin, J.D., and Rosiek, J., 2007. Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry: borderland spaces and tensions. In: J. D. Clandinin, ed. Handbook of narrative inquiry: mapping a methodology. CA: Sage Publications Inc, 35–76. doi:10.4135/9781452226552: Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., Braun, V., and Hayfield, N., 2015. Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods, 222 (2015), 248.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, F., and Clandinin, D., 2006. Narrative inquiry. In: J. Green, G. Camilli, and P. Elmore, eds. Handbook of complementary methods in education research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 477–487.
   Google Scholar
• Cresswell, J., 2013. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, K., 1995. Qualitative methodology as caring science methodology. Scandinavian journal of caring science, 9 (3), 187–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST), 2005. Teaching reading: report and recommendations, national inquiry into the teaching of literacy. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. Available from: https://research.acer.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article = 1004&context = tll_misc.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, T.R., and Orozco, M., 2021. Prompts, not questions: four techniques for crafting better interview protocols. Qualitative sociology, 44 (4), 507–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kervin, L., et al., 2016. Research for educators. South Melbourne, Vic: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, J., Fickel, L., and Greenwook, J., 2022. Mapping the landscape of professional inquiry as a form of teacher learning in New Zealand: a narrative inquiry into one teacher’s experience. Professional development in education, 48 (1), 120–133. doi:10.1080/19415257.2019.1689526.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, G., 2006. Experiencing nursing education research: narrative inquiry and interpretive phenomenology. Nurse researcher, 13 (4), 30–47.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyons, D., 2014. Australian educational leaders’ perceptions of literacy learning for Year 6 students in and for the 21st century. Dissertation (Master of Arts). University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, D., 2015. Literacy in and for the 21st century. Thesis (PhD). Deakin University.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, N., and LaBoskey, V., 2002. Narrative inquiry in practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marvasti, A., 2004. Qualitative research in sociology: an introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. 2000. Teaching children to read: an evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). National Institute of Child Health & Development. Available from: https://www.www1.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Polkinghorne, D.E., 1988. Narrative knowing in the human sciences. Albany: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, K., and Ravitch, S., 2012. Narratives of learning to teach: taking on professional identities. Journal of teacher education, 12 (1) 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Scull, J., 2010. Embedding comprehension within reading acquisition processes. Australian journal of language and literacy, 33 (2), 87–107.
   Google Scholar
• Scull, J., et al. 2019. Improving reading and writing performance in the early years. Report for Catholic Education Melbourne.
   Google Scholar
• Topsfield, J. 2012. Teach or test? The age.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, L., and Mertova, P., 2007. Using narrative inquiry as a research method. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, K., 2011. Narrative inquiry. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wyse, D., and Bradbury, A., 2022. Reading wars or reading reconciliation? A critical examination of robust research evidence, curriculum policy and teacher’s practices for teaching phonics and reading. Review of education, 10, e3314. doi:10.1002/rev3.3314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar