Comparative judgement in education research

References

• Andrich, D., 1978. Relationships between the Thurstone and Rasch approaches to item scaling. Applied psychological measurement, 2 (3), 451–462.
   Google Scholar
• Bisson, M.-J., et al., 2016. Measuring conceptual understanding using comparative judgement. International journal of research in undergraduate mathematics education, 2 (2), 141–164.
   Google Scholar
• Bisson, M.-J., et al., 2020. Teaching using contextualised and decontextualised representations: examining the case of differential calculus through a comparative judgement technique. Research in mathematics education, 22 (3), 284–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, T., and Fox, C., 2007. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R.A., and Terry, M., 1952. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39 (3/4), 324–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramley, Tom. 2007. “Paired comparison methods”. In techniques for monitoring the comparability of examination standards, edited by Paul Newton, Jo-Anne Baird, Harvey Goldstein, Helen Patrick, and Peter Tymms, 264–294. London: QCA.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, T., Bell, J., and Pollitt, A., 1998. Assessing changes in standards over time using Thurstone paired comparisons. Education research and perspectives, 25, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bramley, T., and Vitello, S., 2019. The effect of adaptivity on the reliability coefficient in adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 26 (1), 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., Alcock, L., and Jones, I., 2021. What Do mathematicians mean by proof? A comparative-judgement study of students’ and mathematicians’ views. The journal of mathematical behavior, 61, 100824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., and Jones, I., 2022. Assessing proof reading comprehension using summaries. International journal of research in undergraduate mathematics education, 8, 469–489.
   Google Scholar
• Elander, J., and Hardman, D., 2002. An application of judgment analysis to examination marking in psychology. British journal of psychology, 93 (3), 303–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, J., 2013. The calculus concept inventory-measurement of the effect of teaching methodology in mathematics. Notices of the American mathematical society, 60 (8), 1018–1027.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, S., Jones, I., and Dawson, C. 2014. Do subject specialists produce more useful feedback than non-specialists when observing mathematics lessons? In: Proceedings of the 38th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, 3:33–40. Vancouver: IGPME.
   Google Scholar
• Grashuis, J., and Magnier, A., 2018. Product differentiation by marketing and processing cooperatives: A choice experiment with cheese and cereal products. Agribusiness, 34 (4), 813–830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, N., Wright, R., and Adamowicz, V., 1998. Using choice experiments to value the environment. Environmental and resource economics, 11 (3), 413–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartell, E., Strimel, G., and Bartholomew, S. 2017. “Comparing teacher assessment practices of an engineering design challenge across countries”. In: Association for educational assessment-Europe The 18th annual AEA-Europe conference. Prague 8–11 November 2017. Association for Educational Assessment-Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Heldsinger, S., and Humphry, S., 2013. Using calibrated exemplars in the teacher-assessment of writing: an empirical study. Educational research, 55 (3), 219–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, S., He, Q., and Meadows, M., 2017. An investigation of construct relevant and irrelevant features of mathematics problem-solving questions using comparative judgement and Kelly’s repertory grid. Research in mathematics education, 19 (2), 112–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, D., 2004. MM algorithms for generalized Bradley-Terry models. The annals of statistics, 32 (1), 384–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., et al. 2013. “Measuring conceptual understanding: The case of fractions”. In Proceedings of the 37th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, edited by A. M. Lindmeier and A Heinze, 3:113–20. Kiel, Germany: IGPME.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I., et al., 2016. Fifty years of A-level mathematics: have standards changed? British educational research journal, 42 (4), 543–560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., et al., 2019. Measuring conceptual understanding in randomised controlled trials: can comparative judgement help? British educational research journal, 45 (3), 662–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., and Alcock, L., 2014. Peer assessment without assessment criteria. Studies in higher education, 39 (10), 1774–1787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., and Inglis, M., 2015. The problem of assessing problem solving: can comparative judgement help? Educational studies in mathematics, 89, 337–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, I., Swan, M., and Pollitt, A., 2015. Assessing mathematical problem solving using comparative judgement. International journal of science and mathematics education, 13 (1), 151–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keppens, K., et al., 2019. Measuring pre-service teachers’ professional vision of inclusive classrooms: a video-based comparative judgement instrument. Teaching and teacher education, 78, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnear, G., Jones, I., and Davies, B. In prep. Comparative judgement as a research tool: a meta-analysis of application and reliability.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, N., et al., 2020. Assessment by comparative judgement: an application to secondary statistics and English in New Zealand. New Zealand journal of educational studies, 55 (1), 49–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, P., and Shaw, S., 2014. Validity in educational and psychological assessment. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, A., 2012. The method of adaptive comparative judgement. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 19, 281–300.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, G., and Gertzog, W., 1982. The clinical interview and the measurement of conceptual change. Science education, 66 (2), 195–209.
   Google Scholar
• Roose, I., et al., 2019. Measuring teachers’ professional vision of inclusive classrooms through video-based comparative judgement. What does it mean to misfit? International journal of educational research, 98, 257–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soekhai, V., et al., 2019. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future. Pharmacoeconomics, 37 (2), 201–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steedle, J., and Ferrara, S., 2016. Evaluating comparative judgment as an approach to essay scoring. Applied measurement in education, 29 (3), 211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanswell, F., et al. Submitted. Comparative judgement for experimental philosophy: a new method for assessing ordinary meaning in vehicles in the park cases.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L., 1927. A Law of comparative judgment. Psychological review, 34, 273–286.
   Google Scholar
• Verhavert, S., et al., 2019. A meta-analysis on the reliability of comparative judgement. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 26 (5), 541–562.
   Google Scholar
• Wainer, H., TimbersFairbank, D., and Hough, R.L., 1978. Predicting the impact of simple and compound life change events. Applied psychological measurement, 2 (3), 313–322.
   Google Scholar
• Wheadon, C., et al., 2020. A comparative judgement approach to the large-scale assessment of primary writing in England. Assessment in education: principles, policy & practice, 27 (1), 46–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar