Positionality and reflexivity: negotiating insider-outsider positions within and across cultures

References

• Altheide, D.L., and Johnson, J.M., 2011. Reflections on interpretive adequacy in qualitative research. In: N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 581–594.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R., 2015. Now i see it, now i don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative research, 15 (2), 219–234. doi:10.1177/1468794112468475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biernacki, P., and Waldorf, D., 1981. Snowball sampling: problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological methods & research, 10 (2), 141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaikie, N.W.H., 2009. Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bradbury-Jones, C., 2007. Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research: exploring subjectivity through Peshkin's i's. Journal of advanced nursing, 59 (3), 290–298. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04306.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkmann, S., and Kvale, S., 2005. Confronting the ethics of qualitative research. Journal of constructivist psychology, 18, 157–181. doi:10.1080/10720530590914789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckner, S., 2005. Taking the debate on reflexivity further. Journal of social work practice, 19 (1), 59–72. doi:10.1080/02650530500071969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., 2014. Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Coemans, S., Raymakers, A.L., and Vandenabeele, J., 2019. Evaluating the extent to which social researchers apply feminist and empowerment frameworks in photovoice studies with female participants: a literature review. Qualitative social work, 18 (1), 37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W., 2013. Qualitative inquiry & research design. choosing among five approaches. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cutcliffe, J.R., 2003. Reconsidering reflexivity: introducing the case for intellectual entrepreneurship. Qualitative health research, 13 (1), 136–148. doi:10.1177/1049732302239416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon, J.K., and Thomas, N., 2019. Ethics of engagement and insider-outsider perspectives: issues and dilemmas in cross-cultural interpretation. International journal of research & method in education, 42 (4), 442–453. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2018.1533939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppley, K., 2006. Review essay: defying insider-outsider categorization: one researcher's fluid and complicated positioning on the insider-outsider continuum. Forum, qualitative social research, 7 (3). doi:10.17169/fqs-7.3.150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Etherington, K., 2004. Becoming a reflexive researcher: using ourselves in research. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fay, B., 1996. Contemporary philosophy of social science: a multicultural approach. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, L.A., 2011. Comment: on respondent-driven sampling and snowball sampling in hard-to-reach populations and snowball sampling not in hard-to-reach populations. Sociological methodology, 41 (1), 347–353.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., and Gillam, L., 2004. Ethics, reflexivity, and ‘ethically important moments’ in research. Qualitative inquiry, 10 (2), 261–280. doi:10.1177/1077800403262360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamzeh, M.Z., and Oliver, K., 2010. Gaining research access into the lives of muslim girls: researchers negotiating muslimness, modesty, inshallah, and haram. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 23 (2), 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Han, K.H., 2016. The feeling of ‘face’ in confucian society: from a perspective of psychosocial equilibrium. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 1055–1055. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellawell, D., 2006. Inside-out: analysis of the insider-outsider concept as a heuristic device to develop reflexivity in students doing qualitative research. Teaching in higher education, 11 (4), 483–494.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsburgh, D., 2003. Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of clinical nursing, 12 (2), 307–312. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00683.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, K.K., 2012. Foundations of Chinese psychology: confucian social relations. New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kacen, L., and Chaitin, J., 2006. The times are changing: understanding qualitative research in ambiguous, conflictual and changing contexts. Qualitative report, 11, 209–228.
   Google Scholar
• Kara, H., 2017. Identity and power in Co-produced activist research. Qualitative research, 17 (3), 289–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnieli-Miller, O., Strier, R., and Pessach, L., 2009. Power relations in qualitative research. Journal of qualitative health research, 19, 279–289. doi:10.1177/1049732308329306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katyal, K.R., and King, M.E., 2014. Non-Chinese researchers conducting research in Chinese cultures: critical reflections. International journal of research & method in education, 37 (1), 44–62. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2012.736484.
   Google Scholar
• King, N., and Horrocks, C., 2010. Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kriz, A., Gummesson, E., and Quazi, A., 2014. Methodology meets culture. International journal of cross-cultural management , 14 (1), 27–46. doi:10.1177/1470595813493265.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., and Ramakrishnan, K., 2020. Who counts as Asian? Ethnic and racial studies, 43 (10), 1733–1756. doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1671600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lietz, C.A., Langer, C.L., and Furman, R., 2006. Establishing trustworthiness in qualitative research in social work: implications from a study regarding spirituality. Qualitative social work, 5, 441–458.
   Google Scholar
• Limkakeng, A., et al., 2013. Willingness to participate in clinical trials among patients of Chinese heritage: a meta-synthesis. Plos One, 8 (1), e51328–e51328. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M., 2000. Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge. Theory culture and society, 17 (3), 26–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macbeth, D., 2001. On ‘reflexivity’ in qualitative research: two readings: and a third. Qualitative inquiry, 7 (1), 35–68.
   Google Scholar
• Mauthner, N.S., and Doucet, A., 2003. Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37, 413–431.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S.B., 2001. Power and positionality: negotiating insider/outsider status within and across cultures. International journal of lifelong education, 20 (5), 405–416. doi:10.1080/02601370120490.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, L., 2016. Insider-outsider-Inbetweener? Researcher positioning, participative methods and cross-cultural educational research. Compare: a journal of comparative and international education, 46 (2), 235–250. doi:10.1080/03057925.2014.928510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J.M., 2012. Sampling in grounded theory, edited by A. Bryant, and K. Charmaz, eds. The sage handbook of grounded theory. London: Sage Publications, 229–244.
   Google Scholar
• Noy, C., 2008. Sampling knowledge: the hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International journal of social research methodology, 11 (4), 327–344. doi:10.1080/13645570701401305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okamoto, D.G., 2014. Redefining race: Asian American panethnicity and shifting ethnic boundaries. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Ozano, K., and Khatri, R., 2018. Reflexivity, positionality and power in cross-cultural participatory action research with research assistants in rural Cambodia. Educational action research, 26 (2), 190–204. doi:10.1080/09650792.2017.1331860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padgett, D.K., 2008. Qualitative methods in social work research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2015. Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pezalla, A.E., Pettigrew, J., and Miller-Day, M., 2012. Researching the researcher-as-instrument: an exercise in interviewer self-reflexivity. Qualitative research, 12 (2), 165–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillow, W.S., 2003. Confession, catharsis, or cure? Rethinking the uses of reflexivity as methodological power in qualitative research. International journal of qualitative studies in education, 16, 175–196.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley, T., 2012. The (extra)ordinary practices of qualitative interviewing, edited by J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, and K. D. McKinney, eds. The sage handbook of interview research: the complexity of the craft. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 541–555.
   Google Scholar
• Roulston, K. 2022. Interviewing: a guide to theory and practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, W.E., 2014. Positionality. In , edited by D. Coghlan, and M. Brydon-Miller, eds. The SAGE encyclopedia of action research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., and C. H. Major. 2013. Qualitative research: the essential guide to theory and practice. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, S., 2004. The researcher/interviewer in intercultural context: a social intruder!. British educational research journal, 30 (4), 549–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, D.C., and Yuan, L., 2010. Inter-cultural interactions: the Chinese context, edited by M. H. Bonds, ed. The Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, 679–697.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., and Gunter, H., 2010. Inside, outside, upside down: the fluidity of academic researcher ‘identity’ in working with/in school. International journal of research and method in education, 34 (1), 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Triandis, H.C. 2015. Collectivism and individualism: cultural and psychological concerns. In Vol. 4 of International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. 206–210. doi:10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24008-7.
   Google Scholar
• Tufford, L., and Newman, P., 2012. Bracketing in qualitative research. Research and practice, 11 (1), 80–96. doi:10.1177/1473325010368316.
   Google Scholar
• Warin, J., 2011. Ethical mindfulness and reflexivity. Qualitative inquiry, 17 (9), 805–814. doi:10.1177/1077800411423196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, D., 2014. Contemporary social constructionism: key themes. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. 1990. “Reading feminism in fieldnotes.” In Feminist praxis: research, theory, & epistemology in feminist sociology, edited by L. Stanley, ed. United Kingdom: Routledge, 253–261.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, D.L., et al., 2011. Interpreter-facilitated cross-language interviews: a research note. Qualitative research, 11 (4), 381–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C., Janes, G., and Williams, J., 2022. Identity, positionality and reflexivity: relevance and application to research paramedics. British paramedic journal, 7 (2), 43–49. doi:10.29045/14784726.2022.09.7.2.43.
   Google Scholar