In control or at the mercy of others? Navigating power dynamics in online data collection with UK secondary school students

References

• Aaltonen, S., 2017. Challenges in gaining and re-gaining informed consent among young people on the margins of education. International journal of social research methodology, 20 (4), 329–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agbebiyi, A., 2013. Tiers of gatekeepers and ethical practice: researching adolescent students and sexually explicit online material. International journal of social research methodology, 16 (6), 535–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderson, P., 2001. Research by children. International journal of social research methodology, 4, 139–153.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, L., 2009. ‘Caught in the act’: ethics committee review and researching the sexual culture of schools. Qualitative research, 9 (4), 395–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, M., Wilson, C., and Hendry, G., 2022. Learning from lockdown: examining Scottish primary teachers’ experiences of emergency remote teaching. British journal of educational studies, 70 (2), 217–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, S., 2008. Power after Foucault. In: J. S. Dryzek, B. Honig, and A. Phillips, eds. The Oxford handbook of political theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, C., 2005. “Play in focus”: children researching their own spaces and places for play. Children youth and environments, 15 (1), 27–53.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, L.M., et al., 2006. Gatekeepers and key masters: dynamic relationships of access in geographical fieldwork. Geographical review, 96, 97–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowhurst, I., and Kennedy-Macfoy, M., 2013. Troubling gatekeepers: methodological considerations for social research. International journal of social research methodology, 16 (6), 457–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, E., 2017. Saying it like it is? Power, participation and research involving young people. Social inclusion, 5 (3), 228–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deakin, H., and Wakefield, K., 2013. Skype interviewing: reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative research, 14 (5), 603–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot Major, L., and Machin, S., 2018. Social mobility and its enemies. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A., 2005. Ethical research with children. Maidenhead, UK: The Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fecke, M., et al., 2022. The ethics of gatekeeping: how guarding access influences digital child and youth research. Media and communication, 10 (1), 361–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1975[1991]. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. reprint. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1978[1990]. The history of sexuality 1: the will to knowledge. reprint. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 1988. Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2003. Society must be defended: lectures at the collège de France, 1975-76. London: Picador.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M., 2008. The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gallacher, L.A., and Gallagher, M., 2008. Methodological immaturity in childhood research? Thinking through participatory methods. Childhood (Copenhagen, Denmark), 15 (4), 499–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, R., 2016. What is Gillick competence? Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 12 (1), 244–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover, S., 2004. Why won’t they listen to us? On giving power and voice to children participating in social research. Childhood (Copenhagen, Denmark), 11 (1), 81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helseth, S., and Slettebo, A., 2004. Research involving children: some ethical issues. Nursing ethics, 11 (3), 298–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunleth, J., 2011. Beyond on or with: questioning power dynamics and knowledge production in ‘child-oriented’ research methodology. Childhood (Copenhagen, Denmark), 18 (1), 81–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iphofen, R., ed. 2020. Handbook of research ethics and scientific integrity. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• James, F., 2021. Ethics review, neoliberal governmentality and the activation of moral subjects. Educational philosophy and theory, 53 (5), 548–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keen, S., Lomeli-Rodriguez, M., and Joffe, H., 2022. From challenge to opportunity: virtual qualitative research during COVID-19 and beyond. International journal of qualitative methods, 21, 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellett, M., 2010. Small shoes, big steps! Empowering children as active researchers. American journal of community psychology, 46, 195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, C.-Y., 2023. Towards a model for analysing adolescents’ reflexivity: reflectiveness, criticality and boundedness. Children & society, 37 (4), 1171–1186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, L.E., Oxley, L., and Asbury, K., 2022. “My brain feels like a browser with 100 tabs open”: a longitudinal study of teachers’ mental health and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. British journal of educational psychology, 92 (1), 299–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, N., 2001. Childhood and society: growing up in an age of uncertainty. Buckingham: Open university press.
   Google Scholar
• Lees, A.B., Walters, S., and Godbold, R., 2021. Variation in ethics review for tertiary-based educational research: an international and interdisciplinary cross-sectional review. Journal of academic ethics, 19, 517–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littler, J., 2018. Against meritocracy: culture, power and myths of mobility. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lohmeyer, B.A., 2020. ‘Keen as fuck’: youth participation in qualitative research as ‘parallel projects’. Qualitative research, 20 (1), 39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S., 2005. Power: a radical view. 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mcareavey, R., and Muir, J., 2011. Research ethics committees: values and power in higher education. International journal of social research methodology, 14 (5), 391–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe, J.L., and Holmes, D., 2009. Reflexivity, critical qualitative research and emancipation: a Foucauldian perspective. Journal of advanced nursing, 65 (7), 1518–1526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry, O., 2016. Repositioning the research encounter: exploring power dynamics and positionality in youth research. International journal of social research methodology, 19 (3), 339–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, A., 2007. Whose agenda? Issues of power and relationship when listening to looked-after young people. Child and family social work, 12, 278–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T., and Bell, L., 2012. Consenting to what? Issues of access, gate-keeping and ‘informed’ consent. In: T. Miller, M. Birch, M. Mauthner, and J. Jessop, eds. Ethics in qualitative research. London: Sage, 61–75.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, A.M., et al., 2018. Ethical dilemmas and reflexivity in qualitative research. Perspectives on medical education, 7 (2), 69–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runciman, W.G., 1999. The social animal. London: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Seitz, S., 2016. Pixilated partnerships, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via skype: a research note. Qualitative research, 16 (2), 229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood, G., and Parsons, S., 2021. Negotiating the practicalities of informed consent in the field with children and young people: learning from social science researchers. Research ethics, 17 (4), 448–463.
   Google Scholar
• Simons, J., 2013. Power, resistance, and freedom. In: C. Falzon, T. O’Leary, and J. Sawicki, eds. A companion to Foucault. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing, 301–320.
   Google Scholar
• Sleeboom-Faulkner, M., et al., 2017. The formalization of social-science research ethics: how did we get there? HAU: journal of ethnographic theory, 7 (1), 71–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, G., and Doull, M., 2015. Examining concepts of power and agency in research with young people. Journal of youth studies, 18 (7), 900–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spyrou, S., 2011. The limits of children’s voices: from authenticity to critical, reflexive representation. Childhood (Copenhagen, Denmark), 18 (2), 151–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thapar-Björkert, S., and Henry, M., 2004. Reassessing the research relationship: location, position and power in fieldwork accounts. International journal of social research methodology, 7 (5), 363–381.
   Google Scholar
• Tinson, J., 2009. Conducting research with children and adolescents: design, methods and empirical cases. Oxford: Goodfellow Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Tisdall, E., and Punch, S., 2012. Not so ‘new’? Looking critically at childhood studies. Children’s geographies, 10, 249–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyldum, G., 2012. Ethics or access? Balancing informed consent against the application of institutional, economic or emotional pressures in recruiting respondents for research. International journal of social research methodology, 15 (3), 199–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadeboncoeur, C., et al., 2016. Variation in university research ethics review: reflections following an inter-university study in England. Research ethics, 12 (4), 217–233.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoonaard, W.C., ed. 2002. Walking the tightrope: ethical issues for qualitative researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, S., 2017. Using internet video calls in qualitative longitudinal interviews: some implications for rapport. International journal of social research methodology, 20 (6), 613–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, S., 2023. From oversight to overkill: inside the broken system that blocks medical breakthroughs – And how we can fix it. Irvington, NY: Rivertowns Books.
   Google Scholar
• Woodhead, M., 2011. Child development and the development of childhood. In: J. Qvortrup, W. A. Corsaro, and M. Honig, eds. The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 46–61.
   Google Scholar