Evaluating museum websites using a combination of decision-making theories

References

• Anand, O., & Srivastava, P. R. (2015). A comparative gender based evaluation of e-commerce website: A hybrid MCDM approach. Eighth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3), 279–284. doi: 10.1109/IC3.2015.7346693
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., & Wells, M. (1996). Assessment of museum world wide web page formats. Visitor Studies: Theory Research and Practice, 9, 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, M., Zhang, Q., & Seydel, J. (2005). B2c e-commerce web site quality: An empirical examination. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 105(5), 645–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capstick, B. (1985). Museums and tourism. International Journal of Museum Management and Curatorship, 4(4), 365–372. doi: 10.1080/09647778509514990
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Tang, B. (2012). Group-buying website evaluation based on combination of TOPSIS, entropy weight and FAHP. Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 7(7), 130–139.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Sh., & Li, R., (2011). Research on evaluation of group-buying website based on FAHP. Advanced Materials Research, 204–210, 1588-1593
   Google Scholar
• Chung, Y. F., Liu, S. H., Wang, C. H., & Pang, C. T. (2015). Applying Fuzzy MCDM methods to the evaluation on portal website service quality. The SIJ Transactions on Computer Science Engineering & its Applications (CSEA, 3(1), 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Cunliffe, D., Kritou, E., & Tudhope, D. (2001). Usability evaluation for museum web sites. Museum Management and Curatorship, 19(3), 229–252.
   Google Scholar
• Davoli, P., Mazzoni, F., & Corradini, E. (2005). Quality Assessment of cultural Web sites with Fuzzy Operators. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(1), 44–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, S., Jana, B., Gourisaria, M. K., Mohanty, S. N., & Chatterjee, R. (2015). Evaluation of Indian B2C E-Shopping websites under multi criteria decision-making using Fuzzy Hybrid technique. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(9), 24551–24580.
   Google Scholar
• Di Blas, N., Guermand, M. P., Orsini, C., & Paolini, P. (2002). Evaluating the features of museum websites. In Museums and the Web 2002: Selected Papers from an international Conference (6th, pp. 179–185). Boston, MA. April 17-20. May-Aug 2017, 24p. Retrieved from https://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw2002/papers/diblas/diblas.html
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, M., & Moran, K. (2000). Informing the design of Web interfaces to museum collections. Museum Management and Curatorship, 18, 391–406.
   Google Scholar
• Edson, G. (2004). Heritage: Pride or passion, product or service? International Journal of Heritage Studies, 10(4), 333–348.
   Google Scholar
• Faustina, F., & Balaji, T. (2016). Evaluation of universities websites in Chennai city, India using analytical hierarchy process international conference on electrical, electronics, and optimization techniques (ICEEOT) - 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Fotakis, T., & Economides, A. (2008). Art, science/ technology and history museums on the web. International Journal on Digital Culture and Electronic Tourism, 1(1), 37–63.
   Google Scholar
• Garzotto, F., Matera, M., & Paolini, P. (1998). To use or not to use? Evaluating usability of museum web sites. In Proceedings of Museums and the Web ‘98, Toronto, Canada, 1998. Retrieved from http://www.museumsandtheweb.com/mw98/papers/garzotto/garzotto_paper.html
   Google Scholar
• Herreman, Y. (1998). Museums and tourism: Culture and consumption. Museum International, No. 1999, 50(3), 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, S., & Kim, J. (2004). Architectural criteria for website evaluation – conceptual framework and empirical validation. Behaviour & Information Technology, 23(5), 337–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, Z. (2012). Quality evaluation model study of B2C E-commerce website. In D. Zeng (Ed.), Advances in Control and communication, LNEE 137 (pp. 39–47). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (Eds.). (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, 186.
   Google Scholar
• Jadhav, A. S., & Sonar, R. (2011). Framework for evaluation and selection of the software packages: A hybrid knowledge based system approach. Journal of Systems and Software, 84, 1394–1407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesús, G. M., Nuria Recuero, V., & Blasco, L. F. (2017). The influence of museums’ websites on users’ intentions. ESIC Market. Economic & Business Journal, 48(2), 369–392. May-Aug 2017, 24p.
   Google Scholar
• Kabassi, K. (2017). Evaluating websites of museums: State of the Art. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 24, 184–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir, G., & Hasin, M. A. A. (2012). Comparative analysis of TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS for the evaluation of Travel website service quality. International Journal for Quality Research, 6(3), 169–185.
   Google Scholar
• Karoulis, A., Sylaiou, S., & White, M. (2006). Usability evaluation of a virtual museum interface. INFORMATICA, 17(3), 363–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., Kaumar Dash, M., & Seharawat, R. (2017). Using entropy and AHP-TOPSIS for comprehensive evaluation of internet shopping malls and solution optimality. International Journal of Business Excellence, 11(4), 487–504. doi: 10.1504/IJBEX.2017.082575
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., & Rieman, J. (1994). Task-centered user interface design: A practical introduction. Boulder: University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Li, H., & Qian, Z. (2017). Archaeological heritage tourism in China: The case of the Daming Palace from the tourists’ perspective. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12(4), 380–393. doi: 10.1080/1743873X.2016.1208205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, A. C. H., Fernandez, W. D., & Gregor, S. (2012). Understanding web enjoyment experiences and informal learning: A Study in a museum context. Decision Support Systems, 53(4), 846–858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H. L. (2010). An application of fuzzy AHP for evaluating course website quality. Computers & Education, 54, 877–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., Xuan, H. W., Cui, X., & Krasnoproshin, V. V. (2015). Determine weights of evaluation indices for E-commerce websites ranking based on fuzzy AHP. In Wang (Ed.), Electronic engineering and information science (pp. 271–274). London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• López, X., Margapoti, I., Maragliano, R., & Bove, G. (2010). The presence of Web 2.0 tools on museum websites: A comparative study between England, France, Spain. Italy, and the USA. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25(2), 235–249.
   Google Scholar
• Maravelakis, E., Konstantaras, A., Kritsotaki, A., Angelakis, D., & Xinogalos, M. (2013). Analysing user needs for a unified 3D metadata recording and exploitation of cultural heritage Monuments system, Advances in visual Computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8034, 138–147.
   Google Scholar
• Masudin, I., & Saputro, T. E. (2015). Evaluation of B2C website based on the usability factors by using fuzzy AHP & hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 114, 1–8. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/114/1/012091,
   Google Scholar
• Mikalef, K., Giannakos, M. N., Chorianopoulos, K., & Jaccheri, L. (2013). Does informal learning benefit from interactivity? The effect of trial and error on knowledge acquisition during a museum visit. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 7(2), 158–175.
   Google Scholar
• Monistrol, R., Rovira, C., & Codina, L. (2006). Catalonia's museums websites: Analysis and evaluation proposal. Hipertext.Net, Retrieved from https://www.upf.edu/hipertextnet/en/numero-4/museos.html
   Google Scholar
• Mulubrhan, F., Mokhtar, A. A., & Muhammad, M. (2014). Comparative Analysis between Fuzzy and Traditional Analytical hierarchy process. MATEC web of conferences 13.
   Google Scholar
• Nagpal, R., Mehrotra, D., Kumar Bhatia, P., & Sharma, A. (2015). Rank University websites using Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach on usability. International Journal of Information Engineering and Electronic Business, 1, 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Nilashi, M., & Janahmadi, N. (2012). Assessing and prioritizing affecting factors in E-learning websites using AHP method and Fuzzy Approach. Information and Knowledge Management, 2(1), 46–61.
   Google Scholar
• Olsina Santos, L. (1999). Web-site quality evaluation method: a case study of museums. In Proceedings 2nd Workshop on software engineering over the Internet- ICSE 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Othman, M. K., Petrie, H., & Power, C. (2013). Measuring the usability of a smartphone delivered museum guide. The 9th international conference on cognitive science. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97, 629–637.
   Google Scholar
• Pacifio, D., & Vogel, M. (2012). Archaeological sites, modern communities, and tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(3), 1588–1611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallud, J., & Straub, D. W. (2014). Effective website design for experience-influenced environments: The case of high culture museums. Information & Management, 51, 359–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, W., & Wang, K. (2011). The research of e-commerce site evaluation based on AHP and Cluster Analysis means. In M. Zhou (Ed.), ISAEBD 2011, part III, CCIS 210 (pp. 458–463). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Presley, A., & Fellows, P. (2013). An analytic hierarchy process model for evaluating and comparing website usability. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 12(2), 123–139.
   Google Scholar
• Raynolds, R., Walker, K., & Speight, C. (2010). Web-based museum trails on PDAs for university-level design students: Design and evaluation. Journal Computers & Education Archive, 55(3), 994–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (2003). Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary? European Journal of Operational Research, 145, 85–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T., & Hu, G. (1998). Ranking by eigenvector versus other methods in the analytic hierarchy process. Applied Mathematics Letters, 11(4), 121–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarraf, S. (1999). A survey of museums on the web: Who uses museum websites? Curator, 42(3), 231–243.
   Google Scholar
• Shackley, M. (2001). Visitor management, case studies from World Heritage Sites. Jordan Hill: Butterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Sheng, J., & Lo, A. (2010). Evaluating the tourism potential of public museums in Hangzhou: A supply- side perspective. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27(3), 287–305. doi: 10.1080/10548401003744719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirah, S., Mikhailov, L., & Keane, J. A. (2015). Priest: An interactive decision support tool to estimate priorities from pair-wise comparison judgments. International Transactions in Operational Research, 22(2), 203–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soleymaninejad, M., Shadifar, M., & Karimi, A. (2016). Evaluation of two major online travel agencies of US using TOPSIS method. Digital Technologies, 2(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sylaiou, S., Killintzis, V., Paliokas, I., Mania, K., & Patias, P. (2014). Usability evaluation of virtual museums’ interfaces visualization technologies. In R. Shumaker, & S. Lackey (Eds.), VAMR 2014, part II, LNCS 8526 (pp. 124–133). Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tasich, T., & Villaespesa, E. Meeting the real user: Evaluating the usabilityof Tate’s website, The annual conference of Museums and the Web, April17-20, 2013, Portland, OR, USA, 2013 (Retrieved from http://mw2013.museumsandtheweb.com/paper/meeting-the-real-user-evaluating-the-usability-of-tates-website)
   Google Scholar
• van Welie, M., & Klaasse, B. (2004). Evaluating museum websites using design patterns. Technical report number: IR-IMSE-001. Amsterdam: Vrije Universiteit.
   Google Scholar
• Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P., Meek, J., & Lonsdale, P. (2009). Myartspace: Design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers and Education, 53(2), 286–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, K. (2008). Structuring visitor participation. In L. Tallon, & K. Walker (Eds.), Digital dialogues: Personal technologies and the museum experience (pp. 109–124). Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. M., Yang, M., & Li, J. T. (2012). Comparative Study on C2C e-commerce Credit Evaluation System. Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, Xian, 670-674.
   Google Scholar
• Wijayanti, A., & Damanik, J. (2018). Analysis of the tourist experience of management of a heritage tourism product: Case study of the Sultan Palace of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 14(2), 166–177. doi: 10.1080/1743873X.2018.1494182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. A., Wavell, C., Baxter, G., MacLennan, A., & Jobson, D. (2005). Implementing impact evaluation in professional practice: A study of support needs within the museum, archive and library sector. International Journal of Information Management, 25(6), 533–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, Y., & Xu, J. (2004). Cultural tourism vs tourist culture: Case of domestic tourism in modern Beijing. Tourism Recreation Research, 29(2), 81–88. doi: 10.1080/02508281.2004.11081446
   Google Scholar
• Yu, X., Guo, S., Guo, J., & Huang, X. (2011). Rank B2C e-commerce websites in e-alliance based on AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 3550–3557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. (2015). Group-buying websites evaluation model based on AHP-TOPSIS under the environment of multi-attribute decision-making. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering, 10(7), 31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., & Guo, H. (2012). A service quality evaluation model and Its application based on customer perception in B2C companies. Second international Conference on Business Computing and Global Informatization. IEEE, 18–21. doi: 10.1109/BCGIN.2012.12
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, Y., & Buchman, A. (2000). Evaluating and selecting web sources as external information resources of a data warehouse. The Third International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering (WISE'00), 149–160. doi: 10.1109/WISE.2002.1181652
   Google Scholar