Revisiting desirable response bias in well-being reports

References

• Alexander, M. G., & Fisher, T. D. (2003). Truth and consequences: Using the bogus pipeline to examine sex differences in self‐reported sexuality. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 27–35.10.1080/00224490309552164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avey, J. B., Patera, J. L., & West, B. J. (2006). The implications of positive psychological capital on employee absenteeism. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13, 42–60.10.1177/10717919070130020401
   Google Scholar
• Carlsmith, J. M., Collins, B. E., & Helmreich, R. L. (1966). Studies in forced compliance: I. The effect of pressure for compliance on attitude change produced by face-to-face role playing and anonymous essay writing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 1–13.10.1037/h0023507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, F., Jussim, L., Harber, K. D., & Bhasin, G. (2009). Modern anti-semitism and anti-Israeli attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 290–306.10.1037/a0015338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. A. (1964). The approval motive. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., & Diener, C. (1996). Most people are happy. Psychological Science, 7, 181–185.10.1111/psci.1996.7.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., & Emmons, R. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105–1117.10.1037/0022-3514.47.5.1105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Emmons, R., Larsen, R., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Ng, W., Harter, J., & Arora, R. (2010). Wealth and happiness across the world: Material prosperity predicts life evaluation, whereas psychosocial prosperity predicts positive feeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 52–61.10.1037/a0018066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Smith, H., & Fujita, F. (1995). The personality structure of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 130–141.10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Smith, H., & Shao, L. (1995). National differences in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur? Social Indicators Research, 34, 7–32.10.1007/BF01078966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.10.1023/A:1025007614869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, K. E., & Sasso, T. (2011). Mapping the contours of contemporary positive psychology. Canadian Psychology, 52, 82–92.10.1037/a0023118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heintzelman, S. J., & King, L. A. (in press). Life is pretty meaningful. American Psychologist.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E., & Sigall, H. (1971). The bogus pipeline: A new paradigm for measuring affect and attitude. Psychological Bulletin, 76, 349–364.10.1037/h0031617
   Google Scholar
• Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: Measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology, 60, 541–572.10.1111/peps.2007.60.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyubomirsky, S., King, L. A., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 882–888.10.1037/0022-006X.51.6.882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummendey, H. D., & Bolten, H. (1981). Die veränderung von social-desirability-antworten bei erwarteter warheitskontrolle (bogus-pipeline-paradigma) [Modification of social desirability responses when control of truthful responding is anticipated: The bogus pipeline paradigm]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 2, 151–156.
   Google Scholar
• Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307–317.10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731.10.3758/BF03206553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 925–971.10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J., & Jamieson, D. W. (1993). Twenty years of bogus pipeline research: A critical review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 363–375.10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck, J. M., Riolli, L. T., Peng, A. C., & Spain, E. S. (2011). Resilience to traumatic exposure among soldiers deployed in combat. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16, 18–37.10.1037/a0021006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.10.1037/0003-066X.60.5.410
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu, L. L., Mazar, N., Gino, F., Ariely, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2012). Signing at the beginning makes ethics salient and decreases dishonest self-reports in comparison to signing at the end. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 15197–15200.10.1073/pnas.1209746109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soubelet, A., & Salthouse, T. A. (2011). Influence of social desirability on age differences in self-reports of mood and personality. Journal of Personality, 79, 741–762.10.1111/jopy.2011.79.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53, 80–93.10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.N. News Centre. (2011, July 19). Happiness should have greater role in development policy – UN Member States. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=39084
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, D., te Nijenhuis, J., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). The general factor of personality: A meta-analysis of Big Five intercorrelations and a criterion-related validity study. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 315–327.10.1016/j.jrp.2010.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (1999). Meta-analyses of fakability estimates: Implications for personality measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59, 197–210.10.1177/00131649921969802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar