A self-determination perspective of strengths use at work: Examining its determinant and performance implications

References

• Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing the interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411–423.10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Google Scholar
• Avey, J. B., Luthans, F., Hannah, S. T., Sweetman, D., & Peterson, C. (2012). Impact of employees’ character strengths of wisdom on stress and creative performance. Human Resource Management Journal, 22, 165–181.10.1111/hrmj.2012.22.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O., & Weber, T. J. (2009). Leadership: Current theories, research, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 421–449.10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163621
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M., & Bonnett, D. G. (1990). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L. (1972). Social norms, feelings, and other factors affecting helping and altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 63–108). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham, M. (2007). Go put your strengths to work. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K. S., Dutton, J. E., & Quinn, R. E. (2003). Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
   Google Scholar
• Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 980–1008.
   Google Scholar
• Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Personnel Psychology, 64, 89–136.10.1111/peps.2011.64.issue-1
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, D., & Anderson, E. (2002). StrengthsQuest: Discover and develop your strengths, in academics, career, and beyond. Washington, DC: The Gallup Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, D., & Harter, J. K. (2003). Investing in strengths. In K. Cameron, J. Dutton, & R. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 111–121). San Francisco, CA: Barrett-Kochler.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, J., & Lance, C. (2010). What reviewers should expect from authors regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25, 325–334.10.1007/s10869-010-9181-6
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1–19.10.1007/s10869-013-9308-7
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580–590.10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Google Scholar
• Duarte, N. T., Goodson, J. R., & Klich, N. R. (1994). Effects of dyadic quality and duration on performance appraisal. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 499–521.10.2307/256698
   Google Scholar
• Dubreuil, P., Forest, J., & Courcy, F. (2014). From strengths use to work performance: The role of harmonious passion, subjective vitality, and concentration. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 9, 335–349.10.1080/17439760.2014.898318
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. R., & Shipp, A. J. (2007). The relationship between person-environment fit and outcomes: An integrative theoretical framework. In C. Ostroff & T. A. Judge (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational fit (pp. 209–258). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Endler, N. S., & Magnusson, D. (1976). Toward an interactional psychology of personality. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 956–974.10.1037/0033-2909.83.5.956
   Google Scholar
• Evans, M. G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305–323.10.1016/0749-5978(85)90002-0
   Google Scholar
• Forest, J., Mageau, G. A., Crevier-Braud, L., Bergeron, E., Dubreuil, P., & Lavigne, G. L. (2012). Harmonious passion as an explanation of the relation between signature strengths’ use and well-being at work: Test of an intervention program. Human Relations, 65, 1233–1252.10.1177/0018726711433134
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 199–223.10.1023/A:1025007614869
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M. (2009). A model of knowledge-sharing motivation. Human Resource Management, 48, 571–589.10.1002/hrm.v48:4
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Google Scholar
• Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.-H., Aubé, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 628–646.10.1177/0013164409355698
   Google Scholar
• Govindji, R., & Linley, P. A. (2007). Strengths use, self-concordance and well-being: Implications for strengths coaching and coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2, 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 48–58.10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48
   Google Scholar
• Guay, F., Boggiano, A. K., & Vallerand, R. J. (2001). Autonomy support, intrinsic motivation, and perceived competence: Conceptual and empirical linkages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 643–650.10.1177/0146167201276001
   Google Scholar
• Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2012). When the job is a calling: The role of applying one’s signature strengths at work. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 362–371.10.1080/17439760.2012.702784
   Google Scholar
• Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2013). The application of signature character strengths and positive experiences at work. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 965–983.10.1007/s10902-012-9364-0
   Google Scholar
• Harzer, C., & Ruch, W. (2014). The role of character strengths for task performance, job dedication, interpersonal facilitation, and organizational support. Human Performance, 27, 183–205.10.1080/08959285.2014.913592
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, V. T., & Pollack, J. M. (2014). Passion isn’t always a good thing: Examining entrepreneurs’ network centrality and financial performance with a dualistic model of passion. Journal of Management Studies, 51, 433–459.10.1111/joms.2014.51.issue-3
   Google Scholar
• Ho, V. T., Wong, S., & Lee, C. H. (2011). A tale of passion: Linking job passion and cognitive engagement to employee work performance. Journal of Management Studies, 48, 26–47.10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00878.x
   Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., & Levin, P. F. (1972). Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21, 384–388.10.1037/h0032317
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL (Version 8.8) [ Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Bono, J. E. (2001). Relationship of core self-evaluation traits – Self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability – With job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 80–92.10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Linley, P. A. (2008). Average to A+: Realizing strengths in yourself and others. Coventry: CAPP Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linley, P. A., & Harrington, S. (2006). Strengths coaching: A potential-guided approach to coaching psychology. International Coaching Psychology Review, 1, 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Linley, P. A., Nielsen, K. M., Wood, A. M., Gillett, R., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2010). Using signature strengths in pursuit of goals: Effects on goal progress, need satisfaction, and well-being, and implications for coaching psychologists. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5, 6–15.
   Google Scholar
• Littman-Ovadia, H., & Steger, M. F. (2010). Character strengths and well-being among volunteers and employees: Toward an integrative model. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 419–430.10.1080/17439760.2010.516765
   Google Scholar
• Luthans, F. (2002). Positive organizational behavior: Developing and managing psychological strengths. Academy of Management Executive, 16, 57–72.10.5465/AME.2002.6640181
   Google Scholar
• Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224
   Google Scholar
• Montes, S. D., & Zweig, D. (2009). Do promises matter? An exploration of the role of promises in psychological contract breach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1243–1260.10.1037/a0015725
   Google Scholar
• Moreau, E., & Mageau, G. A. (2012). The importance of perceived autonomy support for the psychological health and work satisfaction of health professionals: Not only supervisors count, colleagues too! Motivation and Emotion, 36, 268–286.10.1007/s11031-011-9250-9
   Google Scholar
• Moss, S. E., Sanchez, J. I., Brumbaugh, A. M., & Borkowski, N. (2009). The mediating role of feedback avoidance behavior in the LMX-performance relationship. Group & Organization Management, 34, 645–664.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24, 1517–1538.10.1287/orsc.1120.0795
   Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D., & Markus, H. R. (1996). The self as social representation. In S. Moscovici & U. Flick (Eds.), Psychology of the social (pp. 38–70). Berlin: Rowohlt.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Park, N. (2006). Character strengths in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1149–1154.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1379
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Piccolo, R. F., & Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 327–340.10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786079
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, C., Maltby, J., & Linley, P. A. (2011). Strengths use as a predictor of well-being and health-related quality of life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12, 153–169.10.1007/s10902-009-9181-2
   Google Scholar
• Rath, T. (2007). StrengthsFinder 2.0. New York, NY: Gallup Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rath, T., & Conchie, B. (2009). Strength based leadership: Great leaders, teams, and why people follow. New York, NY: Gallup Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raub, S., & Robert, C. (2010). Differential effects of empowering leadership on in-role and extra-role employee behaviors: Exploring the role of psychological empowerment and power values. Human Relations, 63, 1743–1770.10.1177/0018726710365092
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 139–170.10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, B. (1983). Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 5, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55, 5–14.10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.5
   Google Scholar
• Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.10.1177/0146167294205014
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A., III. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402–423.10.2307/256368
   Google Scholar
• Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: Contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 678–691.10.1037/0022-3514.64.4.678
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). When helping helps: Autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 222–244.10.1037/a0016984
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17, 601–617.10.1177/014920639101700305
   Google Scholar
• Williams, G. C., Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Facilitating autonomous motivation for smoking cessation. Health Psychology, 21, 40–50.10.1037/0278-6133.21.1.40
   Google Scholar
• Wood, A. M., Linley, P. A., Maltby, J., Kashdan, T. B., & Hurling, R. (2011). Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 15–19.10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.004
   Google Scholar