7,342
Views
119
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REVIEW ARTICLE

Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards

, &
Pages 213-225 | Published online: 08 Aug 2007

References

  • Abrahamson , D. 2003 . “ Text talk, body talk, table talk: a design of ratio and proportion as classroom parallel events ” . In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education , Edited by: Pateman , N. A. , Dougherty , B. J. and Zilliox , J. Vol. 2 , 1 – 8 . Columbus, OH : Eric Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education .
  • Armstrong , V. , Barnes , S. , Sutherland , R. , Curran , S. , Mills , S. and Thompson , I. 2005 . Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: the use of interactive whiteboard technology . Educational Review , 57 (4) : 457 – 469 .
  • Ball , B. 2003 . Teaching and learning mathematics with an interactive whiteboard . Micromath , 19 (1) : 4 – 7 .
  • Beauchamp , G. 2004 . Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: towards an effective transition framework . Technology, Pedagogy and Education , 13 (3) : 327 – 348 .
  • Beauchamp , G. and Parkinson , J. 2005 . Beyond the ‘wow’ factor: developing interactivity with the interactive whiteboard . School Science Review , 86 (316) : 97 – 103 .
  • Becta . 2004 . Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard: a guide for secondary schools , Coventry : Becta .
  • Becta . 2006 . The Becta review 2006: evidence on the progress of ICT in education , Coventry : Becta .
  • Beeland , W. D. 2002 . Student engagement, visual learning and technology: can interactive whiteboards help? . Action Research Exchange , 1 (1) Available on‐line at: http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/Artmanscrpt/vol1no1/beeland_am.pdf (accessed 16 May 2007)
  • Birmingham , P. , Davies , C. and Greiffenhagen , C. 2002 . Turn to face the Bard: making sense of the three way interactions between teacher, pupils and technology in the classroom . Education, Communication and Information , 2 (2–3) : 139 – 161 .
  • Brown , S. 2002 . JISC briefing paper on interactive white boards Available online at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Interactivewhiteboards.pdf (accessed 16 May 2007).
  • Buckley , B. C. 2000 . Interactive multimedia and model‐based learning in biology . International Journal of Science Education , 22 (3) : 895 – 935 .
  • Carr , L. 1999 . Bringing lessons to life . Managing Schools Today , 9 (1) : 14
  • Clemens , A. , Moore , T. and Nelson , B. 2001 . Math intervention ‘SMART’ project (student mathematical analysis and reasoning with technology) Available online at: http://www.smarterkids.org/research/paper10.asp (accessed 16 May 2007)
  • Cogill , J. 2003 . The use of interactive whiteboards in the primary school: effects on pedagogy , Coventry : Becta . Research Bursary Reports
  • Condie , R. and Munro , R. 2007 . The impact of ICT in schools—a landscape review , Coventry : Becta . Available online at: http://publications.becta.org.uk/display.cfm?resID=28221&page=1835 (accessed 16 May 2007).
  • Davison , I. and Pratt , D. 2003 . An investigation into the visual and kinaesthetic affordances of interactive whiteboards , Coventry : Becta . Research Bursary Reports
  • Edwards , J. , Hartnell , M. and Martin , R. 2002 . Interactive whiteboards: some lessons for the classroom . Micromath , 18 (2) : 30 – 34 .
  • Ekhami , L. 2002 . The power of interactive whiteboards . School Library Media Activities Monthly , 18 (8) : 35 – 38 .
  • Glover , D. and Miller , D. 2001a . A report to Blackburn and Colne EAZ on new technologies , Keele : Department of Education, Keele University .
  • Glover , D. and Miller , D. Missioners, tentatives and luddites: leadership challenges for school and classroom posed by the introduction of interactive whiteboards into schools in the UK . paper presented at the BEMAS Conference . October , Newport Pagnell.
  • Glover , D. and Miller , D. 2001c . Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large‐scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school . Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education , 10 (3) : 257 – 275 .
  • Glover , D. and Miller , D. 2002 . The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change: the experience of five elementary schools in an English education authority . Information Technology in Childhood Education , 2002 ( 1 ) : 5 – 19 .
  • Glover , D. and Miller , D. 2003 . Players in the management of change: introducing interactive whiteboards into schools . Management in Education , 17 (1) : 20 – 23 .
  • Glover , D. , Miller , D. , Averis , D. and Door , V. 2005 . The interactive whiteboard: a literature survey . Technology, Pedagogy and Education , 14 (2) : 155 – 170 .
  • Goldin‐Meadow , S. and Singer , S. 2005 . Children learn when their teacher’s gestures and speech differ . Psychological Science , 16 : 85 – 89 .
  • Hall , I. and Higgins , S. 2005 . Primary school students’ perceptions of interactive whiteboards . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 21 : 102 – 117 .
  • Harrison , C. , Comber , C. Fisher , T. 2002 . ImpaCT2: the impact of information and communication technologies on pupil learning and attainment , Coventry : Becta . A report to the DfES (ICT in Schools Research and Evaluation Series No. 7)
  • Higgins , S. 2003 . Does ICT improve learning and teaching in schools? , Nottingham : British Educational Research Association .
  • Higgins , S. Evaluating a national pilot project involving the use of electronic whiteboards by teachers to improve literacy and mathematics standards in UK elementary schools . paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting . April 7–11 , San Francisco, CA.
  • Higgins , S. , Falzon , C. Hall , I. 2005 . Embedding ICT in the literacy and numeracy strategies: final report , Newcastle upon Tyne : Newcastle University .
  • Iding , M. 2000 . Is seeing believing? Features of effective multimedia for learning science . International Journal of Instructive Media , 27 (4) : 403 – 416 .
  • Jewitt , C. 2002 . The move from page to screen: the multimodal reshaping of school English . Journal of Visual Communication , 1 (2) : 171 – 196 .
  • Johnson , C. September 2002 . “ The writing’s on the board ” . In Educational Computing & Technology September , 58 – 59 .
  • Jones , S. and Tanner , H. 2002 . Teachers interpretations of effective whole‐class interactive teaching in secondary mathematics classrooms . Educational Studies , 28 (3) : 265 – 274 .
  • Kennewell , S. 2001 . Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning . Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education , 10 (1–2) : 101 – 116 .
  • Kennewell , S. Researching the influence of interactive presentation tools on teacher pedagogy . paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, UMIST . September , Manchester.
  • Kennewell , S. and Beauchamp , G. 2003 . The influence of a technology‐rich classroom environment on elementary teachers’ pedagogy and children’s learning . Young Children and Learning Technologies: Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology , 34 : 65 – 70 .
  • Knight , P. , Pennant , J. and Piggott , J. 2004 . What does it mean to ‘use the interactive whiteboard’ in the daily mathematics lesson? . Micromath , 20 (2) : 14 – 16 .
  • Latane , B. 2002 . Focused interactive learning: a tool for active class discussion . Teaching of Psychology , 29 (1) : 10 – 16 .
  • Latham , P. 2002 . Teaching and learning primary mathematics: the impact of interactive whiteboards North Islington Education Action Zone: BEAM research papers. Available online at: http://www.beam.co.uk/pdfs/RES03.pdf (accessed 16 May 2007)
  • Levy , P. 2002 . Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study , Sheffield : Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield . Available online at: http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm (accessed 16 May 2007)
  • McCormick , R. and Scrimshaw , P. 2001 . Information and communications technology, knowledge and pedagogy . Education, Communication and Information , 1 : 37 – 57 .
  • Miller , D. 2003 . Developing interactive whiteboard activity . Micromath , 19 : 33 – 35 . Available online at: http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ed/iaw/docs/NuffieldReport.pdf (accessed 16 May 2007)
  • Miller , D. , Glover , D. and Averis , D. Matching technology and pedagogy in teaching mathematics: understanding fractions using a ‘virtual manipulative’ fraction wall . paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, UMIST, Manchester . September . Available online at: http://www.keele.ac.uk/depts/ed/iaw/docs/BERA%20Paper% 20Sep%202004.pdf (accessed 16 May 2007).
  • Miller , D. , Glover , D. and Averis , D. Panacea or prop: the role of the interactive whiteboard in improving teaching effectiveness . paper presented at the Tenth International Congress of Mathematics Education . July , Copenhagen. Available online at: http://www.icme-organisers.dk/tsg15/Glover_et_al.pdf (accessed 16 May 2007).
  • Moseley , D. , Higgins , S. Bramald , R. 1999 . Ways forward with ICT: effective pedagogy using information and communications technology in literacy and numeracy in primary schools , Newcastle upon Tyne : Newcastle University .
  • Moss , G. , Jewitt , C. , Levaãiç , R. , Armstrong , V. , Cardini , A. and Castle , F. 2007 . The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation: an evaluation of the Schools Whiteboard Expansion (SWE) Project: London Challenge , London : DfES . DfES Research Report 816
  • Murphy , J. F. , Jain , N. L. Spooner , S. A. 1995 . Use of an interactive electronic whiteboard to teach clinical cardiology decision analysis to medical students . Journal of the American College of Cardiology , 25 (2) : 238A
  • Ofsted . 2004 . ICT in schools: the impact of government initiatives five years on , London : Ofsted .
  • Olive , J. 2002 . Computer tools for interactive mathematical activity in elementary schools . International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning , 5 (3) : 241 – 262 .
  • Passey . 2006 . Technology enhancing learning: analysing uses of information and communication technologies by primary and secondary school pupils with learning frameworks . Curriculum Journal , 17 (2) : 139 – 166 .
  • Passey , D. , Rogers , C. , Machell , J. , McHugh , G. and Allaway , D. 2003 . The motivational effect of ICT on pupils: emerging findings , London : DfES .
  • Rasmussen , C. , Stephan , M. and Allen , K. 2004 . Classroom mathematical practices and gesturing . Journal of Mathematical Behaviour , 23 : 301 – 323 .
  • Richardson , A. 2002 . Effective questioning in teaching mathematics using an interactive whiteboard . Micromath , 18 (2) : 8 – 12 .
  • Robison , S. 2000 . Math classes for the 21st century . Media and Methods , 36 (4) : 10 – 11 .
  • Rogers , E. 1983 . Diffusion of innovations , (3rd edn) , New York : Free Press .
  • Schmid , E. C. 2006 . Investigating the use of interactive whiteboard technology in the English language classroom through the lens of a critical theory of technology . Computer Assisted Language Learning , 19 (1) : 47 – 62 .
  • Schuck , S. and Kearney , M. 2007 . Exploring pedagogy with interactive whiteboards: a case study of six schools , Sydney : University of Technology Sydney . Available online at: http://www.ed‐dev.uts.edu.au/teachered/research/iwbproject/pdfs/iwbreportweb.pdf (accessed 16 May 2007).
  • Sinclair , J. and Coulthard , M. 1975 . Towards an analysis of discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils , London : Oxford University Press .
  • Smith , F. , Hardman , F. and Higgins , S. 2006 . The impact of interactive whiteboards on teacher‐pupil interaction in the national literacy and numeracy strategies . British Educational Research Journal , 32 (3) : 443 – 457 .
  • Smith , H. and Higgins , S. 2006 . Opening classroom interaction: the importance of feedback . Cambridge Journal of Education , 36 (4) : 485 – 502 .
  • Smith , H. , Higgins , S. , Wall , K. and Miller , J. 2005 . Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 21 : 91 – 101 .
  • Stephens , C. D. 2000 . Forget the sailboard—let’s go whiteboarding! . Dental Update , 27 (5) : 236 – 240 .
  • Sutherland , R. , Armstrong , V. Barnes , S. 2004 . Transforming teaching and learning: embedding ICT into every‐day classroom practices . Journal of Computer Assisted Learning , 20 (6) : 413 – 425 .
  • Tanner , H. , Jones , S. , Kennewell , S. and Beauchamp , G. Interactive whole class teaching and interactive white boards . paper presented at the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australia Conference (MERGA 28) . July , Melbourne, Australia. Available online at: http://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP832005.pdf (accessed 16 May 2007)
  • Walker , D. September 13 2002 . “ Meet Whiteboard Wendy ” . In Times Educational Supplement September 13 ,
  • Wall , K. , Higgins , S. and Smith , H. 2005 . The visual helps me understand the complicated things: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards . British Journal of Educational Technology , 36 (5) : 851 – 867 .
  • Watson , A. and De Geest , E. 2005 . Principled teaching for deep progress: improving mathematical learning beyond methods and materials . Educational Studies in Mathematics , 58 (2) : 209 – 234 .
  • Weimer , M. J. 2001 . The influence of technology such as SMART board interactive whiteboard on student motivation in the classroom Available online at: http://www.smarterkids.org/research/paper7.asp (accessed 16 May 2007)
  • Wood , R. and Ashfield , J. 2007 . The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and learning in literacy and mathematics: a case study . British Journal of Educational Technology , OnlineEarly Articles, DOI: 10.1111/j.1467–8535.2007.00703.x.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.