Reclaiming the students – coping with social media in 1:1 schools

References

• Bebell, Damian, and Rachel Kay. 2010. “One to One Computing: A Summary of the Quantitative Results From the Berkshire Wireless Learning Initiative.” The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 9 (2): 5–59.
   Google Scholar
• Bjelvenmark, Jens. 2011. One to One – a Student Perspective on Computer Use in Swedish High School. Linköping: Linköpings Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• DeGagne, Mike, and Robert Wolk. 2007. “Unwired: Student Use of Technology in the Ubiquitous Computing World.” Information Systems Education Journal 5 (13): 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Dunleavy, Matt, and Walter Heinecke. 2008. “The Impact of 1:1 Laptop Use on Middle School Math and Science Standardized Test Scores.” Computers in the Schools 24 (3–4): 7–22. doi: 10.1300/J025v24n03_02
   Google Scholar
• Ellison, Nicole B., Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. “The Benefits of Facebook ‘Friends:’ Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (4): 1143–1168. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Englund, Tomas. 1996. Utbildningspolitiskt Systemskifte [System Change in Educational Politics]. Stockholm: HLS.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, Carrie B.. 2008. “In-Class Laptop Use and Its Effects on Student Learning.” Computers & Education 50 (3): 906–914. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, Bryan. 2011. “One-to-One Laptop Programs Are No Silver Bullet.” Educational Leadership 68 (5): 78–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhow, Christine, and Beth Robelia. 2009. “Informal Learning and Identity Formation in Online Social Networks.” Learning, Media and Technology 34 (2): 119–140. doi: 10.1080/17439880902923580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes, Douglas, and Mark Warschauer. 2008. “Learning with Laptops: A Multi-Method Case Study.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 38 (3): 305–332. doi: 10.2190/EC.38.3.d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund, Åke, Tomas Englund, Annika Andersson, Matilda Wiklund, Isabella Norén, and Mathias Hatakka. Årsrapport Unosuno 2011 [Annual Report Unosuno 2011], edited by Örebro University, 15: Örebro University, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Idebro, J. 2010. En-Till-En-Satsning På Vimmery Gymnasium [One-to-One-Initiative at Vimmerby Upper Secondary School]. Linköping: Linköping University.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, Andreas M., and Michael Haenlein. 2010. “Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media.” Business Horizons 53 (1): 59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, Paul A., and Aryn C. Karpinski. 2010. “Facebook® and Academic Performance.” Computers in Human Behavior 26 (6): 1237–1245. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, Klaus. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kulesza, J., G.II, and Nezlek, G. DeHondt. 2011. “More Technology, Less Learning?.” Information Systems Education Journal 9 (7): 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• Learning Cultures Consulting Inc. 2009. One-to-One Mobile Computing – Literature Review, edited by Alberta Education, 65. Alberta: Department of Education and Training.
   Google Scholar
• Lindblad, S., and F. Sahlström. 1999. “Gamla Mönster Och Nya Gränser: Om Ramfaktorer Och Klassrumsinteraktion [Old Patterns and New Boundaries: Limitation Factors and Classroom Interaction].” Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige 4 (1): 73–92.
   Google Scholar
• Madge, Clare, Julia Meek, Jane Wellens, and Tristram Hooley. 2009. “Facebook, Social Integration and Informal Learning at University: ‘It Is More for Socialising and Talking to Friends About Work Than for Actually Doing Work’.” Learning, Media and Technology 34 (2): 14155. doi: 10.1080/17439880902923606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education & Cultural Affairs. 1980. A Summary of Goals and Guidelines in Lgr 80 [Microform]: The New Primary School Curriculum, edited by Ministry of Education & Cultural Affairs, Stockholm. Washington, DC: Distributed by ERIC Clearinghouse.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, Briony J.. 2008. Researching Information Systems and Computing. Cornwall: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Österlind, Eva. 1998. Disciplinering Via Frihet: Elevers Planering Av Sitt Eget Arbete [Domestication Through Freedom: Students’ Planning of Their Own Work], Vol. 75. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsalaiensis, Uppsala Studies in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, Michael Quinn. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. 2nd ed. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peck, Kyle, and Karl Sprenger. 2008. “One-to-One Educational Computing: Ten Lessons for Successful Implementation.” International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education, edited by Joke Voogt and Gerald KnezekSpringer International Handbooks of Education, 935–942. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeil, Ulrike, Raj Arjan, and Panayiotis Zaphiris. 2009. “Age Differences in Online Social Networking – a Study of User Profiles and the Social Capital Divide among Teenagers and Older Users in Myspace.” Computers in Human Behavior 25 (3): 643–654. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuck, Sandy, and Peter Aubusson. 2010. “Educational Scenarios for Digital Futures.” Learning, Media & Technology 35 (3): 293–305. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2010.509351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N.. 2007. “The Use of Computer Technology in University Teaching and Learning: A Critical Perspective.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 (2): 83–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N.. 2009. “Faceworking: Exploring Students’ Education-Related Use of Facebook.” Learning, Media and Technology 34 (2): 157–174. doi: 10.1080/17439880902923622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2011. “Social Media in Higher Education.” In The Europa World of Learning 2012, edited by The Europa World of Learning. The Europa World of Learning, 2996. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, Bridget. 2007. Pedagogy and Learning Wwith ICT: Researching the Art of Innovation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suhr, Kurt A., David A. Hernandez, Doug Grimes, and Mark Warschauer. 2010. “Laptops and Fourth-Grade Literacy: Assisting the Jump over the Fourth-Grade Slump.” The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 9 (5): 5–45.
   Google Scholar
• Taawo, Alma, Mattias Davidsson, and Peter Becker. 2010. 1-1 Satsningar I Sverige [1:1 Initiatives in Sweden]. Accessed June 19, 2012. http://bit.ly/egen-dator.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Agency for Education. 2009. “Vad Påverkar Resultaten I Svensk Grundskola? Kunskapsöversikt Om Betydelsen Av Olika Faktorer [What Affects the Results in Swedish Compulory Schools? An Overview of Different Factors’ Importance].” In Kunskapsöversikter, edited by Per Thullberg & Lena Olsson, 264. Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Agency for Education. 2011. Curriculum for the Compulsory School System, the Preschool Class and the Leisure-Time Centre (Lgr11), edited by The Swedish National Agency for Education. Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Vinterek, Monika. 2006. Individualisering I Ett Skolsammanhang [Individualization in a School Context]. Forskning i fokus, edited by Myndigheten för skolutveckling. Stockholm: Myndigheten för skolutveckling.
   Google Scholar
• Warschauer, Mark. 2007. “Information Literacy in the Laptop Classroom.” Teachers College Record 109 (11): 2511–2540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar