1,044
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Getting it together: relational habitus in the emergence of digital literacies

, &
Pages 478-494 | Received 02 Jul 2012, Accepted 23 Jan 2013, Published online: 20 Feb 2013

References

  • Barton, D., and Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy Practices. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, and R. Ivanic (Ed.), In Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context, (pp. 7–15). London: Routledge.
  • Bouffard, S., Goss, C., and Weiss, H. (2008). Emerging Strategies, Evolving Ideas, Cambridge: Harvard Family Research Project.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The Logic of Practice, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Buckingham, D. (2006). Defining Digital Literacy: What Do Young People Need to Know About Digital Media?. Digital Kompetense, 1(4), 263–276.
  • Coffield, F. (2000). In F. Coffield (Ed.), The Necessity of Informal Learning, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cole, M. (and The Distributed Literacy Consortium. 2006). The Fifth Dimension: An After-School Program Built on Diversity, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Engeström, Y. (2010). From Teams to Knots: Activity-Theoretical Studies of Collaboration and Learning at Work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Eraut, M. (2000). Non-Formal Learning, Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge in Professional Work. In F. Coffield (Ed.), In The Necessity of Informal Learning, (pp. 12–31). Bristol: The Policy Press.
  • Fairlie, R. W. 2003. “Is There a Digital Divide? Ethnic and Racial Differences in Access to Technology and Possible Explanations.” Final report to the University of California Latino Policy Institute and California Policy Research Center. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California, November. Accessed January 27, 2012. http://cjtc.ucsc.edu/docs/r_techreport5.pdf
  • Fairlie, R. W. 2005. “Are We Really a Nation Online? Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Access to Technology and Their Consequences.” September 20. Accessed February 7, 2013. http://www.freepress.net/files/lccrdigitaldivide.pdf
  • Gee, J. P. (2000). The New Literacy Studies: From ‘Socially Situated’ to the Work of the Social. In D. Barton, M. Hamilton, and R. Ivanic (Ed.), In Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context, (pp. 180–196). London: Routledge.
  • González, N., Moll, L. C., and Amanti, C. (2005). Funds of Knowledge: Theorizing Practices in Households, Communities, and Classrooms, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Goodwin, C., and Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking Context: An Introduction. In A. Duranti, and GoodwinC. (Ed.), In Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gray, L., Thomas, N., and Laurie, L. (2010). Teachers’ Use of Educational Technology in U.S. Public Schools: 2009, Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. , May. Accessed January 3, 2012. http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010040.pdf
  • Halpern, R. (2003). Making Play Work: The Promise of After-School Programs for Low-Income Children, New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., and Cain, C. (2001). Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  • Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Hutchins, E. 2003. “Cognitive Ethnography. Plenary address at the 25th meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston
  • Ito, M. (2010). Introduction. In M. Ito, S. Baumer, M. Brittani, d. boyd, R. Cody, B. Herr-Stephenson, H.A. Horst, P.G. Lange, D. Mahendran, K.Z. Martínez, C.J. Pascoe, D. Perkel, L. Robinson, C. Sims, and Lisa Tripp (Ed.), In Hanging Out, Messing Around, and Geeking Out: Kids Living and Learning with New Media, (pp. 1–28). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kafai, Y. B., and Peppler, K. A. (2011). Youth, Technology, and DIY. Review of Research in Education, 35(1), 89–119. doi: 10.3102/0091732X10383211
  • Lave, J. (1996). The Practice of Learning. In S. Chaiklin, and J. Lave (Ed.), In Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context, (pp. 3–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Moll, L., Amanti, C., Neff, D., and Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Homes and Classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141. doi: 10.1080/00405849209543534
  • Palak, D., and Walls, R. T. (2009). Teachers’ Beliefs and Technology Practices: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Journal for Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 417–441.
  • Parker, L. Leann (2008). Technology in Support of Young English Learners in and Out of School. In L. L. Parker (Ed.), In Technology-Mediated Learning Environments for Young English Learners: Connections In and Out of School, (pp. 213–250). New York: Erlbaum.
  • Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge. An Essay on the Cognitive Unconscious, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Richards, L. (2005). Handling Qualitative Data, Thousand OaksCA: Sage.
  • Rogoff, B. (1995). Observing Sociocultural Activity on Three Planes: Participatory Appropriation, Guided Participation, and Apprenticeship. In J. Wertsch, P. del Río,, and A. Álvarez (Ed.), In Sociocultural Studies of Mind, (pp. 139–164). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stone, L. D. 2011. “Digital Literacy: Annual Report to the UC Links Statewide Office.” Unpublished data report
  • Stone, L. D., and Gutiérrez, K. D. (2007). Problem Articulation and the Processes of Assistance: An Activity Theoretic View of Mediation in Game Play. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1–2), 43–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2007.07.005
  • Stone, L. D., Underwood, C., and Hotchkiss, J. (2012). The Relational Habitus: Intersubjective Processes in Learning Settings. Human Development, 55(2), 65–91. doi: 10.1159/000337150
  • Street, B. V. (1985). Literacy in Theory and Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tennant, M. (2009). Lifelong Learning as a Technology of the Self. In K. Illeris (Ed.), In Contemporary Theories of Learning: Learning Theorists… in Their Own Words, (pp. 147–158). London: Routledge.
  • Underwood, C., and Parker, L. (2010). University-Community Links to Higher Learning: Annual Report 2009–10, Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley.
  • Underwood, C., and Parker, L. (2011). The Tools at Hand: Agency, Industry and Technological Innovation in a Distributed Learning Community. In M. Bowdon, and R. Carpenter (Ed.), In Higher Education, Emerging Technologies, and Community Partnerships: Concepts, Models, and Applications, (pp. 300–313). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  • Underwood, C., Welsh, M., Gauvain, M., and Duffy, S. (2000). Learning at the Edges: Challenges to the Sustainability of Service Learning in Higher Education. Journal of Language and Learning Across the Disciplines, 4(3), 7–26.
  • Vásquez, O. (2003). La Clase Mágica: Imagining Optimal Possibilities in a Bilingual Learning Community, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Warschauer, M., Knobel, M., and Stone, L. (2004). Technology and Equity in Schooling: Deconstructing the Digital Divide. Educational Policy, 18(4), 562–588. doi: 10.1177/0895904804266469
  • Weber, S., and C. Mitchell. 2008. “Imaging, Keyboarding, and Posting Identities: Young People and New Media Technologies.” In Youth, Identity, and Digital Media, edited by David Buckingham, 25–48. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Accessed January 9, 2012. http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/dmal.9780262524834.025
  • Williams, R. 2006. “Using Cognitive Ethnography to Study Instruction.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Vol. 2, edited by K. Hay and D. Jickey, 838–844. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  • Woods, D., and P. Dempster. 2011. “Tales from the Bleeding Edge: The Qualitative Analysis of Complex Video Data Using Transana.” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum Qualitative Social Research 12(1): Article 17

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.