Can we avoid digital structural violence in future learning systems?

References

• Ananny, M., and K. Crawford. 2018. “Seeing without Knowing: Limitations of the Transparency Ideal and its Application to Algorithmic Accountability.” New Media & Society 20 (3): 97–989. doi:10.1177/1461444816676645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angwin, J., J. Larson, S. Mattu, and L. Kirchner. 2016. “Machine Bias: There’s Software Used Across the Country to Predict Future Criminals and it’s Biased Against Blacks.” ProPublica, May.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. J. 2017. The Education Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barocas, S., M. Hardt, and A. Narayanan. 2019. “Fairness and Machine Learning: Limitations and Opportunities.” https://fairmlbook.org (open access).
   Google Scholar
• Bergviken Rensfeldt, A., T. Hillman, and N. Selwyn. 2018. “Teachers ‘Liking’ Their Work? Exploring the Realities of Teacher Facebook Groups.” British Educational Research Journal 44 (2): 230–250. doi:10.1002/berj.3325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossen, C. 2006. “Participation, Power, Critique: Constructing a Standard for Electronic Patient Records.” Proceedings of the ninth conference on Participatory design: Expanding boundaries in design - Volume 1 (PDC ‘06), 1 vol., ACM, New York, NY, USA, 95–104. doi:10.1145/1147261.1147276.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourgois, P., and N. Scheper-Hughes, Response to Farmer, P. 2004. “An Anthropology of Structural Violence.” Current Anthropology 45 (3): 305–325. doi: 10.1086/382250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• boyd, d., and K. Crawford. 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 662–679. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buolamwini, J., and T. Gebru. 2018. “Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification.” Proceedings of Machine Learning Research Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 81 vols., 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, J. 2016. How the Machine Thinks: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512.
   Google Scholar
• Caliskan, A., J. Bryson, and A. Narayanan. 2017. “Semantics Derived Automatically from Language Corpora Contain Human-like Biases.” Science 356, April 14: 183–186. doi: 10.1126/science.aal4230
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, M., J. Law, and A. Rip. 1986. Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, C., L. Dearden, J. Micklewright, and A. Vignoles. 2016. Family Background and University Success: Differences in Higher Education Access and Outcomes in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A., S. K. Devitt, and M. Mann, eds. 2019. Good Data. Theory on Demand. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/125605/1/Good_Data_book.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, H., and T. Cole. 2010. “Exclusion from School: Short-term Setback or a Long Term of Difficulties?” European Journal of Special Needs Education 25 (2): 115–130. doi:10.1080/08856251003658652.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, C, and R Eynon. 2013. Teenagers and Technology. London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ignazio, C., and L. Klein. 2019. Data Feminism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drentea, P., and J. Moren-Cross. 2005. “Social Capital and Social Support on the Web: The Case of an Internet Mother Site.” Sociology of Health and Illness 27 (7): 920–943. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00464.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuNann Winter, D., and D. Leighton. 2001. “Structural Violence: Introduction.” In Peace, Conflict, and Violence: Peace Psychology for the 21st Century, edited by D. Christie, R. Wagner, and D. DuNann Winter, 1–14. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. 2012. Digital Dead End: Fighting for Social Justice in the Information Age. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eubanks, V. 2018. Automated Inequality. New York: St Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eynon, R. 2013. “The Rise of Big Data: What Does it Mean for Education, Technology, and Media Research?” Learning, Media and Technology 38 (3): 237–240. doi:10.1080/17439884.2013.771783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eynon, R. 2018. “Feminist Perspectives on Learning, Media and Technology: Recognition and Future Contributions.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (1): 1–2. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2018.1442848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eynon, R., and A. Geniets. 2016. “The Digital Skills Paradox: How Do Digitally Excluded Youth Develop Skills to Use the Internet?” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (3): 463–479. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2014.1002845
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, P. 2004. “An Anthropology of Structural Violence.” Current Anthropology 45 (3): 305–325. doi: 10.1086/382250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funes, M., and J. Mackness. 2018. “When Inclusion Excludes: A Counter Narrative of Open Online Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 43 (2): 119–138. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1444638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galtung, J. 1969. “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research 6 (3): 167–191. doi: 10.1177/002234336900600301
   Google Scholar
• Green, B. 2018. “Data Science as Political Action: Grounding Data Science in a Politics of Justice.” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.03435.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, J., and J. Reich. 2015. “Socioeconomic Status and MOOC Enrollment: Enriching Demographic Information with External Datasets.” Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge (LAK ‘15), ACM, New York, NY, USA, 59–63. doi:10.1145/2723576.2723615.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S., and M. Hintikka, eds. 1983. Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Hargittai, E. 2010. “Digital Na(t)ives? Variation in Internet Skills and Uses Among Members of the ‘Net Generation’.” Sociological Inquiry 80: 92–113. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartsock, N. 1983. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism.” In Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science, edited by S. Harding and M. B. Hintikka, 283–310. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, B., and J. Mönig. 2010. “Bringing ‘No Ceiling’ to Scratch: Can One Language Serve Kids and Computer Scientists?” Proceedings: Constructionism, Paris, France.
   Google Scholar
• Heeks, R. 1999. The Tyranny of Participation in Information Systems: Learning from Development Projects. Development Informatics Working Paper 4. Manchester, UK: Development Informatics Group, University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Hirom, U., V. S. Shyama, P. Doke, S. Lobo, S. Devkar, and N. Pandey. 2017. “A Critique on Participatory Design in Developmental Context: A Case Study.” In Cross-Cultural Design, edited by P. L. Rau, 647–658. CCD 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 10281 Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, B. and Mitchell, M. 2019. “Translation Tutorial: A History of Quantitative Fairness in Testing.” Tutorial given at FAT*2019, Atlanta, GA USA, January.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Ken. 1977. “Three Interactions between AI and Education.” Machine Intelligence 8: 422–429.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, K, and N Winters. 2017. Child-Friendly Programming Interfaces to AI Cloud Services. In: É. Lavoué, H. Drachsler, K. Verbert, J. Broisin, M. Pérez-Sanagustín (eds) Data Driven Approaches in Digital Education. EC-TEL 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10474. Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, M., C. Matuszek, and S. Munson. 2015. “Unequal Representation and Gender Stereotypes in Image Search Results for Occupations.” Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 3819–3828.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, C. D., R. Orr, G. D. Abowd, C. G. Atkeson, I. A. Essa, B. MacIntyre, E. Mynatt, T. E. Starner, and W. Newstetter. 1999. “The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research.” Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Cooperative Buildings — CoBuild’99.
   Google Scholar
• Krutka, D., S. Manca, S. Galvin, C. Greenhow, M. Koehler, and E. Askari. 2019. “Teaching “Against” Social Media: Confronting Problems of Profit in the Curriculum.” Teachers College Record 121: 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larke, L. 2019. “Agentic Neglect: Teachers as Gatekeepers of England’s National Computing Curriculum.” British Journal of Educational Technology, Early view. doi:10.1111/bjet.12744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loveday, V. 2018. “The Neurotic Academic: Anxiety, Casualisation, and Governance in the Neoliberalising University.” Journal of Cultural Economy 11 (2): 154–166. doi:10.1080/17530350.2018.1426032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luckin, R., W. Holmes, M. Griffiths, and L. B. Forcier. 2016. Intelligence Unleashed. An Argument for AI in Education. London: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Macgilchrist, F. 2019. “Cruel Optimism in Edtech: When the Digital Data Practices of Educational Technology Providers Inadvertently Hinder Educational Equity.” Learning, Media and Technology 44 (1): 77–86. doi:10.1080/17439884.2018.1556217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manovich, L. 2011. “Trending: The Promises and the Challenges of Big Social Data.” In Debates in the Digital Humanities, edited by M. Gold, 460–475. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, E. 2017. “Teachers on Twitter: Why You Should Join and How to Get Started.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/teacher-network/2017/apr/20/teachers-on-twitter-why-join-get-started-social-media.
   Google Scholar
• Narayan, U. 1988. “Working Together Across Differences: Some Considerations on Emotions and Political Practice.” Hypatia 3 (2): 31–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1988.tb00067.x
   Google Scholar
• Noble, S. U. 2018. Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, M. 2011. “Technological Determinism in Educational Technology Research: Some Alternative Ways of Thinking About the Relationship between Learning and Technology.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27: 373–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00406.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neil, C. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction. New York: Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, K., J. Robson, and N. Winters. 2018. “‘I Feel Like I Have a Disadvantage’: How Socio-economically Disadvantaged Students Make the Decision to Study at a Prestigious University.” Studies in Higher Education. doi:10.1080/03075079.2018.1460591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto, H. U., N. Kutscher, A. Klein, and S. Iske. 2005. “Social Inequality in the Virtual Space: How Do Young People Use the Internet? Results from Empirical Research about Online Use Differences and Acquiring Patterns of Young People.” http://www.kib-bielefeld.de/veroeffentlichungen.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Ozga, J. 2016. “Trust in Numbers? Digital Education Governance and the Inspection Process.” European Educational Research Journal 15 (1): 69–81. doi: 10.1177/1474904115616629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pane, Debra Mayes, and Tonette S. Rocco. 2009. “Critical Microethnography: The Search for Emancipatory Methods [101 Paragraphs].” Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research 10 (2): Art. 12. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0902129.
   Google Scholar
• Pangrazio, L. 2016. “Reconceptualising Critical Digital Literacy.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 37 (2): 163–174. doi:10.1080/01596306.2014.942836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquale, F. 2015. The Black Box Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2018. “Many Turn to YouTube for Children’s Content, News, How-To Lessons.” Accessed February 10, 2019. http://www.pewinternet.org/2018/11/07/many-turn-to-youtube-for-childrens-content-news-how-to-lessons/.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, T. 1994. “Making Things Quantitative.” Science in Context 7 (3): 389–407. doi: 10.1017/S0269889700001757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratner, H., B. L. Andersen, and S. R. Madsen. 2018. “Configuring the Teacher as Data User: Public-private Sector Mediations of National Test Data.” Learning, Media and Technology 44: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reich, J., and J. Ruipérez-Valiente. 2019. “The MOOC Pivot.” Science 363, January 11: 130–131. doi: 10.1126/science.aav7958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, M., R. Berg, and M. Eisenberg. 2000. “Beyond Black Boxes: Bringing Transparency and Aesthetics Back to Scientific Investigation.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 9 (1): 7–30. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0901_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieder, B., A. Matamoros-Fernández, and O. Coromina. 2018. “From Ranking Algorithms to ‘Ranking Cultures’: Investigating the Modulation of Visibility in YouTube Search Results.” Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 24 (1): 50–68. doi:10.1177/1354856517736982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, L. 2009. “A Taste for the Necessary: A Bourdieuian Approach to Digital Inequality.” Information, Communication & Society 12 (4): 488–507. doi: 10.1080/13691180902857678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, J. 2016. “Engagement in Structured Social Space: An Investigation of Teachers’ Online Peer-to-peer Interaction.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (1): 119–139. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1102743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, J. 2018. “Performance, Structure and Ideal Identity: Reconceptualising Teachers’ Engagement in Online Social Spaces.” British Journal of Educational Technology 49 (3): 439–450. doi:10.1111/bjet.12551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson, J., A. Randhawa, and E. Keep. 2018. Employability Skills Development in Studio Schools. Report for the Edge Foundation and Studio Schools Trust. London: The Edge Foundation. http://www.edge.co.uk/research/research-reports/report-on-the-create-curriculum-framework-in-studio-schools.
   Google Scholar
• Sandvig, C., K. Hamilton, K. Karahalios, and C. Langbort. 2016. “When the Algorithm Itself Is a Racist: #8232;Diagnosing Ethical Harm in the Basic Components of Software.” International Journal of Communication 10: 4972–4990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selbst, A., d. boyd, S. Friedler, S. Venkatasubramanian, and J. Vertesi. 2019. “Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems.” Proceedigs of FAT*2019, Atlanta, GA USA, January.
   Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2015. “Data Entry: Towards the Critical Study of Digital Data and Education.” Learning, Media and Technology 40 (1): 64–82. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2014.921628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandewaetere, M., P. Desmet, and G. Clarebout. 2011. “The Contribution of Learner Characteristics in the Development of Computer-based Adaptive Learning Environments.” Computers in Human Behavior 27 (1): 118–130. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.07.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weizenbaum, J. 1972. “On the Impact of the Computer on Society.” Science 176 (4035): 609–614. doi: 10.1126/science.176.4035.609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels, B. 2015. “Digital Divide Authentication, Status, and Power in a Digitally Organized Society.” International Journal of Communication 9: 2801–2818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, P., and N. Selwyn. 2012. “Learning Online? Educational Internet Use and Participation in Adult Learning, 2002 to 2010.” Educational Review 64 (4): 451–469. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2011.626123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, G. W., M. Suchowierska, and M. Campbell. 2004. “Developing and Systematically Implementing Participatory Action Research.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 85 (4 Suppl 2): 3–12. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.08.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B. 2018. “The Hidden Architecture of Higher Education: Building a Big Data Infrastructure for the ‘Smarter University’”: 1–26. doi:10.1186/s41239-018-0094-1.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfram, S. 2017. An Elementary Introduction to the Wolfram Language. 2nd ed. Hanborough: Wolfram Media.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, S. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar