1,771
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Smartphones in the Swedish upper-secondary classroom: A policy enactment perspective

Pages 230-243 | Received 24 Nov 2021, Accepted 02 Sep 2022, Published online: 15 Sep 2022

References

  • Aagaard, Jesper. 2017. “Breaking Down Barriers: The Ambivalent Nature of Technologies in the Classroom.” New Media & Society 19 (7): 1127–1143. doi:10.1177/1461444816631505.
  • Alexandersson, Kristina, and Pamela Davidsson. 2016. Eleverna och internet 2016 [The Students and the Internet 2016]. Stockholm: Internetstiftelsen.
  • Amez, Simon, and Stijn Baert. 2019. Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: A Literature Review. IZA Discussion Paper Series 12723. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3483961.
  • Amez, Simon, Suncica Vujić, Lieven De Marez, and Stijn Baert. 2021. “Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: First Evidence from Longitudinal Data.” New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/14614448211012374.
  • Asplund, Stig-Börje, Christina Olin-Scheller, and Marie Tanner. 2018. “Under the Teacher’s Radar: Literacy Practices in Task-Related Smartphone Use in the Connected Classroom.” L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 1–26. doi:10.17239/L1ESLL-2018.18.01.03.
  • Baert, Stijn, Suncica Vujić, Simon Amez, Matteo Claeskens, Thomas Daman, Arno Maeckelberge, Eddy Omey, and Lieven De Marez. 2020. “Smartphone Use and Academic Performance: Correlation or Causal Relationship?” Kyklos 73 (1): 22–46. doi:10.1111/kykl.12214.
  • Ball, Stephen J. 1997. “Policy Sociology and Critical Social Research: A Personal Review of Recent Education Policy and Policy Research.” British Educational Research Journal 23 (3): 257–274.
  • Ball, Stephen J. 2006. “The Necessity and Violence of Theory.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 27 (1): 3–10. doi:10.1080/01596300500510211.
  • Ball, Stephen J., Meg Maguire, and Annette Braun. 2012. How Schools Do Policy: Policy Enactments in Secondary School. London: Routledge.
  • Beland, Lous-Phillipe, and Richard Murphy. 2016. “Ill Communication: Technology, Distraction & Student Performance.” Labour Economics 41: 61–76.
  • Berg, Gunnar. 2018. Skolledarskap och skolans frirum. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
  • Chen, Quan, and Zheng Yan. 2016. “Does Multitasking with Mobile Phones Affect Learning? A Review.” Computers in Human Behavior 54: 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.047.
  • David, Prabu, Jung-Hyun Kim, Jared S. Brickman, Weina Ran, and Christine M. Curtis. 2015. “Mobile Phone Distraction While Studying.” New Media & Society 17 (10): 1661–1679. doi:10.1177/1461444814531692.
  • Drotner, Kirsten. 1992. “Modernity and Media Panics.” In Media Cultures: Reappraising Transnational Media, edited by Michael Skovmand, and Kim Christian Schrøder, 42–63. London: Routledge.
  • Forsman, Michael. 2014. Duckface/Stoneface: Sociala medier, onlinespel och bildkommunikation bland killar och tjejer, i årskurs 4 och 7. Stockholm: Statens medieråd.
  • Hassoun, Dan. 2015. “‘All Over the Place’: A Case Study of Classroom Multitasking and Attentional Performance.” New Media & Society 17 (10): 1680–1695. doi:10.1177/1461444814531756.
  • Kay, R., D. Benzimra, and J. Li. 2017. “Exploring Factors That Influence Technology-Based Distractions in Bring Your Own Device Classrooms.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 55 (7): 974–995.
  • Kessel, Dany, Hulda Lif Hardardottir, and Björn Tyrefors. 2019. The Impact of Banning Mobile Phones in Swedish Secondary Schools. Working Paper Series 1288. Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
  • Kuznekoff, Jeffrey, H. Stevie Munz, and Scott Titsworth. 2015. “Mobile Phones in the Classroom: Examining the Effects of Texting, Twitter, and Message Content on Student Learning.” Communication Education 64 (3): 344–365. doi:10.1080/03634523.2015.1038727.
  • Lee, Seungyeon, Ian M. McDonough, Jessica S. Mendoza, Mikenzi B. Brasfield, Tasnuva Enam, Catherine Reynolds, and Benjamin C. Pody. 2021. “Cellphone Addiction Explains How Cellphones Impair Learning for Lecture Materials.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 35 (1): 123–135. doi:10.1002/acp.3745.
  • OECD. 2016. Skills for a Digital World: 2016 Ministerial Meeting on the Digital Economy Background Report. OECD Digital Economy Papers No. 250. Paris: OECD. doi:10.1787/5jlwz83z3wnw-en.
  • Olin-Scheller, Christina, Marie Tanner, Stig-Börje Asplund, Janne Kontio, and Peter Wikström. 2020. “Social Excursions During the In-Between Spaces of Lessons. Students’ Smartphone Use in the Upper Secondary School Classroom.” Scandinavian Journal of Education 65 (4): 615–632. doi:10.1080/00313831.2020.1739132.
  • Olin-Scheller, Christina, Marie Tanner, and Anna Öhman. 2018. “Klassrummet som galleri – gymnasieelevers identitetsarbete i ett uppkopplat klassrum. KAPET.” In Berättelser. Vänbok till Héctor Péréz Priéto, edited by Olin-Scheller Tanner, and A. Löfdahl, 143–158. Karlstad: Karlstads universitet.
  • Ott, Torbjörn. 2017. Mobile Phones in School: From Disturbing Objects to Infrastructure for Learning. Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
  • Redecker, Christine. 2017. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcompedu.
  • Sahlström, Fritjof, Marie Tanner, and Verneri Valasmo. 2019. “Connected Youth, Connected Classrooms. Smartphone Use and Student and Teacher Participation During Plenary Teaching.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 21: 311–331.
  • Scollon, Ron, and Susie W. Scollon. 2004. Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge.
  • Scollon, Ron, and Susie W. Scollon. 2007. “Nexus Analysis: Refocusing Ethnography on Action.” Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (5): 608–625. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00342.x.
  • Selwyn, Neil, and Jesper Aagaard. 2021. “Banning Mobile Phones from Classrooms: An Opportunity to Advance Understandings of Technology Addiction, Distraction and Cyberbullying.” British Journal of Education Technologies 52: 8–19. doi:10.1111/bjet.12943.
  • SFS (Svensk författningssamling). 2010. “800. Skollag. [Swedish Code of Statutes: Education Statute].”
  • Singh, Parlo, Stephen Heimans, and Kathryn Glasswell. 2014. “Policy Enactment, Context and Performativity: Ontological Politics and Researching Australian National Partnership Policies.” Journal of Education Policy 29 (6): 826–844. doi:10.1080/02680939.2014.891763.
  • Skolverket. 2016. It-användning och it-kompetens i skolan. Stockholm: Skolverket.
  • Standage, Tom. 1998. The Victorian Internet: The Remarkable Story of the Telegraph and the Nineteenth Century’s Online Pioneers. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
  • Sveningsson Elm Malin. 2008. “Young People’s Gender and Identity Work in a Swedish Internet Community.” In The Future of Identity in the Information Society. Privacy and Identity 2007, edited by S. Fischer-Hübner, P. Duquenoy, A. Zuccato, and L. Martucci, 113–126. Boston: Springer.
  • Utbildningsdepartementet. 2017. Nationell digitaliseringsstrategi för skolväsendet. Stockholm: Utbildningsdepartementet. https://www.regeringen.se/informationsmaterial/2017/10/regeringen-beslutar-omnationell-digitaliseringsstrategi-for-skolvasendet/.
  • Valasmo, Verneri, Antti Paakkari, and Fritjof Sahlström. 2022. “The Device on the Desk: A Sociomaterial Analysis of How Snapchat Adapts to and Participates in the Classroom.” Learning, Media and Technology. doi:10.1080/17439884.2022.2067176.
  • Willermark, Sara. 2018. “Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge: A Review of Empirical Studies Published from 2011 to 2016.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 56 (3): 315–343. doi:10.1177/0735633117713114.