Highly cited educational technology journal articles: a descriptive and critical analysis

References

• Aksnes, D. 2003. “A Macro Study of Self-Citation.” Scientometrics 56 (2): 235–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., N. Bastardoz, Y. Liu, and C. Schriesheim. 2014. “What Makes Articles Highly Cited?” The Leadership Quarterly 25 (1): 152–179. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avenier, M., and C. Thomas. 2015. “Finding One’s way Around Various Methodological Guidelines for Doing Rigorous Case Studies: A Comparison of Four Epistemological Frameworks.” Systemes D'information Management 20 (1): 61–98. doi:10.3917/sim.151.0061.
   Google Scholar
• Azer, S., and S. Azer. 2019. “Top-cited Articles in Medical Professionalism: A Bibliometric Analysis Versus Altmetric Scores.” BMJ Open 9 (7): e029433. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, L. 2014. “The Origin and Success of Qualitative Research.” International Journal of Market Research 56 (2): 167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigum, C., and J. Kenway. 2005. “New Information Technologies and the Ambiguous Future of Schooling—Some Possible Scenarios.” In Extending Educational Change, edited by A. Hargreaves, 95–115. Cham, NL: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bodily, R., H. Leary, and R. E. West. 2019. “Research Trends in Instructional Design and Technology Journals.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (1): 64–79. doi:10.1111/bjet.12712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, M., and K. Buntins. 2018. “An Analysis of the Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 2013–2017.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 34 (4), n.p. doi:10.14742/ajet.4359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, M., O. Zawacki-Richter, and M. Nichols. 2019. “Revisiting Five Decades of Educational Technology Research: A Content and Authorship Analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (1): 12–63. doi:10.1111/bjet.12730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caon, M. 2017. “Gaming the Impact Factor: Where who Cites What, Whom and When.” Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine 40 (2): 273–276. doi:10.1007/s13246-017-0547-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cloutier, C., and D. Ravasi. 2021. “Using Tables to Enhance Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research.” Strategic Organization 19 (1): 113–133. doi:10.1177/1476127020979329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, I. 2003. Qualitative Data Analysis: A User Friendly Guide for Social Scientists. London, U.K.: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duyx, B., M. Urlings, G. Swaen, L. Bouter, and M. Zeegers. 2017. “Scientific Citations Favor Positive Results: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 88: 92–101. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgendi, M. 2019. “Characteristics of a Highly Cited Article: A Machine Learning Perspective.” IEEE Access 7: 87977–87986. doi:10.1109/access.2019.2925965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanelli, D. 2012. “Negative Results are Disappearing from Most Disciplines and Countries.” Scientometrics 90 (3): 891–904. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farsani, M. A., H. R. Jamali, M. Beikmohammadi, B. D. Ghorbani, and L. Soleimani. 2021. “Methodological Orientations, Academic Citations, and Scientific Collaboration in Applied Linguistics: What do Research Synthesis and Bibliometrics Indicate?” System 100: 102547. doi:10.1016/j.system.2021.102547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, M., and J. Knox. 2019. “Global Technologies, Local Practices.” Learning, Media and Technology 44 (3): 225–234. doi:10.1080/17439884.2019.1640741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Google Scholar. n.d. https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/metrics.html#metrics.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, M. J., and A. Booth. 2009. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information & Libraries Journal 26 (2): 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönfors, Matti. 2011. Laadullisen tutkimuksen kenttätyömenetelmät. Hämeenlinna, Finland: SoFia-Sosiologi-Filosofiapu Vilkka.
   Google Scholar
• Halverson, L., C. Graham, K. Spring, J. Drysdale, and C. Henrie. 2014. “A Thematic Analysis of the Most Highly Cited Scholarship in the First Decade of Blended Learning Research.” The Internet and Higher Education 20: 20–34. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood, N. 2009. “An Interview-Based Study of the Functions of Citations in Academic Writing Across two Disciplines.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (3): 497–518. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinrich, E., Henderson, M., and Redmond, P. 2018. ‘How International is AJET?’ Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4): i – vi. doi:10.14742/ajet.4830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, W. G. 2008. Quantitative research design. http://www.citeulike.org/group/6675/article/3424132.
   Google Scholar
• Hussein, A. 2012. “Freirian and Postcolonial Perspectives on E-Learning Development: A Case Study of Staff Development in an African University.” The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy 4 (1): 135–153.
   Google Scholar
• Ioannidis, J., M. Salholz-Hillel, K. Boyack, and J. Baas. 2021. “The Rapid, Massive Growth of COVID-19 Authors in the Scientific Literature.” bioRxiv, doi:10.1101/2020.12.15.422900.
   Google Scholar
• Jamali, H. R. 2018. “Does Research Using Qualitative Methods (Grounded Theory, Ethnography, and Phenomenology) Have More Impact?” Library & Information Science Research 40 (3–4): 201–207. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2018.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T., D. Cable, A. Colbert, and S. Rynes. 2007. “What Causes a Management Article to be Cited—Article, Author, or Journal?” Academy of Management Journal 50 (3): 491–506. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.25525577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keats, D. 1999. Interviewing: A Practical Guide for Students and Professionals. Sydney: UNSW Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, C., and M. Jennions. 2006. “The h-Index and Career Assessment by Numbers.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21 (4): 167–170. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.01.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunnath, S. N., D. Herrmannova, D. Pride, and P. Knoth. 2021. “A Meta-Analysis of Semantic Classification of Citations.” Quantitative Science Studies 2 (4): 1170–1215. doi:10.1162/qss_a_00159.
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., and S. Brinkman. 2009. Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Learning, Media and Technology. n.d. “Aims and scope.” https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show = aimsScope&journalCode = cjem20.
   Google Scholar
• Lund, B. D. 2022. “Is Academic Research and Publishing Still Leaving Developing Countries Behind?” Accountability in Research 29 (4): 224–231. doi:10.1080/08989621.2021.1913124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-Martín, A., M. Thelwall, E. Orduna-Malea, and E. Delgado López-Cózar. 2021. “Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Scopus, Dimensions, Web of Science, and OpenCitations’ COCI: A Multidisciplinary Comparison of Coverage via Citations.” Scientometrics 126 (1): 871–906. doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03690-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, K. R., E. Yang, S. W. Lewis, B. R. Vaidyanathan, and M. Gorman. 2020. “International Scientific Collaborative Activities and Barriers to Them in Eight Societies.” Accountability in Research 27 (8): 477–495. doi:10.1080/08989621.2020.1774373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertala, P. 2020. “Misunderstanding Child-Centeredness: The Case of “Child 2.0” and Media Education.” Journal of Media Literacy Education 12 (1): 26–41. doi:10.23860/JMLE-2020-12-1-3.
   Google Scholar
• Mertala, P. 2021. ““‘It is Important at This Point to Make Clear That This Study is not “Anti-IPad”’: Ed-Tech Speak Around IPads in Educational Technology Research.” Learning, Media and Technology 46 (2): 230–242. doi:10.1080/17439884.2021.1868501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Muller, J. Z. 2019. The Tyranny of Metrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Sanagustín, M., M. Nussbaum, I. Hilliger, C. Alario-Hoyos, R. Heller, P. Twining, and C. Tsai. 2017. “Research on ICT in K-12 Schools: A Review of Experimental and Survey-Based Studies in Computers & Education 2011 to 2015.” Computers and Education 104: A1–A15. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzhaupt, A., C. Sessums, and M. Johnson. 2012. “Where Should Educational Technologists Publish Their Research? An Examination of Peer-Reviewed Journals Within the Field of Educational Technology and Factors Influencing Publication Choice.” Educational Technology 52 (6): 47–56.
   Google Scholar
• Scimaco Journal & Country Rank. n.d. https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?category=3304.
   Google Scholar
• Selim, H. M. 2007. “Critical Success Factors for e-Learning Acceptance: Confirmatory Factor Models.” Computers & Education 49 (2): 396–413. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2016. ““Minding our Language: Why Education and Technology is Full of Bullshit … and What Might be Done About it.” Learning, Media and Technology 41 (3): 437–443. doi:10.1080/17439884.2015.1012523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. 2020. “How Evidence-Based Reform Will Transform Research and Practice in Education.” Educational Psychologist 55 (1): 21–31. doi:10.1080/00461520.2019.1611432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stang, A., S. Jonas, and C. Poole. 2018. “Case Study in Major Quotation Errors: A Critical Commentary on the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.” European Journal of Epidemiology 33 (11): 1025–1031. doi:10.1007/s10654-018-0443-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stremersch, S., I. Verniers, and P. C. Verhoef. 2007. “The Quest for Citations: Drivers of Article Impact.” Journal of Marketing 71 (3): 171–193. doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.3.171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swygart-Hobaugh, A. 2004. “A Citation Analysis of the Quantitative/Qualitative Methods Debate's Reflection in Sociology Research: Implications for Library Collection Development.” Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services 28 (2): 180–195. doi:10.1080/14649055.2004.10765983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahamtan, I., A. Safipour Afshar, and K. Ahamdzadeh. 2016. “Factors Affecting Number of Citations: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.” Scientometrics 107 (3): 1195–1225. doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twining, P., R. S. Heller, M. Nussbaum, and C. C. Tsai. 2017. “Some Guidance on Conducting and Reporting Qualitative Studies.” Computers & Education 106: A1–A9. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valtonen, T., S. López-Pernas, M. Saqr, H. Vartiainen, E. T. Sointu, and M. Tedre. 2022. “The Nature and Building Blocks of Educational Technology Research.” Computers in Human Behavior 128: 107123. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, R., A. Younas, S. Rehman, and P. Ali. 2021. “Clarivate Listed Nursing Journals in 2020: What They Publish and how They Measure use of Social Media.” medRxiv. doi:10.1101/2021.04.19.21255561
   Google Scholar
• Web of Science. 2021. “Essential Science Indicators - Highly Cited Papers.” https://webofscience.help.clarivate.com/en-us/Content/esi-highly-cited-papers.html.
   Google Scholar
• West, R., and J. Borup. 2014. “An Analysis of a Decade of Research in 10 Instructional Design and Technology Journals.” British Journal of Educational Technology 45 (4): 545–556. doi:10.1111/bjet.12081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, B., J. Potter, and R. Eynon. 2019. “New Research Problems and Agendas in Learning, Media and Technology: The Editors’ Wishlist.” Learning, Media and Technology 44 (2): 87–91. doi:10.1080/17439884.2019.1614953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., U. Alturki, and A. Aldraiweesh. 2017. “Review and Content Analysis of the International Review of Research in Open and Distance/Distributed Learning (2000–2015).” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 18 (2): 1–26. doi:10.19173/irrodl.v18i2.2806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., and C. Latchem. 2018. “Exploring Four Decades of Research in Computers & Education.” Computers & Education 122: 136–152. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawacki-Richter, O., and S. Naidu. 2016. “Mapping Research Trends from 35 Years of Publications in Distance Education.” Distance Education 37 (3): 245–269. doi:10.1080/01587919.2016.1185079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurita, Gustavo, Jose-Maria Merigó, and Lobos-Ossandón Valeria. 2016. “A Bibliometric Analysis of Journals in Educational Research.” Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 1: 403–408.
   Google Scholar