2,170
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Using participatory video for co-production and collaborative research with refugees: critical reflections from the Digital Place-makers program

, &
Pages 306-319 | Received 14 Mar 2022, Accepted 20 Dec 2022, Published online: 14 Jan 2023

References

  • Alencar, A. 2020. “Digital Place-Making Practices and Daily Struggles of Venezuelan (Forced) Migrants in Brazil.” In The SAGE Handbook of Media and Migration, edited by Kevin Smets, Koen Leurs, Myria Georgiou, Saskia Witteborn, and Radhika Gajjala, 503–514. London: Sage.
  • Alencar, A., and V. Tsagkroni. 2019. “Prospects of Refugee Integration in the Netherlands: Social Capital, Information Practices and Digital Media.” Media and Communication 7 (2): 184–194. doi:10.17645/mac.v7i2.1955.
  • Bloemraad, I., and C. Menjívar. 2022. “Precarious Times, Professional Tensions: The Ethics of Migration Research and the Drive for Scientific Accountability.” International Migration Review 56 (1): 4–32. doi:10.1177/01979183211014455.
  • Blomfield, I., and C. Lenette. 2018. “Artistic Representations of Refugees: What is the Role of the Artist?” Journal of Intercultural Studies 39 (3): 322–338. doi:10.1080/07256868.2018.1459517.
  • Brown, K. 2011. “‘Vulnerability’: Handle with Care.” Ethics and Social Welfare 5 (3): 313–321. doi:10.1080/17496535.2011.597165.
  • Bruinenberg, H., S. Sprenger, E. Omerović, and K. Leurs. 2021. “Practicing Critical Media Literacy Education with/for Young Migrants: Lessons Learned from a Participatory Action Research Project.” International Communication Gazette 83 (1): 26–47. doi:10.1177/1748048519883511.
  • Brun, C. 2001. “Reterritorilizing the Relationship Between People and Place in Refugee Studies.” Geograbska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 83 (1): 15–25. doi:10.1111/j.0435-3684.2001.00087.x.
  • Caretta, M., and C. Faria. 2020. “Time and Care in the ‘Lab’ and the Field: Slow Mentoring and Feminist Research in Geography.” Geographical Review 110 (1–2): 172–182. doi:10.1111/gere.12369.
  • Fiedler, A. 2019. “The Gap Between Here and There: Communication and Information Processes in the Migration Context of Syrian and Iraqi Refugees on Their Way to Germany.” International Communication Gazette 81 (4): 327–345. doi:10.1177/1748048518775001.
  • Fish, J., and M. Syed. 2021. “Digital Storytelling Methodologies: Recommendations for a Participatory Approach to Engaging Underrepresented Communities in Counseling Psychology Research.” Journal of Counseling Psychology 68 (3): 271–285. doi:10.1037/cou0000532.
  • Gifford, S. M., and R. Wilding. 2013. “Digital Escapes? ICTs, Settlement and Belonging among Karen Youth in Melbourne, Australia.” Journal of Refugee Studies 26 (4): 558–575. doi:10.1093/jrs/fet020.
  • Gillespie, M., S. Osseiran, and M. Cheesman. 2018. “Syrian Refugees and the Digital Passage to Europe: Smartphone Infrastructures and Affordances.” Social Media + Society 4: 1. doi:10.1177/2056305118764440.
  • Grabska, K. 2022. “In Whose Voice? And for Whom? Collaborative Filming and Narratives of Forced Migration.” In Documenting Displacement. Questioning Methodological Boundaries in Forced Migration Research, edited by Katarzina Grabska and Christina Clark-Kazak, 201–223. Québec: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  • Hall, J., M. Gaved, and J. Sargent. 2021. “Participatory Research Approaches in Times of Covid-19: A Narrative Literature Review.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20. doi:10.1177/16094069211010087.
  • Harris, A. 2010. “Race and Refugeity: Ethnocinema as Radical Pedagogy.” Qualitative Inquiry 16 (9): 768–777. doi:10.1177/1077800410374445.
  • Humpage, L., F. Fozdar, J. Marlowe, and L. Hartley. 2019. “Photovoice and Refugee Research: The Case for a ‘Layers’ Versus ‘Labels’ Approach to Vulnerability.” Research Ethics 15 (3-4): 1–16. doi:10.1177/1747016119864353.
  • Jean, M. 2015. “The Role of Farming in Place-Making Processes of Resettled Refugees.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 34 (3): 46–69. doi:10.1093/rsq/hdv007.
  • Karooma, C. 2019. “Research Fatigue among Rwandan Refugees in Uganda.” Forced Migration Review 61: 18–19. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c663a48a99e46dfb32d1579035c00ce6/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=55113
  • La Spina, E. 2021. “Migrant Vulnerability or Asylum Seeker/Refugee Vulnerability? More Than Complex Categories.” Oñati Socio-Legal Series 11 (6(S): S82–S115. doi:10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1225.
  • Lenette, C. 2019. Arts-based Methods in Refugee Research. Singapore: Springer.
  • Lenette, C., L. Cox, and M. Brough. 2015. “Digital Storytelling as a Social Work Tool: Learning from Ethnographic Research with Women from Refugee Backgrounds.” The British Journal of Social Work 45 (3): 988–1005. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct184.
  • Leurs, K., and K. Smets. 2018. “Five Questions for Digital Migration Studies: Learning from Digital Connectivity and Forced Migration In(to) Europe.” Social Media + Society 4 (1). doi:10.1177/2056305118764425.
  • Liegghio, M., and L. Caragata. 2021. “COVID-19 and Youth Living in Poverty: The Ethical Considerations of Moving from In-Person Interviews to a Photovoice Using Remote Methods.” Affilia 36 (2): 149–155. doi:10.1177/0886109920939051.
  • Lin, V. W., J. Ham, G. Gu, M. Sunuwar, C. Luo, and L. Gil-Besada. 2019. “Reflections Through the Lens: Participatory Video with Migrant Domestic Workers, Asylum Seekers and Ethnic Minorities.” Emotion, Space and Society 33: 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2019.100622.
  • Lockowandt, M. 2013. “Inclusion Through Art: An Organizational Guideline to Using the Participatory Arts with Young Refugees and Asylum Seekers.” Accessed February 10, 2022. https://www.artshealthresources.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/2013-Inclusion_Through_Art_-1.pdf.
  • Luna, F. 2009. “Elucidating the Concept of Vulnerability: Layers not Labels.” International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1): 121–139. doi:10.3138/ijfab.2.1.121.
  • Lunch, N., and C. Lunch. 2006. Insights into Participatory Video: A Handbook for the Field. Oxford, UK: InsightShare.
  • Mak, M. 2012. “Visual Postproduction in Participatory Video-Making Processes.” In Handbook of Participatory Video, edited by E.-J. Milne, Claudia Mitchel, and Naydene de Lange, 194–207. New York: Altamira Press.
  • Marzi, S. 2021. “Participatory Video from a Distance: Co-Producing Knowledge During the COVID-19 Pandemic Using Smartphones.” Qualitative Research. doi:10.1177/14687941211038171.
  • Parr, H. 2007. “Collaborative Film-Making as Process, Method and Text in Mental Health Research.” Cultural Geographies 14 (1): 114–138. doi:10.1177/1474474007072822.
  • Ratnam, C., and D. Drozdzewski. 2021. “Research Ethics with Vulnerable Groups: Ethics in Practice and Procedure.” Gender, Place & Culture 29 (7): 1009–1030. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2021.1994932.
  • Robertson, T., and J. Simonsen. 2013. “Participatory Design: An Introduction.” In Routledge Handbook of Participatory Design, edited by Jesper Simonsen and Toni Robertson, 1–18. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Sarria Sanz, C., and A. Alencar. 2020. “Rebuilding the Yanacona Home in the City: The Role of Digital Technologies for Indigenous Place-Making Practices in Bogota, Colombia.” Global Perspectives 1 (1): 13403. doi:10.1525/gp.2020.13403.
  • Vasudevan, L., and J. Riina-Ferrie. 2019. “Collaborative Filmmaking and Affective Traces of Belonging.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (4): 1560–1572. doi:10.1111/bjet.12808.
  • Vera Espinoza, M. 2020. “Lessons from Refugees: Research Ethics in the Context of Resettlement in South America.” Migration and Society 3 (1): 247–253. https://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/60683.