Parents’ ontological beliefs regarding the use of conversational agents at home: resisting the neoliberal discourse

References

• Ajzen, I., and M. Fishbein. 1975. “A Bayesian Analysis of Attribution Processes.” Psychological Bulletin 82 (2): 261–277. doi:10.1037/h0076477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beneteau, E., A. Boone, Y. Wu, J. A. Kientz, J. Yip, and A. Hiniker. 2020. “Parenting with Alexa: Exploring the Introduction of Smart Speakers on Family Dynamics.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1966. Alain Darbel, L’amour de l’art, les musees d’art et leur public. Paris: Minuit.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. “The Economics of Linguistic Exchanges.” Social Science Information 16 (6): 645–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1989. “Social Space and Symbolic Power.” Sociological Theory 7 (1): 14–25. doi:10.2307/202060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1998a. Acts of Resistance. New York: New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1998b. “Neo-liberalism, the Utopia (Becoming a Reality) of Unlimited Exploitation.” In Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market, 94–105. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, W. 2015. Undoing the Demos. Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Boston: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cannizzaro, S., R. Procter, S. Ma, and C. Maple. 2020. “Trust in the Smart Home: Findings from a Nationally Representative Survey in the UK.” PLoS One 15 (5): e0231615. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli, R. 2004a. “An Empirical Study of the Inhibitors of Technology Usage.” ICIS 2004 Proceedings, 13.
   Google Scholar
• Cenfetelli, R. T. 2004b. “Inhibitors and Enablers as Dual Factor Concepts in Technology Usage.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5 (11): 472–492. doi:10.17705/1jais.00059.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-C., S.-H. Li, and C.-Y. Li. 2012. “Recent Related Research in Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review.” Australian Journal of Business and Management Research 1 (9): 124. doi:10.52283/NSWRCA.AJBMR.20110109A14.
   Google Scholar
• Chocarro, R., M. Cortiñas, and G. Marcos-Matás. 2021. “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards Chatbots in Education: A Technology Acceptance Model Approach Considering the Effect of Social Language, bot Proactiveness, and Users’ Characteristics.” Educational Studies, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopra, R. 2003. “Neoliberalism as Doxa: Bourdieu's Theory of the State and the Contemporary Indian Discourse on Globalization and Liberalization.” Cultural Studies 17 (3-4): 419–444. doi:10.1080/0950238032000083881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., V. Braun, and N. Hayfield. 2015. “Thematic Analysis.” In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, edited by Jonathan A. Smith, 222–248. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Daliri-Ngametua, R., I. Hardy, and S. Creagh. 2022. “Data, Performativity and the Erosion of Trust in Teachers.” Cambridge Journal of Education 52 (3): 391–407. doi:10.1080/0305764X.2021.2002811.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., and P. Bansel. 2007. “Neoliberalism and Education.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 20 (3): 247–259. doi:10.1080/09518390701281751.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F. D. 1986. “A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-user Information Systems: Theory and Results.” Doctoral diss., MiT SLOAN School of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Do, D. H., S. Lakhal, M. Bernier, J. Bisson, L. Bergeron, and C. St-Onge. 2022. ““More than Just a Medical Student”: A Mixed Methods Exploration of a Structured Volunteering Programme for Undergraduate Medical Students.” BMC Medical Education 22 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1186/s12909-021-03037-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facer, K. 2011. Learning Futures: Education, Technology and Social Change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Festerling, J., and I. Siraj. 2020. “Alexa, What are You? Exploring Primary School Children’s Ontological Perceptions of Digital Voice Assistants in Open Interactions.” Human Development 64 (1): 26–43. doi:10.1159/000508499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., and P. S. Malone. 1995. “The cOrrespondence Bias.” Psychological Bulletin 117 (1): 21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillis, J. R. 1997. A World of Their Own Making: Myth, Ritual, and the Quest for Family Values. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gong, M., Y. Xu, and Y. Yu. 2004. “An Enhanced Technology Acceptance Model for Web-Based Learning.” Journal of Information Systems Education 15 (4).
   Google Scholar
• Grenfell, M. J. 2004. Pierre Bourdieu: Agent Provocateur. New York: A&C Black.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, V. 2022. “Bringing in the Technological, Ethical, Educational and Social-Structural for a New Education Data Governance.” Learning, Media and Technology, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, C., S. Hennessy, N. Mercer, M. Vrikki, and L. Wheatley. 2019. “Teacher–Student Dialogue During Classroom Teaching: Does it Really Impact on Student Outcomes?” Journal of the Learning Sciences 28 (4-5): 462–512. doi:10.1080/10508406.2019.1573730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. 1973. Experience and Judgement: Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C., J. Bezemer, and K. O'Halloran. 2016. Introducing Multimodality. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kafai, Y. B., D. A. Fields, and M. S. Cook. 2010. “Your Second Selves.” Games and Culture 5 (1): 23–42. doi:10.1177/1555412009351260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. 2000. “Thinking with Bourdieu Against Bourdieu: A ‘Practical’ Critique of the Habitus.” Sociological Theory 18 (3): 417–433. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. R., and J. He. 2006. “A Meta-Analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information & Management 43 (6): 740–755. doi:10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kory-Westlund, J. M., and C. Breazeal. 2019. “A Long-Term Study of Young Children's Rapport, Social Emulation, and Language Learning with a Peer-Like Robot Playmate in Preschool.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 6: 81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G. 2011. “‘Partnerships in Research’: Multimodality and Ethnography.” Qualitative Research 11 (3): 239–260. doi:10.1177/1468794111399836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucirkova, N., and R. Flewitt. 2020. “Understanding Parents’ Conflicting Beliefs About Children’s Digital Book Reading.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 1468798420930361. doi:10.1080/03004430.2018.1458718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kucirkova, N., and K. Littleton. 2016. The Digital Reading Habits of Children. A National Survey of Parents’ Perceptions of and Practices in Relation to Children’s Reading for Pleasure with Print and Digital Books, 380–387.
   Google Scholar
• Laumer, S., and A. Eckhardt. 2010. “Why do People Reject Technologies?–Towards an Understanding of Resistance to it-Induced Organizational Change.” ICIS 2010 Proceedings, 151. https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/151.
   Google Scholar
• Laumer, S., and A. Eckhardt. 2012. “Integrated Series in Information Systems.” Information Systems Theory 28: 63–86. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6108-2_4.
   Google Scholar
• Laumer, S., C. Maier, and A. Eckhardt. 2009. “Towards an Understanding of an Individual's Resistance to Use an Information System-empirical Examinations and Directions for Future Research.” DIGIT 2009 Proceedings, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, C., S. Šabanović, L. Dombrowski, A. D. Miller, E. Brady, and K. F. MacDorman. 2021. “Parental Acceptance of Children’s Storytelling Robots: A Projection of the Uncanny Valley of AI.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 8: 49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., S. Rawolle, and S. Taylor. 2005. “Globalizing Policy Sociology in Education: Working with Bourdieu.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (6): 759–777. doi:10.1080/02680930500238945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littleton, K., and N. Mercer. 2013. Interthinking: Putting Talk to Work. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S., and K. Pothong. 2022. “Imaginative Play in Digital Environments: Designing Social and Creative Opportunities for Identity Formation.” Information, Communication & Society 25 (4): 485–501. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2022.2046128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopatovska, I., K. Rink, I. Knight, K. Raines, K. Cosenza, H. Williams, P. Sorsche, D. Hirsch, Q. Li, and A. Martinez. 2019. “Talk to Me: Exploring User Interactions with the Amazon Alexa.” Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 51 (4): 984–997. doi:10.1177/0961000618759414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovato, S., and A. M. Piper. 2015, June. ““Siri, is this you?” Understanding young children’s interactions with voice input systems.” In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, 335–338.
   Google Scholar
• Lupton, D., and B. Williamson. 2017. “The Datafied Child: The Dataveillance of Children and Implications for Their Rights.” New Media & Society 19 (5): 780–794. doi:10.1177/1461444816686328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macgilchrist, F., J. Potter, and B. Williamson. 2021. Shifting Scales of Research on Learning, Media and Technology. Vol. 46, pp. 369–376. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Marangunić, N., and A. Granić. 2015. “Technology Acceptance Model: A Literature Review from 1986 to 2013.” Universal Access in the Information Society 14 (1): 81–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McReynolds, E., S. Hubbard, T. Lau, A. Saraf, M. Cakmak, and F. Roesner. 2017. “Toys That Listen: A Study of Parents, Children, and Internet-Connected Toys.” Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrović, L. R. 2005. “Bourdieu's Criticism of the Neoliberal Philosophy of Development, the Myth of ‘Mondialization’ and the New Europe.” FACTA UNIVERSITATIS-Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History 4 (1): 37–49.
   Google Scholar
• Moltó Egea, O. 2014. “Neoliberalism, Education and the Integration of ICT in Schools. A Critical Reading.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 23 (2): 267–283. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2013.810168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olssen, M., and M. A. Peters. 2005. “Neoliberalism, Higher Education and the Knowledge Economy: From the Free Market to Knowledge Capitalism.” Journal of Education Policy 20 (3): 313–345. doi:10.1080/02680930500108718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Önal, N. 2017. “Use of Interactive Whiteboard in the Mathematics Classroom: Students’ Perceptions within the Framework of the Technology Acceptance Model.” International Journal of Instruction 10 (4): 67–86. doi:10.12973/iji.2017.1045a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, B., D. Macdonald, and P. Hay. 2015. “‘Do I Have a Choice?’ The Influences of Family Values and Investments on Chinese Migrant Young People's Lifestyles and Physical Activity Participation in Australia.” Sport, Education and Society 20 (8): 1048–1064. doi:10.1080/13573322.2013.833504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, N., R. Roman, S. Lee, and J. E. Chung. 2009. “User Acceptance of a Digital Library System in Developing Countries: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model.” International Journal of Information Management 29 (3): 196–209. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piwek, L., and A. Joinson. 2016. ““What do They Snapchat About?” Patterns of use in Time-Limited Instant Messaging Service.” Computers in Human Behavior 54: 358–367. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcheron, M., J. E. Fischer, S. Reeves, and S. Sharples. 2018. “Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life.” In Proceedings of The 2018 Chi Conference On Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12, April.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, L., and B. Szerszynski. 2012. “Neoliberalism and Technology: Perpetual Innovation or Perpetual Crisis.” Neoliberalism and Technoscience: Critical Assessments, 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, V. L., Y. Chen, and L. M. Thorimbert. 2010. “Artificially Intelligent Conversational Agents in Libraries.” Library Hi Tech 28 (4): 496–522. doi:10.1108/07378831011096196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N. 2016. “Digital Downsides: Exploring University Students’ Negative Engagements with Digital Technology.” Teaching in Higher Education 21 (8): 1006–1021. doi:10.1080/13562517.2016.1213229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selwyn, N., L. Campbell, and M. Andrejevic. 2022. “Autoroll: Scripting the Emergence of Classroom Facial Recognition Technology.” Learning, Media and Technology, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severson, R. L., and S. M. Carlson. 2010. “Behaving as or Behaving as If? Children’s Conceptions of Personified Robots and the Emergence of a New Ontological Category.” Neural Networks 23 (8–9): 1099–1103. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2010.08.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, R. 2002. “Common Ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5/6): 701–721. doi:10.1023/A:1020867916902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strouse, G. A., L. A. Newland, and D. J. Mourlam. 2019. “Educational and Fun? Parent Versus Preschooler Perceptions and Co-use of Digital and Print Media.” AERA Open 5 (3): 233285841986108. doi:10.1177/2332858419861085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry, G., N. Hayfield, V. Clarke, and V. Braun. 2017. “The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology.” The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology 2: 17–36. doi:10.4135/9781526405555.n2.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, S. J. 2019. Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact. London: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, C. Y., C. C. Wang, and M. T. Lu. 2011. “Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Analyze Ease of Use of a Mobile Communication System.” Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal 39 (1): 65–69. doi:10.2224/sbp.2011.39.1.65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. 2000. “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model.” Information Systems Research 11 (4): 342–365. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and S. A. Brown. 2001. “A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges.” MIS Quarterly 25: 71–102. doi:10.2307/3250959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., and F. D. Davis. 2000. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies.” Management Science 46 (2): 186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegerif, R. 1996. “Using Computers to Help Coach Exploratory Talk Across the Curriculum.” Computers & Education 26 (1-3): 51–60. doi:10.1016/0360-1315(95)00090-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar