‘Daddy should search for help on Google instead of swearing … ’: escaping the boundaries of technologically mediated learning

References

• Ahmed, Sara. 2014. The Cultural Politics of Emotion. NED-New ed. 2. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Ben., and Paul. Harrison. 2012. “The Promise of non-Representational Theories.” In Taking-Place [Electronic Resource]: Non-Representational Theories and Geography, edited by P. D. Harrison, and B. D. Anderson, 1–34. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. 34 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Bene, Marton, and Gabriella Szabó. 2019. “Bonded by Interactions: Polarising Factors and Integrative Capacities of the News Media in Hungary.” Javnost - The Public 26 (3): 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2019.1639427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bíró, Gyula. 2020. “A Hazai Digitális Távoktatás Tapasztalatai a Covid-19-es Járványhelyzet Időszakában egy Kvalitatív Felmérés Tükrében.” In Fejezetek a COVID-19-es Távoktatás Digitális Tapasztalataiból., edited by Gábor Kozma, 18–41. Szeged: Gerhardus Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, Lisa. 2012. The Subject of Affect: Bodies, Process, Becoming. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288153
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, Lisa. 2019. “Haunted Data, Transmedial Storytelling, Affectivity: Attending to “Controversies” as Matters of Ghostly Concern.” Ephemera: Theory & Politics in Organization 19 (1): 31–52. https://ephemerajournal.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/contribution/19-1blackman%20(1).pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braidotti, Rosi. 2018. “Affirmative Ethics, Posthuman Subjectivity, and Intimate Scholarship: A Conversation with Rosi Braidotti.” In Decentering the Researcher in Intimate Scholarship, 179–188. Emerald. 9 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Breazu, Petre, and David Machin. 2019. “Racism Toward the Roma Through the Affordances of Facebook: Bonding, Laughter and Spite.” Discourse & Society 30 (4): 376–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519837396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engler, Ágnes. 2020. “Távolléti Oktatás a Családok Aspektusából.” Civil Szemle, no. Special Issue. http://www.civilszemle.hu/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/CSz-ku%CC%88lo%CC%88nsza%CC%81m-20201.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Engler, Ágnes, Valéria Markos, and Ágnes Réka Dusa. 2021. “Szülői segítségnyújtás a jelenléti és távolléti oktatás idején.” Educatio 30 (1): 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1556/2063.30.2021.1.6.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Joint Research Centre. 2020. The Likely Impact of COVID-19 on Education: Reflections Based on the Existing Literature and Recent International Datasets. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760126686.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. Joint Research Centre. 2021. Emergency remote schooling during COVID-19: A closer look at European families, Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760613798.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. 2019. Living conditions in Europe - income distribution and income inequality. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Living_conditions_in_Europe_-_income_distribution_and_income_inequality&oldid=585980.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Nick J. 2011. “Boundary Objects, Social Meanings and the Success of New Technologies.” Sociology 45 (1): 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510387196.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, Thomas F. 1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review, 781–795. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grajczjár, István, Krisztina Schottner, and Zoltán Szűts. 2021. “A Digitális Távoktatás Felsőoktatási Tapasztalatai: Milyen Tényezők Magyarázzák a Blended Learning Támogatottságát?” Opus et Educatio 8 (2), https://doi.org/10.3311/ope.433.
   Google Scholar
• Healy, Sarah, and Caroline Morrison. 2021. “The Gadfly: A Collaborative Approach to Doing Data Differently.” In Teacher Transition into Innovative Learning Environments, edited by Wesley Imms, and Thomas Kvan, 139–150. Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288153
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, Daniel. 2015. “The Many Faces of Diabetes: A Critical Multimodal Analysis of Diabetes Pages on Facebook.” Language & Communication 43: 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2015.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, Danica and Van Leeuwen, Theo. 2018. “Multimodal Dialogue on Social Media.” Social Semiotics 28 (5): 683–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, Gunther. 2012. “Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, edited by James Paul Gee, and Michael Handford. Routledge. see https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203809068.ch3.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, Per, and David Machin. 2018. Doing Visual Analysis: From Theory to Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ledin, Per, and David Machin. 2019. “Doing Critical Discourse Studies with Multimodality: From Metafunctions to Materiality.” Critical Discourse Studies 16 (5): 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2018.1468789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, David, and Andrea Mayr. 2012. How to Do Critical Discourse Analysis: A Multimodal Introduction. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, Dianne. 2012. “Affective Assemblages: Body Matters in the Pedagogic Practices of Contemporary School Classrooms.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society 20 (1): 9–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012.649413.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, Dianne. 2016. “‘Sticky’ Learning: Assembling Bodies, Objects and Affects at the Museum and Beyond.” In Learning Bodies, edited by Julia Coffey, Shelley Budgeon, and Helen Cahill, 2:207–222. Singapore: Springer Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, Dianne, and Sarah Healy. 2021. “Ordinary Affect and Its Powers: Assembling Pedagogies of Response-Ability.” Pedagogy, Culture & Society, July, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1950201.
   Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, Dianne, and Maree Martinussen. 2023. “Affecting Advantage: Class Relations in Contemporary Higher Education.” Critical Studies in Education 64 (2): 168–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2022.2055595.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Zizi. 2015. Affective Publics: Sentiment, Technology, and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, Michael I. 2001. “Organization, Trust and Control: A Realist Analysis.” Organization Studies 22 (2): 201–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601222002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, Anne-Marie. 2022. “Digital transformation and why it can’t be done without learning technologists.” In Brain-fluff (blog). May https://ammienoot.com/brain-fluff/digital-transformation-and-why-it-cant-be-done-without-learning-technologists/.
   Google Scholar
• Sontag, Susan. 2004. “Regarding the Torture of Others”. New York Times Magazine, May 23. https://monoskop.org/images/a/af/Sontag_Susan_2004_Regarding_the_Torture_of_Others.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, Kathleen. 2007. Ordinary Affects. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó, József, András Buda, and Gábor Erdei. 2020. “A Pandémiás Helyzet Hatása az Oktatásra a Debreceni Egyetemen.” Opus et Educatio 7 (4), https://doi.org/10.3311/ope.410.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó, Gabriella, Kmetty Zoltán, and K. Molnár Emese. 2021. “Politics and Incivility in the Online Comments: What is Beyond the Norm-Violation Approach?” International Journal of Communication 15 (2), https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/16411/3403.
   Google Scholar
• Szilard, Malatyinszki. 2020. “A digitális oktatás megélése.” https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36400.38408.
   Google Scholar
• Threadgold, Steven. 2020. Bourdieu and Affect: Towards a Theory of Affective Affinities. 1st ed. Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529206630
   Google Scholar
• Threadgold, Steven. 2021. Keynote at Annual Conference of Youth Studies, Finnish Youth Research Society and University of Helsinki. November 5, 2021. https://youtu.be/xMx4BsfSh1U
   Google Scholar
• van Leeuwen, Theo. 1996. “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–71. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wakefield, Robin, and Kirk Wakefield. 2016. “Social Media Network Behavior: A Study of User Passion and Affect.” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 25 (2): 140–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2016.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, Ben, Rebecca Eynon, and John Potter. 2020. “Pandemic Politics, Pedagogies and Practices: Digital Technologies and Distance Education During the Coronavirus Emergency.” Learning, Media and Technology 45 (2): 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1761641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zietsma, Charlene, and Thomas B. Lawrence. 2010. “Institutional Work in the Transformation of an Organizational Field: The Interplay of Boundary Work and Practice Work.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (2): 189–221. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.2.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar