157
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Complexity versus the technical fix or how to put sexuality back into sexual health

Pages 653-660 | Received 29 Nov 2013, Accepted 03 Apr 2014, Published online: 02 Jun 2014

References

  • Bamberger, M., Rugh, J., & Mabry, L. (2012). Real world evaluation: Working under budget, time, data and political constraints (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cilliers, P. (2008). Complexity theory as a general framework for sustainability science. In M. Burns & A. Weaver (Eds.), Exploring sustainability science: A Southern African perspective (pp. 39–57). Stellenbosch: SUN Press.
  • Cooper, D., & Klugman, B. (2013). Community-driven action for sexual and reproductive health and rights—learning from experience (Report of an expert think tank). Johannesburg: Southern African AIDS Trust.
  • Dowsett, G. W., & Couch, M. (2007). Male circumcision and HIV prevention: Really enough of the right kind of evidence? Reproductive Health Matters 15(29), 33–44. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(07)29302-4
  • Jewkes, R., Nduna, M., Levin, J., Jama, N., Dunkel, K. I., Wood, K., & Duvvury, N. (2007). Evaluation of stepping stones: A gender transformative HIV prevention intervention [Policy brief]. Pretoria: Medical Research Council.
  • Johansen, R., Diop, N., Laverack, G., & Leye, E. (2013). What works and what does not: A discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. Vol. 2013, 10 p. Article ID 348248. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/348248
  • Kambou, S. D., Magar, V., Hora, G., & Mukherjee, A. (2007). Power, pleasure, pain, and shame: Assimilating gender and sexuality into community-centred reproductive health and HIV prevention programmes in India. Global Public Health, 2, 155–168. doi:10.1080/17441690601066375
  • Karim, Q. A. (2007). Prevention of HIV by male circumcision. Effective but integration with existing sexual health services remains the biggest challenge. British Medical Journal, 335, 4–5. doi:10.1136/bmj.39245.491169.BE
  • Loewenson, R. (2010, November 16–19). Connecting the streams: Using health-systems research knowledge in low- and middle-income countries. Background paper commissioned by the World Health Organization for the Global Symposium on Health Systems Research, Montreux.
  • Onyango-Ouma, W., Laisser, R., Mbilima, M., Araoye, M., Pittman, P., Agyepong, I., … Vlassof, C. (2001). An evaluation of health workers for change in seven settings: A useful management and health system development tool. Health Policy and Planning, 16(Suppl. 1), 24–32. doi:10.1093/heapol/16.suppl_1.24
  • Parkhurst, J., Weller, I., & Kemp, J. (2010). Getting research into policy, or out of practice, in HIV? The Lancet, 375, 1414–1415. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60585-5
  • Patton, M. Q. (2012). Essentials of utilisation-focused evaluation. Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Rychetnik, L., Hawe, P., Waters, E., Barratt, A. & Frommer, M. (2004) A glossary for evidence based public health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 58, 538–545. doi:10.1136/jech.2003.011585
  • Sawires, S. R., Dworkin, S. L., Fiamma, A., Peacock, D., Szekeres, G., & Coates, T. J. (2007). Male circumcision and HIV/AIDS: Challenges and opportunities. The Lancet, 369, 708–713. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60323-7
  • Sutton, R. (1999) The policy process: An overview (Working paper 118). London: Overseas Development Institute. Retrieved November 29, 2010, from http://www.odi.org.uk/sites/odi.org.uk/files/odi-assets/publications-opinion-files/2535.pdf
  • Trostle, J., Bronfman, M., & Langer, A. (1999). How do researchers influence decision-makers? Case studies of Mexican policies. Health Policy and Planning, 14(2), 103–114. doi:10.1093/heapol/14.2.103
  • United Nations & AIDS [UNAIDS]/Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa [CAPRISA]. (2007, January 18–19). Consultation on social science perspectives on male circumcision for HIV prevention (Summary report). Geneva and Durban: Author.
  • United Nations. (1994, September 5–13). Programme of action of the international conference on population and development (Report of the international conference on population and development, para. 7.2, 7.3). UN Doc. A/CONF.171/13.
  • United Nations. (1995, October 17). Platform for action of the fourth world conference on women, September 1995, para. 96, UN Doc. A/CONF.177/20.
  • Walby, S. (2005). Gender mainstreaming: Productive tensions in theory and practice. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State and Society, 12, 321–343. doi:10.1093/sp/jxi018
  • WHO Guidelines Development Group, & Troussier, T. (2013). Systematic review on counselling and sexuality: How types of counselling adapt to sexuality. Conference of the World Association for Sexual Health.
  • WHO/UNAIDS. (2007). Information package on male circumcision and HIV prevention: Implications for women. Insert 5. Geneva: Author.
  • World Health Organization. (2010). Developing sexual health programmes – A framework for action, WHO/RHR/HRP/10.22. Geneva: Author. Retrieved from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2010/WHO_RHR_HRP_10.22_eng.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.