Re-visioning evidence: Reflections on the recent controversy around gender selective abortion in the UK

References

• Ahmed, F. (2006). The scandal of arranged marriages and the pathologisation of British Asian families. In N. Ali et al. (Ed.), A postcolonial people: South Asians in Britain (pp. 272–288). London: Hurst & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Almond, D., & Edlund, L. (2008). Son-biased sex ratios in the 2000 United States census. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(15), 5681–5682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800703105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, D., Edlund, L., & Milligan, K. (2013). Son preference and the persistence of culture: Evidence from Asian immigrants to Canada. Population and Development Review, 39(1), 75–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00574.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, F., Kishor, S., & Roy, T. K. (2002) Sex-selective abortions in India. Population and Development Review, 28(4), 759–785. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2002.00759.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhopal, K. (1997). Gender, ‘race' and patriarchy: A study of South Asian women. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: CUP.
   Google Scholar
• BPAS. (2014). Abortion “on the grounds of the sex of the unborn child”: The threat to women posed by an amendment to the serious crime bill. A Briefing from the British Pregnancy Advisory Service. 5 pp. Retrieved July 3, 2017, from https://vfc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/BPAS-Sex-Selective-Abortion-Briefing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• C-Far. (2013). Making a difference: A newsletter on issues of the girl child. 5(2) ( December), Jaipur. Retrieved from www.cfar.org.in
   Google Scholar
• Citro, B., Gilson, J., Kalantry, S., & Stricker K. (2014). Replacing myths with facts: Sex-selective abortion laws in the United States. Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 1399.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, S. (2014). The lost girls. The Independent, January 15.
   Google Scholar
• Croll, E. (2002, June). Family size and female discrimination: A study of reproductive management in East and South Asia. Asia Pacific Journal, 17(2), 11–38.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, E., Beutel, M., Brosig, B., Grussner, S., Stobe-Richeter, Y., Tinneberg, H. R., & Brahler, E. (2006). Social sex selection and the balance of the sexes: Empirical evidence from Germany, the UK, and the US. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 23, 311–318. doi: 10.1007/s10815-006-9064-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das Gupta, M., Chung, W., & Li, S. (2009). Evidence for an incipient decline in numbers of missing girls in China and India. Population and Development Review, 35(2), 401–416. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2009.00285.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das Gupta, M., & Bhat, M. P. N. (1997). Fertility decline and increased manifestation of sex bias in India. Population Studies, 51(3), 307–316. doi: 10.1080/0032472031000150076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das Gupta, M., Zhenghua, J., Zhenming, X., Bohua, L., Chung, W., & Hwa-Ok, B. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in east and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India, and the Republic of Korea. Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153–187. doi: 10.1080/00220380412331293807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Zordo, S. (2014, November 13–14). From the edge to the centre of the screen: foetal rights and abortion rights in Italy and Spain. Paper presented at the Centre for Cultures of Reproduction, Technologies and Health (CORTH) conference on Re-situating abortion: Bio-politics, global health and rights in neo-liberal times. School of Global Studies, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Dickens, B. M., Serour, G. I., Cook, R. J., & Qiu, R. (2005). Sex selection: Treating different case differently. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 90, 171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditum, S. (2013). Why women have a right to sex-selective abortion. The Guardian, 19 September.
   Google Scholar
• Doring, O. (2008). What’s in a choice? Ethical, cultural and social dimensions of sex selection in China. Human Ontogenetics, 2, 11–24. doi: 10.1002/huon.200800002
   Google Scholar
• Dubuc, S. (2009, 29 April–2 May). Demographic manifestations of son-preference in England and Wales. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, session: Gender, power and reproductive behavior, Detroit.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuc, S. (2015). Prenatal sex-selection against females: Evidences, causes and implications. Workshop report, Nuffield Foundation, 20 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuc, S. (forthcoming). Son preference and fertility: An overview. In S. Basten, J. Casterline, & M. Choe (Eds.), Family demography in Asia: A comparative analysis of fertility preferences. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuc, S., & Coleman, D. (2007). An increase in the sex ratio of births to Indian-born mothers in England and Wales: Evidence for sex-selective abortion. Population and Development Review, 32(2), 328–332.
   Google Scholar
• Dubuc, S., & Sivia, D. (2014, May 1–3). Son preference and prenatal sex selection: the impact of fertility decline on gender imbalances. Paper presented at population American Association conference, Boston (Completed manuscript under review).
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, S., & Novas, C. (2008). Biosocialities, genetics and the social sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Outline of the theory of structuration (p. 407). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hampshire, K., Blell, M., & Simpson, B. (2012). Navigating new socio-demographic landscapes: Using anthropological demography to understand the ‘persistence’ of high and early fertility among British Pakistanis. European Journal of Population, 28, 39–63.
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. 2003. Sex-selection: options for regulation. HFEA report, 44 p. Retrieved from http://www.hfea.gov.uk/803.html
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, R., Møller, H., & Mouritsen, A. (1999). Natural variation in the human sex ratio. Human Reproduction, 14(12), 3120–3125. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.12.3120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur, M. S. (2009). Lessons from Punjab's missing girls: Toward a global feminist perspective on choice in abortion. California Law Review, 97, 905–942. Retrieved from http://scholarship.law.berkeley.edu/californialawreview/vol97/iss3/6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. (2014, November 13–14). The sex-selection controversy in Britain. Paper Presented at the Centre for Cultures of Reproduction, Technologies and Health (CORTH) on Re-situating abortion: Bio-politics, global health and rights in neo-liberal times. School of Global Studies, University of Sussex, Sussex, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Macklin, R. (1999). Against relativism: Cultural diversity and the search for ethical universals in medicine (299 pp.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macklin, R. (2010). The ethics of sex-selection and family balancing. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 28(4), 315–321. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, B. (2001). Female selective abortion in Asia: Patterns, policies and debates. American Anthropologist, 103(4), 1083–1095. doi: 10.1525/aa.2001.103.4.1083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moazam, F. (2004). Feminist discourse on sex screening and selective abortion of female foetuses. Bioethics, 18(3), 205–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00390.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, L., & Roberts, E. (2012). Reproductive Governance in Latin America. Anthropology and Medicine, 19(2), 241–254. doi: 10.1080/13648470.2012.675046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, J.-B. (2010). Limits of state intervention in sex-selective abortion: The case of China. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 12(2), 205–219. doi: 10.1080/13691050903108431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C. B., & Cho, N. H. (1995). Consequences of son preference in a low-fertility society: Imbalance of the sex ratio at birth in Korea. Population and Development Review, 21(1), 59–84. doi: 10.2307/2137413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel, T. (2007). Sex selective abortion in India. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Petchesky, R., & Judd, K. (1998). Negotiating reproductive rights: Women’s perspectives across countries and cultures. London: Zed.
   Google Scholar
• Puri, S., Adams, V., Ivey, S., & Nachtigall, R. D. (2011). “There is such a thing as too many daughters, but not too many sons”: A qualitative study of son preference and fetal sex selection among Indian immigrants in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 72(7), 1169–1176. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi, K. (2014). Migration, marital instability and divorce among British Asians. Oxford: University of Oxford, report ESRC grant.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, W., Ballantyne, A., & Draper, H. (2007). Is sex-selective abortion morally justified and should it be prohibited? Bioethics, 21, 520–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00599.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2005). Sex-selection. Nature Reviews Genetics; Ethics watch, 6, 666 (September 2005). doi:10.1038/nrg1701
   Google Scholar
• Singh, M., & Srivastava, K. (2008). Saving the girl child. Seminar 583, March. New Delhi: Malvika.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Population Fund, UNFPA. (2014). Sex ratios and gender bias sex-selection. History, debates and future directions. UN Women, 72 p.
   Google Scholar
• Unnithan, M. (2001). “Emotion, agency and access to healthcare: Women's experiences of reproduction in Jaipur”. In S. Tremayne (Ed.), Managing reproductive life: Cross-cultural themes in fertility and sexuality (pp. 27–52). Oxford: Berghahn.
   Google Scholar
• Unnithan, M. (2003). Reproduction, health, rights: Connections and disconnections. In J. Mitchell & R. Wilson (Eds.), Human rights in global perspective: Anthropology of rights, claims and entitlements (pp. 183–209). London: Routledge. ASA series.
   Google Scholar
• Unnithan, M. (2010). Female selective abortion beyond ‘culture’: Gender inequality and family making in a globalising India. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 12(2), 153–166. doi: 10.1080/13691050902825290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unnithan, M. (2015). What constitutes evidence in human rights based approaches to health?: Learning from lived experiences of maternal and sexual reproductive health. Harvard Journal of Health and Human Rights, 17(2), 45–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma, R. (2002). Technological fix: Sex determination in India. Bulletin of Science Technology Society, 22(21), 11.
   Google Scholar
• Warren Mary, A. (1999). Sex selection: Individual choice or cultural coercion? In H. Kuhse & P. Singer (Eds.), Bioethics: An anthology (pp. 137–142). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Z. (2007). Interventions to balance sex ratio at birth in rural China. Chapter In I. Attané & C. Z. Guilmoto (Eds.), Watering the neighbor's garden: The growing demographic female deficit in Asia (pp. 327–346). Paris: CICRED.
   Google Scholar
• Zilberberg, J. (2007). Sex selection and restricting abortion and sex determination. Bioethics, 21, 517–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00598.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar