The context and quality of evidence used by tobacco interests to oppose ANVISA’s 2012 regulations in Brazil

References

• Bialous, S., da Costa e Silva, V., Drope, J., Lencucha, R., McGrady, B., & Richter, A. P. (2014). The political economy of Tobacco control in Brazil: Protecting public health in a complex policy environment. Rio de Janeiro: Centro de Estudos sobre Tabaco e Saúde, Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública/FIOCRU.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, A., Oliveria, G., Cohen, J., Tang, E., Elf, J., Sosa, P., … Biz, A. (2010). Analysis of ‘The study of socioeconomic effects of the regulation of the Matters dealt with in the Public Consultations number 112 and 117 of 2010 by ANVISA.’ PAHO.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M. (2014). The not so independent tobacco experts. British Medical Journal, 348, g2908. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2908
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin, J., LeGresley, E., MacKenzie, R., Lawrence, S., & Lee, K. (2004). Complicity in contraband: British American tobacco and cigarette smuggling in Asia. Tobacco Control, 13(Suppl. 2), ii104–ii111. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.009357
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crancio, F. (2011, December 7). Marcelo Moraes participa em Brasilia de debates sobre consultas da Anvisa ao tabaco. Agência de Notícias ALRS. Retrieved from http://www2.al.rs.gov.br/noticias/ExibeNoticia/tabid/5374/IdMateria/269225/language/pt-BR/Default.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Crosbie, E., & Glantz, S. A. (2012). Tobacco industry argues domestic trademark laws and international treaties preclude cigarette health warning labels, despite consistent legal advice that the argument is invalid. Tobacco Control. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050569
   Google Scholar
• da Costa e Silva, V. L., Pantani, D., Andreis, M., Sparks, R., & Pinsky, I. (2013). Bridging the gap between science and public health: Taking advantage of tobacco control experience in Brazil to inform policies to counter risk factors for non-communicable diseases. Addiction, 108(8), 1360–1366. doi: 10.1111/add.12203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2014). Tobacco industry-funded research on standardised packaging: There are none so blind as those who will not see! Tobacco Control. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estudo dos Efeitos Socioeconômicos da Regulamentação, pela ANVISA, dos Assuntos de que tratam as Consultas Públicas n 112 e 117, de 2010. (2010). FGV Projetos.
   Google Scholar
• Evans-Reeves, K. A., Hatchard, J. L., & Gilmore, A. B. (2015). ‘It will harm business and increase illicit trade’: An evaluation of the relevance, quality and transparency of evidence submitted by transnational tobacco companies to the UK consultation on standardised packaging 2012. Tobacco Control, 24(e2), e168–e177. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, C. G. M., Silveira, D., Hatsukami, D. K., Paumgartten, F. J. R., Fong, G. T., Glória, M. B. d. A., … Talhout, R. (2015). The effect of tobacco additives on smoking initiation and maintenance. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 31(2), 223–225. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XPE010215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FGV sugere menos rigor contra o fumo - Santa Cruz do Sul (SC). (n.d.). Sindicato de Hotéis, Restaurantes, Bares E Similares de São Paulo. Retrieved from http://www.sinhores-sp.com.br/noticia_270.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fooks, G., & Gilmore, A. B. (2013). International trade law, plain packaging and tobacco industry political activity: The trans-pacific partnership. Tobacco Control. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmore, A. B., Fooks, G., Drope, J., Bialous, S. A., & Jackson, R. R. (2015). Exposing and addressing tobacco industry conduct in low-income and middle-income countries. The Lancet, 385(9972), 1029–1043. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60312-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüning, T., Gilmore, A. B., & McKee, M. (2006). Tobacco industry influence on science and scientists in Germany. American Journal of Public Health, 96(1), 20–32. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.061507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, D., Collishaw, N. E., & Callard, C. (2006). Secret science: Tobacco industry research on smoking behaviour and cigarette toxicity. Lancet, 367(9512), 781–787. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68077-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatchard, J., Fooks, G. J., Evans-Reeves, K. A., & Gilmore, A. (2013). OP03 assessing the evidence base of tobacco industry submissions to public consultations: The case of ‘plain packaging’ of tobacco products in the UK. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 67(Suppl. 1), A4–A5. doi: 10.1136/jech-2013-203126.3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jarman, H. (2013). Attack on Australia: Tobacco industry challenges to plain packaging. Journal of Public Health Policy, 34(3), 375–387. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2013.18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landman, A., & Glantz, S. A. (2009). Tobacco industry efforts to undermine policy-relevant research. American Journal of Public Health, 99(1), 45–58. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.130740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laverty, A. A., Diethelm, P., Hopkinson, N. S., Watt, H. C., & McKee, M. (2015). Use and abuse of statistics in tobacco industry-funded research on standardised packaging. Tobacco Control. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeGresley, E., Lee, K., Muggli, M. E., Patel, P., Collin, J., & Hurt, R. D. (2008). British American Tobacco and the ‘insidious impact of illicit trade’ in cigarettes across Africa. Tobacco Control, 17(5), 339–346. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.025999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lencucha, R., Drope, J., & Labonte, R. (2016). Rhetoric and the law, or the law of rhetoric: How countries oppose novel tobacco control measures at the World Trade Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 100–107. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhães, L. (2011, September 26). Futuro da cadeia produtiva do tabaco volta a ser discutido. clicRBS. Retrieved from http://wp.clicrbs.com.br/santacruz/2011/09/26/futuro-da-cadeia-produtiva-do-tabaco-volta-a-ser-discutido/
   Google Scholar
• Mamudu, H. M., Gonzalez, M., & Glantz, S. (2011). The nature, scope, and development of the global Tobacco control epistemic community. American Journal of Public Health, 101(11), 2044–2054. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medidas da Anvisa ameaçam produção, empregos, impostos e divisas para o Brasil. (2012, March 10). Fator Brasil. Retrieved from https://www.revistafatorbrasil.com.br/ver_noticia.php?not=195056
   Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. (2013). Who killed the plan for cigarettes to be sold in plain packets? The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. (2014). How big tobacco’s lobbyists get what they want from the media. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/mar/17/media-big-tobacco-lobbyists-bbc-cigarette-packs
   Google Scholar
• Muggli, M. E., Forster, J. L., Hurt, R. D., & Repace, J. L. (2001). The smoke you don’t see: Uncovering tobacco industry scientific strategies aimed against environmental tobacco smoke policies. American Journal of Public Health, 91(9), 1419–1423. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.9.1419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muggli, M. E., Hurt, R. D., & Blanke, D. D. (2003). Science for hire: A tobacco industry strategy to influence public opinion on secondhand smoke. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 5(3), 303–314. doi: 10.1080/1462220031000094169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, E. K., & Glantz, S. A. (2001). Constructing ‘sound science’ and ‘good epidemiology’: Tobacco, lawyers, and public relations firms. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11), 1749–1757. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick Basham. (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2016, from http://www.tobaccotactics.org/index.php/Patrick_Basham
   Google Scholar
• Pertence, S., & Barroso, L. R. (2015). Resolução da Anvisa que proíbe o uso nos cigarros de ingredientes que não oferecem risco à saúde. Invalidade formal e material da medida. Incompetência, desvio de finalidade e asfixia regulatória. Revista de Direito Administrativo, 269, 281–320. doi: 10.12660/rda.v269.2015.57603
   Google Scholar
• Samet, J. M., & Burke, T. A. (2001). Turning science into junk: The tobacco industry and passive smoking. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11), 1742–1744. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollo, M., Lal, A., Hyland, A., & Glantz, S. (2003). Review of the quality of studies on the economic effects of smoke-free policies on the hospitality industry. Tobacco Control, 12(1), 13–20. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.1.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Séralini, G.-E., Clair, E., Mesnage, R., Gress, S., Defarge, N., Malatesta, M., … de Vendômois, J. S. (2012). RETRACTED: Long term toxicity of a roundup herbicide and a roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50(11), 4221–4231. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SindiTabaco News Abril/Maio/Junho 2011. (2011). SindiTabaco.
   Google Scholar
• SP: FGC avalia efeitos socioeconômicos das propostas da Anvisa para o setor do tabaco. (2011, April 7). Pagina Rural. Retrieved from http://www.paginarural.com.br/noticia/149264/fgv-avalia-efeitos-socioeconomicos-das-propostas-da-anvisa-para-o-setor-do-tabaco
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281–300. doi: 10.2307/2151585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stülp, E. (2011, April 7). FGV avalia efeitos socioeconômicos das propostas da Anvisa. Cultivar. Retrieved from http://www.grupocultivar.com.br/noticias/fgv-avalia-efeitos-socioeconomicos-das-propostas-da-anvisa
   Google Scholar
• Ulucanlar, S., Fooks, G. J., Hatchard, J. L., & Gilmore, A. B. (2014). Representation and misrepresentation of scientific evidence in contemporary tobacco regulation: A review of tobacco industry submissions to the UK government consultation on standardised packaging. PLoS Medicine, 11(3), e1001629. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, K. E. (2005). The role of research in international tobacco control. American Journal of Public Health, 95(6), 976–984. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.046904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widome, R., Samet, J. M., Hiatt, R. A., Luke, D. A., Orleans, C. T., Ponkshe, P., & Hyland, A. (2010). Science, prudence, and politics: The case of smoke-free indoor spaces. Annals of Epidemiology, 20(6), 428–435. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2010.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yach, D., & Bialous, S. A. (2001). Junking science to promote tobacco. American Journal of Public Health, 91(11), 1745–1748. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar