416
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Regular Articles

The power of popular opinion in everyday primary care provision in urban India

ORCID Icon
Pages 528-541 | Received 09 Jul 2017, Accepted 08 Apr 2018, Published online: 26 Apr 2018

References

  • Adam, T., Hsu, J., de Savigny, D., Lavis, J. N., Røttingen, J.-A., & Bennett, S. (2012). Evaluating health systems strengthening interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: Are we asking the right questions? Health Policy and Planning, 27(suppl 4), iv9–iv19. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs086
  • Agarwal, S., Satyavada, A., Patra, P., & Kumar, R. (2008). Strengthening functional community provider linkages: Lessons from the Indore urban health programme. Global Public Health, 3(3), 308–325. doi: 10.1080/17441690701592957
  • Amrith, S. (2007). Political culture of health in India: A historical perspective. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(2),114–121.
  • Anjaria, J. (2011). Ordinary states: Everyday corruption and the politics of space in Mumbai. American Ethnologist, 38(1), 58–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01292.x
  • Archer, M. (2003). Introduction: How does structure influence agency. In Structure, agency and the internal conversation (pp. 1–16). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Banerjee-Guha, S. (2009). Neoliberalising the “urban”: New geographies of power and injustice in Indian cities. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(22), 95–107.
  • Baru, R. (2003). Privatisation of health services: A South Asian perspective. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(42), 4433–4437.
  • Baru, R., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2009). The commission on social determinants of health: Mainstreaming social inequalities in public health education in India. The National Medical Journal of India, 22(1), 33–34.
  • Barua, N., & Pandav, C. S. (2011). The allure of the private practitioner: Is this the only alternative for the urban poor in India? Indian Journal of Public Health, 55, 107–114. doi: 10.4103/0019-557X.85242
  • Berlan, D., & Shiffman, J. (2012). Holding health providers in developing countries accountable to consumers: A synthesis of relevant scholarship. Health Policy and Planning, 27, 271–280. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr036
  • Brooks, C., & Manza, J. (2007). Why welfare states persist: The importance of public opinion in democracies. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Chatterjee, P. (1997). Development planning and the Indian state. In P. Chatterjee (Ed.), State and politics in India (pp. 271–298). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Choudhury, P. (2016). Role of private sector in medical education and human resource development for health in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 51(3), 71–79.
  • Coelho, K., & Maringanti, A. (2012). Urban poverty in India: Tools, treatment and politics at the neo-liberal turn. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(47 & 48), 39–43.
  • Corbridge, S., Williams, G., Srivastava, M., & Véron, R. (2005). Seeing the state: Governance and governmentality in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Das, J., & Hammer, J. (2014). Quality of primary care in low-income countries: Facts and economics. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 525–553. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041350
  • Das, J., Holla, A., Das, V., Mohanan, M., Tabak, D., & Chan, B. (2012). In urban and rural India, a standardized patient study showed low levels of provider training and huge quality gaps. Health Affairs (Millwood), 31(12), 2774–2784. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.1356
  • Das, V., & Das, R. (2006). Urban health and pharmaceutical consumption in Delhi, India. Journal of Biosocial Science, 38(1), 69–82. doi: 10.1017/S002193200500091X
  • Dasgupta, R., & Bisht, R. (2010). The missing mission in health. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(6), 16–18.
  • De Costa, A., Johansson, E., & Diwan, V. (2008). Barriers of mistrust: Public and private health sectors’ perceptions of each other in Madhya Pradesh, India. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 756–766. doi: 10.1177/1049732308318504
  • Diarra, A., & Ousseini, A. (2015). The coping strategies of front-line health workers in the context of user fee exemptions in Niger. BMC Health Services Research, 15(3), s1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-15-S3-S1
  • Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Erasmus, E. (2014). The use of street-level bureaucracy theory in health policy analysis in low- and middle-income countries: A meta-ethnographic synthesis. Health Policy and Planning, 29, iii70–iii78. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu112
  • Erasmus, E., Orgill, M., Schneider, H., & Gilson, L. (2014). Mapping the existing body of health policy implementation research in lower income settings: What is covered and what are the gaps? Health Policy and Planning, 29, iii35–iii50. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu063
  • Ergler, C., Sakdapolrak, P., Bohle, H.-G., & Kearns, R. (2011). Entitlements to health care: Why is there a preference for private facilities among poorer residents of Chennai, India? Social Science & Medicine, 72, 327–337. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.042
  • Evans, P. (2009). Population health and development: An institutional-cultural approach to capability expansion. In P. Hall & M. Lamont (Eds.), Successful societies: How institutions and culture affect health (pp. 104–127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Furedi, F. (2011). The authority of public opinion—why Weber declined to take part in the conversation. Max Weber Studies, 11(1), 119–139.
  • Geldsetzer, P., Williams, T., Kirolos, A., Mitchell, S., Ratcliffe, A., Kohli-Lynch, M., … Campbell, H. (2014). The recognition of and care seeking behaviour for childhood illness in developing countries: A systematic review. PLoS Medicine, 9(4), e93427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093427
  • George, A. (2009). “By papers and pens, you can only do so much”: Views about accountability and human resource management from Indian government health administrators and workers. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 24, 205–224. doi: 10.1002/hpm.986
  • Gilson, L., & Raphaely, N. (2008). The terrain of health policy analysis in low and middle income countries: A review of published literature 1994–2007. Health Policy and Planning, 23(5), 294–307. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czn019
  • Gilson, L., Schneider, H., & Orgill, M. (2014). Practice and power: A review and interpretive synthesis focused on the exercise of discretionary power in policy implementation by front-line providers and managers. Health Policy and Planning, 29, iii51–iii69. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czu098
  • Gomez, E. (2016). Introduction: The state of political science research in global health politics and policy. Global Health Governance, 10(3), 3–8.
  • Green, L. (1998). Authority. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. doi: 10.4324/9780415249126-S004-1
  • Grimen, H. (2009). Power, trust, and risk: Some reflections on an absent issue. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 23(1), 16–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1387.2009.01035.x
  • Gupta, A. (2012). Red tape: Bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Gupta, K., Arnold, F., & Lhungdim, H. (2009). Health and living conditions in eight Indian cities. National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), India, 2005-06. Mumbai: International Institute for Population Sciences; Calverton: ICF Macro.
  • Hall, P., & Lamont, M. (2009). Introduction. In P. Hall, & M. Lamont (Eds.), Successful societies: How institutions and culture affect health (pp. 1–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hanson, K., Gilson, L., Goodman, C., Mills, A., Smith, R., Feachem, R., … Kinlaw, H. (2008). Is private health care the answer to the health problems of the world’s poor? PLoS Medicine, 5(11), 1528–1532. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050233
  • Hayward, C., & Lukes, S. (2008). Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: A dialogue. Journal of Power, 1(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1080/17540290801943364
  • Heller, P., Harilal, K. N., & Chaudhuri, S. (2007). Building local democracy: Evaluating the impact of decentralization in Kerala, India. World Development, 35(4), 626–648. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.07.001
  • Hupe, P., & Buffat, A. (2014). A public service gap: Capturing contexts in a comparative approach of street-level bureaucracy. Public Management Review, 16(4), 548–569. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2013.854401
  • Kaler, A., & Watkins, S. (2001). Disobedient distributors: Street-level bureaucrats and would-be patrons in community-based family planning programs in rural Kenya. Studies in Family Planning, 32, 254–269. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2001.00254.x
  • Kaviraj, S. (2005). On the enchantment of the state: Indian thought on the role of the state in the narrative of modernity. European Journal of Sociology, 46(2), 263–296. doi: 10.1017/S0003975605000093
  • Kielmann, K., Datye, V., Pradhan, A., & Rangan, S. (2014). Balancing authority, deference and trust across the public–private divide in health care: Tuberculosis health visitors in western Maharashtra, India. Global Public Health, 9(8), 975–992. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.941898
  • Kroll, M., Butsch, C., & Kraas, F. (2011). Health inequities in the city of Pune, India. In A. Kramer, M. H. Khan, & F. Kraas (Eds.), Health in megacities and urban areas (pp. 263–277). Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag HD.
  • Kruk, M., Porignon, D., Rockers, P., & Van Lerberghe, W. (2010). The contribution of primary care to health and health systems in low- and middle-income countries: A critical review of major primary care initiatives. Social Science & Medicine, 70, 904–911. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.20 09.11.025
  • Kutty, L. (2010). The “intractable” patient: Managing context, illness, health care. In A. Zachariah, R. Srivatsan, & S. Tharu (Eds.), Towards a critical medical practice: Reflections on the dilemmas of medical culture today (pp. 226–245). New Delhi: Orient Blackswan.
  • Lehmann, U., & Gilson, L. (2013). Actor interfaces and practices of power in a community health worker programme: A South African study of unintended policy outcomes. Health Policy and Planning, 28, 358–366. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs066
  • Leonard, D., Bloom, G., Hanson, K., O’Farrell, J., & Spicer, N. (2013). Institutional solutions to the asymmetric information problem in health and development services for the poor. World Development, 48, 71–87. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.04.003
  • Levitsky, S. (2008). “What rights?” The construction of political claims to American health care entitlements. Law & Society Review, 42(3), 551–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5893.2008.00351.x
  • Mackintosh, M., & Koivusalo, M. 2005. Commercialization of health care: Global and local dynamics and policy responses. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mander, H., Xaxa, V., Lingam, L., & Bhide, A. (2009). Poverty discourses and global civil society. In A. Kumar, J. A. Scholte, M. Kaldor, M. Glasius, H. Seckinelgin, & H. Anheier (Eds.), Global civil society 2009: Poverty and activism (pp. 26–40). London: Sage Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781446269275.n2
  • Mares, I., & Carnes, M. (2009). Social policy in developing countries. Annual Review of Political Science, 12, 93–113. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.071207.093504
  • McLaughlin, P. (2007). Anarchism and authority: A philosophical introduction to classical anarchism. Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • McLaughlin, P. (2013). Authority. In G. Claeys (Ed.), Encyclopedia of modern political thought (pp. 53–56). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Meier, K., & Krause, G. (2003). The scientific study of bureaucracy: An overview. In Politics, policy, and organizations: Frontiers in the scientific study of bureaucracy (pp. 1–22). Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Metzl, J., & Hansen, H. (2014). Structural competency: Theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Social Science & Medicine, 103, 126–133. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.032
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW). (2013a). Framework for implementation: National Health Mission, 2012–2017. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW). (2013b). National Urban Health Mission: Framework for implementation (No. No.L.19017/1/2008-UH). New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW). (2014). Report and recommendations of the technical resource group for the National Urban Health Mission. New Delhi: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  • Mishra, A. (2014). “Trust and teamwork matter”: Community health workers’ experiences in integrated service delivery in India. Global Public Health, 9(8), 960–974. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.934877
  • Molyneux, S., Atela, M., Angwenyi, V., & Goodman, C. (2012). Community accountability at peripheral health facilities: A review of the empirical literature and development of a conceptual framework. Health Policy and Planning, 27, 541–554. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czr083
  • More, N. S., Bapat, U., Das, S., Alcock, G., Patil, S., Porel, M., … Osrin, D. (2012). Community mobilization in Mumbai slums to improve perinatal care and outcomes: A cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS Medicine, 9(7), e1001257. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001257
  • Nambiar, D., Ganesan, P., & Rao, A. (2016). “Who cares?” Urban health care and exclusion. In India exclusion report 2015 (pp. 29–66). New Delhi: Yoda Press.
  • Ooms, G. (2015). Navigating between stealth advocacy and unconscious dogmatism: The challenge of researching the norms, politics and power of global health. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 4(10), 641–644. doi: 10.15171/IJHPM.2015.116
  • Ortner, S. (2010). Access: Reflections on studying up in Hollywood. Ethnography, 11(2), 211–233. doi: 10.1177/1466138110362006
  • Perry, S. (2013). Political authority and political obligation. In L. Green, & B. Leiter (Eds.), Oxford studies in philosophy of law (Vol. 2, pp. 1–74). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Planning Commission. (2002). Tenth five year plan 2002-2007, Volume II: Sectoral policies and programmes. New Delhi: Planning Commission, Goverment of India.
  • Powers, M., & Faden, R. (2008). Social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Price, V. (2008). The public and public opinion in political theories. In W. Donsbach & M. Traugott (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of public opinion research (pp. 11–24). London: Sage Publications.
  • Pune Municipal Corporation. (2014). Environment status report 2013-2014. Pune: Pune Municipal Corporation.
  • Rao, K., Bhatnagar, A., & Berman, P. (2012). So many, yet few: Human resources for health in India. Human Resources for Health, 10(19). doi:10.1186/1478-4491-10-19
  • Rao, M. (2004). The unheard scream: Reproductive health and women’s lives in India. New Delhi: Zubaan and Panos Institute.
  • Raz, J. (2006). The problem of authority: Revisiting the service conception. Minnesota Law Review, 90(4), 1003–1044.
  • Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87. doi: 10.1177/1473095208099299
  • Sharma, A., & Gupta, A. (2006). Introduction: Rethinking theories of the state in a age of globalization. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state: A reader (pp. 1–41). Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Sheikh, K., Gilson, L., Agyepong, I. A., Hanson, K., Ssengooba, F., & Bennett, S. (2011). Building the field of health policy and systems research: Framing the questions. PLoS Medicine, 8(8), e1001073. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001081
  • Sheikh, K., & Porter, J. (2011). Disempowered doctors? A relational view of public health policy implementation in urban India. Health Policy and Planning, 26, 83–92. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czq023
  • Storeng, K. T., & Mishra, A. (2014). Politics and practices of global health: Critical ethnographies of health systems. Global Public Health, 9(8), 858–864. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.941901
  • Swidler, A. (2009). Responding to AIDS in sub-Saharan Africa: Culture, institutions, and health. In P. Hall, & M. Lamont (Eds.), Successful societies: How institutions and culture affect health (pp. 128–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Thakur, M. (2014). Understanding ruralities: Contemporary debates (CAS working paper series No. CAS/WP/14-1). New Delhi: Centre for the Study of Social Systems, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
  • Walker, L., & Gilson, L. (2004). “We are bitter but we are satisfied”: Nurses as street-level bureaucrats in South Africa. Social Science & Medicine, 59, 1251–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.12.020
  • Weinstein, L., Sami, N., & Shatkin, G. (2014). Contested developments: Enduring legacies and emergent political actors in contemporary urban India. In G. Shatkin (Ed.), Contesting the Indian city: Global visions and the politics of the local (pp. 39–64). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Zachariah, A. (2014). Discrimination in health care and the structure of medical knowledge. In Social discrimination in health. New Delhi. Retrieved from www.mfcindia.org/main/bgpapers/bgpapers2014/am/bgpap2014e.pdf

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.