Science, health, and human rights

References

• Andersen, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C., & Garry, R. F. (2020). The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Medicine, 26(4), 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell, M. (2005). The truth about the drug companies: How they deceive us and what to do about it (1st ed). Random House Trade Paperbacks.
   Google Scholar
• Arancibia, F., & Motta, R. (2019). Undone science and counter-expertise: Fighting for justice in an Argentine community contaminated by pesticides. Science as Culture, 28(3), 277–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2018.1533936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachelard, G. (1993). La Formation de l’Esprit Scientifique: Contribution a Une Psychanalyse de la Connaissance Objective (0 edition). Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin.
   Google Scholar
• Barrotta, P., & Gronda, R. (2020). Epistemic inequality and the grounds of trust in scientific experts. In Adriano Fabris (Ed.), Trust: A philosophical approach (pp. 81–94). Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Benecke, O., & DeYoung, S. E. (2019). Anti-vaccine decision-making and measles resurgence in the United States. Global Pediatric Health, 6, 2333794X1986294. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333794X19862949
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandt, A. (2009). The cigarette century: The rise, fall, and deadly persistence of the product that defined america (Reprint edition). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Broniatowski, David A., Jamison, Amelia M., Qi, SiHua, AlKulaib, Lulwah, Chen, Tao, Benton, Adrian, Quinn, Sandra C., & Dredze, Mark. (2018). Weaponized health communication: Twitter bots and russian trolls amplify the vaccine debate. American Journal of Public Health, 108(10), 1378–1384. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calisher, C., Carroll, D., Colwell, R., Corley, R. B., Daszak, P., Drosten, C., Enjuanes, L., Farrar, J., Field, H., & Golding, J. (2020). Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19. The Lancet, 395(10226), e42–e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30418-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caponi, S. (2020). Covid-19 no Brasil: Entre o negacionismo e a razão neoliberal. Estudos Avançados, 34(99), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-4014.2020.3499.013
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy(ed), J. (2006). Science, risk and the media: Do the front pages reflect reality? Social Market Foundation. http://www.smf.co.uk/publications/science-risk-and-the-media-do-the-front-pages-reflect-reality/.
   Google Scholar
• Caudill, D. S. (2020). Expertise in political contexts: Latour avec the third wave in science and technology studies. Law, Technology and Humans, 2(1), 524–534. 10.1093/heapro/daaa140
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, C., Sumner, P., Boivin, J., Vivian-Griffiths, S., & Williams, A. (2014, December 10). Science and health news hype: Where does it come from? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2014/dec/10/science-health-news-hype-press-releases-universities.
   Google Scholar
• Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., & Scala, A. (2020). The covid-19 social media infodemic. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2003.05004.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, U. S., & Hurd, Y. L. (2020). Addressing racism and disparities in the biomedical sciences. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(8), 774–777. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0917-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2008). Rethinking expertise. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2017). Why democracies need science. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2019). Populism and science. Epistemology & Philosophy of Science, 56(4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.5840/eps201956476
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H., & Pinch, T. (2008). Dr. Golem: How to think about medicine. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, P. (2007). The medicalization of society. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2011). The debunking handbook. University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Cuan-Baltazar, J. Y., Muñoz-Perez, M. J., Robledo-Vega, C., Pérez-Zepeda, M. F., & Soto-Vega, E. (2020). Misinformation of COVID-19 on the internet: Infodemiology study. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance, 6(2), e18444. https://doi.org/10.2196/18444
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Datta, R., Yadav, A. K., Singh, A., Datta, K., & Bansal, A. (2020). The infodemics of COVID-19 amongst healthcare professionals in India. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 76(3), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.05.009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Depoux, A., Martin, S., Karafillakis, E., Preet, R., Wilder-Smith, A., & Larson, H. (2020). The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Travel Medicine, 27(3), taaa031. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaa031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Sousa Santos, B. (1989). Introdução a Uma Ciência Pós-Moderna. Graal.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, I. (2020 August, 2019). When COVID-19 Came to the Kuikuro: How an Indigenous community in Brazil used tech to contain the coronavirus. https://slate.com/technology/2020/08/kuikuro-contact-tracing-upper-xingu.html.
   Google Scholar
• Diethelm, P., & McKee, M. (2009). Denialism: What is it and how should scientists respond? The European Journal of Public Health, 19(1), 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckn139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durant, D. (2019). Ignoring experts. In David S. Caudill, Shannon N. Conley, Michael E. Gorman, & Martin Weinel (Eds.), The third wave in science and technology studies (pp. 33–52). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1996). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge (Vol. 7). Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ewen, S. (1996). PR! - A social history of spin (10/16/96 edition). Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal, G. (2013). For a sociology of expertise: The social origins of the autism epidemic. American Journal of Sociology, 118(4), 863–907. https://doi.org/10.1086/668448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyal, G. (2019). The crisis of expertise. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Frances, A. (2013). Saving normal: An insider’s revolt against out-of-control psychiatric diagnosis, DSM-5, big pharma, and the medicalization of ordinary life. William Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuda, K., Wang, R., & Vallat, B. (2015). Naming diseases: First do no harm. Science, 348(6235), 643–643. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.348.6235.643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, L. (2020). COVID-19: The medium is the message. The Lancet, 395(10228), 942–943. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30600-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghebreyesus, T. A. (2020, February 8). Director-General’s remarks at the media briefing on 2019 novel coronavirus on 8 February 2020. https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/director-general-s-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-2019-novel-coronavirus—8-february-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2003). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Glasziou, P. P., Sanders, S., & Hoffmann, T. (2020). Waste in covid-19 research. BMJ, 369(8247). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1847
   Google Scholar
• Goldacre, B. (2014). Bad pharma: How drug companies mislead doctors and harm patients. Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gonçalves-Sá, J. (2020). In the fight against the new coronavirus outbreak, we must also struggle with human bias. Nature Medicine, 26(3), 305–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0802-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, T., Bruns, A., Zhu, G., & Campbell, R. (2020). Like a virus. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2020-06/apo-nid305864.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holone, H. (2016). The filter bubble and its effect on online personal health information. Croatian Medical Journal, 57(3), 298–301. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2016.57.298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopf, H., Matlin, S. A., Mehta, G., & Krief, A. (2020). Blocking the hype-hypocrisy-falsification-fakery pathway is needed to safeguard science. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 59(6), 2150–2154. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201911889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hordern, J. (2019). Higher expertise, pedagogic rights and the post-truth society. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(3), 288–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1532957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2003). Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on HM Collins and Robert Evans,The third wave of science studies’. Social Studies of Science, 33(3), 389–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127030333004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014). The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PloS One, 9(2), e89177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2017). Prevention is better than cure: Addressing anti-vaccine conspiracy theories. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(8), 459–469. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C. E. (1998). In S. A. Glantz, J. Slade, L. A. Bero, P. Hanauer, & D. E. Barnes (Eds.), The Cigarette papers. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kouzy, R., Abi Jaoude, J., Kraitem, A., El Alam, M. B., Karam, B., Adib, E., Zarka, J., Traboulsi, C., Akl, E. W., & Baddour, K. (2020). Coronavirus goes viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on Twitter. Cureus, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krick, E., & Holst, C. (2019). The socio-political ties of expert bodies. How to reconcile the independence requirement of reliable expertise and the responsiveness requirement of democratic governance. European Politics and Society, 20(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2018.1515866
   Google Scholar
• Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121–1134. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. (2002). The road since structure: Philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. University Of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, R., Zhao, X., Li, J., Niu, P., Yang, B., Wu, H., Wang, W., Song, H., Huang, B., & Zhu, N. (2020). Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. The Lancet, 395(10224), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matlin, S. A., Mehta, G., Krief, A., & Hopf, H. (2017). The scientific publishing conundrum: A perspective from chemistry. Beilstein Magazine, 3(10.3762). https://doi.org/10.3762/bmag.9
   Google Scholar
• McGarity, T. O., & Wagner, W. E. (2008). Bending science: How special interests corrupt public health research. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta, G., Hopf, H., Krief, A., & Matlin, S. A. (2020). Realigning science, society and policy in uncertain times. Royal Society Open Science, 7(5), 200554. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mian, A., & Khan, S. (2020). Coronavirus: The spread of misinformation. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1443-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, D. (2008). Doubt is their product: How industry’s assault on science threatens your health. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mogensen, J. F. (2020). Science has an ugly, complicated dark side. And the coronavirus is bringing it out. Mother Jones. https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2020/04/coronavirus-science-rush-to-publish-retractions/.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. (2006). Bad science in the headlines. EMBO Reports, 7(12), 1193–1196. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nesi, T. (2008). Poison pills: The untold story of the Vioxx drug scandal. Thomas Dunne Books.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, C. T. (2018). Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme: A Journal of Individual and Social Epistemology, 17(2), 141–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. (2017). The death of expertise: The campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olive, J. K., Hotez, P. J., Damania, A., & Nolan, M. S. (2018). The state of the antivaccine movement in the United States: A focused examination of nonmedical exemptions in states and counties. PLoS Medicine, 15(6), e1002578. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
   Google Scholar
• Ortega, F., & Orsini, M. (2020). Governing COVID-19 without government in Brazil: Ignorance, neoliberal authoritarianism, and the collapse of public health leadership. Global Public Health, 15(9), 1257–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2020.1795223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Dictionaries. (n.d.). Definition of post-truth. https://www.lexico.com/definition/post-truth.
   Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, S. (2010). Breaking the expertise barrier: Understanding activist strategies in science and technology policy domains. Science and Public Policy, 37(5), 355–367. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X501180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piller, C., & Travis, J. (2020). Authors, elite journals under fire after major retractions. Science (New York, NY), 368(6496), 1167–1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.368.6496.1167
   Google Scholar
• Posetti, J., & Bontcheva, K. D. (2020). Deciphering COVID-19 disinformation. UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Potter, W. (2010). Deadly spin: An insurance company insider speaks out on how corporate PR is killing health care and deceiving Americans. Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rampton, S., & Stauber, J. (2002). Trust us we’re experts: How industry manipulates science and gambles with your future. TarcherPerigee.
   Google Scholar
• Rios, A., Joshi, R., & Shin, H. (2020). Quantifying 60 years of gender bias in biomedical research with word embeddings. Proceedings of the 19th SIGBioMed Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Rochel de Camargo, K. (2012). How to identify science being bent: The tobacco industry’s fight to deny second-hand smoking health hazards as an example. Social Science & Medicine, 75(7), 1230–1235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.03.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochel de Camargo, K. (2013). Medicalization, pharmaceuticalization, and health imperialism. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 29(5), 844–846. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2013000500002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochel de Camargo, K. (2018). On health needs: The concept labyrinth. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 34(6), e00113717. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00113717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, T., Eli, K., McLennan, A., Dolan, C., Lezaun, J., & Ulijaszek, S. (2019). Governance by campaign: The co-constitution of food issues, publics and expertise through new information and communication technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 22(2), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1363264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahi, G. K., Dirkson, A., & Majchrzak, T. A. (2020). An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2005.05710.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, L., Bansal, S., Bode, L., Budak, C., Chi, G., Kawintiranon, K., Padden, C., Vanarsdall, R., Vraga, E., & Wang, Y. (2020). A first look at COVID-19 information and misinformation sharing on Twitter. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2003.13907.
   Google Scholar
• Sismondo, S. (2017). Post-truth? Social Studies of Science, 47(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312717692076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurlin, W. J. (2019). Queer theory and biomedical practice: The biomedicalization of sexuality/the cultural politics of biomedicine. Journal of Medical Humanities, 40(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-018-9526-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strasser, B., Baudry, J., Mahr, D., Sanchez, G., & Tancoigne, E. (2019). “Citizen science”? Rethinking science and public participation. Science & Technology Studies, 32(2), 52–76. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.60425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, P., Vivian-Griffiths, S., Boivin, J., Williams, A., Bott, L., Adams, R., Venetis, C. A., Whelan, L., Hughes, B., & Chambers, C. D. (2016). Exaggerations and caveats in press releases and health-related science news. PloS One, 11(12), e0168217. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift, A. (2016, September 14). Americans’ trust in mass media sinks to new low. https://news.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• van Prooijen, J.-W. (2020). An existential threat model of conspiracy theories. European Psychologist, 25(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velásquez, N., Leahy, R., Restrepo, N. J., Lupu, Y., Sear, R., Gabriel, N., Jha, O., & Johnson, N. F. (2020). Hate multiverse spreads malicious COVID-19 content online beyond individual platform control. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2004.00673.
   Google Scholar
• Weinel, M. (2019). Recognizing counterfeit scientific controversies in science policy contexts: A criteria-based approach. In David S. Caudill, Shannon N. Conley, Michael E. Gorman, & Martin Weinel (Eds.), The third wave in science and technology studies (pp. 53–70). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Yamin, A. E. (2019). Struggles for human rights in health in an age of neoliberalism: From civil disobedience to epistemic disobedience. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 11(2), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huz026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K.-C., Torres-Lugo, C., & Menczer, F. (2020). Prevalence of low-credibility information on twitter during the covid-19 outbreak. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2004.14484.
   Google Scholar
• Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The Lancet, 395(10225), 676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., Yang, X.-L., Wang, X.-G., Hu, B., Zhang, L., Zhang, W., Si, H.-R., Zhu, Y., Li, B., & Huang, C.-L. (2020). A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature, 579(7798), 270–273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar