Intersectionality and the CRPD: an analysis of the CRPD committee’s discourse and civil society advocacy at the intersections of disability and LGBTI

References

• Austrian Monitoring Body. (2018). Monitoring report to the UN expert committee for the rights of people with disabilities on the occasion of the second constructive dialogue with Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Autism Aspergers Advocacy Australia. (2019). Submission to the CteeRPD on autistic Australians and our actual rights.
   Google Scholar
• Bantekas, I. (2018). Article 38: Relationship of the committee with other bodies. In I. Bantekas, M. A. Stein, & D. Anastasiou (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A commentary (pp. 1105–1118). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanc, N. (2021). Queer et validisme, le corps de la Convention relative aux droits des personnes handicapées. In B. K. Schramm (Ed.), Queer(s) et droit international, Études du réseau Olympe (pp. 115–175). Société de législation comparée.
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, J., Alexander, K., & Woolf, L. (2020). Out of the Margins: An intersectional analysis of disability and diverse sexual orientation, gender identity, expression & sex characteristics in humanitarian and development contexts. https://www.did4all.com.au/Resources/Out of the Margins_Full Report_June 2020_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• BRK-Allianz (Ed.). (2013). For independent living, equal rights, accessibility and inclusion! First civil society report on the implementation of the UN CRPD in Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, L. X. Z. (2017). Ableist shame and disruptive bodies: Survivorship at the intersection of queer, trans, and disabled existence. In A. Johnson, J. Nelson, & E. Lund (Eds.), Religion, disability, and interpersonal violence (pp. 163–178). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carastathis, A. (2016). Intersectionality: Origins, contestations, horizons. University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• CIMUNIDIS, Corporación Humanas, Centro Regional de Derechos Humanos y Justicia de Género, Agrupación Lésbica Rompiendo el Silencio, Agrupación Líderes con Mil Capacidades, Centro de Estudios de la Mujer, Coordinadora Autónoma Contra la Violencia, Corporación Chilena de Prevención del SIDA, Corporación Coordinadora Nacional de Familiares, Usuarios y Amigos de Personas con Afecciones de Salud Mental, Corporación Opción, Fundación Down 21 Chile, Fundación Henry Dunant América Latina, Fundación Instituto de la Mujer, Fundación Iguales, Fundación Observatorio Contra el Acoso Callejero, Fundación Rostros Nuevos, Litigio Estructural en Derechos Humanos, Movimiento Acción Migrante, Observatorio de Derechos Humanos y Legislación, Observatorio de Género y Equidad, & Unión Nacional de Ciegos de Chile. (2016). Shadow report for the review of the state of Chile before the CteeRPD in the 15th session.
   Google Scholar
• Coalition for Independent Living, Georgian Young Lawyers' Association, Society for Inclusion, Parents Bridge, Neurodevelopment Center, Article 42 of the Constitution, Georgian Association of Social Workers, Education Development and Employment Center, Union of the Deaf, Union of the Blind, Child, Family, Society, Association Anika, Accessible Tourism Center Parsa, Changes for Equal Rights, Welfare and Development Center, & Women's Initiatives Support Group. (2019). Alternative report on the implementation of the CRPD in Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Cody, A. (2014). NGOs and human rights monitoring. Alternative Law Journal, 39(4), 254–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X1403900411
   Google Scholar
• Coffey, A. (2014). Analysing documents. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 367–379). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Colombian Coalition for the Implementation of the CRPD. (2016). Alternative report, UN CteeRPD, 16th session.
   Google Scholar
• Combrinck, H. (2018). Article 36: Consideration of reports. In I. Bantekas, M. A. Stein, & D. Anastasiou (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A commentary (pp. 1060–1083). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conte, C. (2016). What about refugees with disabilities? The interplay between EU asylum law and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. European Journal of Migration and Law, 18(3), 327–349. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12342105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2009). Guidelines on treaty-specific document to be submitted by states parties under art. 35, para. 1 of the CRPD. U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/2/3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2011). Working methods of the CteeRPD. U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/5/4.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2015a). COs: Germany, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/DEU/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2015b). LOI: Lithuania, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/LTU/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2016a). COs: Chile, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/CHL/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2016b). COs: Colombia, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/COL/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2016c). COs: Italy, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/ITA/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2016d). COs: Lithuania, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/LTU/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2016e). COs: Uganda, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/UGA/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2016f). COs: Uruguay, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/URY/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2016g). General comment No. 3 on women and girls with disabilities, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/GC/3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2016h). General comment No. 4 on the right to inclusive education, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/GC/4.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2016i). LOI: Cyprus, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/CYP/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2016j). LOI: Iran, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/IRN/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2017a). COs: Armenia, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/ARM/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2017b). COs: Canada, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/CAN/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2017c). COs: Iran, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/IRN/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2017d). COs: Morocco, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/MAR/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2017e). COs: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/GBR/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2017f). General comment No. 5 on living independently and being included in the community, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/GC/5.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018a). COs: Haiti, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/HTI/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018b). COs: Philippines, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/PHL/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018c). COs: Poland, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/POL/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018d). COs: Slovenia, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/SVN/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018e). General comment No. 6 on equality and non-discrimination, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/GC/6.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018f). General comment No. 7 on the participation of persons with disabilities, including children with disabilities, through their representative organizations, in the implementation and monitoring of the Convention, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/GC/7.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018g). LOI: Algeria, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/DZA/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018h). LOI: Cuba, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/CUB/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018i). LOI: Norway, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/NOR/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018j). LOI: Poland, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/POL/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018k). LOIPR: Austria, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/AUT/QPR/2-3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018l). LOIPR: New Zealand, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/NZL/QPR/2-3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2018m). LOIPR: Sweden, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/SWE/QPR/2-3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019a). COs: Australia, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/AUS/CO/2-3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019b). COs: El Salvador, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/SLV/CO/2-3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019c). COs: India, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/IND/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019d). COs: Myanmar, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/MMR/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019e). COs: Norway, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/NOR/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019f). COs: Spain, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/ESP/CO/2-3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019g). LOI: France, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/FRA/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019h). LOI: India, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/IND/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019i). LOI: Switzerland, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/CHE/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019j). LOI: Venezuela, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/VEN/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019k). LOIPR: Canada, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/CAN/QPR/2-3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2019l). LOIPR: Slovakia, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/SVK/QPR/2-3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2020a). LOI: Burkina Faso, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/BFA/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2020b). LOI: Georgia, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/GEO/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2020c). LOI: Hong Kong, China, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/CHN-HKG/Q/2-3.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2020d). LOI: Kazakhstan, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/KAZ/Q/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2020e). LOIPR: Qatar, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/QAT/QPR/2-4.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (2021). COs: Estonia, U.N. Doc. CRPD/C/EST/CO/1.
   Google Scholar
• CteeRPD. (n.d.). General comments. https://ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/CRPD/Pages/GC.aspx
   Google Scholar
• DAWN-RAFH Canada. (2016). [Shadow report to the CteeRPD on Canada: For LOI].
   Google Scholar
• De Beco, G. (2020). Intersectionality and disability in international human rights law. The International Journal of Human Rights, 24(5), 593–614. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1661241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O. (2020). International human rights law: Cases, materials, commentary. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Degener, T. (2006). The definition of disability in (German and) international discrimination law. Disability Studies Quarterly, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v26i2.696
   Google Scholar
• Degener, T. (2017). A new human rights model of disability. In V. Della Fina, R. Cera, & G. Palmisano (Eds.), The United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: A commentary (pp. 41–59). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Disability Council International. (n.d.). Shadow reporting to the UN Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: A practical guide for NGOs.
   Google Scholar
• Egale Canada Human Right Trust. (2017). Canada: Discrimination and violence against LGBTQI2S persons with disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Equal Rights Trust. (2017). Submission to the 17th session of the CteeRPD in relation to the first periodic report of Jordan.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, A. (n.d.). Toolkit on the review process of the UN CRPD. Mental Health Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, N. (2017). Oppression squared: D/deaf and disabled trans experiences in Europe. Transgender Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Salzberg, D. A. (2019). Sexuality and transsexuality under the European Convention on human rights: A queer reading of human rights law. Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hickey, H. (2014). Indigenous people with disabilities: The missing link. In M. Sabatello & M. Schulze (Eds.), Human rights and disability advocacy (pp. 157–169). University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, M. M. (2008). Mind the gaps: Intersex and (re-productive) spaces in disability studies and bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 5(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-007-9073-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ILGA World, CREA, ILGA Oceania, OII Europe, OHCHR, Permanent Mission of Mexico, & Permanent Mission of New Zealand. (2021, March 19). Intersectional human rights framework: LGBTI and disability: 46th Human Rights Council side event [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/W_ud3dfbV4A
   Google Scholar
• Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. (2019). Data collection and management as a means to create heightened awareness of violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/41/45.
   Google Scholar
• Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. (2020). Practices of so-called ‘conversion therapy’. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/44/53.
   Google Scholar
• Intersex Human Rights Australia. (2019). Shadow report submission to the CteeRPD: Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Jaramillo Ruiz, F. (2017). The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and its take on sexuality. Reproductive Health Matters, 25(50), 92–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1332449
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist queer crip. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirichenko, K. (2020). United Nations treaty bodies: References to sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics: Annual report 2019. ILGA World.
   Google Scholar
• Kismödi, E., Cottingham, J., Gruskin, S., & Miller, A. M. (2015). Advancing sexual health through human rights: The role of the law. Global Public Health, 10(2), 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2014.986175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Król, A., Bilnicka, A., Rodzinka, M., Godzisz, P., & Makuchowska, M. (2018). Intersections between disabilities and sexual orientation, gender identity and sex characteristics: The situation in Poland: Alternative submission to the UN CteeRPD. Association Strefa Wenus z Milo, Association Lambda Warsaw, Campaign Against Homophobia, Culture of Equality Association, Autonomy Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, A. (2016). The reporting cycle to the United Nations human rights treaty bodies: Creating dialogue between the state and civil society – The Israeli case study. George Washington International Law Review, 48(2), 315–376.
   Google Scholar
• Mad Canada Shadow Report Group. (2017). Reporting on human rights to the CteeRPD in reference to the UN-CRPD.
   Google Scholar
• McRuer, R. (2006). Crip theory. Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mechlem, K. (2009). Treaty bodies and the interpretation of human rights. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 42, 905–947.
   Google Scholar
• Mendos, L. R., Botha, K., Carrano Lelis, R., López de la Peña, E., Savelev, I., & Tan, D. (2020). State-sponsored homophobia 2020: Global legislation overview update. ILGA World.
   Google Scholar
• Mental Disability Advocacy Center. (2014). The right to legal capacity in Kenya.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, W. (2000). Queering international human rights law. In C. Stychin & D. Herman (Eds.), Sexuality in the legal arena (pp. 208–225). Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• National CRPD Coalition-India. (2019). CRPD alternative report for India: Submitted to the CteeRPD in response to the Initial report submitted by the Government of India.
   Google Scholar
• NCAVP. (2018). Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer and HIV-Affected Hate and Intimate Partner Violence in 2017. http://avp.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/NCAVP-HV-IPV-2017-report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Flaherty, M. (2006). The concluding observations of United Nations human rights treaty bodies. Human Rights Law Review, 6(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngi037
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR. (n.d.a). Human rights treaty bodies – Glossary of technical terms related to the treaty bodies. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/Pages/TBGlossary.aspx#gc
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR. (n.d.b). Sessions for CRPD – Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/15/TreatyBodyExternal/SessionsList.aspx?Treaty=CRPD
   Google Scholar
• OHCHR. (n.d.c). Status of ratification: Interactive dashboard. https://indicators.ohchr.org
   Google Scholar
• Otto, D. (2014). Between pleasure and danger: Lesbian human rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 6, 618–628.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, D. (2018). Embracing queer curiosity. In D. Otto (Ed.), Queering international law: Possibilities, alliances, complicities, risks (pp. 1–11). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, G. (2016). Reflections on the value of intersectionality to the development of anti-discrimination law. The Equal Rights Review, 16, 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, R. (2020). Out of time: The queer politics of postcoloniality. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblum, D. (1994). Queer intersectionality and the failure of recent lesbian and gay ‘victories’. Law and Sexuality: A Review of Lesbian and Gay Legal Issues, 4, 83–122.
   Google Scholar
• Series, L. (2020). Disability and human rights. In N. Watson & S. Vehmas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of disability studies (pp. 72–88). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sisters of Frida. (2017). Shadow report on the UK initial report on the UN CRPD.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrinaki, T. (2018). Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In I. Bantekas, M. A. Stein, & D. Anastasiou (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities: A commentary (pp. 1218–1255). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treuthart, M. P. (2018). Article 39: Report of the committee. In I. Bantekas, M. A. Stein, & D. Anastasiou (Eds.), The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities: A commentary (pp. 1119–1134). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006a). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.Treaty Series 2515, 3.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006b). Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Treaty Series 2518, 283.
   Google Scholar
• Valdes, F. (1997). Queer margins, queer ethics: Call to account for race and ethnicity in the law, theory, and politics of sexual orientation. Hastings Law Journal, 48(6), 1293–1342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Weele, E. (2012). The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities in the context of human rights Law. In J. Anderson & J. Philips (Eds.), Disability and universal human rights: Legal, ethical, and conceptual implications of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities (pp. 9–30). Universiteit Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Women Enabled International. (2017). accountABILITY toolkit: A guide to using UN human rights mechanisms to advance the rights of women and girls with disabilities.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, V. (2019). The missing piece: Domestic civil society access to human rights treaty bodies. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3382861
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). International classification of diseases for mortality and morbidity statistics (11th Revision).
   Google Scholar