Reflections on the use of FPAR as a research methodology for sex worker (and key populations) research

References

• Bennett, J. (2008). Editorial: Researching for life: Paradigms and power. Feminist Africa, (11), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, L. M. (2010). Gendered sexuality over the life course: A conceptual framework. Sociological Perspectives, 53(2), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2010.53.2.155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cossman, B. (2007). Sexual citizens: The legal and cultural regulation of sex and belonging. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davids, L. (2018, 15 May). Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/waleed.davids/posts/2163798690304753.
   Google Scholar
• Derickson, K. (2019). Healthy Community-University Partnerships. University of Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• ESWA (European Sex Workers Rights Alliance). (2022). Call for FPAR sub-grantees. https://assets.nationbuilder.com/eswa/pages/219/attachments/original/1647959625/ESWA_FPAR_Call_for_subgrantees.docx.pdf?1647959625
   Google Scholar
• García, B., Welford, J., & Smith, B. (2016). Using a smartphone app in qualitative research: The good, the bad and the ugly. Qualitative Research, 16(5), 508–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794115593335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatenby, B., & Humphries, M. (2000). Feminist participatory action research. Women's Studies International Forum, 23(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(99)00095-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, A. C., Jernigan, K., & Krause, E. L. (2014). Strategic Authenticity and Voice: New ways of seeing and being seen as young mothers through digital storytelling. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 11(4), 337–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, A. C., & Turner, K. C. (2011). Digital storytelling as an emergent method for social research and practice. In S. N. Hesse-Biber (Ed.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research (pp. 469–491). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (1981). Ain’t I a woman Black women and feminism. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• hooks, b. (2000). Feminism Is for Everybody: Passionate Politics. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, C.-A., & van Vlaenderen, H. (1994). Participatory research: A feminist critique. Psychology in Society, 18, 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Killermann, S. (2018). The GenderBread Person version 4. https://www.itspronouncedmetrosexual.com/2018/10/the-genderbread-person-v4/
   Google Scholar
• Kusenbach, M. (2003). Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography, 4(3), 455–485. https://doi.org/10.1177/146613810343007
   Google Scholar
• Laing, M., Pilcher, K., & Smith, N. (2015). Queer sex work. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lugones, M. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25(4), 742–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mama, A. (2007). Critical connections: Feminist studies in African contexts. In A. Cornwall, E. Harrison, & A. Whitehead (Eds.), Feminisms in development: Contradictions, contestations and challenges (pp. 150–160). Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mare, A.. (2017). Tracing and archiving ‘constructed’ data on Facebook pages and groups: Reflections on fieldwork among young activists in Zimbabwe and South Africa. Qualitative Research, 17(6), 645–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117720973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay, C. (1999, July). Is sex work queer. Social Alternatives., 18(3), 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mhlongo, N. (ed.). (2019). Black tax: Burden or Ubuntu. Jonathan Ball Publishers SA.
   Google Scholar
• Mofokeng, T. (2019). Dr T: A guide to sexual health and pleasure. Pan Macmillan SA.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. T.. (1984). Under Western Eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Boundary 2, 12(3), 333. http://doi.org/10.2307/302821
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, E., & Vearey, J. (2020). The seductive nature of participatory research: Reflecting on more than a decade of work with marginalized migrants in South Africa. Migration Letters, 17(2), 219–228. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v17i2.785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyewùmi, O. (2003). African women and feminism: Reflecting on the politics of sisterhood. Africa World Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petit-Perrot, C., & Daniels, L. (2019). Using WhatsApp for radio: A toolkit by the Children’s Radio Foundation. Cape Town: Children’s Radio Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rahim, S. (2012). Digital storytelling in Bangladesh: Experiences, challenges and possibilities. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 43(5), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00369.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramphele, M. (1990). Participatory research - the myths and realities. Social Dynamics, 16(2), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). The SAGE handbook of action research: Participate inquiry and practice. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S., & Davidman, L. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, A. (1997). The God of small things. Fourth Estate.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, T. (2006). Sexing up the subject: Methodological nuances in researching the female sex industry. Sexualities, 9(4), 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460706068044
   Google Scholar
• Van der Meulen, E. (2011). Action research with sex workers: Dismantling barriers and building bridges. Action Research, 9(4), 370–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750311409767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. (1993). Introduction. In M. Warner (Ed.), Fear of a queer planet: Queer politics and social theory (pp. vii–xxxi). University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Worcester, L. (2012). Reframing digital storytelling as co-creative. Institute of Development Studies Bulletin, 43(5), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00368.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar