Publication Cover
Global Public Health
An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice
Volume 18, 2023 - Issue 1
1,545
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Love Shouldn’t HurtE le Sauā le Alofa: Co-designing a theory of change for preventing violence against women in Samoa

ORCID Icon, , , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , & ORCID Icon show all
Article: 2201632 | Received 08 Jul 2022, Accepted 06 Apr 2023, Published online: 13 Apr 2023

References

  • Abramsky, T., Devries, K., Kiss, L., Francisco, L., Nakuti, J., Musuya, T., Kyegombe, N., Starmann, E., Kaye, D., Michau, L., & Watts, C. (2012). A community mobilisation intervention to prevent violence against women and reduce HIV/AIDS risk in Kampala, Uganda (the SASA! Study): Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials, 13(1), 96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-96
  • Ah Siu-Maliko, M. (2019). Tatala le Ta’ui a le Atua| Rolling Out the Fine Mat of Scripture.
  • Ah Siu-Maliko, M., Beres, M., Blyth, C., Boodoosingh, R., Patterson, T., & Tombs, D. (2019). Church responses to gender-based violence against women in Samoa.
  • Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100307
  • Bishop, R. (2011). Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research. In Freeing ourselves (pp. 1–30). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-415-7_1.
  • Blamey, A., & Mackenzie, M. (2007). Theories of change and realistic evaluation: Peas in a Pod or apples and oranges? Evaluation, 13(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007082129
  • Brand, S. L., Quinn, C., Pearson, M., Lennox, C., Owens, C., Kirkpatrick, T., Callaghan, L., Stirzaker, A., Michie, S., Maguire, M., Shaw, J., & Byng, R. (2019). Building programme theory to develop more adaptable and scalable complex interventions: Realist formative process evaluation prior to full trial. Evaluation, 25(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018802134
  • Chadwick, R. (2021). On the politics of discomfort. Feminist Theory, 22(4), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700120987379
  • Connell, R. (2015). Meeting at the edge of fear: Theory on a world scale. Feminist Theory, 16(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700114562531
  • Contreras, M., Ellsberg, M., Barker, G., & Women, U. N. (2011). Safe cities free of violence against women and girls global programme impact evaluation strategy. In Endvawnow.org.
  • Coryn, C. L. S., Noakes, L. A., Westine, C. D., & Schröter, D. C. (2011). A systematic review of theory-driven evaluation practice from 1990 to 2009. American Journal of Evaluation, 32(2), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010389321
  • Daruwalla, N., Machchhar, U., Pantvaidya, S., D’Souza, V., Gram, L., Copas, A., & Osrin, D. (2019). Community interventions to prevent violence against women and girls in informal settlements in mumbai: The SNEHA-TARA pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials, 20(1), 743. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3817-2
  • De Silva, M. J., Breuer, E., Lee, L., Asher, L., Chowdhary, N., Lund, C., & Patel, V. (2014). Theory of change: A theory-driven approach to enhance the medical research council’s framework for complex interventions. Trials, 15(1), 267. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-267
  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. (1979). Violence against wives: A case against the patriarchy. Free Press.
  • Durie, M. (1994). Te whare tapa whā. Mental Health Foundation of New Zealand.
  • Eisenbruch, M. (2018). Violence against women in Cambodia: Towards a culturally responsive theory of change. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 42(2), 350–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-017-9564-5
  • Fiedeldey-Van Dijk, C., Rowan, M., Dell, C., Mushquash, C., Hopkins, C., Fornssler, B., Hall, L., Mykota, D., Farag, M., & Shea, B. (2017). Honoring indigenous culture-as-intervention: Development and validity of the native wellness AssessmentTM. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse, 16(2), 181–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2015.1119774
  • Filemoni-Tofaeono, J., & Johnson, L. (2016). Reweaving the relational mat: A christian response to violence against women from oceania. Routledge.
  • Fruean, A. (2021, September 11). Village’s anti-violence strategy praised. Samoan Observer.
  • Gegeo, D. W., & Watson-Gegeo, K. A. (2001). “How we know”: Kwara’ae rural villagers doing indigenous epistemology. The Contemporary Pacific, 13(1), 55–88. https://doi.org/10.1353/cp.2001.0004
  • Ghate, D. (2018). Developing theories of change for social programmes: Co-producing evidence-supported quality improvement. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0139-z
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. ECTJ, 30(4), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185
  • Heard, E., Fitzgerald, L., Whittaker, M., Va’ai, S., & Mutch, A. (2018). Exploring intimate partner violence in Polynesia: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 1524838018795504. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018795504
  • Held, M. B. E. (2019). Decolonizing research paradigms in the context of settler colonialism: An unsettling, mutual, and collaborative effort. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1609406918821574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918821574
  • Hemmings, C., & Kabesh, A. T. (2013). The feminist subject of agency: Recognition and affect in encounters with “the other”. In S. Madhok, A. Phillips, & K. Wilson (Eds.), Gender, agency and coercion (pp. 29–46). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • James, C. (2011). Theory of Change Review. In Ngo-federatie.be.
  • Jennings, H. M., Morrison, J., Akter, K., Kuddus, A., Ahmed, N., Shaha, S. K., Nahar, T., Haghparast-Bidgoli, H., Khan, A. A., Azad, K., & Fottrell, E. (2019). Developing a theory-driven contextually relevant mHealth intervention. Global Health Action, 12(1), 1550736. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2018.1550736
  • Kovach, M. (2015). Emerging from the margins: Indigenous methodologies. In L. Brown & S. Strega (Eds.), Research as resistance, 2e: Revisiting critical, indigenous, and anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 43–64). Canadian Scholars’ Press.
  • Kruse, L.-N. M. (2021). Teaching women’s histories in oceania: Weaving indigenous ways of knowing and being within the relational mat of academic discourse. Pacific Asia Inquiry, 12, 325–338.
  • Latai, L. (2015). Changing covenants in Samoa? From brothers and sisters to husbands and wives? Oceania; A Journal Devoted To the Study of the Native Peoples of Australia, New Guinea, and the Islands of the Pacific, 85(1), 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/ocea.5076
  • Lee, S. (2022). Aboriginal traditional healing. Canadian Cancer Society. https://cancer.ca/en/treatments/complementary-therapies/aboriginal-traditional-healing.
  • Lilomaiava-Doktor, S. (2020). Oral traditions, cultural significance of storytelling, and samoan understandings of place or fanua. Native American and Indigenous Studies, 7(1), 121–151. https://doi.org/10.5749/natiindistudj.7.1.0121
  • Linda Tuhiwai Smith. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. In Zed Books. https://doi.org/10.1353/cla.2013.0001.
  • Mahmood, S. (2012). Politics of piety: The islamic revival and the feminist subject. Princeton University Press.
  • Mannell, J., Amaama, S. A., Boodoosingh, R., Brown, L., Calderon, M., Cowley-Malcolm, E., Lowe, H., Motta, A., Shannon, G., Tanielu, H., & Vergara, C. C. (2021). Decolonising violence against women research: A study design for co-developing violence prevention interventions with communities in low and middle income countries (LMICs). BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11172-2
  • Mannell, J., Lowe, H., Brown, L., Mukerji, R., Devakumar, D., Gram, L., Jansen, H. A. F. M., Minckas, N., Osrin, D., Prost, A., Shannon, G., & Vyas, S. (2022). Risk factors for violence against women in high-prevalence settings: A mixed-methods systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMJ Global Health, 7(3), e007704. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007704
  • Martin, K., & Mirraboopa, B. (2003). Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and indigenist re-search. Journal of Australian Studies, 27(76), 203–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443050309387838
  • Mason, P., & Barnes, M. (2007). Constructing theories of change. Evaluation, 13(2), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389007075221
  • Ministry of Health NZ. (2022). Rongoā Māori: Traditional Māori healing. https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/populations/maori-health/rongoa-maori-traditional-maori-healing.
  • Mohanty, C. T. (1984). Under western eyes. In T. L. A. Russo (Ed.), Third world women and the politics of feminism (pp. 51–80). Indiana University Press.
  • Namy, S., Carlson, C., O’Hara, K., Nakuti, J., Bukuluki, P., Lwanyaaga, J., Namakula, S., Nanyunja, B., Wainberg, M. L., Naker, D., & Michau, L. (2017). Towards a feminist understanding of intersecting violence against women and children in the family. Social Science & Medicine, 184, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.04.042
  • Narayan, U. (1989). The project of feminist epistemology—Perspectives from a nonwestern feminist. (pp. 256–272). Rutgers University Press. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct = true&db = ioh&AN = 887387&site = ehost-live.
  • Nash, S. T. (2006). The changing of the gods: Abused christian wives and their hermeneutic revision of gender, power, and spousal conduct. Qualitative Sociology, 29(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-006-9018-9
  • Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
  • Peteru, M. C. (2012). Falevitu: A literature review on culture and family violence in seven pacific communities in New Zealand. Ministry of Social Development.
  • Pulotu-Endemann, F. K., & Tu'itahi, S. (2009). Fonofale: Model of health. Fuimaono Karl Pulotu-Endemann.
  • Reinholz, D. L., & Andrews, T. C. (2020). Change theory and theory of change: What’s the difference anyway? International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-0202-3
  • Rihani, S. (2002). Complex systems theory and development practice: Understanding non-linear realities. Zed Books.
  • Ringrose, J., & Renold, E. (2012). Slut-shaming, girl power and ‘sexualisation’: Thinking through the politics of the international SlutWalks with teen girls. Gender and Education, 24(3), 333–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2011.645023
  • Rogers, P. (2014). Theory of Change.
  • Samoa Bureau of Statistics. (2020). Samoa Demographic and Health Survey-Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (DHS-MICS) 2019-20 (p. 23). UNFPA. https://pacific.unfpa.org/en/publications/fact-sheet-samoa-dhs-mics-2019-20.
  • Samoa Office of the Ombudsman. (2018). National inquiry report into family violence (p. 342). National Human Rights Institution.
  • Sardinha, L., Maheu-Giroux, M., Stöckl, H., Meyer, S. R., & García-Moreno, C. (2022). Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. The Lancet, 399(10327), 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7
  • Schoeffel, P., Boodoosingh, R., & Percival, G. S. (2018). It’s all about eve: Women’s attitudes to gender-based violence in Samoa. In C. Blyth, E. Colgan, & K. B. Edwards (Eds.), Rape culture, gender violence, and religion: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 9–31). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72224-5_2.
  • Scroope, C. (2017). Samoan culture. The Cultural Atlas. http://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/samoan-culture/samoan-culture.
  • Simonič, B. (2021). The power of women’s faith in coping with intimate partner violence: Systematic literature review. Journal of Religion and Health, 60(6), 4278–4295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01222-9
  • Sinclair, R. (2020). Exploding individuals: Engaging indigenous logic and decolonizing science. Hypatia, 35(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2019.18
  • Siu-Maliko, M. A. (2016). A public theology response to domestic violence in Samoa. International Journal of Public Theology, 10(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1163/15697320-12341428
  • Suaalii-Sauni, T., & Fulu-Aiolupotea, S. M. (2014). Decolonising pacific research, building pacific research communities and developing pacific research tools: The case of the talanoa and the faafaletui in Samoa. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 55(3), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12061
  • Weiss, N. M. (2021). A critical perspective on syndemic theory and social justice. Public Anthropologist, 3(2), 285–317. https://doi.org/10.1163/25891715-bja10022
  • Wendt, S. (2008). Christianity and domestic violence: Feminist poststructuralist perspectives. Affilia, 23(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109908314326
  • Whitesell, N. R., Mousseau, A., Parker, M., Rasmus, S., & Allen, J. (2020). Promising practices for promoting health equity through rigorous intervention science with indigenous communities. Prevention Science, 21(1), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-018-0954-x
  • Zanotti, L., Carothers, C., Apok, C. A., Huang, S., Coleman, J., & Ambrozek, C. (2020). Political ecology and decolonial research: Co-production with the Iñupiat in Utqiaġvik. Journal of Political Ecology, 27(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2458/v27i1.23335