References
- Almond, D., Edlund, L., & Milligan, K. (2013). Son preference and the persistence of culture: Evidence from South and East Asian immigrants to Canada. Population and Development Review, 39(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2013.00574.x
- Bendix, D., & Schultz, S. (2018). The political economy of family planning: Population dynamics and contraceptive markets. Development and Change, 49(2), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12363
- Berkowitz, J. M., & Snyder, J. W. (1998). Racism and sexism in medically assisted conception. Bioethics, 12(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8519.00090
- Bongaarts, J., & Guilmoto, C. Z. (2015). How many more missing women? Excess female mortality and prenatal sex selection, 1970–2050. Population and Development Review, 41(2), 241–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2015.00046.x
- Bowman-Smart, H., Savulescu, J., Gyngell, C., Mand, C., & Delatycki, M. B. (2020). Sex selection and non-invasive prenatal testing: A review of current practices, evidence, and ethical issues. Prenatal Diagnosis, 40(4), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5555
- Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Cioffi, A., Cecannecchia, C., Cioffi, F., Bolino, G., & Rinaldi, R. (2022). Abortion in Europe: Recent legislative changes and risk of inequality. International Journal of Risk & Safety in Medicine, 33(3), 281–286. https://doi.org/10.3233/JRS-200095
- de Londras, F., Cleeve, A., Rodriguez, M. I., & Lavelanet, A. (2021). Integrating rights and evidence: A technical advance in abortion guideline development. BMJ Global Health, 6(2), e004141. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004141
- Dickens, B. M., Serour, G. I., Cook, R. J., & Qiu, R. Z. (2005). Sex selection: Treating different cases differently. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 90(2), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2005.05.001
- Dubuc, S., & Coleman, D. (2007). An increase in the sex ratio of births to India-born mothers in England and Wales: Evidence for sex-selective abortion. Population and Development Review, 33(2), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2007.00173.x
- Filoche, S. K., Lawton, B., Beard, A., & Stone, P. (2017). Views of the obstetric profession on non-invasive prenatal testing in Aotearoa New Zealand: A national survey. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 57(6), 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12656
- Ganguli-Mitra, A. (2021). Sex selection and global gender justice. Journal of Social Philosophy, 52(2), 217–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/josp.12405
- George, A. (2003). Using accountability to improve reproductive health care. Reproductive Health Matters, 11(21), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(03)02164-5
- Gill, A., & Mitra-Kahn, T. (2008). From preference to prejudice: Daughter devaluation and the missing women phenomenon in south Asia and the UK. Pakistan Journal of Women's Studies, 15(1), 29–46. http://ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/preference-prejudice-daughter-devaluationmissing/docview/237260452/se-2.
- Harris, J. (2005). No sex selection please, we’re British. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(5), 286–288. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.008870
- Harutyunyan, N. (2019). Reproductive autonomy and genetic technologies: Ethical and legal implications related to sex selection. Trivent Publishing. http://trivent-publishing.eu/
- Huang, Y., Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Sociodemographic factors associated with attitudes towards abortion in New Zealand. New Zealand Medical Journal, 132(1497), 9–20. https://assets-global.websitefiles.com/5e332a62c703f653182faf47/5e332a62c703f6a0492fcd3f_Huang%20FINAL.pdf
- Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act. (2004). https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2004/0092/latest/whole.html.
- Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2003). Content and thematic analysis. In D. F. Marks, & L. Yardley (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 56–68). SAGE.
- Kasstan, B., & Unnithan, M. (2020). Arbitrating abortion: Sex-selection and care work among abortion providers in England. Medical Anthropology, 39(6), 491–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2019.1709183
- Kohli, A. (2018). Son preference among the educated urban middle-class in North India. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 3(1), 05. https://doi.org/10.20897/jcasc/3116
- Lee, E. (2017). Constructing abortion as a social problem: ‘Sex selection’ and the British abortion debate. Feminism & Psychology, 27(1), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353516678010
- Maalouf, W. E., Mincheva, M. N., Campbell, B. K., & Hardy, I. C. (2014). Effects of assisted reproductive technologies on human sex ratio at birth. Fertility and Sterility, 101(5), 1321–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.041
- Macklin, R. (2010). The ethics of sex selection and family balancing. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 28(4), 315–321.
- McDougall, R. (2005). Acting parentally: An argument against sex selection. Journal of Medical Ethics, 31(10), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.008813
- Mills, C. (2016). Choice and consent in prenatal testing in Australia’, choice and consent in prenatal testing. In Igs project series (Vol. 1, pp. 5–37). Institute for Gender Studies, Ochanomizu University.
- Ministry of Health. (2021). Abortion Services Aotearoa New Zealand: Annual Report, Wellington: New Zealand. https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/abortion-services-aotearoa-new-zealand-annual-report-2021.
- Moazam, F. (2004). Feminist discourse on sex screening and selective abortion of female foetuses. Bioethics, 18(3), 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2004.00390.x
- Moeller, K. (2018). The gender effect: Capitalism, feminism, and the corporate politics of development. University of California Press.
- Parker, W. J. (2020). The moral imperative of reproductive rights, health, and justice. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 62, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.07.006
- Parmar, P. (2020). New Zealand Parliament. Abortion Legislation Bill — In Committee—Part 1, https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/hansard-debates/rhr/combined/HansDeb_20200310_20200310_20.
- Purewal, N., & Eklund, L. (2018). Gendercide,’ abortion policy, and the disciplining of prenatal sex-selection in neoliberal Europe. Global Public Health, 13(6), 724–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2017.1289230
- Puri, S., Adams, V., Ivey, S., & Nachtigall, R. D. (2011). There is such a thing as too many daughters, but not too many sons’: A qualitative study of son preference and foetal sex selection among Indian immigrants in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 72(7), 1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.01.027
- Rao, M., & Sexton, S. (Eds.). (2010). Markets and malthus: Population, gender and health in neo-liberal times. SAGE.
- Romanis, E. C. (2023). Abortion access and the benefits and limitations of abortion-permissive legal frameworks: Lessons from the United Kingdom. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 32(3), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096318012200086X
- Sandel, M. J. (2004). The case against perfection. The Atlantic Monthly, 293(3), 51–62. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2004/04/the-case-against-perfection/302927/
- Savulescu, J. (1999). Sex selection: The case for. Medical Journal of Australia, 171(7), 373–375. https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.1999.tb123697.x
- Schaaf, M., Arnott, G., Chilufya, K. M., Khanna, R., Khanal, C., Monga, T., Otema, C., & Wegs, C. (2022). Social accountability as a strategy to promote sexual and reproductive health entitlements for stigmatised issues and populations. International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(Suppl 1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01597-x
- Scully, J. L., Banks, S., & Shakespeare, T. W. (2006). Chance, choice, and control: Lay debate on prenatal social sex selection. Social Science & Medicine, 63(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.013
- Sen, A. (1990). More Than 100 Million Women Are Missing. The New York Review of Books, 37, 61.
- Simon-Kumar, R. (2009). The ‘problem’ of Asian women's sexuality: Public discourses in Aotearoa/New Zealand. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050802272304
- Simon-Kumar, R. (2019). Ethnic perspectives on family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand. Issues Paper 14. Auckland, New Zealand: New Zealand Family Violence Clearinghouse, University of Auckland.
- Simon-Kumar, R., Paynter, J., Chiang, A., & Chabba, N. (2021). Sex ratios and ‘missing women’ among Asian minority and migrant populations in Aotearoa/New Zealand: A retrospective cohort analysis. BMJ Open, 11(11), e052343. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052343
- Somasekharr, S. (2016). ‘What will people think?’ Indian Women and Domestic Violence in Aotearoa/ New Zealand, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)). University of Waikato, New Zealand.
- Srinivasan, S. (2018). Transnationally relocated? Sex selection among punjabis in Canada. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue Canadienne D'études du Développement, 39(3), 408–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2018.1450737
- Stats, N. Z. (2019a). New Zealand’s population reflects growing diversity. https://www.stats.govt.nz/news/new-zealands-population-reflects-growing-diversity#:~:text = There%20were%201%2C271%2C775%20people%20in,from%2025.2%20percent%20in%202013.
- Stats, N. Z. (2019b). Losing our religion. https://www.stats.govt.nz/news/losing-our-religion#:~:text = In%202018%2C%20although%20the%20largest,representing%20157%20religious%20affiliation%20categories.
- Stats, N. Z. (2020). Ethnic group summaries reveal New Zealand’s multicultural makeup. https://www.stats.govt.nz/news/ethnic-group-summaries-reveal-new-zealands-multicultural-make-up/#:~:text = 2018%20Census%20data%20has %20made,the%20time%20of%20the%20census.
- Stifani, B. M., Vilar, D., & Vicente, L. (2018). ‘Referendum on Sunday, working group on Monday’: A success story of implementing abortion services after legalisation in Portugal. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 143(S4), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12675
- Strange, H., & CESAGEN (ESRC Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics). (2010). Non-medical sex selection: Ethical issues. British Medical Bulletin, 94(1), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldq002
- Toebes, B. (2008). Sex selection under international human rights law. Medical Law International, 9(3), 197–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/096853320800900301
- Unnithan, M., & Dubuc, S. (2018). Re-visioning evidence: Reflections on the recent controversy around gender selective abortion in the UK. Global Public Health, 13(6), 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2017.1346694
- Unnithan, M., & Kasstan, B. (2022). But it’s not that they don’t love their girls”: gender equality, reproductive rights, and sex-selective abortion in Britain. Medical Anthropology, 41(6-7), 645–658. https://doi.org/10.1080/01459740.2021.2002857
- Van Balen, F., & Inhorn, M. C. (2003). Son preference, sex selection, and the ‘new’ new reproductive technologies. International Journal of Health Services, 33(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.2190/PP5X-V039-3QGK-YQJB
- Vogel, L. (2012). Sex selection migrates to Canada. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 184(3), E163–E164. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.109-4091
- Wanigaratne, S., Uppal, P., Bhangoo, M., Januwalla, A., Singal, D., & Urquia, M. L. (2018). Sex ratios at birth among second-generation mothers of south Asian ethnicity in Ontario, Canada: A retrospective population-based cohort study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 72(11), 1044–1051. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2018-210622