‘We never thought this would be considered drug trafficking’: International finance rules, policy space and Uruguay’s regulation of recreational cannabis

References

• Alexander, K. (2002). Extraterritorial US banking regulation and international terrorism: The Patriot Act and the international response. Journal of Banking Regulation, 3(4), 307–326. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057palgrave.jbr.2340122.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, A., & Salisbury, D. (2019). Going it alone: The causes and consequences of U.S. extraterritorial counterproliferation enforcement. Contemporary Security Policy, 40(4), 435–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1595882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudean, M. (2021). Five years of cannabis regulation: What can we learn from the Uruguayan experience? In D. Corva, & J. S. Meisel (Eds.), The routledge handbook of post-prohibition cannabis research (pp. 63–80). Routledge Handbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Bewley-Taylor, D., Jelsma, M., & Kay, S.. (2020). Cannabis regulation and development: Fair (er) trade options for emerging legal markets. International Development Policy, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4000/poldev.3758
   Google Scholar
• Bucacos, E., Graña, A., Licandro, G., & Mello, M. (2019). Intervention in Uruguay and its effects, 2005 to 2017. In A. Werner, M. Chamon, D. Hofman, & N. Magud (Eds.), Foreign exchange interventions in inflation targeters in Latin America (pp. 249–284). International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Catão, L. A. V., & Terrones, M. E. (2016). Dollar Dependence. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2016/09/pdf/catao.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cerda, M., & Kilmer, B. (2017). Uruguay's middle-ground approach to cannabis legalization. International Journal of Drug Policy, 42, 118–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2017.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti-Brown, P. (2018). The policy barriers to marijuana banking. Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative, 6(2), 1–9. https://repository.upenn.edu/pennwhartonppi/52.
   Google Scholar
• Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq. (1970). https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title21/chapter13/subchapter1&edition=prelim.
   Google Scholar
• Crabb, J. (2019). Banks still scared of cannabis businesses. International Financial Law Review. https://www.iflr.com/article/2a638ls5pmz4hbpy1375s/banks-still-scared-of-cannabis-businesses.
   Google Scholar
• Eggenberger, K. (2018). When is blacklisting effective? Stigma, sanctions and legitimacy: the reputational and financial costs of being blacklisted. Review of International Political Economy, 25(4), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2018.1469529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Action Task Force. (1990). Financial action task force on money laundering report. http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/1990%20ENG.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Action Task Force. (2014). Guidance for a risk-based approach: The banking sector. http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Risk-Based-Approach-Banking-Sector.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Action Task Force. (2016). Correspondent banking services FATF guidance, Issue. http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Guidance-correspondent-Banking-Services.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Action Task Force. (2019a). FATF Members and Observers. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/about/membersandobservers/.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Action Task Force. (2019b). International standards on combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation, adopted by the FATF plenary in February 2012 (FATF Recommendations Issue. https://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/pdfs/FATF%20Recommendations%202012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Action Task Force of Latin America. (2019). Financial action task force of Latin America (GAFILAT). Retrieved 3 February from https://www.fatf-gafi.org/pages/gafilat.html.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Action Task Force of Latin America. (2020). Mutual evaluation report of the Eastern Republic of Uruguay. http://www.gafilat.org/index.php/es/biblioteca-virtual/miembros/uruguay-1/evaluaciones-mutuas-16/3726-mer-uruguay-jan-2020/file.
   Google Scholar
• Garton, K., Swinburn, B., & Thow, A. M. (2021). Who influences nutrition policy space using international trade and investment agreements? A global stakeholder analysis. Globalization and Health, 17(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00764-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudán, A. (2017). International money laundering rules clash with Uruguay´s Legal Marijuana Shops. https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/notisur/14561.
   Google Scholar
• Hawken, A., & Kulick, J. (2014). Treaties (probably) not an impediment to ‘legal’ cannabis in Washington and Colorado. Addiction, 109(3), 355–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, B., & McCambridge, J. (2021). Alcohol policy, multi-level governance and corporate political strategy: The campaign for Scotland's minimum unit pricing in Edinburgh, London and Brussels. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 23(3), 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148120959040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helleiner, E. (1999). State power and the regulation of illicit activity in global finance. In F. RH, & A. P (Eds.), The illicit global economy and state power (pp. 53–90). Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal institutions and comparative politics: A research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(4), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592704040472
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. (2015). Banks, marijuana, and federalism. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 65(3), 597–647. https://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol65/iss3/7.
   Google Scholar
• Hülsse, R. (2008). Even clubs can’t do without legitimacy: Why the anti-money laundering blacklist was suspended. Regulation & Governance, 2(4), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00046.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Institute for the Regulation and Control of Cannabis. (2023). Inicio. Retrieved 16 May 2023, from https://ircca.gub.uy/.
   Google Scholar
• International Narcotics Control Board. (2013). INCB is concerned about draft cannabis legislation in Uruguay. https://www.incb.org/documents/Publications/PressRelease/PR2013/press_release_191113e.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Itaú. (2020). Correspondent Banks. Retrieved 8 March 2023, from https://ir.itau.cl/English/our-company/correspondent-banks/default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. (2021). The purpose of policy space for developing and developed countries in a changing global economic system. Research in Globalization, 3, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2021.100039
   Google Scholar
• Junta Nacional de Drogas. (2016). Estrategia Nacional para el abordaje del problema drogas. Período 2016-2020. https://www.gub.uy/junta-nacional-drogas/comunicacion/publicaciones/estrategia-nacional-para-abordaje-del-problema-drogas-periodo-2016-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Koivusalo, M. (2014). Policy space for health and trade and investment agreements. Health Promotion International, 29(Suppl 1), ii29–ii47. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dau033
   Google Scholar
• Koivusalo, M., Schrecker, T., & Labonté, R. (2009). Globalization and policy space for health and social determinants of health. In R. Labonté, T. Schrecker, C. Packer, & V. Runnels (Eds.), Globalization and Health (pp. 127–152). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Londoño, E. (2017, August 25). Pot was flying off the shelves in Uruguay. Then U.S. Banks Weighed In. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/25/world/americas/uruguay-marijuana-us-banks.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mander, B. (2020, 6 June). Uruguay cannabis producer sets sights on global dominance. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/ad308e8b-935c-4153-842e-8156b76c5786.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, J. (2009). Policy space: What, for what, and where? Development Policy Review, 27(4), 373–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Salud Pública. (2020). Cometidos. Retrieved 4 May from https://www.gub.uy/ministerio-salud-publica/institucional/cometidos.
   Google Scholar
• Mugarura, N. (2016). The global anti-money laundering regulatory landscape in less developed countries. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Musto, C. (2018). Regulating cannabis markets. The construction of an innovative drug policy in Uruguay [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kent, Utrect University]. University of Kent Theses and Dissertations Archive. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/68477/.
   Google Scholar
• Office of the President of Uruguay. (2023). Uruguay Presidencia. Retrieved 16 May 2023, from https://www.gub.uy/presidencia/.
   Google Scholar
• Preston, E. (2002). The USA Patriot Act: New adventures in American extraterritoriality. Journal of Financial Crime, 10(2), 104–116. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.110813590790310808664/full/html.
   Google Scholar
• Queirolo, R. (2020). Uruguay: The first country to legalize cannabis. In T. Decorte, S. Lenton, & C. Wilkins (Eds.), Legalizing cannabis: Experiences, lessons and scenarios (pp. 116–130). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Santander Group. (2013, October 17). Santander launches its retail banking brand in the U.S. 8 March 2023. https://www.santander.com/content/dam/santander-com/en/documentos/historico-notas-de-prensa/2013/10/NP-2013-10-17-Santander%20launches%20its%20retail%20banking%20brand%20in%20the%20U.S.%20-en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scotiabank. (2020). Our global presence. Retrieved 21 March 2023, from https://www.gbm.scotiabank.com/en/about-overview/our-global-presence.html.
   Google Scholar
• SENACLAFT. (2018). Information to present for the issuance of financial inspection report to the National Secretariat for the fight against money laundering and financing of terrorism (SENACLAFT). https://www.ircca.gub.uy/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Instructivo-Senaclaft-v2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, G. C. (2013). Transnational legal ordering and state change. In G. C. Shaffer (Ed.), Transnational legal ordering and state change (pp. 18–20). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharman, J. C. (2008). Power and discourse in policy diffusion: Anti-money laundering in developing states. International Studies Quarterly, 52(3), 635–656. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29734254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatenhove, J. v., Mak, J., & Liefferin, D. (2006). The inter-play between formal and informal practices. Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 7(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850600839470
   Google Scholar
• teleSur. (2018, August 22). Uruguay government defends legal cannabis as global bankers bust distributors. teleSur. https://www.mintpressnews.com/uruguay-government-defends-legal-cannabis-global-bankers-bust-distributors/231186/.
   Google Scholar
• The USA Patriot Act of 2001, Pub. L. No 107-156, 115 Stat. 272. (2001). https://www.congress.gov/107/plaws/publ56/PLAW-107publ56.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thow, A. M., & McGrady, B. (2014). Protecting policy space for public health nutrition in an era of international investment agreements. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.120543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1961). Single convention on narcotic drugs, 1961, As amended by the 1972 Protocol amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs. https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s21517en/s21517en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1971). Commentary on the convention on psychotropic substances. https://www.unodc.org/documents/commissions/CND/Int_Drug_Control_Conventions/Commentaries-OfficialRecords/1971Convention/1971_COMMENTARY_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1972). Commentary on the protocol amending the single convention on narcotic drugs, 1961. https://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/organized_crime/Drug%20Convention/Commentary_on_the_protocol_1961.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Convention against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances. (1988). United Nations convention against illicit traffic in narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances. http://www.incb.org/e/conv/1988/articles.htm.
   Google Scholar
• von Hoffmann, J. (2018). Breaking ranks: Pioneering drug policy protagonism in Uruguay and Bolivia. In A. Klein, & B. Stothard (Eds.), Collapse of the global order on drugs: From UNGASS 2016 to review 2019 (pp. 191–216). Emerald Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J., & Jelsma, M. (2019). Regulating drugs: Resolving conflicts with the UN drug control treaty system. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 1(3), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.31389/jied.23
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J., & Ramsey, G. (2018). Uruguay’s Drug Policy: Major Innovations, Major Challenges. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Walsh-Uruguay-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2020a). Financial Inclusion. 3 February 2023, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialinclusion/overview.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2020b). Financial Integrity. 20 March 2023, from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/financialmarketintegrity.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage.
   Google Scholar