Integrated modelling, design and analysis of submarine structures

References

• Bureau Veritas. 2009 June. Rules for classification of naval submarines. Bureau Veritas Marine Division, Neuilly-sur-Seine; France, http://www.veristar.com
   Google Scholar
• Bushnell D, Almroth BO, Sobel LH. 1968. Buckling of shells of revolution with various wall constructions: volume 3–user's manual for BOSOR. NASA Contractor. Report No.: NASA CR-1051.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell DJ, Dow RS. 1986. The application of nonlinear analysis to ship and submarine structures. In: Smith CS, Clarke JD, editors. Advances in marine structures: proceedings of an international conference. Dunfermline/London (UK): Elsevier Applied Science. p. 174–200.
   Google Scholar
• Germanischer Lloyd. 2008. Rules for classification and construction, part II-2-1 submarines. 2008 ed. Hamburg: Germanischer Lloyd Aktiengesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Graham D. 2007. Predicting the collapse of externally pressurised ring-stiffened cylinders using finite element analysis. Marine Struct. 20:202–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham D. 2008. A partial safety factor for pressure hull collapse prediction using finite element analysis. In: Warship 2008. Glasgow: Naval Submarines 9, Royal Institution of Naval Architects.
   Google Scholar
• Hess AMO, Smith JL. 1962. Calculation of non-lifting potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional bodies. Douglas Aircraft Company. Report No.: ES 40622, 15 March 1962. DTIC No. AD0282255.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick S. 1970. Externally pressurized vessels. In: Gill SS editor. The stress analysis of pressure vessels and pressure vessel components, Oxford (UK): Pergamon Press. p. 405–511.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick S. 1979. The influence of shape imperfections and residual stress on the collapse of stiffened cylinders. Proceedings of the conference on significance of deviations from design shape. London (UK): Institution of Mechanical Engineers. p. 261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick S. 1982. Design for external pressure using general criteria. Int J Mech Sci. 24:209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendrick S. 1983. Vessels to withstand external pressure. In: Nichols RW editor. Developments in pressure vessel technology – 4. London (UK): Elsevier. p. 197–233.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay J, Jiang L, Glas A. 2011a. Accuracy of nonlinear finite element collapse predictions for submarine pressure hulls with and without artificial corrosion damage. Marine Struct. 24:292–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay J, Pegg N, MacAdam T, Norwood M. 2010. Submarine structural analysis Suite–subSAS: tutorial manual. Halifax: Martec Limited.
   Google Scholar
• MacKay JR, van Keulen F. 2013. Partial safety factor approach to the design of submarine pressure hulls using nonlinear finite element analysis. Finite Elem Anal Des. 65:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay JR, van Keulen F, Smith MJ. 2011b. Quantifying the accuracy of numerical collapse predictions for the design of submarine pressure hulls. ThinWalled Struct. 49:145–156.
   Google Scholar
• Morandi AC, Das PK, Faulkner D. 1996. Finite element analysis and reliability based design of externally pressurized ring stiffened cylinders. Trans R Inst Nav Archit. 138:171–188.
   Google Scholar
• Nash W. 1995. Hydrostatically loaded structures. Oxford (UK): Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• PD 5500. 2012. Specification for unfired fusion welded pressure vessels. London (UK): BSI Group. www.bsigroup.com.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider H, Fiedler C, Berg R, Gilroy L, Karasalo I, MacGillivray M, et al. 2003. “Benchmark Target Strength Simulation Workshop” in Proceedings of UDT Europe. 2003 Jun 24–26; Malmo, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• SSP 74. 2001. Design of submarine structures. Abbey Wood, Bristol (UK): Defence Procurement Agency, Sea Technology Group. Sea Systems Publication No. 74 (SSP74).
   Google Scholar
• VAST. 2007. User's manual, version 9.0. Halifax: Martec Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Vernon TA, Bara B, Hally D. 1988. A surface panel method for the calculation of added mass matrices for finite element models. Defence Research Establishment Atlantic. Technical Memorandum 88/203, Dartmouth, Canada.
   Google Scholar