Coupled dynamics of deepwater structures – issues and challenges

References

• API RP 2SK. 2005. Recommended practice for design and analysis of stationkeeping systems for floating structures. 3rd ed. Addendum, 2008. Washington (DC): API Publishing Services.
   Google Scholar
• Aranha JAP. 1996. Second-order horizontal steady forces and moment on a floating body with small forward speed. J Fluid Mech. 313:39–54. doi: 10.1017/S002211209600211X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrup OC, Nestegard A, Roncess M, Sodhal N. 2001. Coupled analysis strategies for deepwater Spar platforms. In: Proceedings of the 11th ISOPE Conference; Stavanger (Norway); p. 449–456.
   Google Scholar
• Bathe KJ. 2005. Finite element procedures. New Delhi (India): Prentice Hall India.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya SK, Sreekumar S, Idichandy VG. 2003. Coupled dynamics of SeaStar mini tension leg platform. Ocean Eng. 30(6):709–737. doi: 10.1016/S0029-8018(02)00061-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarti SK. 1987. Hydrodynamics of offshore structures. Berlin (Germany): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chen X, Ding Y, Zhang J, Liagre P, Nedzwecki JN, Teigen P. 2006. Coupled dynamic analysis of a mini TLP: Comparison with measurements. Ocean Eng. 33(1):93–117. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colby C, Sodahl N, Katla E, Okkenhaug S. 2000. Coupling effects of a Deepwater Spar. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 12083; Houston (TX).
   Google Scholar
• Cummins WE. 1962. The impulse response functions and ship motions. Shifftechnik. 9:101–109.
   Google Scholar
• DNV-RP-F205. 2010. Recommended practice, Global performance analysis of deepwater floating structures. Hovik (Norway): Det Norske Veritas.
   Google Scholar
• Faltinsen OM. 1990. Sea loads on ships and offshore structures. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett DL. 2005. Coupled analysis of floating production systems, Ocean Eng. 32(7):802–816. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett DL, Chappell JF, Gordon RB. 2002a. Global performance of floating production systems. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 14230; Houston (TX).
   Google Scholar
• Garrett DL, Gordon RB. Chappell JF. 2002b. Mooring- and riser-induced damping in fatigue seastates. Proceedings of the Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference (OMAE2002)-28550; Oslo (Norway).
   Google Scholar
• Grue J, Palm E. 1996. Wave drift damping of floating bodies in slow yaw motion. J Fluid Mech. 319:323–352. doi: 10.1017/S0022112096007367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkyard J, Atluri S, Srinivas S. 2006. Truss Spar vortex induced motions: benchmarking of CFD and model tests. Proceeding of the 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, OMAE-2006-92673; Hamburg (Germany).
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton J. 1980. Three-dimensional Fourier analysis of drag force for compliant offshore structures. Appl Ocean Res. 2(4):147–153. doi: 10.1016/0141-1187(80)90010-3
   Google Scholar
• Heuirtier JM, Le Buhan P, Fontaine E, Le Cunff C, Biolly F, Berhault C. 2001. Coupled dynamic response of moored FPSO with risers. In: Proceedings of the 11th ISOPE Conference; Stavanger (Norway); p. 319–326.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph A, Idichandy VG, Bhattacharyya SK. 2004. Experimental and numerical study of coupled dynamic response of mini tension leg platform. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng. 126(4):318–330. doi: 10.1115/1.1833358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo BJ, Kim MH, Randall RE. 2004. Mathieu instability of a Spar platform with mooring and risers. Ocean Eng. 31(17):2175–2208. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo W, Kim MH. 2004. Freely floating-body simulation by a 2D fully nonlinear numerical wave tank. Ocean Eng. 31(16):2011–2046. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2004.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langley RS. 1984. The linearization of three dimensional drag force in random seas with current. Appl Ocean Res. 6(3):126–131. doi: 10.1016/0141-1187(84)90001-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low YM, Grime AJ. 2011. Extreme response analysis of floating structures using coupled frequency domain analysis. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng. 133(3):031601–1–031601-8. doi: 10.1115/1.4002734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low YM, Langley RS. 2006. Time and frequency domain coupled analysis of deepwater floating production systems. Appl Ocean Res. 28(6):371–385. doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2007.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low YM, Langley RS. 2008a. A hybrid time/frequency domain approach for efficient coupled analysis of vessel/mooring/riser dynamics. Ocean Eng. 35(5):433–446. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low YM, Langley RS. 2008b. Understanding the dynamic coupling effect in deep water floating structures using a simplified model. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng. 130(3):031007–1–031007-10. doi: 10.1115/1.2904951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma QW, Wu GX, Eatock TR, 2001. Finite element simulation of fully nonlinear interaction between vertical cylinders and steep waves. Part 1: methodology and numerical procedure. Int J Numer Meth Fluids. 36(3): 265–285. doi: 10.1002/fld.131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma QW, Yan S. 2009. QALE-FEM for numerical modeling of nonlinear interaction between 3D moored floating bodies and steep waves. Int J Numerical Methods Eng. 78(6):713–756. doi: 10.1002/nme.2505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma W, Lee Y, Zou J, Huang EW. 2000. Deepwater nonlinear coupled analysis tool. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 12085; Houston (TX).
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra AK, Penzien J. 1970. Nondeterministic analysis of offshore structures. J Eng Mech. 96(6):985–988.
   Google Scholar
• Mei CC, Stiassnie M, Yue DK-P. 2005. Theory and applications of ocean surface waves: Part 2-Nonlinear aspects. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Molin B. 1994. Second-order hydrodynamics applied to moored structure – a state-of-the-art survey. Ship Technol (Schiffstecnik). 41(2):59–84.
   Google Scholar
• Naess A, Moan T. 2013. Stochastic dynamics of marine structures. London (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman JN. 1977. Marine hydrodynamics. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman JN. 1993. Wave drift damping of floating bodies. J Fluid Mech. 249:241–259. doi: 10.1017/S0022112093001168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ORCAFLEX. 2014. OrcaFlex Manual, Cumbria (UK). [accessed 2014, August 1]. Available from: www.orcina.com/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Ormberg H, Larsen K. 1998. Coupled analysis of floater motion and mooring dynamics for a turret-moored ship. Appl Ocean Res. 20(1):55–67. doi: 10.1016/S0141-1187(98)00012-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkster JA. 1979. Mean and low frequency wave forces on floating structures. Ocean Eng. 6(6):593–615. doi: 10.1016/0029-8018(79)90010-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RIFLEX. 1998. Riflex program documentation. Trondheim (Norway): SINTEF.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts JB, Spanos PD. 2003. Random vibration and statistical linearization. Mineola (NY): Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Rodenbusch G, Garrett DL, Anderson SL. 1986. Statistical linearization of velocity-squared drag forces. In: Proceedings of the Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference (OMAE86); Tokyo (Japan); p. 123–129.
   Google Scholar
• Sathyapal S, Bhattacharyya SK, Vendhan CP. 1999. Analysis of second order steady hydrodynamic forces on floating bodies in regular waves by finite element method. Proceedings of the 9^th ISOPE Conference; Brest (France).
   Google Scholar
• Schellin TE, Kirsch A. 1989. Low-frequency damping of a moored semisubmersible obtained from simulated extinction tests and mean wave drift forces. J Appl Ocean Res. 11(4):202–211. doi: 10.1016/0141-1187(89)90019-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senan A, Krishnankutty P. 2011. A study on nonlinear wave forces and motion responses of a tri-hull carrier. Proc Inst Mech Eng M J Eng Marit Environ. 226(1):3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks CP. 2007. Fundamentals of marine riser mechanics: basic principles and simplified analyses. Tulsa (OK): PennWell.
   Google Scholar
• Stansberg CT, Ormberg H, Oritsland O. 2002. Challenges in deep water experiments: hybrid approach. J Offshore Mech Arctic Eng. 124(2):90–96. doi: 10.1115/1.1464129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahar A, Kim MH. 2008. Coupled-dynamic analysis of floating structures with polyester mooring lines. Ocean Eng. 35(17):1676–1685. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vendhan CP, Seetharaman S. 1998. Spectral analysis of offshore guyed towers under combined loading. In: Proceedings of the National Symposium on Dynamics (NASDYN 98); New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill; p. 101–108.
   Google Scholar
• WAMIT. 2014. User Manual, Version 7.0, Massachusetts, USA [accessed 2014 August 1]. Available from: http://www.wamit.com/
   Google Scholar
• Wichers JEW. 1988. Wave current-interaction effects on moored tankers in high seas. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 5631; Houston (TX).
   Google Scholar
• Wichers JEW, van Sluijs MF. 1979. The influence of waves on the low frequency hydrodynamic coefficients of moored vessels. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 3625; Houston (TX).
   Google Scholar
• Wu SC, Tung CC. 1975. Random response of offshore structures to wave and current forces. Rayleigh (NC): Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina University. Sea Grant Publication UNC-SG-75-22.
   Google Scholar
• Yang M, Teng D, Ning D, Shi Z. 2012. Coupled dynamic analysis with truss-spar and its mooring line/riser system in time domain. Ocean Eng. 39(1):72–87. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang F, Yang J, Li R, Chen G. 2008. Coupling effects for cell-truss spar platform: Comparison of frequency- and time-domain analyses with model tests. J Hydrodynamics 20(4):424–432. doi: 10.1016/S1001-6058(08)60076-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar