Study of manoeuvrability of container ship by static and dynamic simulations using a RANSE-based solver

References

• Abkowitz MA. 1964. Lectures on ship hydrodynamics – steering and maneuverability (Report Hy-5. Lyngby). Denmark: Hydro-Og Aero-dynamisk Laboratorium.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee N, Rao CS, Raju MSP, Hughes P. 2006. Determination of manoeuvrability of ship model using large amplitude horizontal planar motion mechanism. International Conference in Marine Hydrodynamics (MAHY-2006); 5–7 January; Visakhapatnam: NSTL.
   Google Scholar
• Carrica PM, Ismail F, Hyman M, Bhushan S, Stern F. 2013. Turn and Zig-zag maneuvers of surface combatant using URANS approach with dynamic overset grids. J Mar Sci Technol. 18:166–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane CL, Eda H, Landsburg A. 1989. Principles of naval architecture. Chapter 9, Controllability; Jersey City: SNAME. p. 200–258.
   Google Scholar
• Cura-Hochbaum A. 2011. On the numerical prediction of the ship's manoeuvring behaviour. Ship Sci Technol. 5:27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Dhinesh G, Murali K, Anantha Subramanian V. 2010. Estimation of hull-propeller interaction of a self-propelling model hull using a RANSE solver. Ship Offshore Struct. 5:125–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mascio A, Dubbioso G, Notaro C, Vivan M. 2011. Investigation of twin-screw naval ships maneuverability behaviour. J Ship Res. 55:221–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubbioso G, Durante D, Broglia R. 2013. Zig-zag maneuver simulation by CFD for tanker like vessel. 5th International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering; 29–31 May 2013; Hamburg, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Eda H. 1980. Maneuvering Performance of high-speed ships with effects of roll motion. Ocean Eng. 7:379–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fach K, Bertram V. 2007. High-performance simulations for high-performance ships. Ship Offshore Struct. 2:105–113.
   Google Scholar
• [IMO] International Maritime Organization. 2002. Explanatory notes to the standard for ship manoeuvrability. Resolution MSC.137(76). London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• [ITTC] International Towing Tank Conference. 2011. Guideline on use of RANS tools for manoeuvring prediction. ITTC Recommended Procedures and Guidelines 7.5-03-04-01.
   Google Scholar
• Janardhanan S, Rudra UARVR, Elangovan M, Ram Kumar J. 2011. Maneuverability assessment of a container ship using CFD. International Conference on Developments in Marine CFD; 18–19 November 2011; Chennai, India.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka KH, Miyazaki H, Nimura T, Ueno M, Hino T, Kodama Y. 2000. Calculation of hydrodynamic forces acting on a ship in maneuvering motion. Proceedings of MARSIM 2000, International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Maneouvring; 8–12 May 2000; Orlando, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto N, Carrica PM, Stern F. 2012. URANS simulations of static and dynamic maneuvering for surface combatant: Part 1 verification and validation for forces, moments and hydrodynamic derivatives. J Mar Sci Technol. 17:422–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen D. 2000. A study on sensitivity of maneuverability performance on the hydrodynamic coefficients for submerged bodies. J Ship Res. 44:186–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenoi RR, Krishnankutty P, Selvam RP, Kulsreshtha A. 2013. Prediction of maneuvering coefficients of a container ship by numerically simulating HPMM using RANSE based solver. 3rd International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water; 3–5 June 2013; Ghent, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen CD, Otzen JF, Klimt C, Larsen NL, Stern F. 2012. Maneuvering predictions in the early design phase using CFD generated PMM data. 29th Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics; 26–31 August 2012; Gothenburg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• [SNAME] Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers. 1952. Nomenclature for treating the motion of a submerged body through a fluid: SNAME technical and research bulletin 1-5. New York, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Son K, Nomoto K. 1981. On coupled motion of steering and rolling of a high speed container ship. J Soc Nav Archit Jpn. 150:73–83.
   Google Scholar
• Stern F, Agdrup K, Kim SY, Hochbaum AC, Rhee K, Quadvleig F, Perdon P, Hino T, Broglia R, Gorski J. 2011. Experience from SIMMIAN2008 – the first workshop on verification and validation of ship maneuvering simulation methods. J Ship Res. 55:135–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vantorre M. 2000. Captive Manoeuvring tests with ship models: a review of actual practice based on 22nd ITTC Maneouvring Committee Questionnaire. International Conference on Marine Simulation and Ship Manoeuvrability (MARSIM 2000); 8–12 May 2000; Orlando, FL, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Xing-Kaeding Y, Jensen AG. 2006. Simulation of ship motions during maneuvers. Ship Technol Res. 53:14–28.
   Google Scholar
• Yeon-Gyu K, Sun-young K, Hyoung-Tae K, Seok-won L, Byeong-Seok Y. 2007. Prediction of the maneuverability of a large container ship with twin propellers and twin rudders. J Mar Sci Technol. 12:130–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon HK, Son NS, Lee CM. 2004. Estimation of roll related hydrodynamic coefficients through the free running model tests. Proceedings of OCEANS’04/MTS/IEE/TECHNO-OCEAN’04; 9–12 November 2004; Kobe, Japan.
   Google Scholar