On the sensitivity to work hardening and strain-rate effects in nonlinear FEM analysis of ship collisions

References

• Alsos HS, Amdahl J. 2009. On the resistance to penetration of stiffened plates, part I: experiments. Int J Impact Eng. 36(6):799–807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves M, Jones N. 1999. Influence of hydrostatic stress on failure of axisymmetric notched specimens. J Mech Phys Solids. 47(3):643–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson D, Winkler S, Bardelcik A, Worswick MJ. 2014. Influence of stress triaxiality and strain rate on the failure behavior of a dual-phase dp780 steel. Mater Des. 60:198–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billingham J, Sharp JV, Spurrier J, Kilgallon PJ. 2003. Research report 105: review of the performance of high strength steels used offshore. Bedfordshire (UK): Health and Safety Executive.
   Google Scholar
• Choung J, Cho SR, Kim KS. 2010. Impact test simulations of stiffened plates using the micromechanical porous plasticity model. Ocean Eng. 37(8–9):749–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choung J, Nam W, Lee JY. 2013. Dynamic hardening behaviors of various marine structural steels considering dependencies on strain rate and temperature. Mar Struct. 32:49–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowper J, Symonds P. 1957. Strain-hardening and strain-rate effects in the impact loading of cantilever beams. Providence (RI): Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University. Technical Report No.: 28. Contract Nonr-562(10), NR-064-406.
   Google Scholar
• Det Norske Veritas. 2009. DNV-OS-B101: metallic materials, April 2009. Høvik, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Det Norske Veritas. 2013. DNV-RP-C208: determination of structural capacity by non-linear FE analysis methods, June 2013. Høvik, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Guo WG, Gao X. 2013. On the constitutive modeling of a structural steel over a range of strain rates and temperatures. Mater Sci Eng A. 561:468–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogström P, Ringsberg JW. 2012. An extensive study of a ship’s survivability after collision – a parameter study of material characteristics, non-linear FEA and damage stability analyses. Mar Struct. 27(1):1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogström P, Ringsberg JW, Johnson E. 2011. Survivability analysis of a struck ship with damage opening – influence from model and material properties uncertainties. Ships Offshore Struct. 6(4):339–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson GR, Cook WH. 1983. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics; vol. 21; The Netherlands. p. 541–547.
   Google Scholar
• Jones N. 1989a. On the dynamic inelastic failure of beams. In: Structural failure. New York: Wiley. Chapter 5; p. 133–159.
   Google Scholar
• Jones N. 1989b. Some comments on the modelling of material properties for dynamic structural plasticity. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Mechanical Properties of Materials at High Rates of Strain; Oxford. Institute of Physics Conference Series No. 102. p. 435–445.
   Google Scholar
• Jones N. 2006. Some recent developments in the dynamic inelastic behaviour of structures. Ships Offshore Struct. 1(1):37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Jones N. 2012. Structural impact. 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones N. 2013. The credibility of predictions for structural designs subjected to large dynamic loadings causing inelastic behaviour. Int J Impact Eng. 53:106–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Chandra A. 1999. Influence of strain-rate sensitivity on necking and instability in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol. 96(1–3):133–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinatos J, Samuelides M. 2015. Towards a unified methodology for the simulation of rupture in collision and grounding of ships. Mar Struct. 42:1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemat-Nasser S, Guo WG. 2003. Thermomechanical response of DH-36 structural steel over a wide range of strain rates and temperatures. Mech Mater. 35(11):1023–1047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paik J. 2007. Practical techniques for finite element modeling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (Part I: theory). Ships Offshore Struct. 2(1):69–80.
   Google Scholar
• Paik JK, Thayamballi AK. 2003. Ultimate limit state design of steel-plated structures. Chichester (UK): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Roth CC, Mohr D. 2014. Effect of strain rate on ductile fracture initiation in advanced high strength steel sheets: experiments and modeling. Int J Plastic. 56:19–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelides M. 2015. Recent advances and future trends in structural crashworthiness of ship structures subjected to impact loads. Ships Offshore Struct. 10(5): 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SSAB. 2014. SSAB Steelfacts database [Internet]. [cited 2014 Dec 04]. Available from: http://www.ssab.com/en/Products--Services/Service--Support/Technical-Tools-and-films/Steelfacts/Steelfacts/
   Google Scholar
• Standard Norge. 2008. NORSOK-M120: material data sheets for structural steels. 5th ed., November 2008. Lysaker, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Standard Norge. 2012. NORSOK-N001: integrity of offshore structures. Rev. 8, September 2012. Lysaker, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Storheim M, Alsos HS, Hopperstad OS, Amdahl J. 2015. A damage-based failure model for coarsely meshed shell structures. Int J Impact Eng. 83:59–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storheim M, Amdahl J. 2014. Non-conservative consequences of “conservative” assumptions in ship–platform collision analysis. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering; June; San Francisco, CA, USA; p. OMAE2014–24457.
   Google Scholar
• Storheim M, Amdahl J, Martens I. 2015. On the accuracy of fracture estimation in collision analysis of ship and offshore structures. Mar Struct. 44:254–287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su J, Guo W, Meng W, Wang J. 2013. Plastic behavior and constitutive relations of DH-36 steel over a wide spectrum of strain rates and temperatures under tension. Mech Mater. 65:76–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanDerHorn E, Wang G. 2011. A statistical study on the material properties of shipbuilding steels. Sustain Maritime Transport Exploit Sea Resour. 371–378. doi:10.1201/b11810-58
   Google Scholar
• Walters CL, Voormeeren LO. 2014. Consequences of using the plane stress assumption for damage calculations in crash analyses, OMAE2014-23946. Proceedings of the ASME 2014 33rd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering; 2014 Jun 8–13; San Francisco (CA): ASME.
   Google Scholar
• Willock RTS. 1992. Research report 108: yield:tensile ratio and safety of high strength steels. Bedfordshire (UK): Health and Safety Executive.
   Google Scholar