References
- Akten N. 2006. Shipping accidents: a serious threat for marine environment. J Black Sea/Mediterr Environ. 12:269–304. Available from: http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/jbme/article/viewFile/5000144486/5000131986
- ALPS/HULL. 2016. Progressive collapse analysis of ship's hull structures. Stevensville (MD): Marine Technology Center, DRS Technologies.
- David P, Holthus P. 2013. The shipping industry and marine spatial planning. London: The Nautical Institute. Available from: http://www.nautinst.org/download.cfm?docid=9423102B-A083-4C8D-94B6BB215544BB42
- Ehlers S, Tabri K, Romanoff J, Varsta P. 2012. Numerical and experimental investigation on the collision resistance of the X-core structure. Ships Offshore Struct. 7:21–29. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445302.2010.532603
- Faisal M, Noh SH, Kawsar M, Youssef SAM, Seo JK, Ha YC, Paik JK. 2016. Rapid hull collapse strength calculations of double hull oil tankers after collisions. Ships Offshore Struct 1:1–16. Available from: http://imarest.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445302.2016. 1192747. doi: 10.1080/17445302.2016.1192747.
- Haris S, Amdahl J. 2012. An analytical model to assess a ship side during a collision. Ships Offshore Struct. 7:431–448. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445302.2011.614527
- Haris S, Amdahl J. 2013. Analysis of ship–ship collision damage accounting for bow and side deformation interaction. Mar Struct. 32:18–48. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833913000166
- Hogström P, Ringsberg JW, Johnson E. 2011. Survivability analysis of a struck ship with damage opening–influence from model and material properties uncertainties. Ships Offshore Struct. 6:339–354. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445302.2010.500052
- Hughes OF, Paik JK. 2010. Ship structural analysis and design. Jersey City (NJ): The Society of Naval architects and Marine Engineers.
- [IMO] International Maritime Organisation. 2000. SOLAS/2 recommended longitudinal strength. MSC.108(73). London: Maritime Safety Committee, International Maritime Organisation.
- ITOPF. 2016. Effects of oil spills international tanker owner's pollution federation. London; [ cited 2016 Feb]. Available from: http://www.itopf.com/informationservices/data-and-statistics/statistics/
- Kim DK, Pedersen PT, Paik JK, Kim HB, Zhang X, Kim MS. 2013. Safety guidelines of ultimate hull girder strength for grounded container ships. Saf Sci. 59:46–54. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753513000933
- Lützen M. 2001. Ship collision damage [dissertation]. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark.
- Obisesan A, Sriramula S, Harrigan J. 2016. A framework for reliability assessment of ship hull damage under ship bow impact. Ships and Offshore Struct. 11(7):700–719. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445302.2015.1051281
- Paik JK. 2007a. Practical techniques for finite element modeling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (Part I: Theory). Ships Offshore Struct. 2:69–80. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1533/saos.2006.0148
- Paik JK. 2007b. Practical techniques for finite element modelling to simulate structural crashworthiness in ship collisions and grounding (Part II: Verification). Ships Offshore Struct. 2:81–85. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1533/saos.2006.0149
- Paik JK, Kim DK, Park DH, Kim HB, Kim MS. 2012. A new method for assessing the safety of ships damaged by grounding. Int J Marit Eng. 154:A1–A20. Available from: http://www.rina.org.uk/ijme_218.html
- Paik JK, Thayamballi AK, Yang SH. 1998. Residual strength assessment of ships after collision and grounding. Mar Technol SNAME News. 35:38–54.
- Qi E, Cui W. 2006. Analytical method for ultimate strength calculations of intact and damaged ship hulls. Ships Offshore Struct. 1:153–163. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1533/saos.2006.0121
- Samuelides M. 2015. Recent advances and future trends in structural crashworthiness of ship structures subjected to impact loads. Ships Offshore Struct. 10:488–497. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445302.2015.1009287
- Saydam D, Frangopol DM. 2013. Performance assessment of damaged ship hulls. Ocean Eng. 68:65–76. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0029801813001327
- Sun B, Hu Z, Wang G. 2015. An analytical method for predicting the ship side structure response in raked bow collisions. Mar Struct. 41:288–311. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833915000180
- Tabri K. 2012. Influence of coupling in the prediction of ship collision damage. Ships Offshore Struct. 7:47–54. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445302.2011.553812
- Wang G, Chen Y, Zhang H, Peng H. 2002. Longitudinal strength of ships with accidental damages. Mar Struct. 15:119–138. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951833901000181
- Youssef SAM, Faisal M, Seo JK, Kim BJ, Ha YC, Kim DK, Paik JK, Cheng F, Kim MS. 2016. Assessing the risk of ship hull collapse due to collision. Ships Offshore Struct. 11:335–350. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445302.2014.993110
- Zhang S, Pedersen PT, Ocakli H. 2015. Collisions damage assessment of ships and jack-up rigs. Ships Offshore Struct. 10:470–478. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445302.2014.1003173
- Zheng Y, Aksu S, Vassalos D, Tuzcu C. 2007. Study on side structure resistance to ship-ship collisions. Ships Offshore Struct. 2:273–293. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17445300701594336