URANS prediction of berthed ship–passing ship interactions

References

• Bunnik T, Toxopeus S. 2011. Viscous flow effects of passing ships in ports. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering; June 19–24; Rotterdam (The Netherlands).
   Google Scholar
• CD-Adapco. 2014. User guide STAR-CCM+ Version 9.0.6. CD-Adapco Group. 1:25–27.
   Google Scholar
• Denehy SP, Duffy JT, Ranmuthugala D, Renilson MR. 2015. Restricted water effects on berthed ship-passing ship interaction. Proceedings of the Australasian Coasts & Ports Conference 2015: 22nd Australasian Coastal and Ocean Engineering Conference and the 15th Australasian Port and Harbour Conference; Sep 15–18; Auckland (New Zealand).
   Google Scholar
• Denehy SP, Duffy JT, Renilson MR, Ranmuthugala D. 2012. The effect of berthed ship size and berth occupancy on berthed ship-passing ship interaction forces and moments. Proceedings of the Joint 19th International Conference on Hydrodynamics in Ship Design and 4th International Symposium on Ship Manoeuvring; Sep 19–21; Hawa (Poland).
   Google Scholar
• Duffy JT, Renilson MR, Denehy S. 2012. Predicting berthed ship-passing ship interaction for different channel geometries. Proceedings of the Pacific 2012 International Maritime Conference; Jan 31–Feb 2; Sydney (Australia).
   Google Scholar
• Flory JF. 2002. The effect of passing ships on moored ships. Proceedings of the Prevention First 2002 Symposium. Long Beach (CA): California State Lands Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Huang ET, Chen H-C. 2007. Influences of site specifics on passing ship effects. Proceedings of the The Seventeenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference; Jul 1–6; Lisbon (Portugal).
   Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Duffy J, Chai S, Chin C, Bose N. 2016a. URANS study of scale effects on hydrodynamic manoeuvring coefficients of KVLCC2. Ocean Eng. 118:93–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Chai S, Duffy J, Chin C, Bose N, Templeton C. 2016b. RANS prediction of FLNG-LNG hydrodynamic interactions in steady current. Appl Ocean Res. 60:141–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2016.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriebel D. 2005. Mooring loads due to parallel passing ships. Port Hueneme (CA): Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center TR-6056-OTN.
   Google Scholar
• Lataire E, Delefortrie G, Vantorre M. 2016. Impact of banks on ship squat. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ship Manoeuvring in Shallow and Confined Water with Special Focus on Ship Bottom Interaction, 4th MASHCON; May 23–26; Hamburg (Germany).
   Google Scholar
• Menter FR. 1994. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32(8):1598–1605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muga BJ, Fang SJ. 1975. Passing ship effects-from theory and experiment. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference; May 5–8; Houston (TX).
   Google Scholar
• Pinkster J, Ruijter MN. 2004. The influence of passing ships on ships moored in restricted waters. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference; May 3–6; Houston (TX).
   Google Scholar
• Remery G. 1974. Mooring forces induced by passing ships. Proceedings of the Offshore Technology Conference; May 6–8; Houston (TX).
   Google Scholar
• Roseman DP. 1987. The Marad systematic series of full-form ship models: the society of naval architects and marine engineers SNAME.
   Google Scholar
• Seelig W. 2001. Passing ship effects on moored ships. Port Hueneme (CA): Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center. TR-6027-OCN.
   Google Scholar
• Stern F, Wilson RV, Coleman HW, Paterson EG. 2001. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations – part 1: methodology and procedures. J Fluids Eng. 123(4):793–802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiegers PB. 2011. Calculation of the forces on a moored ship due to a passing container ship [master's thesis]. Stellenbosch: Stellenbosch University.
   Google Scholar
• Tezdogan T, Demirel YK, Kellett P, Khorasanchi M, Incecik A, Turan O. 2015. Full-scale unsteady RANS CFD simulations of ship behaviour and performance in head seas due to slow steaming. Ocean Eng. 97:186–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vantorre M, Verzhbitskaya E, Laforce E. 2002. Model test based formulations of ship-ship interaction forces. Ship Technol Res. 49:124–141.
   Google Scholar
• Visonneau M, Queutey P, Deng G. 2006. Model and full-scale free-surface viscous flows around fully-appended ships. Proceedings of the ECCOMAS CFD 2006: Proceedings of the European Conference on Computational Fluid Dynamics; Sep 5–8; Egmond aan Zee (The Netherlands).
   Google Scholar
• Wang S. 1975. Dynamic effects of ship passage on moored vessels. J Waterways, Harbors Coast Eng Div. 101(3):247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RV, Stern F, Coleman HW, Paterson EG. 2001. Comprehensive approach to verification and validation of CFD simulations – part 2: application for RANS simulation of a cargo/container ship. J Fluids Eng. 123(4):803–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H-F, Zou Z-J, Wu S-W, Liu X-Y, Zou L. 2017. Bank effects on ship–ship hydrodynamic interaction in shallow water based on high-order panel method. Ships Offshore Struct. 12(6):843–861. doi:10.1080/17445302.2016.1275475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar